Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Protector for Minimally Invasive Thyroidectomy
12 novembre 2017 mis à jour par: Georgios Kotsovolis, 424 General Military Hospital
Study of the Laryngopharyngeal Symptoms After Minimally Invasive Thyroidectomy: Comparison Between the Protector Laryngeal Mask Airway and the Endotracheal Tube.
The patients will be allocated to 2 groups: the LMA group and the endotracheal tube (ET) group.
Airway management will be done with the LMA Protector for the patients of the LMA group and with the classic endotracheal tube for the patients of the ET group.
The main purpose of the study is to determine if the application of the LMA Protector causes less laryngopharyngeal symptoms than the endotracheal tube after minimally invasive thyroidectomy.
The secondary purpose is to confirm that the LMA Protector is a safe alternative airway management device for minimally invasive thyroidectomy.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Complété
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Type d'étude
Interventionnel
Inscription (Réel)
79
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.
Lieux d'étude
-
-
-
Thessaloniki, Grèce, 54636
- Ahepa University Hospital
-
-
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
18 ans à 80 ans (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)
Accepte les volontaires sains
Non
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
Tout
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Total thyroidectomy with the minimally invasive method.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification 1-3
Exclusion Criteria:
- Clinical conditions which cause any kind of airway obstruction or compromise.
- Tracheal displacement greater than 2cm from midline.
- History of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
- Expected difficult airway.
- History of impossible intubation.
- BMI>35
- Reoperation within 24hours.
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Soins de soutien
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Double
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: LMA Protector
After induction of general anesthesia, the LMA Protector will be applied for airway management.
The size of the laryngeal mask will be chosen according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Lubricant gel will be applied to the dorsal side of the mask to ease the insertion to the oropharynx.
The cuff of the mask will be filled with air by syringe until the indication of the integrated cuff pressure indicator is appropriate according to the manufacturer (green indication).
If the indication changes during surgery, air will be added or removed accordingly.
If the ventilation of the patient is inadequate at the beginning or anytime during the operation, the mask will be removed and the patient will be intubated
|
After induction of general anesthesia, the LMA Protector will be applied for airway management.
The size of the laryngeal mask will be chosen according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Lubricant gel will be applied to the dorsal side of the mask to ease the insertion to the oropharynx.
The cuff of the mask will be filled with air by syringe until the indication of the integrated cuff pressure indicator is appropriate according to the manufacturer (green indication).
If the indication changes during surgery, air will be added or removed accordingly.
If the ventilation of the patient is inadequate at the beginning or anytime during the operation, the mask will be removed and the patient will be intubated.
|
|
Comparateur actif: Endotracheal tube
After induction of general anesthesia, the endotracheal tube be applied for airway management.
The size of the tube will be 7.5 for female and 8.5 for male patients.
The cuff of of the tube will be filled with 10ml air.
|
After induction of general anesthesia, the endotracheal tube be applied for airway management.
The size of the tube will be 7.5 for female and 8.5 for male patients.
The cuff of of the tube will be filled with 10ml air.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative sore throat.
Délai: Within 20 minutes from the end of the procedure.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative constant pharyngeal pain by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
Within 20 minutes from the end of the procedure.
|
|
Postoperative sore throat.
Délai: 1 hour after the exit from the recovery room.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative constant pharyngeal pain by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
1 hour after the exit from the recovery room.
|
|
Postoperative sore throat.
Délai: 6 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative constant pharyngeal pain by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
6 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
|
Postoperative sore throat.
Délai: 12 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative constant pharyngeal pain by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
12 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
|
Postoperative sore throat.
Délai: 24 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative constant pharyngeal pain by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
24 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
|
Postoperative surgical site pain.
Délai: Within 20 minutes from the end of the procedure.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative surgical trauma pain by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
Within 20 minutes from the end of the procedure.
|
|
Postoperative surgical site pain.
Délai: 1 hour after the exit from the recovery room.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative surgical trauma pain by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
1 hour after the exit from the recovery room.
|
|
Postoperative surgical site pain.
Délai: 6 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative surgical trauma pain by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
6 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
|
Postoperative surgical site pain.
Délai: 12 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative surgical trauma pain by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
12 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
|
Postoperative surgical site pain.
Délai: 24 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative surgical trauma pain by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
24 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
|
Postoperative dysphagia.
Délai: Within 20 minutes from the end of the procedure.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative pharyngeal pain caused after swallowing one sip of water by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
Within 20 minutes from the end of the procedure.
|
|
Postoperative dysphagia.
Délai: 1 hour after the exit from the recovery room.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative pharyngeal pain caused after swallowing one sip of water by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
1 hour after the exit from the recovery room.
|
|
Postoperative dysphagia.
Délai: 6 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative pharyngeal pain caused after swallowing one sip of water by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
6 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
|
Postoperative dysphagia.
Délai: 12 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative pharyngeal pain caused after swallowing one sip of water by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
12 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
|
Postoperative dysphagia.
Délai: 24 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative pharyngeal pain caused after swallowing one sip of water by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
24 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Airway management difficulty.
Délai: 3 minutes after induction of general anesthesia.
|
The efforts required to establish a secure airway and manage adequate patient ventilation will be recorded.
|
3 minutes after induction of general anesthesia.
|
|
Airway management complications.
Délai: Within 5 minutes from induction of general anesthesia.
|
Any complication from airway management will be recorded like bleeding from the stomatopharynx or the larynx, tooth trauma, lip trauma, etc.
|
Within 5 minutes from induction of general anesthesia.
|
|
Emergence coughing.
Délai: Within 10 minutes from the end of the surgery.
|
The incidence of cough upon emergence from general anesthesia will be recorded.
|
Within 10 minutes from the end of the surgery.
|
|
Postoperative paracetamol consumption.
Délai: 1, 6, 12 and 24 hours after emergence from general anesthesia.
|
The patients will be instructed to ask for analgesics as needed.
When rescue analgesia is required 1000mg paracetamol will be administered.
The frequency of paracetamol administration will be documented.
|
1, 6, 12 and 24 hours after emergence from general anesthesia.
|
|
Postoperative hoarseness.
Délai: Within 20 minutes from the end of the procedure and after 1, 6, 12 and 24 hours.
|
The patients postoperative hoarseness will be evaluated according to the GRBAS scale.
|
Within 20 minutes from the end of the procedure and after 1, 6, 12 and 24 hours.
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Parrainer
Publications et liens utiles
La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.
Publications générales
- Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R; Global Consensus Group. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Aug;101(8):1900-20; quiz 1943. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00630.x.
- Chun BJ, Bae JS, Lee SH, Joo J, Kim ES, Sun DI. A prospective randomized controlled trial of the laryngeal mask airway versus the endotracheal intubation in the thyroid surgery: evaluation of postoperative voice, and laryngopharyngeal symptom. World J Surg. 2015 Jul;39(7):1713-20. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-2995-7.
- Kumar C, Mishra A. Prospective randomized controlled trial on the use of flexible reinforced laryngeal mask airway (LMA) during total thyroidectomy: effects on postoperative laryngopharyngeal symptoms: reply. World J Surg. 2015 Mar;39(3):810. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2675-z. No abstract available.
- Moris D, Mantonakis E, Makris M, Michalinos A, Vernadakis S. Hoarseness after thyroidectomy: blame the endocrine surgeon alone? Hormones (Athens). 2014 Jan-Mar;13(1):5-15. doi: 10.1007/BF03401316.
- Ryu JH, Yom CK, Park DJ, Kim KH, Do SH, Yoo SH, Oh AY. Prospective randomized controlled trial on the use of flexible reinforced laryngeal mask airway (LMA) during total thyroidectomy: effects on postoperative laryngopharyngeal symptoms. World J Surg. 2014 Feb;38(2):378-84. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2269-1. Erratum In: World J Surg. 2014 Feb;38(2):519. Yom, Cha-Kyoung [corrected to Yom, Cha Kyong].
- Nemr K, Simoes-Zenari M, Cordeiro GF, Tsuji D, Ogawa AI, Ubrig MT, Menezes MH. GRBAS and Cape-V scales: high reliability and consensus when applied at different times. J Voice. 2012 Nov;26(6):812.e17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Sep 29.
- Taguchi A, Mise K, Nishikubo K, Hyodo M, Shiromoto O. Japanese version of voice handicap index for subjective evaluation of voice disorder. J Voice. 2012 Sep;26(5):668.e15-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.11.005. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
- Awan SN, Helou LB, Stojadinovic A, Solomon NP. Tracking voice change after thyroidectomy: application of spectral/cepstral analyses. Clin Linguist Phon. 2011 Apr;25(4):302-20. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2010.535646. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
- Werth K, Voigt D, Dollinger M, Eysholdt U, Lohscheller J. Clinical value of acoustic voice measures: a retrospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Aug;267(8):1261-71. doi: 10.1007/s00405-010-1214-2. Epub 2010 Feb 21.
- Maryn Y, De Bodt M, Roy N. The Acoustic Voice Quality Index: toward improved treatment outcomes assessment in voice disorders. J Commun Disord. 2010 May-Jun;43(3):161-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.12.004. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
- Pott L, Swick JT, Stack BC Jr. Assessment of recurrent laryngeal nerve during thyroid surgery with laryngeal mask airway. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Mar;133(3):266-9. doi: 10.1001/archotol.133.3.266.
- Brimacombe J, Knott J, Keller C. Laryngeal mask airway for preservation of the external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve during thyroid surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2003 Oct;50(8):858. doi: 10.1007/BF03019391. No abstract available.
- Scheuller MC, Ellison D. Laryngeal mask anesthesia with intraoperative laryngoscopy for identification of the recurrent laryngeal nerve during thyroidectomy. Laryngoscope. 2002 Sep;112(9):1594-7. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200209000-00011.
- Rosswick P. Use of the laryngeal mask airway in thyroid and parathyroid surgery as an aid in identification and preservation of the recurrent laryngeal nerves. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002 Mar;84(2):148; author reply 148. No abstract available.
- Watters G. Use of the laryngeal mask airway in thyroid and parathyroid surgery as an aid in identification and preservation of the recurrent laryngeal nerves. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002 Mar;84(2):148; author reply 148. No abstract available.
- Dingle AF. Use of the laryngeal mask airway in thyroid and parathyroid surgery as an aid in identification and preservation of the recurrent laryngeal nerves. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002 Mar;84(2):147; author reply 148. No abstract available.
- Shah EF, Allen JG, Greatorex RA. Use of the laryngeal mask airway in thyroid and parathyroid surgery as an aid to the identification and preservation of the recurrent laryngeal nerves. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2001 Sep;83(5):315-8.
- Palazzo FF, Allen JG, Greatorex RA. Laryngeal mask airway and fibre-optic tracheal inspection in thyroid surgery: a method for timely identification of tracheomalacia requiring tracheostomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000 Mar;82(2):141-2.
- Wuyts FL, De Bodt MS, Van de Heyning PH. Is the reliability of a visual analog scale higher than an ordinal scale? An experiment with the GRBAS scale for the perceptual evaluation of dysphonia. J Voice. 1999 Dec;13(4):508-17. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(99)80006-x.
- Rieger A, Brunne B, Striebel HW. Intracuff pressures do not predict laryngopharyngeal discomfort after use of the laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology. 1997 Jul;87(1):63-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199707000-00009.
- Rieger A, Brunne B, Hass I, Brummer G, Spies C, Striebel HW, Eyrich K. Laryngo-pharyngeal complaints following laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth. 1997 Feb;9(1):42-7. doi: 10.1016/S0952-8180(96)00209-7.
- Hobbiger HE, Allen JG, Greatorex RG, Denny NM. The laryngeal mask airway for thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Anaesthesia. 1996 Oct;51(10):972-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb14969.x.
- Premachandra DJ. Application of the laryngeal mask airway to thyroid surgery and the preservation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1992 May;74(3):226. No abstract available.
- Charters P, Cave-Bigley D. Application of the laryngeal mask airway to thyroid surgery and the preservation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1992 May;74(3):225-6. No abstract available.
- Maroof M, Siddique M, Khan RM. Post-thyroidectomy vocal cord examination by fibreoscopy aided by the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia. 1992 May;47(5):445. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb02238.x. No abstract available.
- Charters P, Cave-Bigley D, Roysam CS. Should a laryngeal mask be routinely used in patients undergoing thyroid surgery? Anesthesiology. 1991 Nov;75(5):918-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199111000-00036. No abstract available.
- Greatorex RA, Denny NM. Application of the laryngeal mask airway to thyroid surgery and the preservation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1991 Nov;73(6):352-4.
- Akhtar TM. Laryngeal mask airway and visualisation of vocal cords during thyroid surgery. Can J Anaesth. 1991 Jan;38(1):140. doi: 10.1007/BF03009184. No abstract available.
- Kotsovolis G, Pliakos I, Panidis S, Gkinas D, Papavramidis T. Comparison Between the Protector Laryngeal Mask Airway and the Endotracheal Tube for Minimally Invasive Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery. World J Surg. 2019 Nov;43(11):2822-2828. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05122-8.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
1 février 2017
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
30 octobre 2017
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
1 novembre 2017
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
22 mars 2017
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
28 mars 2017
Première publication (Réel)
4 avril 2017
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
14 novembre 2017
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
12 novembre 2017
Dernière vérification
1 novembre 2017
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 184/15.03.2017
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
NON
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .