Effects of Scapular Stabilization Versus Thoracic Spine Extension Exercises in Mechanical Neck Pain
8 de novembro de 2022 atualizado por: Riphah International University
Effects of Scapular Stabilization Versus Thoracic Spine Extension Exercises on Pain, Disability and Range Of Motion in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain
Mechanical neck pain is posteriorly occurring non-specific pain that originates from the superior nuchal line and extends to the first thoracic vertebrae.
It is exacerbated by sustained neck postures, neck movements or cervical muscle palpation.
The aim of study will be to compare the effects of scapular stabilization versus thoracic spine extension exercises on pain, disability and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Concluído
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
A Randomized Clinical Trial will be conducted at Riphah Clinic Lahore, FMH Physiotherapy Clinic and Boston Physiotherapy Clinic Lahore through consecutive sampling technique on 30 patients which will be allocated using simple random sampling through sealed opaque enveloped into Group A and Group B. Group A will be treated with scapular stabilization exercises and Group B will be treated with thoracic extension exercises at the frequency of 2 sets with 10 repetitions and thrice a week.
Outcome measures will be conducted through pain, disability and range of motion questionnaire after 6 weeks.
Data will be analyzed during SPSS software version 21.
After assessing normality of data by Shapiro-Wilk test, it will be decided either parametric or non-parametric test will be used within a group or between two groups.
Tipo de estudo
Intervencional
Inscrição (Real)
34
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.
Locais de estudo
-
-
Punjab
-
Lahore, Punjab, Paquistão, 54000
- Fatima memorial hospital - Physical therapy clinic
-
-
Critérios de participação
Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
18 anos a 40 anos (Adulto)
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Não
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Tudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Males and Females between 18 and 40 years of age with mechanical neck pain. (symptoms provoked by neck movement and/or palpation of musculature of the cervical region)
- Chronic mechanical neck pain for more than 3 months.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cervical radiculopathy
- Traumatic neck injury
- History of cervical and thoracic spine surgery
- Neck pain associated with vertigo
- Osteoporosis
- Vertebral Fractures
- Tumors
- Pregnancy
- Diagnosed psychological disorders
Plano de estudo
Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Solteiro
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Scapular stabilization exercises
Group A performed scapular stabilization exercises for 4 weeks with 2 sets of 10 repetitions.
These exercises comprised of four exercise programs (Scapular retraction; Scapular mobilization, Scapular dynamic stabilization I and Scapular dynamic stabilization II).
|
Scapular stabilization exercise aims to restore scapular position, orientations, motor control of muscles, and movement pattern, thereby attaining stability of scapula for better kinematics of shoulder.scapular
stabilization exercises for 4 weeks with 2 sets of 10 repetitions.
These exercises comprised of four exercise programs (Scapular retraction; Scapular mobilization, Scapular dynamic stabilization I and Scapular dynamic stabilization II)
|
|
Comparador Ativo: Thoracic extension exercises
Group B performed thoracic extension exercises for 4 weeks with 2 sets of 10 repetitions.
These exercises comprised of three exercise programs.
|
Thoracic extension involves concurrent posterior rotation (external torsion) and depression of the posterior ribs with elevation of the anterior ribs.
Bending to the side is a combination of spinal segments side bending, ribs on the same come together while ribs on the opposite side separate.Group B performed thoracic extension exercises for 4 weeks with 2 sets of 10 repetitions.
These exercises comprised of three exercise programs.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Prazo: follow up at 6th week
|
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (an outcome measure) that is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity in adults, including those with chronic pain. The NPRS is a segmented numeric version in which a respondent selects a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of pain. The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable"). The NPRS takes <1 minute to complete The NPRS is a valid and reliable scale to measure pain intensity;
|
follow up at 6th week
|
|
Neck Disability index (NDI)
Prazo: follow up at 6th week
|
This questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how your neck pain has affected your ability to manage in everyday life. Every section is marked in each section only the one box that applies to you. We realise you may consider that two or more statements in any one section relate to you, but please just mark the box that most closely describes your problem. Intended population includes: Chronic neck or upper back pain and musculoskeletal neck pain. Scoring: For each section the total possible score is 5: if the first statement is marked the section score = 0, if the last statement is marked it = 5. If all ten sections are completed the score is calculated. |
follow up at 6th week
|
|
Range of Motion
Prazo: follow up at 6th week
|
A goniometer is an instrument that measures the available range of motion at a joint.
To measure the range of motion physical therapists most commonly use a goniometer.
It is necessary that a single notation system is used in goniometry.
The neutral zero method (0 to 180- degree system) is the most widely used method.
The same goniometer should always be used to reduce the chances of instrumental error.
|
follow up at 6th week
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Samrood Akram, Mphil, Riphah International University,Lahore
Publicações e links úteis
A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.
Publicações Gerais
- Mendes-Fernandes T, Puente-Gonzalez AS, Marquez-Vera MA, Vila-Cha C, Mendez-Sanchez R. Effects of Global Postural Reeducation versus Specific Therapeutic Neck Exercises on Pain, Disability, Postural Control, and Neuromuscular Efficiency in Women with Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: Study Protocol for a Randomized, Parallel, Clinical Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 12;18(20):10704. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010704.
- Masaracchio M, Kirker K, States R, Hanney WJ, Liu X, Kolber M. Thoracic spine manipulation for the management of mechanical neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019 Feb 13;14(2):e0211877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211877. eCollection 2019.
- Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Bennett MI, Benoliel R, Cohen M, Evers S, Finnerup NB, First MB, Giamberardino MA, Kaasa S, Korwisi B, Kosek E, Lavand'homme P, Nicholas M, Perrot S, Scholz J, Schug S, Smith BH, Svensson P, Vlaeyen JWS, Wang SJ. Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP Classification of Chronic Pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Pain. 2019 Jan;160(1):19-27. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001384.
- Gonzalez-Rueda V, Hidalgo-Garcia C, Rodriguez-Sanz J, Bueno-Gracia E, Perez-Bellmunt A, Rodriguez-Rubio PR, Lopez-de-Celis C. Does Upper Cervical Manual Therapy Provide Additional Benefit in Disability and Mobility over a Physiotherapy Primary Care Program for Chronic Cervicalgia? A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 11;17(22):8334. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228334.
- 5. Verma CV, Bhosale KS. Evaluation of neck pain and scapular stability in graduate dental students: A cross-sectional study. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences. 2021;13(4):260.
- Javdaneh N, Ambrozy T, Barati AH, Mozafaripour E, Rydzik L. Focus on the Scapular Region in the Rehabilitation of Chronic Neck Pain Is Effective in Improving the Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 8;10(16):3495. doi: 10.3390/jcm10163495.
- Yu L-J, Kim T-H. The Effect of Cervical Stabilization Exercises with Thoracic Spine Extension Exercises on Forward Head Posture. 2021.
- Seo YG, Park WH, Lee CS, Kang KC, Min KB, Lee SM, Yoo JC. Is Scapular Stabilization Exercise Effective for Managing Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain?: A Systematic Review. Asian Spine J. 2020 Feb;14(1):122-129. doi: 10.31616/asj.2019.0055. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
- Al-Bassiouny HA, Shendy S, El-Khozamy H. Effect of Upper Thoracic Mobilization on Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain. Med J Cairo Univ. 2019;87(3):1449-57.
- Yildiz TI, Turgut E, Duzgun I. Neck and Scapula-Focused Exercise Training on Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Sport Rehabil. 2018 Sep 1;27(5):403-412. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2017-0024. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
Datas de registro do estudo
Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
30 de abril de 2022
Conclusão Primária (Real)
18 de outubro de 2022
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
4 de novembro de 2022
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
21 de abril de 2022
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
28 de abril de 2022
Primeira postagem (Real)
29 de abril de 2022
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
9 de novembro de 2022
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
8 de novembro de 2022
Última verificação
1 de novembro de 2022
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- REC/RCR & AHS/22/0115 Anam
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
NÃO
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .