Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Um estudo para avaliar a eficácia, segurança, farmacocinética e farmacodinâmica do satralizumabe em participantes com doença ocular da tireoide (SatraGO-2) (SatraGO-2)

20 de julho de 2026 atualizado por: Hoffmann-La Roche

Um estudo de fase III, randomizado, duplo-mascarado, controlado por placebo e multicêntrico para avaliar a eficácia, segurança, farmacocinética e farmacodinâmica do satralizumabe em participantes com doença ocular da tireoide moderada a grave

O objetivo deste estudo é avaliar a eficácia, segurança, farmacocinética e farmacodinâmica do satralizumabe subcutâneo, um anticorpo monoclonal recombinante e humanizado do receptor anti-interleucina-6 (IL-6), em participantes com doença ocular da tireoide (TED).

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Concluído

Condições

Intervenção / Tratamento

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

127

Estágio

  • Fase 3

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

  • Canadá
    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canadá
        • University of Alberta
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canadá, M3C 0G9
        • Toronto Retina Institute
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canadá, H1T 2M4
        • Universite de Montreal - Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
  • China
      • Beijing, China, 100191
        • Peking University Third Hospital
      • Beijing, China, 100032
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital
      • Beijing, China, 100730
        • Beijing Hospital of Ministry of Health
      • Beijing, China, 100730
        • Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University
      • Xi'an, China, 710004
        • Xi'an Fourth Hospital
  • Coréia do Sul
      • Seongnam-si, Coréia do Sul, 13620
        • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
      • Seoul, Coréia do Sul, 003-722
        • Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
      • Seoul, Coréia do Sul, 135-710
        • Samsung Medical Center
      • Seoul, Coréia do Sul, 06973
        • Chung-Ang University Hospital
  • Espanha
      • Barcelona, Espanha, 08035
        • Hospital Universitario Vall d Hebron
      • Granada, Espanha, 18012
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
      • Madrid, Espanha, 28040
        • Hospital Universitario Clinico San Carlos
      • Madrid, Espanha, 28031
        • Hospital Ramón Y Cajal
      • Seville, Espanha, 41007
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen De La Macarena
      • Valencia, Espanha, 46026
        • Hospital Universitario la Fe: Servicio de Oftalmologia
    • Barcelona
      • L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Espanha, 8907
        • Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
  • Estados Unidos
    • California
      • San Diego, California, Estados Unidos, 92108
        • Plastics-Orbit-Neuro
    • Connecticut
      • Danbury, Connecticut, Estados Unidos, 06810
        • Connecticut Eye Consultants, P.C.
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, Estados Unidos, 60612
        • University of Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Estados Unidos, 19104
        • Scheie Eye Institute
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, Estados Unidos, 37232-8808
        • Vanderbilt Eye Institute
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, Estados Unidos, 78251
        • Retina Consultants of Texas
  • França
      • Nantes, França, 44093
        • CHU Nantes - Hôtel Dieu
      • Paris, França, 75019
        • Fondation Rothschild
      • Paris, França, 75012
        • CHNO Hopital des Quinze Vingts
  • Israel
      • Jerusalem, Israel, 9112001
        • Hadassah MC
      • Petah Tikva, Israel, 4941492
        • Rabin MC
      • Ramat Gan, Israel
        • Sheba Medical Center
  • Polônia
      • Bydgoszcz, Polônia, 85-316
        • Specjalistyczny Osrodek Okulistyczny Oculomedica
      • Gdansk, Polônia, 80-180
        • Profesorskie Centrum Medyczne Spolka Z Ograniczona Odpowiedzialnoscia
  • Portugal
      • Coimbra, Portugal, 3000-548
        • AIBILI - Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light
  • Reino Unido
      • Brighton, Reino Unido, BN2 5BF
        • Sussex Eye Hospital
      • Bristol, Reino Unido, BS1 2LX
        • Bristol Eye Hospital
      • Glasgow, Reino Unido, G12 0YN
        • Gartnavel General Hospital
      • Leeds, Reino Unido, LS9 7TF
        • St James University Hospital
      • Liverpool, Reino Unido, L7 8XP
        • Royal Liverpool University Hospital
      • London, Reino Unido, EC1V 2PD
        • Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
      • Maidstone, Kent, Reino Unido, ME16 9QQ
        • Maidstone Hospital

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Critério de inclusão:

- Diagnóstico clínico de doença ocular da tireoide (TED) com base em CAS

Critério de exclusão:

  • Diminuição no CAS ou proptose de >= 2 pontos ou >= 2 mm, respectivamente, no olho do estudo entre a Triagem e a Linha de Base do Estudo (Dia 1)
  • Requer intervenção oftalmológica cirúrgica imediata ou planejamento de cirurgia corretiva ou irradiação durante o curso do estudo, a critério do investigador
  • Doença oftálmica pré-existente identificada que, no julgamento do investigador, impediria a participação no estudo ou complicaria a interpretação dos resultados do estudo, incluindo descompensação da córnea que não responde ao tratamento médico e incluindo doenças oftálmicas que provavelmente exigirão terapia proibida durante o estudo
  • Qualquer condição médica grave ou anormalidade em testes laboratoriais clínicos que, no julgamento do investigador, impeça a participação segura de um indivíduo e a conclusão do estudo
  • Grávida ou amamentando, ou intenção de engravidar durante o estudo ou dentro de 12 semanas após a dose final de satralizumabe

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Quadruplicar

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Satralizumabe
No período da Parte I, os participantes receberão satralizumabe a cada 4 semanas (q4w) seguido de tratamento individualizado baseado na resposta da proptose na Parte II do estudo.
Medicamento: Satralizumabe
Satralizumabe será administrado por injeção SC.
Comparador de Placebo: Placebo
No período da parte I, os participantes receberão placebo a cada 4 semanas, seguido de tratamento individualizado baseado na resposta à proptose na parte II do estudo.
Medicamento: Placebo
Placebo será administrado por injeção SC

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Percentage of Participants in the Active TED Population Who Achieved ≥ 2 Millimeters (mm) Reduction in Proptosis From Baseline at Week 24 in the Study Eye
Prazo: At Week 24
Percentage of participants in the active TED population (i.e., participants who have active disease) who achieved a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 in the study eye, with no corresponding deterioration of proptosis (≥ 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye have been reported. Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Percentage of Participants in Active TED Population Achieving ≥ 1 Grade Reduction/Improvement in Diplopia at Week 24
Prazo: At Week 24
Diplopia grade was assessed with the use of the Gorman subjective diplopia score (range: 0-3 points), which included: no diplopia (absent, scored as 0), diplopia in the primary position of gaze when the participant is tired or awakening (intermittent, scored as 1), diplopia at extremes of gaze (inconstant, scored as 2), and continuous diplopia in the primary or reading position (constant, scored as 3). Participants with active TED with diplopia present at baseline who had Grade ≥1 reduction or improvement at Week 24 have been reported. Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in the Overall Population Achieving ≥ 1 Grade Reduction/Improvement in Diplopia at Week 24
Prazo: At Week 24
Diplopia grade was assessed with the use of the Gorman subjective diplopia score (range: 0-3 points), which included: no diplopia (absent, scored as 0), diplopia in the primary position of gaze when the participant is tired or awakening (intermittent, scored as 1), diplopia at extremes of gaze (inconstant, scored as 2), and continuous diplopia in the primary or reading position (constant, scored as 3). Participants with active and chronic inactive TED with diplopia present at baseline who had Grade ≥1 reduction or improvement at Week 24 have been reported. Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Active TED Population Achieving Absence of Motility-induced Pain at Week 24
Prazo: At Week 24
Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Active TED Population Who Achieved Overall Response in the Study Eye at Week 24
Prazo: At Week 24
Overall Response was defined as a ≥ 2-point reduction in clinical activity score (CAS), and a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline in the study eye, provided there is no corresponding deterioration in CAS or proptosis (≥ 2-point/mm increase) in the fellow eye. The CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Active TED Population Who Achieved a ≥ 2-point Reduction in CAS in the Study Eye From Baseline to Week 24
Prazo: At Week 24
CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Active TED Population Who Achieved a CAS Value of 0 or 1 in the Study Eye at Week 24
Prazo: At Week 24
CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Prazo: Up to Week 72
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study intervention.
Up to Week 72
Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Satralizumab at Specified Timepoints
Prazo: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24
Percentage of Participants in the Overall Population Who Achieved ≥ 2 mm Reduction in Proptosis From Baseline at Week 24 in the Study Eye
Prazo: At Week 24
Percentage of participants in the overall population (i.e., participants with active and chronic inactive TED) who achieved a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 in the study eye, with no corresponding deterioration of proptosis (≥ 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye have been reported. Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24
Change From Baseline in Proptosis at Week 24 in Active TED Population for Study Eye
Prazo: At Week 24
This analysis used a Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measure (MMRM) model. Adjusted mean values have been reported here.
At Week 24
Change From Baseline in Proptosis at Week 24 in Overall Population for Study Eye
Prazo: At Week 24
This analysis used a MMRM model. Adjusted mean values have been reported here.
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Active TED Population Achieving Absence of Spontaneous Pain at Week 24
Prazo: At Week 24
Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Active TED Population With a ≥ 6-point Improvement in the Visual Functioning Subscale of the Graves' Ophthalmopathy Quality-of-life (GO-QoL) From Baseline at Week 24
Prazo: At Week 24
The GO-QoL is a 16-item self-administered questionnaire divided into two sub-scales, and is used to assess the perceived effects of TED by the participants on their: 1) Visual Functioning (questions 1-8); and 2) Appearance (questions 9-16). Both subscales and overall score (sum of scores from all 16 questions) are transformed to a scale of 0 to 100. Higher total scores indicate better QoL. Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Active TED Population With a ≥ 6-point Improvement in the Appearance Subscale of the GO-QoL From Baseline at Week 24
Prazo: At Week 24
The GO-QoL is a 16-item self-administered questionnaire divided into two sub-scales and used to assess the perceived effects of TED by the participants on their: 1) Visual Functioning (questions 1-8); and 2) Appearance (questions 9-16). Both subscales and overall score (sum of scores from all 16 questions) are transformed to a scale of 0 to 100. Higher total scores indicate better QoL. Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 10-point Improvement in the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Overall Scores Across All Levels of Baseline Severity at Week 24 in Overall Population
Prazo: At Week 24
The OSDI instrument is a validated dry eye questionnaire and consists of three main sections concerning ocular symptoms, visual function, and environmental factors. It comprises of 12 questions and for every question, participants select a number between 0 and 4, where 0 equals "none of the time" and 4 equals "all of the time" with totals of score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores represent a worse disease index. Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24
Change From Baseline in the OSDI Ocular Symptoms, and Vision-related Function Subscale Scores at Week 24 in the Overall Population
Prazo: At Week 24
The OSDI instrument is a validated dry eye questionnaire and consists of three main sections concerning ocular symptoms, visual function, and environmental factors. It comprises of 12 questions and for every question, participants select a number between 0 and 4, where 0 equals "none of the time" and 4 equals "all of the time" with totals of score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores represent a worse disease index. This analysis used a MMRM model. Adjusted mean values have been reported here.
At Week 24
Change From Baseline in Oxford Corneal Staining Scores at Week 24 in the Overall Population
Prazo: At Week 24
Corneal staining was graded using Oxford Corneal Staining Chart which consists of a 6-point scale. Staining assessment will be based on the intensity of fluorescein staining, ranging from Grade 0 to V for each panel (0=absent; I=minimal; II=mild; III=moderate; IV= marked; and V=severe). Higher grade indicates worse disease index. The observer compares the overall appearance of the participant's corneal staining with the reference figure in the protocol. The observer selects the appropriate grade that best represents the state of corneal staining. The staining score were recorded for the exposed interpalpebral cornea and conjunctiva. This analysis used a MMRM model. Adjusted mean values have been reported here.
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Binocular Diplopia Response at Week 24 in Overall Population
Prazo: At Week 24
The percentage of participants achieving a complete binocular diplopia response (diplopia score=0) at Week 24 have been reported. Diplopia grade was assessed with the use of the Gorman subjective diplopia score (range: 0-3 points), which included: no diplopia (absent, scored as 0), diplopia in the primary position of gaze when the participant is tired or awakening (intermittent, scored as 1), diplopia at extremes of gaze (inconstant, scored as 2), and continuous diplopia in the primary or reading position (constant, scored as 3). Percentages have been rounded off.
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Non-responders at Week 24) Achieving ≥ 2 mm Reduction in Proptosis at Week 48 in the Study Eye
Prazo: At Week 48
Percentage of participants (proptosis non-responders) who will achieve a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline (Day 1) to Week 48 in the study eye, with no corresponding deterioration of proptosis (≥ 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye will be reported.
At Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Non-responders at Week 24) Achieving Overall Response at Week 48
Prazo: At Week 48
Overall Response is defined as a ≥ 2-point reduction in CAS, and a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline in the study eye, provided there is no corresponding deterioration in CAS or proptosis ( ≥ 2-point/mm increase) in the fellow eye. The CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
At Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Non-responders at Week 24) Achieving a ≥ 2-point Reduction in CAS in the Study Eye From Baseline to Week 48
Prazo: Baseline to Week 48
The CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Baseline to Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Non-responders at Week 24) Achieving Grade ≥ 1 Reduction/Improvement in Diplopia at Week 48 in Participants With Baseline Diplopia > 0
Prazo: At Week 48
Diplopia grade was assessed with the use of the Gorman subjective diplopia score (range: 0-3 points), which included: no diplopia (absent, scored as 0), diplopia in the primary position of gaze when the participant is tired or awakening (intermittent, scored as 1), diplopia at extremes of gaze (inconstant, scored as 2), and continuous diplopia in the primary or reading position (constant, scored as 3).
At Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Non-responders at Week 24) With a ≥ 6-point Improvement in the Visual Functioning and Appearance Subscale Scores of the GO-QoL From Week 24 to Week 48
Prazo: From Week 24 to Week 48
The GO-QoL is a 16-item self-administered questionnaire divided into two sub-scales and used to assess the perceived effects of TED by the participants on their: 1) Visual Functioning (questions 1-8); and 2) Appearance (questions 9-16). Both subscales and overall score (sum of scores from all 16 questions) are transformed to a scale of 0 to 100. Higher total scores indicate better QoL.
From Week 24 to Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Non-responders at Week 24) With a ≥ 6-point Improvement in the Visual Functioning and Appearance Subscale Scores of the GO-QoL From Baseline to Week 48
Prazo: From baseline up to Week 48
The GO-QoL is a 16-item self-administered questionnaire divided into two sub-scales and used to assess the perceived effects of TED by the participants on their: 1) Visual Functioning (questions 1-8); and 2) Appearance (questions 9-16). Both subscales and overall score (sum of scores from all 16 questions) are transformed to a scale of 0 to 100. Higher total scores indicate better QoL.
From baseline up to Week 48
Change From Baseline in Proptosis at Week 48 (in Proptosis Non-responders at Week 24)
Prazo: Baseline and Week 48
Proptosis response is defined as achieving a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 in the study eye, with no corresponding deterioration of proptosis (≥ 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye.
Baseline and Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Non-responders at Week 24) Requiring Surgical Intervention for TED up to Week 48
Prazo: Up to Week 48
Up to Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) With Worsening of Proptosis by ≥ 2 mm From Week 24 to Week 48
Prazo: From Week 24 to Week 48
From Week 24 to Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) With Worsening of Proptosis by ≥ 2 mm From Baseline to Week 48
Prazo: Baseline to Week 48
Baseline to Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) With Maintenance of Proptosis Response From Week 24 at Week 48
Prazo: Weeks 24 and 48
Proptosis response is defined as achieving a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 in the study eye, with no corresponding deterioration of proptosis (≥ 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye.
Weeks 24 and 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) With Maintenance of CAS Response From Week 24 at Week 48
Prazo: Weeks 24 and 48
The CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Weeks 24 and 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) With Maintenance of Proptosis Response From Baseline at Week 48
Prazo: At Week 48
Proptosis response is defined as achieving a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 in the study eye, with no corresponding deterioration of proptosis (≥ 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye.
At Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) With Maintenance of CAS Response From Baseline at Week 48
Prazo: At Week 48
The CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
At Week 48
Change in Proptosis From Week 24 to 48 (in Proptosis Responders at Week 24)
Prazo: From Week 24 to Week 48
Proptosis response is defined as achieving a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 in the study eye, with no corresponding deterioration of proptosis (≥ 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye.
From Week 24 to Week 48
Change in CAS From Week 24 to 48 (in Proptosis Responders at Week 24)
Prazo: From Week 24 to Week 48
The CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
From Week 24 to Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) With a ≥ 6-point Improvement in the Visual Functioning and Appearance Subscale Scores of the GO-QoL From Week 24 to Week 48
Prazo: From Week 24 to Week 48
The GO-QoL is a 16-item self-administered questionnaire divided into two sub-scales and used to assess the perceived effects of TED by the participants on their: 1) Visual Functioning (questions 1-8); and 2) Appearance (questions 9-16). Both subscales and overall score (sum of scores from all 16 questions) are transformed to a scale of 0 to 100. Higher total scores indicate better QoL.
From Week 24 to Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) With a ≥ 6-point Improvement in the Visual Functioning and Appearance Subscale Scores of the GO-QoL From Baseline to Week 48
Prazo: From baseline up to Week 48
The GO-QoL is a 16-item self-administered questionnaire divided into two sub-scales and used to assess the perceived effects of TED by the participants on their: 1) Visual Functioning (questions 1-8); and 2) Appearance (questions 9-16). Both subscales and overall score (sum of scores from all 16 questions) are transformed to a scale of 0 to 100. Higher total scores indicate better QoL.
From baseline up to Week 48
Change From Baseline in Proptosis to Week 48 (in Proptosis Responders at Week 24)
Prazo: Baseline to Week 48
Proptosis response is defined as achieving a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 in the study eye, with no corresponding deterioration of proptosis (≥ 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye.
Baseline to Week 48
Change From Baseline in CAS to Week 48 (in Proptosis Responders at Week 24)
Prazo: Baseline to Week 48
The CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Baseline to Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) Requiring Surgical Intervention for TED up to Week 48
Prazo: Up to Week 48
Up to Week 48
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Satralizumab at Baseline and During the Study
Prazo: Up to Week 48
Participants will be considered to be ADA positive if they were ADA negative at baseline but developed an ADA response following study drug exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples is at least 4-fold greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response).
Up to Week 48

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Hoffmann-La Roche

Investigadores

  • Diretor de estudo: Clinical Trials, Hoffmann-La Roche

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Publicações Gerais

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

15 de novembro de 2023

Conclusão Primária (Real)

24 de julho de 2025

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

25 de junho de 2026

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

25 de outubro de 2023

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

25 de outubro de 2023

Primeira postagem (Real)

30 de outubro de 2023

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

12 de agosto de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

20 de julho de 2026

Última verificação

1 de julho de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Palavras-chave

Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • GP44729
  • 2023-503669-50-00 (Ctis: EU CT Number)

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

SIM

Descrição do plano IPD

Pesquisadores qualificados podem solicitar acesso a dados individuais de pacientes por meio da plataforma de solicitação (www.vivli.org). Mais detalhes sobre os critérios da Roche para estudos elegíveis estão disponíveis aqui (https://vivli.org/ourmember/roche/).

Para obter mais detalhes sobre a Política Global da Roche sobre Compartilhamento de Informações Clínicas e como solicitar acesso a documentos de estudos clínicos relacionados, consulte aqui (https://www.roche.com/innovation/process/clinical-trials/data-sharing/) .

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Sim

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever