- ICH GCP
- US-Register für klinische Studien
- Klinische Studie NCT03098667
Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Protector for Minimally Invasive Thyroidectomy
12. November 2017 aktualisiert von: Georgios Kotsovolis, 424 General Military Hospital
Study of the Laryngopharyngeal Symptoms After Minimally Invasive Thyroidectomy: Comparison Between the Protector Laryngeal Mask Airway and the Endotracheal Tube.
The patients will be allocated to 2 groups: the LMA group and the endotracheal tube (ET) group.
Airway management will be done with the LMA Protector for the patients of the LMA group and with the classic endotracheal tube for the patients of the ET group.
The main purpose of the study is to determine if the application of the LMA Protector causes less laryngopharyngeal symptoms than the endotracheal tube after minimally invasive thyroidectomy.
The secondary purpose is to confirm that the LMA Protector is a safe alternative airway management device for minimally invasive thyroidectomy.
Studienübersicht
Status
Abgeschlossen
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Studientyp
Interventionell
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
79
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.
Studienorte
-
-
-
Thessaloniki, Griechenland, 54636
- Ahepa University Hospital
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
18 Jahre bis 80 Jahre (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Nein
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Alle
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Total thyroidectomy with the minimally invasive method.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification 1-3
Exclusion Criteria:
- Clinical conditions which cause any kind of airway obstruction or compromise.
- Tracheal displacement greater than 2cm from midline.
- History of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
- Expected difficult airway.
- History of impossible intubation.
- BMI>35
- Reoperation within 24hours.
Studienplan
Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Unterstützende Pflege
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Doppelt
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: LMA Protector
After induction of general anesthesia, the LMA Protector will be applied for airway management.
The size of the laryngeal mask will be chosen according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Lubricant gel will be applied to the dorsal side of the mask to ease the insertion to the oropharynx.
The cuff of the mask will be filled with air by syringe until the indication of the integrated cuff pressure indicator is appropriate according to the manufacturer (green indication).
If the indication changes during surgery, air will be added or removed accordingly.
If the ventilation of the patient is inadequate at the beginning or anytime during the operation, the mask will be removed and the patient will be intubated
|
After induction of general anesthesia, the LMA Protector will be applied for airway management.
The size of the laryngeal mask will be chosen according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Lubricant gel will be applied to the dorsal side of the mask to ease the insertion to the oropharynx.
The cuff of the mask will be filled with air by syringe until the indication of the integrated cuff pressure indicator is appropriate according to the manufacturer (green indication).
If the indication changes during surgery, air will be added or removed accordingly.
If the ventilation of the patient is inadequate at the beginning or anytime during the operation, the mask will be removed and the patient will be intubated.
|
|
Aktiver Komparator: Endotracheal tube
After induction of general anesthesia, the endotracheal tube be applied for airway management.
The size of the tube will be 7.5 for female and 8.5 for male patients.
The cuff of of the tube will be filled with 10ml air.
|
After induction of general anesthesia, the endotracheal tube be applied for airway management.
The size of the tube will be 7.5 for female and 8.5 for male patients.
The cuff of of the tube will be filled with 10ml air.
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative sore throat.
Zeitfenster: Within 20 minutes from the end of the procedure.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative constant pharyngeal pain by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
Within 20 minutes from the end of the procedure.
|
|
Postoperative sore throat.
Zeitfenster: 1 hour after the exit from the recovery room.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative constant pharyngeal pain by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
1 hour after the exit from the recovery room.
|
|
Postoperative sore throat.
Zeitfenster: 6 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative constant pharyngeal pain by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
6 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
|
Postoperative sore throat.
Zeitfenster: 12 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative constant pharyngeal pain by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
12 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
|
Postoperative sore throat.
Zeitfenster: 24 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative constant pharyngeal pain by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
24 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
|
Postoperative surgical site pain.
Zeitfenster: Within 20 minutes from the end of the procedure.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative surgical trauma pain by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
Within 20 minutes from the end of the procedure.
|
|
Postoperative surgical site pain.
Zeitfenster: 1 hour after the exit from the recovery room.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative surgical trauma pain by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
1 hour after the exit from the recovery room.
|
|
Postoperative surgical site pain.
Zeitfenster: 6 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative surgical trauma pain by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
6 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
|
Postoperative surgical site pain.
Zeitfenster: 12 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative surgical trauma pain by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
12 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
|
Postoperative surgical site pain.
Zeitfenster: 24 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative surgical trauma pain by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
24 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
|
Postoperative dysphagia.
Zeitfenster: Within 20 minutes from the end of the procedure.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative pharyngeal pain caused after swallowing one sip of water by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
Within 20 minutes from the end of the procedure.
|
|
Postoperative dysphagia.
Zeitfenster: 1 hour after the exit from the recovery room.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative pharyngeal pain caused after swallowing one sip of water by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
1 hour after the exit from the recovery room.
|
|
Postoperative dysphagia.
Zeitfenster: 6 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative pharyngeal pain caused after swallowing one sip of water by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
6 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
|
Postoperative dysphagia.
Zeitfenster: 12 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative pharyngeal pain caused after swallowing one sip of water by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
12 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
|
Postoperative dysphagia.
Zeitfenster: 24 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
The patients will be asked to evaluate their postoperative pharyngeal pain caused after swallowing one sip of water by using the 11grade Numerical Rating Scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum possible pain).
|
24 hours after the exit from the recovery room.
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Airway management difficulty.
Zeitfenster: 3 minutes after induction of general anesthesia.
|
The efforts required to establish a secure airway and manage adequate patient ventilation will be recorded.
|
3 minutes after induction of general anesthesia.
|
|
Airway management complications.
Zeitfenster: Within 5 minutes from induction of general anesthesia.
|
Any complication from airway management will be recorded like bleeding from the stomatopharynx or the larynx, tooth trauma, lip trauma, etc.
|
Within 5 minutes from induction of general anesthesia.
|
|
Emergence coughing.
Zeitfenster: Within 10 minutes from the end of the surgery.
|
The incidence of cough upon emergence from general anesthesia will be recorded.
|
Within 10 minutes from the end of the surgery.
|
|
Postoperative paracetamol consumption.
Zeitfenster: 1, 6, 12 and 24 hours after emergence from general anesthesia.
|
The patients will be instructed to ask for analgesics as needed.
When rescue analgesia is required 1000mg paracetamol will be administered.
The frequency of paracetamol administration will be documented.
|
1, 6, 12 and 24 hours after emergence from general anesthesia.
|
|
Postoperative hoarseness.
Zeitfenster: Within 20 minutes from the end of the procedure and after 1, 6, 12 and 24 hours.
|
The patients postoperative hoarseness will be evaluated according to the GRBAS scale.
|
Within 20 minutes from the end of the procedure and after 1, 6, 12 and 24 hours.
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.
Sponsor
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.
Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen
- Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R; Global Consensus Group. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Aug;101(8):1900-20; quiz 1943. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00630.x.
- Chun BJ, Bae JS, Lee SH, Joo J, Kim ES, Sun DI. A prospective randomized controlled trial of the laryngeal mask airway versus the endotracheal intubation in the thyroid surgery: evaluation of postoperative voice, and laryngopharyngeal symptom. World J Surg. 2015 Jul;39(7):1713-20. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-2995-7.
- Kumar C, Mishra A. Prospective randomized controlled trial on the use of flexible reinforced laryngeal mask airway (LMA) during total thyroidectomy: effects on postoperative laryngopharyngeal symptoms: reply. World J Surg. 2015 Mar;39(3):810. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2675-z. No abstract available.
- Moris D, Mantonakis E, Makris M, Michalinos A, Vernadakis S. Hoarseness after thyroidectomy: blame the endocrine surgeon alone? Hormones (Athens). 2014 Jan-Mar;13(1):5-15. doi: 10.1007/BF03401316.
- Ryu JH, Yom CK, Park DJ, Kim KH, Do SH, Yoo SH, Oh AY. Prospective randomized controlled trial on the use of flexible reinforced laryngeal mask airway (LMA) during total thyroidectomy: effects on postoperative laryngopharyngeal symptoms. World J Surg. 2014 Feb;38(2):378-84. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2269-1. Erratum In: World J Surg. 2014 Feb;38(2):519. Yom, Cha-Kyoung [corrected to Yom, Cha Kyong].
- Nemr K, Simoes-Zenari M, Cordeiro GF, Tsuji D, Ogawa AI, Ubrig MT, Menezes MH. GRBAS and Cape-V scales: high reliability and consensus when applied at different times. J Voice. 2012 Nov;26(6):812.e17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Sep 29.
- Taguchi A, Mise K, Nishikubo K, Hyodo M, Shiromoto O. Japanese version of voice handicap index for subjective evaluation of voice disorder. J Voice. 2012 Sep;26(5):668.e15-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.11.005. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
- Awan SN, Helou LB, Stojadinovic A, Solomon NP. Tracking voice change after thyroidectomy: application of spectral/cepstral analyses. Clin Linguist Phon. 2011 Apr;25(4):302-20. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2010.535646. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
- Werth K, Voigt D, Dollinger M, Eysholdt U, Lohscheller J. Clinical value of acoustic voice measures: a retrospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Aug;267(8):1261-71. doi: 10.1007/s00405-010-1214-2. Epub 2010 Feb 21.
- Maryn Y, De Bodt M, Roy N. The Acoustic Voice Quality Index: toward improved treatment outcomes assessment in voice disorders. J Commun Disord. 2010 May-Jun;43(3):161-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.12.004. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
- Pott L, Swick JT, Stack BC Jr. Assessment of recurrent laryngeal nerve during thyroid surgery with laryngeal mask airway. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Mar;133(3):266-9. doi: 10.1001/archotol.133.3.266.
- Brimacombe J, Knott J, Keller C. Laryngeal mask airway for preservation of the external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve during thyroid surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2003 Oct;50(8):858. doi: 10.1007/BF03019391. No abstract available.
- Scheuller MC, Ellison D. Laryngeal mask anesthesia with intraoperative laryngoscopy for identification of the recurrent laryngeal nerve during thyroidectomy. Laryngoscope. 2002 Sep;112(9):1594-7. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200209000-00011.
- Rosswick P. Use of the laryngeal mask airway in thyroid and parathyroid surgery as an aid in identification and preservation of the recurrent laryngeal nerves. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002 Mar;84(2):148; author reply 148. No abstract available.
- Watters G. Use of the laryngeal mask airway in thyroid and parathyroid surgery as an aid in identification and preservation of the recurrent laryngeal nerves. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002 Mar;84(2):148; author reply 148. No abstract available.
- Dingle AF. Use of the laryngeal mask airway in thyroid and parathyroid surgery as an aid in identification and preservation of the recurrent laryngeal nerves. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002 Mar;84(2):147; author reply 148. No abstract available.
- Shah EF, Allen JG, Greatorex RA. Use of the laryngeal mask airway in thyroid and parathyroid surgery as an aid to the identification and preservation of the recurrent laryngeal nerves. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2001 Sep;83(5):315-8.
- Palazzo FF, Allen JG, Greatorex RA. Laryngeal mask airway and fibre-optic tracheal inspection in thyroid surgery: a method for timely identification of tracheomalacia requiring tracheostomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000 Mar;82(2):141-2.
- Wuyts FL, De Bodt MS, Van de Heyning PH. Is the reliability of a visual analog scale higher than an ordinal scale? An experiment with the GRBAS scale for the perceptual evaluation of dysphonia. J Voice. 1999 Dec;13(4):508-17. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(99)80006-x.
- Rieger A, Brunne B, Striebel HW. Intracuff pressures do not predict laryngopharyngeal discomfort after use of the laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology. 1997 Jul;87(1):63-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199707000-00009.
- Rieger A, Brunne B, Hass I, Brummer G, Spies C, Striebel HW, Eyrich K. Laryngo-pharyngeal complaints following laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth. 1997 Feb;9(1):42-7. doi: 10.1016/S0952-8180(96)00209-7.
- Hobbiger HE, Allen JG, Greatorex RG, Denny NM. The laryngeal mask airway for thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Anaesthesia. 1996 Oct;51(10):972-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb14969.x.
- Premachandra DJ. Application of the laryngeal mask airway to thyroid surgery and the preservation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1992 May;74(3):226. No abstract available.
- Charters P, Cave-Bigley D. Application of the laryngeal mask airway to thyroid surgery and the preservation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1992 May;74(3):225-6. No abstract available.
- Maroof M, Siddique M, Khan RM. Post-thyroidectomy vocal cord examination by fibreoscopy aided by the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia. 1992 May;47(5):445. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb02238.x. No abstract available.
- Charters P, Cave-Bigley D, Roysam CS. Should a laryngeal mask be routinely used in patients undergoing thyroid surgery? Anesthesiology. 1991 Nov;75(5):918-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199111000-00036. No abstract available.
- Greatorex RA, Denny NM. Application of the laryngeal mask airway to thyroid surgery and the preservation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1991 Nov;73(6):352-4.
- Akhtar TM. Laryngeal mask airway and visualisation of vocal cords during thyroid surgery. Can J Anaesth. 1991 Jan;38(1):140. doi: 10.1007/BF03009184. No abstract available.
- Kotsovolis G, Pliakos I, Panidis S, Gkinas D, Papavramidis T. Comparison Between the Protector Laryngeal Mask Airway and the Endotracheal Tube for Minimally Invasive Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery. World J Surg. 2019 Nov;43(11):2822-2828. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05122-8.
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)
1. Februar 2017
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
30. Oktober 2017
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
1. November 2017
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
22. März 2017
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
28. März 2017
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
4. April 2017
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
14. November 2017
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
12. November 2017
Zuletzt verifiziert
1. November 2017
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- 184/15.03.2017
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
NEIN
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Nein
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Nein
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .
Klinische Studien zur Postoperative Schmerzen
-
Brixton Biosciences, Inc.MCRANoch keine RekrutierungGreater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome | Seitliche Hüftschmerzen | Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome beider unteren ExtremitätenVereinigte Staaten
-
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research HospitalRekrutierungGreater Trochanteric Pain SyndromeTürkei (türkiye)
-
Foundation IRCCS San Matteo HospitalAktiv, nicht rekrutierendGreater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome beider unteren ExtremitätenItalien
-
Sahmyook UniversityAbgeschlossenMyofascial Pain Syndrom (MPS)Südkorea
-
Future University in EgyptAbgeschlossen
-
Ankara Etlik City HospitalAbgeschlossenGluteale Tendinopathie | Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome | Tiefes Gluteal-SyndromTürkei (türkiye)
-
Camilo Jose Cela UniversityAbgeschlossenMyofascial Pain Syndrom (MPS)Spanien
-
University of California, DavisNational Institutes of Health (NIH); National Center for Complementary and Integrative...RekrutierungChronischer Kreuzschmerz (cLBP) | Myofascial Pain Syndrom (MPS)Vereinigte Staaten
-
Gazi UniversityAbgeschlossenGesäß-Tendinitis | Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome beider unteren ExtremitätenTruthahn
-
Palacky UniversityRekrutierungTemporomandibular Joint Dysfunction; Myofascial Pain Syndrome; Orofacial Pain; Musculoskeletal DisordersTschechien
Klinische Studien zur LMA Protector
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterAmbu A/SAbgeschlossenAnästhesieVereinigte Staaten
-
Umraniye Education and Research HospitalAbgeschlossen
-
Dr.Mahak MehtaAbgeschlossenProseal LMA gegen Air-Q LMA gegen Ambu AurGain LMA
-
Axogen CorporationAktiv, nicht rekrutierendWiederkehrendes Kubitaltunnelsyndrom | Widerspenstiges KubitaltunnelsyndromVereinigte Staaten
-
National Taiwan University HospitalAbgeschlossender Einfluss des oropharyngealen Leckagedrucks und der Abdichtung zwischen Maske und Stimmband bei wechselnder Kopf- und Halsposition des PatientenTaiwan
-
Inonu UniversityAbgeschlossenAtemwegskomplikation der AnästhesieTruthahn
-
Prince of Songkla UniversityUnbekanntUnzureichendes oder beeinträchtigtes Atemmuster oder BelüftungThailand
-
Medical University InnsbruckAbgeschlossen
-
University of MalayaAbgeschlossenKehlkopfmaske AtemwegeMalaysia
-
Liu Chian YongAbgeschlossen