Neurophysiologic Effects of Cervical Spinal Manipulation in Asymptomatic Individuals
12 mars 2018 mis à jour par: Nuno Filipe Pinho Nogueira, Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde do Porto
This study had the goal of analyse the neurophysiologic effects of both mechanical and manual cervical manipulation, in asymptomatic individuals.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Complété
Les conditions
Description détaillée
In this study, the investigators compared the effects of manual manipulation and instrument assisted manipulation of C3/C4 on muscle tone, elasticity and stiffness and on pressure pain threshold , and pressure pain perception.
The muscles evaluated were upper trapezius and biceps brachialis, bilaterally.
The study also had a placebo and a control group.
All individuals were asymptomatic.
Type d'étude
Interventionnel
Inscription (Réel)
59
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)
Accepte les volontaires sains
Oui
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
Tout
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy subjects.
- Minimum of 18 years old.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pain in cervical region, shoulders or arms.
- History of trauma or disease in the cervical region or upper limb.
- Use of medication that could affect the outcomes (painkillers, NSAID, or anti depressives) during the last week.
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Tripler
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Manual manipulation
In the Manual manipulation group, the thrust was applied in the right side of C3/C4 with neutral flexion/extension, ipsilateral side bending and contralateral rotation.
Then, a low amplitude, high velocity thrust in rotation was delivered.
|
In the Manual manipulation group, the thrust was applied in the right side of C3/C4 with neutral flexion/extension, ipsilateral side bending and contralateral rotation.
Then, a low amplitude, high velocity thrust in rotation was delivered.
|
|
Comparateur actif: Mechanical manipulation
In the Mechanical manipulation group, the Activator instrument was applied on the right transverse apophyses of C3.
|
In the Mechanical manipulation group, the Activator instrument was applied on the right transverse apophyses of C3.
|
|
Comparateur placebo: Placebo
The subjects were positioned in the same pre-manipulative position as the manual manipulation group, but the thrust didn't occur.
Instead, the position was hold for 3 seconds and then the subject's head returned passively to neutral position.
|
The subjects were positioned in the same pre-manipulative position as the manual manipulation group, but the thrust didn't occur.
Instead, the position was hold for 3 seconds and then the subject's head returned passively to neutral position.
|
|
Aucune intervention: Control
The subjects stayed in supine position and no intervention occurred.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Pressure pain thresholds
Délai: Immediately after the intervention
|
To measure the pressure pain threshold, it was used an electronic pressure dynamometer FORCE ONE™ FDIX (Wagner Instruments - Greenwich, USA), with 1cm2 of surface.
The values were expressed in Kg/cm2.
The pressure was increased at a rate of 1 kg/cm2/s until the subject inform that the sense of pressure has become a sense of pain.
|
Immediately after the intervention
|
|
Pressure pain perception
Délai: Immediately after the intervention
|
To evaluate the pressure pain perception, it was used a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
The pressure increased until 2,5 kg/cm2 and was hold for 5 seconds, and the subject used the VAS scale to record the pressure pain perception he felt.
|
Immediately after the intervention
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Muscle tone
Délai: Immediately after the intervention
|
To measure muscle tone it was used the MyotonPro device.
It was used to evaluate those parameters both on the biceps and on the upper trapezius, bilaterally.
The device was located perpendicular to the middle point of each muscle and it were recorded 6 impulses in each one of them.
The non-neural tone was recorded as frequency.
|
Immediately after the intervention
|
|
Muscle stiffness
Délai: Immediately after the intervention
|
To measure muscle stiffness it was used the MyotonPro device.
It was used to evaluate this parameter both on the biceps and on the upper trapezius, bilaterally.
The device was located perpendicular to the middle point of each muscle and it were recorded 6 impulses in each one of them.
The muscle stiffness was recorded as N/m.
|
Immediately after the intervention
|
|
Muscle elasticity
Délai: Immediately after the intervention
|
To measure muscle elasticity it was used the MyotonPro device.
It was used to evaluate those parameters both on the biceps and on the upper trapezius, bilaterally.
The device was located perpendicular to the middle point of each muscle and it were recorded 6 impulses in each one of them.
The elasticity was indicated by logarithmic decrement.
|
Immediately after the intervention
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Nuno Nogueira, MSc, Instituto Politécnico da Saúde do Norte
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
1 mai 2013
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
1 juillet 2014
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
1 octobre 2016
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
8 septembre 2017
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
10 mars 2018
Première publication (Réel)
13 mars 2018
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
14 mars 2018
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
12 mars 2018
Dernière vérification
1 mars 2018
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 20122017
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
NON
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .