Effects of Scapular Stabilization Versus Thoracic Spine Extension Exercises in Mechanical Neck Pain
8 de noviembre de 2022 actualizado por: Riphah International University
Effects of Scapular Stabilization Versus Thoracic Spine Extension Exercises on Pain, Disability and Range Of Motion in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain
Mechanical neck pain is posteriorly occurring non-specific pain that originates from the superior nuchal line and extends to the first thoracic vertebrae.
It is exacerbated by sustained neck postures, neck movements or cervical muscle palpation.
The aim of study will be to compare the effects of scapular stabilization versus thoracic spine extension exercises on pain, disability and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Terminado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
A Randomized Clinical Trial will be conducted at Riphah Clinic Lahore, FMH Physiotherapy Clinic and Boston Physiotherapy Clinic Lahore through consecutive sampling technique on 30 patients which will be allocated using simple random sampling through sealed opaque enveloped into Group A and Group B. Group A will be treated with scapular stabilization exercises and Group B will be treated with thoracic extension exercises at the frequency of 2 sets with 10 repetitions and thrice a week.
Outcome measures will be conducted through pain, disability and range of motion questionnaire after 6 weeks.
Data will be analyzed during SPSS software version 21.
After assessing normality of data by Shapiro-Wilk test, it will be decided either parametric or non-parametric test will be used within a group or between two groups.
Tipo de estudio
Intervencionista
Inscripción (Actual)
34
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Punjab
-
Lahore, Punjab, Pakistán, 54000
- Fatima memorial hospital - Physical therapy clinic
-
-
Criterios de participación
Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
18 años a 40 años (Adulto)
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
No
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Todos
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Males and Females between 18 and 40 years of age with mechanical neck pain. (symptoms provoked by neck movement and/or palpation of musculature of the cervical region)
- Chronic mechanical neck pain for more than 3 months.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cervical radiculopathy
- Traumatic neck injury
- History of cervical and thoracic spine surgery
- Neck pain associated with vertigo
- Osteoporosis
- Vertebral Fractures
- Tumors
- Pregnancy
- Diagnosed psychological disorders
Plan de estudios
Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Tratamiento
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Único
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Scapular stabilization exercises
Group A performed scapular stabilization exercises for 4 weeks with 2 sets of 10 repetitions.
These exercises comprised of four exercise programs (Scapular retraction; Scapular mobilization, Scapular dynamic stabilization I and Scapular dynamic stabilization II).
|
Scapular stabilization exercise aims to restore scapular position, orientations, motor control of muscles, and movement pattern, thereby attaining stability of scapula for better kinematics of shoulder.scapular
stabilization exercises for 4 weeks with 2 sets of 10 repetitions.
These exercises comprised of four exercise programs (Scapular retraction; Scapular mobilization, Scapular dynamic stabilization I and Scapular dynamic stabilization II)
|
|
Comparador activo: Thoracic extension exercises
Group B performed thoracic extension exercises for 4 weeks with 2 sets of 10 repetitions.
These exercises comprised of three exercise programs.
|
Thoracic extension involves concurrent posterior rotation (external torsion) and depression of the posterior ribs with elevation of the anterior ribs.
Bending to the side is a combination of spinal segments side bending, ribs on the same come together while ribs on the opposite side separate.Group B performed thoracic extension exercises for 4 weeks with 2 sets of 10 repetitions.
These exercises comprised of three exercise programs.
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Periodo de tiempo: follow up at 6th week
|
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (an outcome measure) that is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity in adults, including those with chronic pain. The NPRS is a segmented numeric version in which a respondent selects a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of pain. The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable"). The NPRS takes <1 minute to complete The NPRS is a valid and reliable scale to measure pain intensity;
|
follow up at 6th week
|
|
Neck Disability index (NDI)
Periodo de tiempo: follow up at 6th week
|
This questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how your neck pain has affected your ability to manage in everyday life. Every section is marked in each section only the one box that applies to you. We realise you may consider that two or more statements in any one section relate to you, but please just mark the box that most closely describes your problem. Intended population includes: Chronic neck or upper back pain and musculoskeletal neck pain. Scoring: For each section the total possible score is 5: if the first statement is marked the section score = 0, if the last statement is marked it = 5. If all ten sections are completed the score is calculated. |
follow up at 6th week
|
|
Range of Motion
Periodo de tiempo: follow up at 6th week
|
A goniometer is an instrument that measures the available range of motion at a joint.
To measure the range of motion physical therapists most commonly use a goniometer.
It is necessary that a single notation system is used in goniometry.
The neutral zero method (0 to 180- degree system) is the most widely used method.
The same goniometer should always be used to reduce the chances of instrumental error.
|
follow up at 6th week
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Samrood Akram, Mphil, Riphah International University,Lahore
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.
Publicaciones Generales
- Mendes-Fernandes T, Puente-Gonzalez AS, Marquez-Vera MA, Vila-Cha C, Mendez-Sanchez R. Effects of Global Postural Reeducation versus Specific Therapeutic Neck Exercises on Pain, Disability, Postural Control, and Neuromuscular Efficiency in Women with Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: Study Protocol for a Randomized, Parallel, Clinical Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 12;18(20):10704. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010704.
- Masaracchio M, Kirker K, States R, Hanney WJ, Liu X, Kolber M. Thoracic spine manipulation for the management of mechanical neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019 Feb 13;14(2):e0211877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211877. eCollection 2019.
- Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Bennett MI, Benoliel R, Cohen M, Evers S, Finnerup NB, First MB, Giamberardino MA, Kaasa S, Korwisi B, Kosek E, Lavand'homme P, Nicholas M, Perrot S, Scholz J, Schug S, Smith BH, Svensson P, Vlaeyen JWS, Wang SJ. Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP Classification of Chronic Pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Pain. 2019 Jan;160(1):19-27. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001384.
- Gonzalez-Rueda V, Hidalgo-Garcia C, Rodriguez-Sanz J, Bueno-Gracia E, Perez-Bellmunt A, Rodriguez-Rubio PR, Lopez-de-Celis C. Does Upper Cervical Manual Therapy Provide Additional Benefit in Disability and Mobility over a Physiotherapy Primary Care Program for Chronic Cervicalgia? A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 11;17(22):8334. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228334.
- 5. Verma CV, Bhosale KS. Evaluation of neck pain and scapular stability in graduate dental students: A cross-sectional study. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences. 2021;13(4):260.
- Javdaneh N, Ambrozy T, Barati AH, Mozafaripour E, Rydzik L. Focus on the Scapular Region in the Rehabilitation of Chronic Neck Pain Is Effective in Improving the Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 8;10(16):3495. doi: 10.3390/jcm10163495.
- Yu L-J, Kim T-H. The Effect of Cervical Stabilization Exercises with Thoracic Spine Extension Exercises on Forward Head Posture. 2021.
- Seo YG, Park WH, Lee CS, Kang KC, Min KB, Lee SM, Yoo JC. Is Scapular Stabilization Exercise Effective for Managing Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain?: A Systematic Review. Asian Spine J. 2020 Feb;14(1):122-129. doi: 10.31616/asj.2019.0055. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
- Al-Bassiouny HA, Shendy S, El-Khozamy H. Effect of Upper Thoracic Mobilization on Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain. Med J Cairo Univ. 2019;87(3):1449-57.
- Yildiz TI, Turgut E, Duzgun I. Neck and Scapula-Focused Exercise Training on Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Sport Rehabil. 2018 Sep 1;27(5):403-412. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2017-0024. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
Fechas de registro del estudio
Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
30 de abril de 2022
Finalización primaria (Actual)
18 de octubre de 2022
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
4 de noviembre de 2022
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
21 de abril de 2022
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
28 de abril de 2022
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
29 de abril de 2022
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
9 de noviembre de 2022
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
8 de noviembre de 2022
Última verificación
1 de noviembre de 2022
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- REC/RCR & AHS/22/0115 Anam
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
NO
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .
Ensayos clínicos sobre scapular stabilization
-
Massachusetts General HospitalDesconocidoFracturas de fémur distalEstados Unidos