Effects of Scapular Stabilization Versus Thoracic Spine Extension Exercises in Mechanical Neck Pain
8 novembre 2022 mis à jour par: Riphah International University
Effects of Scapular Stabilization Versus Thoracic Spine Extension Exercises on Pain, Disability and Range Of Motion in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain
Mechanical neck pain is posteriorly occurring non-specific pain that originates from the superior nuchal line and extends to the first thoracic vertebrae.
It is exacerbated by sustained neck postures, neck movements or cervical muscle palpation.
The aim of study will be to compare the effects of scapular stabilization versus thoracic spine extension exercises on pain, disability and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Complété
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
A Randomized Clinical Trial will be conducted at Riphah Clinic Lahore, FMH Physiotherapy Clinic and Boston Physiotherapy Clinic Lahore through consecutive sampling technique on 30 patients which will be allocated using simple random sampling through sealed opaque enveloped into Group A and Group B. Group A will be treated with scapular stabilization exercises and Group B will be treated with thoracic extension exercises at the frequency of 2 sets with 10 repetitions and thrice a week.
Outcome measures will be conducted through pain, disability and range of motion questionnaire after 6 weeks.
Data will be analyzed during SPSS software version 21.
After assessing normality of data by Shapiro-Wilk test, it will be decided either parametric or non-parametric test will be used within a group or between two groups.
Type d'étude
Interventionnel
Inscription (Réel)
34
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Punjab
-
Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan, 54000
- Fatima memorial hospital - Physical therapy clinic
-
-
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
18 ans à 40 ans (Adulte)
Accepte les volontaires sains
Non
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
Tout
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Males and Females between 18 and 40 years of age with mechanical neck pain. (symptoms provoked by neck movement and/or palpation of musculature of the cervical region)
- Chronic mechanical neck pain for more than 3 months.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cervical radiculopathy
- Traumatic neck injury
- History of cervical and thoracic spine surgery
- Neck pain associated with vertigo
- Osteoporosis
- Vertebral Fractures
- Tumors
- Pregnancy
- Diagnosed psychological disorders
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Seul
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Scapular stabilization exercises
Group A performed scapular stabilization exercises for 4 weeks with 2 sets of 10 repetitions.
These exercises comprised of four exercise programs (Scapular retraction; Scapular mobilization, Scapular dynamic stabilization I and Scapular dynamic stabilization II).
|
Scapular stabilization exercise aims to restore scapular position, orientations, motor control of muscles, and movement pattern, thereby attaining stability of scapula for better kinematics of shoulder.scapular
stabilization exercises for 4 weeks with 2 sets of 10 repetitions.
These exercises comprised of four exercise programs (Scapular retraction; Scapular mobilization, Scapular dynamic stabilization I and Scapular dynamic stabilization II)
|
|
Comparateur actif: Thoracic extension exercises
Group B performed thoracic extension exercises for 4 weeks with 2 sets of 10 repetitions.
These exercises comprised of three exercise programs.
|
Thoracic extension involves concurrent posterior rotation (external torsion) and depression of the posterior ribs with elevation of the anterior ribs.
Bending to the side is a combination of spinal segments side bending, ribs on the same come together while ribs on the opposite side separate.Group B performed thoracic extension exercises for 4 weeks with 2 sets of 10 repetitions.
These exercises comprised of three exercise programs.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Délai: follow up at 6th week
|
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (an outcome measure) that is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity in adults, including those with chronic pain. The NPRS is a segmented numeric version in which a respondent selects a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of pain. The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable"). The NPRS takes <1 minute to complete The NPRS is a valid and reliable scale to measure pain intensity;
|
follow up at 6th week
|
|
Neck Disability index (NDI)
Délai: follow up at 6th week
|
This questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how your neck pain has affected your ability to manage in everyday life. Every section is marked in each section only the one box that applies to you. We realise you may consider that two or more statements in any one section relate to you, but please just mark the box that most closely describes your problem. Intended population includes: Chronic neck or upper back pain and musculoskeletal neck pain. Scoring: For each section the total possible score is 5: if the first statement is marked the section score = 0, if the last statement is marked it = 5. If all ten sections are completed the score is calculated. |
follow up at 6th week
|
|
Range of Motion
Délai: follow up at 6th week
|
A goniometer is an instrument that measures the available range of motion at a joint.
To measure the range of motion physical therapists most commonly use a goniometer.
It is necessary that a single notation system is used in goniometry.
The neutral zero method (0 to 180- degree system) is the most widely used method.
The same goniometer should always be used to reduce the chances of instrumental error.
|
follow up at 6th week
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Samrood Akram, Mphil, Riphah International University,Lahore
Publications et liens utiles
La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.
Publications générales
- Mendes-Fernandes T, Puente-Gonzalez AS, Marquez-Vera MA, Vila-Cha C, Mendez-Sanchez R. Effects of Global Postural Reeducation versus Specific Therapeutic Neck Exercises on Pain, Disability, Postural Control, and Neuromuscular Efficiency in Women with Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: Study Protocol for a Randomized, Parallel, Clinical Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 12;18(20):10704. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010704.
- Masaracchio M, Kirker K, States R, Hanney WJ, Liu X, Kolber M. Thoracic spine manipulation for the management of mechanical neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019 Feb 13;14(2):e0211877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211877. eCollection 2019.
- Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Bennett MI, Benoliel R, Cohen M, Evers S, Finnerup NB, First MB, Giamberardino MA, Kaasa S, Korwisi B, Kosek E, Lavand'homme P, Nicholas M, Perrot S, Scholz J, Schug S, Smith BH, Svensson P, Vlaeyen JWS, Wang SJ. Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP Classification of Chronic Pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Pain. 2019 Jan;160(1):19-27. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001384.
- Gonzalez-Rueda V, Hidalgo-Garcia C, Rodriguez-Sanz J, Bueno-Gracia E, Perez-Bellmunt A, Rodriguez-Rubio PR, Lopez-de-Celis C. Does Upper Cervical Manual Therapy Provide Additional Benefit in Disability and Mobility over a Physiotherapy Primary Care Program for Chronic Cervicalgia? A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 11;17(22):8334. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228334.
- 5. Verma CV, Bhosale KS. Evaluation of neck pain and scapular stability in graduate dental students: A cross-sectional study. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences. 2021;13(4):260.
- Javdaneh N, Ambrozy T, Barati AH, Mozafaripour E, Rydzik L. Focus on the Scapular Region in the Rehabilitation of Chronic Neck Pain Is Effective in Improving the Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 8;10(16):3495. doi: 10.3390/jcm10163495.
- Yu L-J, Kim T-H. The Effect of Cervical Stabilization Exercises with Thoracic Spine Extension Exercises on Forward Head Posture. 2021.
- Seo YG, Park WH, Lee CS, Kang KC, Min KB, Lee SM, Yoo JC. Is Scapular Stabilization Exercise Effective for Managing Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain?: A Systematic Review. Asian Spine J. 2020 Feb;14(1):122-129. doi: 10.31616/asj.2019.0055. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
- Al-Bassiouny HA, Shendy S, El-Khozamy H. Effect of Upper Thoracic Mobilization on Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain. Med J Cairo Univ. 2019;87(3):1449-57.
- Yildiz TI, Turgut E, Duzgun I. Neck and Scapula-Focused Exercise Training on Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Sport Rehabil. 2018 Sep 1;27(5):403-412. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2017-0024. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
30 avril 2022
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
18 octobre 2022
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
4 novembre 2022
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
21 avril 2022
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
28 avril 2022
Première publication (Réel)
29 avril 2022
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
9 novembre 2022
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
8 novembre 2022
Dernière vérification
1 novembre 2022
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- REC/RCR & AHS/22/0115 Anam
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
NON
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .