Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Une étude pour évaluer l'efficacité, l'innocuité, la pharmacocinétique et la pharmacodynamique du satralizumab chez les participants atteints d'une maladie oculaire thyroïdienne (SatraGO-2) (SatraGO-2)

20 juillet 2026 mis à jour par: Hoffmann-La Roche

Une étude multicentrique de phase III, randomisée, à double insu, contrôlée par placebo, pour évaluer l'efficacité, l'innocuité, la pharmacocinétique et la pharmacodynamique du satralizumab chez les participants atteints d'une maladie oculaire thyroïdienne modérée à sévère

Le but de cette étude est d'évaluer l'efficacité, l'innocuité, la pharmacocinétique et la pharmacodynamique du satralizumab sous-cutané, un anticorps monoclonal recombinant et humanisé du récepteur anti-interleukine-6 ​​(IL-6), chez les participants atteints de maladie oculaire thyroïdienne (TED).

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

127

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

  • Canada
    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
        • University of Alberta
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M3C 0G9
        • Toronto Retina Institute
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H1T 2M4
        • Universite de Montreal - Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
  • Chine
      • Beijing, Chine, 100191
        • Peking University Third Hospital
      • Beijing, Chine, 100032
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital
      • Beijing, Chine, 100730
        • Beijing Hospital of Ministry of Health
      • Beijing, Chine, 100730
        • Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University
      • Xi'an, Chine, 710004
        • Xi'an Fourth Hospital
  • Corée du Sud
      • Seongnam-si, Corée du Sud, 13620
        • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
      • Seoul, Corée du Sud, 003-722
        • Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
      • Seoul, Corée du Sud, 135-710
        • Samsung Medical Center
      • Seoul, Corée du Sud, 06973
        • Chung-Ang University Hospital
  • Espagne
      • Barcelona, Espagne, 08035
        • Hospital Universitario Vall D hebron
      • Granada, Espagne, 18012
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
      • Madrid, Espagne, 28040
        • Hospital Universitario Clinico San Carlos
      • Madrid, Espagne, 28031
        • Hospital Ramon y Cajal
      • Seville, Espagne, 41007
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen De La Macarena
      • Valencia, Espagne, 46026
        • Hospital Universitario la Fe: Servicio de Oftalmologia
    • Barcelona
      • L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Espagne, 8907
        • Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
  • France
      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • CHU Nantes - Hôtel Dieu
      • Paris, France, 75019
        • Fondation Rothschild
      • Paris, France, 75012
        • CHNO Hopital des Quinze Vingts
  • Israël
      • Jerusalem, Israël, 9112001
        • Hadassah MC
      • Petah Tikva, Israël, 4941492
        • Rabin MC
      • Ramat Gan, Israël
        • Sheba medical center
  • Le Portugal
      • Coimbra, Le Portugal, 3000-548
        • AIBILI - Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light
  • Pologne
      • Bydgoszcz, Pologne, 85-316
        • Specjalistyczny Osrodek Okulistyczny Oculomedica
      • Gdansk, Pologne, 80-180
        • Profesorskie Centrum Medyczne Spolka Z Ograniczona Odpowiedzialnoscia
  • Royaume-Uni
      • Brighton, Royaume-Uni, BN2 5BF
        • Sussex Eye Hospital
      • Bristol, Royaume-Uni, BS1 2LX
        • Bristol Eye Hospital
      • Glasgow, Royaume-Uni, G12 0YN
        • Gartnavel General Hospital
      • Leeds, Royaume-Uni, LS9 7TF
        • St James University Hospital
      • Liverpool, Royaume-Uni, L7 8XP
        • Royal Liverpool University Hospital
      • London, Royaume-Uni, EC1V 2PD
        • Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
      • Maidstone, Kent, Royaume-Uni, ME16 9QQ
        • Maidstone Hospital
  • États-Unis
    • California
      • San Diego, California, États-Unis, 92108
        • Plastics-Orbit-Neuro
    • Connecticut
      • Danbury, Connecticut, États-Unis, 06810
        • Connecticut Eye Consultants, P.C.
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, États-Unis, 60612
        • University of Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, États-Unis, 19104
        • Scheie Eye Institute
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, États-Unis, 37232-8808
        • Vanderbilt Eye Institute
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, États-Unis, 78251
        • Retina Consultants of Texas

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Critère d'intégration:

- Diagnostic clinique de la maladie oculaire thyroïdienne (TED) basé sur CAS

Critère d'exclusion:

  • Diminution du CAS ou de l'exophtalmie de >= 2 points ou >= 2 mm, respectivement, dans l'œil étudié entre le dépistage et la ligne de base de l'étude (jour 1)
  • Nécessitant une intervention chirurgicale ophtalmologique immédiate ou planifiant une chirurgie corrective ou une irradiation au cours de l'étude, selon le jugement de l'investigateur
  • Maladie ophtalmique préexistante identifiée qui, de l'avis de l'investigateur, empêcherait la participation à l'étude ou compliquerait l'interprétation des résultats de l'étude, y compris une décompensation cornéenne ne répondant pas à la prise en charge médicale et y compris des maladies ophtalmiques qui nécessiteront probablement un traitement interdit pendant l'étude.
  • Toute condition médicale grave ou anomalie dans les tests de laboratoire clinique qui, de l'avis de l'investigateur, empêche la participation et la réalisation en toute sécurité d'une personne à l'étude.
  • Enceinte ou allaitante, ou intention de devenir enceinte pendant l'étude ou dans les 12 semaines suivant la dernière dose de satralizumab

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Quadruple

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Satralizumab
Au cours de la période de la première partie, les participants recevront du satralizumab toutes les 4 semaines (toutes les 4 semaines), suivi d'un traitement individualisé basé sur la réponse à l'exophtalmie dans la partie II de l'étude.
Médicament: Satralizumab
Le satralizumab sera administré par injection SC.
Comparateur placebo: Placebo
Au cours de la période de la première partie, les participants recevront un placebo toutes les 4 semaines suivi d'un traitement individualisé basé sur la réponse à l'exophtalmie dans la partie II de l'étude.
Médicament: Placebo
Le placebo sera administré par injection SC

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Percentage of Participants in the Active TED Population Who Achieved ≥ 2 Millimeters (mm) Reduction in Proptosis From Baseline at Week 24 in the Study Eye
Délai: At Week 24
Percentage of participants in the active TED population (i.e., participants who have active disease) who achieved a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 in the study eye, with no corresponding deterioration of proptosis (≥ 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye have been reported. Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Percentage of Participants in Active TED Population Achieving ≥ 1 Grade Reduction/Improvement in Diplopia at Week 24
Délai: At Week 24
Diplopia grade was assessed with the use of the Gorman subjective diplopia score (range: 0-3 points), which included: no diplopia (absent, scored as 0), diplopia in the primary position of gaze when the participant is tired or awakening (intermittent, scored as 1), diplopia at extremes of gaze (inconstant, scored as 2), and continuous diplopia in the primary or reading position (constant, scored as 3). Participants with active TED with diplopia present at baseline who had Grade ≥1 reduction or improvement at Week 24 have been reported. Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in the Overall Population Achieving ≥ 1 Grade Reduction/Improvement in Diplopia at Week 24
Délai: At Week 24
Diplopia grade was assessed with the use of the Gorman subjective diplopia score (range: 0-3 points), which included: no diplopia (absent, scored as 0), diplopia in the primary position of gaze when the participant is tired or awakening (intermittent, scored as 1), diplopia at extremes of gaze (inconstant, scored as 2), and continuous diplopia in the primary or reading position (constant, scored as 3). Participants with active and chronic inactive TED with diplopia present at baseline who had Grade ≥1 reduction or improvement at Week 24 have been reported. Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Active TED Population Achieving Absence of Motility-induced Pain at Week 24
Délai: At Week 24
Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Active TED Population Who Achieved Overall Response in the Study Eye at Week 24
Délai: At Week 24
Overall Response was defined as a ≥ 2-point reduction in clinical activity score (CAS), and a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline in the study eye, provided there is no corresponding deterioration in CAS or proptosis (≥ 2-point/mm increase) in the fellow eye. The CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Active TED Population Who Achieved a ≥ 2-point Reduction in CAS in the Study Eye From Baseline to Week 24
Délai: At Week 24
CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Active TED Population Who Achieved a CAS Value of 0 or 1 in the Study Eye at Week 24
Délai: At Week 24
CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Délai: Up to Week 72
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study intervention.
Up to Week 72
Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Satralizumab at Specified Timepoints
Délai: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24
Percentage of Participants in the Overall Population Who Achieved ≥ 2 mm Reduction in Proptosis From Baseline at Week 24 in the Study Eye
Délai: At Week 24
Percentage of participants in the overall population (i.e., participants with active and chronic inactive TED) who achieved a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 in the study eye, with no corresponding deterioration of proptosis (≥ 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye have been reported. Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24
Change From Baseline in Proptosis at Week 24 in Active TED Population for Study Eye
Délai: At Week 24
This analysis used a Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measure (MMRM) model. Adjusted mean values have been reported here.
At Week 24
Change From Baseline in Proptosis at Week 24 in Overall Population for Study Eye
Délai: At Week 24
This analysis used a MMRM model. Adjusted mean values have been reported here.
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Active TED Population Achieving Absence of Spontaneous Pain at Week 24
Délai: At Week 24
Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Active TED Population With a ≥ 6-point Improvement in the Visual Functioning Subscale of the Graves' Ophthalmopathy Quality-of-life (GO-QoL) From Baseline at Week 24
Délai: At Week 24
The GO-QoL is a 16-item self-administered questionnaire divided into two sub-scales, and is used to assess the perceived effects of TED by the participants on their: 1) Visual Functioning (questions 1-8); and 2) Appearance (questions 9-16). Both subscales and overall score (sum of scores from all 16 questions) are transformed to a scale of 0 to 100. Higher total scores indicate better QoL. Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Active TED Population With a ≥ 6-point Improvement in the Appearance Subscale of the GO-QoL From Baseline at Week 24
Délai: At Week 24
The GO-QoL is a 16-item self-administered questionnaire divided into two sub-scales and used to assess the perceived effects of TED by the participants on their: 1) Visual Functioning (questions 1-8); and 2) Appearance (questions 9-16). Both subscales and overall score (sum of scores from all 16 questions) are transformed to a scale of 0 to 100. Higher total scores indicate better QoL. Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 10-point Improvement in the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Overall Scores Across All Levels of Baseline Severity at Week 24 in Overall Population
Délai: At Week 24
The OSDI instrument is a validated dry eye questionnaire and consists of three main sections concerning ocular symptoms, visual function, and environmental factors. It comprises of 12 questions and for every question, participants select a number between 0 and 4, where 0 equals "none of the time" and 4 equals "all of the time" with totals of score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores represent a worse disease index. Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24
Change From Baseline in the OSDI Ocular Symptoms, and Vision-related Function Subscale Scores at Week 24 in the Overall Population
Délai: At Week 24
The OSDI instrument is a validated dry eye questionnaire and consists of three main sections concerning ocular symptoms, visual function, and environmental factors. It comprises of 12 questions and for every question, participants select a number between 0 and 4, where 0 equals "none of the time" and 4 equals "all of the time" with totals of score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores represent a worse disease index. This analysis used a MMRM model. Adjusted mean values have been reported here.
At Week 24
Change From Baseline in Oxford Corneal Staining Scores at Week 24 in the Overall Population
Délai: At Week 24
Corneal staining was graded using Oxford Corneal Staining Chart which consists of a 6-point scale. Staining assessment will be based on the intensity of fluorescein staining, ranging from Grade 0 to V for each panel (0=absent; I=minimal; II=mild; III=moderate; IV= marked; and V=severe). Higher grade indicates worse disease index. The observer compares the overall appearance of the participant's corneal staining with the reference figure in the protocol. The observer selects the appropriate grade that best represents the state of corneal staining. The staining score were recorded for the exposed interpalpebral cornea and conjunctiva. This analysis used a MMRM model. Adjusted mean values have been reported here.
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Binocular Diplopia Response at Week 24 in Overall Population
Délai: At Week 24
The percentage of participants achieving a complete binocular diplopia response (diplopia score=0) at Week 24 have been reported. Diplopia grade was assessed with the use of the Gorman subjective diplopia score (range: 0-3 points), which included: no diplopia (absent, scored as 0), diplopia in the primary position of gaze when the participant is tired or awakening (intermittent, scored as 1), diplopia at extremes of gaze (inconstant, scored as 2), and continuous diplopia in the primary or reading position (constant, scored as 3). Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Non-responders at Week 24) Achieving ≥ 2 mm Reduction in Proptosis at Week 48 in the Study Eye
Délai: At Week 48
Percentage of participants (proptosis non-responders) who will achieve a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline (Day 1) to Week 48 in the study eye, with no corresponding deterioration of proptosis (≥ 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye will be reported.
At Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Non-responders at Week 24) Achieving Overall Response at Week 48
Délai: At Week 48
Overall Response is defined as a ≥ 2-point reduction in CAS, and a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline in the study eye, provided there is no corresponding deterioration in CAS or proptosis ( ≥ 2-point/mm increase) in the fellow eye. The CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
At Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Non-responders at Week 24) Achieving a ≥ 2-point Reduction in CAS in the Study Eye From Baseline to Week 48
Délai: Baseline to Week 48
The CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Baseline to Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Non-responders at Week 24) Achieving Grade ≥ 1 Reduction/Improvement in Diplopia at Week 48 in Participants With Baseline Diplopia > 0
Délai: At Week 48
Diplopia grade was assessed with the use of the Gorman subjective diplopia score (range: 0-3 points), which included: no diplopia (absent, scored as 0), diplopia in the primary position of gaze when the participant is tired or awakening (intermittent, scored as 1), diplopia at extremes of gaze (inconstant, scored as 2), and continuous diplopia in the primary or reading position (constant, scored as 3).
At Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Non-responders at Week 24) With a ≥ 6-point Improvement in the Visual Functioning and Appearance Subscale Scores of the GO-QoL From Week 24 to Week 48
Délai: From Week 24 to Week 48
The GO-QoL is a 16-item self-administered questionnaire divided into two sub-scales and used to assess the perceived effects of TED by the participants on their: 1) Visual Functioning (questions 1-8); and 2) Appearance (questions 9-16). Both subscales and overall score (sum of scores from all 16 questions) are transformed to a scale of 0 to 100. Higher total scores indicate better QoL.
From Week 24 to Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Non-responders at Week 24) With a ≥ 6-point Improvement in the Visual Functioning and Appearance Subscale Scores of the GO-QoL From Baseline to Week 48
Délai: From baseline up to Week 48
The GO-QoL is a 16-item self-administered questionnaire divided into two sub-scales and used to assess the perceived effects of TED by the participants on their: 1) Visual Functioning (questions 1-8); and 2) Appearance (questions 9-16). Both subscales and overall score (sum of scores from all 16 questions) are transformed to a scale of 0 to 100. Higher total scores indicate better QoL.
From baseline up to Week 48
Change From Baseline in Proptosis at Week 48 (in Proptosis Non-responders at Week 24)
Délai: Baseline and Week 48
Proptosis response is defined as achieving a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 in the study eye, with no corresponding deterioration of proptosis (≥ 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye.
Baseline and Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Non-responders at Week 24) Requiring Surgical Intervention for TED up to Week 48
Délai: Up to Week 48
Up to Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) With Worsening of Proptosis by ≥ 2 mm From Week 24 to Week 48
Délai: From Week 24 to Week 48
From Week 24 to Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) With Worsening of Proptosis by ≥ 2 mm From Baseline to Week 48
Délai: Baseline to Week 48
Baseline to Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) With Maintenance of Proptosis Response From Week 24 at Week 48
Délai: Weeks 24 and 48
Proptosis response is defined as achieving a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 in the study eye, with no corresponding deterioration of proptosis (≥ 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye.
Weeks 24 and 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) With Maintenance of CAS Response From Week 24 at Week 48
Délai: Weeks 24 and 48
The CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Weeks 24 and 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) With Maintenance of Proptosis Response From Baseline at Week 48
Délai: At Week 48
Proptosis response is defined as achieving a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 in the study eye, with no corresponding deterioration of proptosis (≥ 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye.
At Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) With Maintenance of CAS Response From Baseline at Week 48
Délai: At Week 48
The CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
At Week 48
Change in Proptosis From Week 24 to 48 (in Proptosis Responders at Week 24)
Délai: From Week 24 to Week 48
Proptosis response is defined as achieving a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 in the study eye, with no corresponding deterioration of proptosis (≥ 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye.
From Week 24 to Week 48
Change in CAS From Week 24 to 48 (in Proptosis Responders at Week 24)
Délai: From Week 24 to Week 48
The CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
From Week 24 to Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) With a ≥ 6-point Improvement in the Visual Functioning and Appearance Subscale Scores of the GO-QoL From Week 24 to Week 48
Délai: From Week 24 to Week 48
The GO-QoL is a 16-item self-administered questionnaire divided into two sub-scales and used to assess the perceived effects of TED by the participants on their: 1) Visual Functioning (questions 1-8); and 2) Appearance (questions 9-16). Both subscales and overall score (sum of scores from all 16 questions) are transformed to a scale of 0 to 100. Higher total scores indicate better QoL.
From Week 24 to Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) With a ≥ 6-point Improvement in the Visual Functioning and Appearance Subscale Scores of the GO-QoL From Baseline to Week 48
Délai: From baseline up to Week 48
The GO-QoL is a 16-item self-administered questionnaire divided into two sub-scales and used to assess the perceived effects of TED by the participants on their: 1) Visual Functioning (questions 1-8); and 2) Appearance (questions 9-16). Both subscales and overall score (sum of scores from all 16 questions) are transformed to a scale of 0 to 100. Higher total scores indicate better QoL.
From baseline up to Week 48
Change From Baseline in Proptosis to Week 48 (in Proptosis Responders at Week 24)
Délai: Baseline to Week 48
Proptosis response is defined as achieving a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 in the study eye, with no corresponding deterioration of proptosis (≥ 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye.
Baseline to Week 48
Change From Baseline in CAS to Week 48 (in Proptosis Responders at Week 24)
Délai: Baseline to Week 48
The CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Baseline to Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) Requiring Surgical Intervention for TED up to Week 48
Délai: Up to Week 48
Up to Week 48
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Satralizumab at Baseline and During the Study
Délai: Up to Week 48
Participants will be considered to be ADA positive if they were ADA negative at baseline but developed an ADA response following study drug exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples is at least 4-fold greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response).
Up to Week 48

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Hoffmann-La Roche

Les enquêteurs

  • Directeur d'études: Clinical Trials, Hoffmann-La Roche

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

15 novembre 2023

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

24 juillet 2025

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

25 juin 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

25 octobre 2023

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

25 octobre 2023

Première publication (Réel)

30 octobre 2023

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

12 août 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

20 juillet 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juillet 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Mots clés

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • GP44729
  • 2023-503669-50-00 (Ctis: EU CT Number)

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

OUI

Description du régime IPD

Les chercheurs qualifiés peuvent demander l'accès aux données individuelles des patients via la plateforme de demande (www.vivli.org). De plus amples détails sur les critères de Roche pour les études éligibles sont disponibles ici (https://vivli.org/ourmember/roche/).

Pour plus de détails sur la politique mondiale de Roche sur le partage d'informations cliniques et sur la manière de demander l'accès aux documents d'études cliniques associés, voir ici (https://www.roche.com/innovation/process/clinical-trials/data-sharing/) .

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Oui

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner