Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Deep Rectus Sheath (DRS) Block in Abdominal Surgery (DRS block)

18 mai 2026 mis à jour par: Tommaso Sorrentino, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital

The Effectiveness of the Deep Rectus Sheath (Preperitoneal) Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective Observational Clinical Study

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the effectiveness of the Deep Rectus Sheath (Preperitoneal) block in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. The main question it aims to answer is:

Does the Deep Rectus Sheath block improve postoperative recovery and pain control compared to standard care or other fascial plane blocks in patients undergoing abdominal surgery?

Participants undergoing open or laparoscopic abdominal surgery as part of their routine clinical care will receive analgesic management according to standard practice, which may include systemic analgesia alone, Deep Rectus Sheath block, or other fascial plane blocks (such as TAP, ESP, or QL), depending on anesthesiologist choice. Postoperative outcomes will be collected prospectively, including quality of recovery (QoR-15 at 24 hours), pain scores at rest and during movement up to 48 hours, analgesic consumption, time to first analgesic request, mobilization time, and occurrence of complications.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Recrutement

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

This prospective, observational, non-interventional clinical study aims to evaluate postoperative recovery and analgesic outcomes in adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery (open or laparoscopic) who receive different perioperative analgesic strategies as part of routine clinical care.

The study focuses on the Deep Rectus Sheath (DRS) block, also referred to as the preperitoneal block, a recently described ultrasound-guided technique involving injection of local anesthetic beneath the posterior rectus sheath into the preperitoneal space. This approach is hypothesized to provide broader analgesia compared with the conventional rectus sheath block by targeting not only somatic afferents of the anterior abdominal wall but also the richly innervated parietal peritoneum, potentially contributing to improved control of both somatic and visceral components of postoperative pain.

Patients will not be randomized. Instead, they will be managed according to standard clinical practice and subsequently categorized based on the analgesic strategy received: (A) standard systemic analgesia alone; (B) DRS block combined with standard care; or (C) alternative or additional fascial plane blocks (such as transversus abdominis plane [TAP], erector spinae plane [ESP], or quadratus lumborum [QL] blocks) combined with standard care. Detailed data will be recorded on the type of block performed, timing (pre-incision or postoperative), technique, local anesthetic dose and concentration, and use of adjuvants.

All patients will receive multimodal postoperative analgesia according to institutional protocols, typically including scheduled non-opioid analgesics with opioids reserved for rescue therapy. The study does not alter clinical management.

The primary outcome is postoperative quality of recovery, assessed using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain scores at rest and during movement at predefined time points up to 48 hours, patient satisfaction (Likert scale), total analgesic consumption, time to first rescue analgesic request (duration of analgesia), time to first mobilization, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, use of antiemetics, and occurrence of complications.

Safety assessment will include monitoring for block-related complications during and immediately after the procedure (e.g., vascular puncture, paresthesia, pain, local anesthetic systemic toxicity), early postoperative complications, and delayed adverse events, including neurological symptoms evaluated up to 7 days after surgery.

The study is exploratory in nature, with sample size based on feasibility, and is expected to be completed within 12 months. Statistical analysis will include comparisons of baseline characteristics and outcomes between groups using appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests, as well as linear mixed-effects models for repeated measures over time. A p-value <0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Type d'étude

Observationnel

Inscription (Estimé)

60

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Enfant
  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Méthode d'échantillonnage

Échantillon non probabiliste

Population étudiée

Patients undergoing abdominal surgery, either open or laparoscopic

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Patients undergoing abdominal surgery, either open or laparoscopic
  • ASA physical status I-III
  • Neuraxial or general anesthesia according to standard clinical practice
  • Provision of informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to provide informed consent
  • Contraindications to locoregional anesthesia
  • Known allergy to local anesthetic agents
  • Coagulation disorders or incompatible anticoagulant therapy
  • Infection at the injection site
  • Cognitive impairment preventing reliable assessment of outcomes

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

Cohortes et interventions

Groupe / Cohorte
Intervention / Traitement
DRS block
Ultrasound-guided Deep Rectus Sheath Block (preperitoneal block)
Fascial plane blocks (TAP, QL, ESP, Rectus sheath)

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score
Délai: 24 hours postoperatively

The Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess the quality of postoperative recovery across multiple dimensions of physical and psychological well-being.

The questionnaire consists of 15 items, each scored on an 11-point numerical scale, resulting in a total score ranging from:

Minimum score: 0 → extremely poor quality of recovery Maximum score: 150 → excellent quality of recovery

Higher QoR-15 scores indicate a better postoperative recovery experience.

The questionnaire evaluates five key domains:

Pain Physical comfort Physical independence Psychological support Emotional state

24 hours postoperatively

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Postoperative pain
Délai: 0-2-4-6-8-12-24-48 hours postoperatively

The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is a validated and widely used tool for the assessment of pain intensity in clinical practice and perioperative research.

Patients are asked to rate their pain on a numerical scale ranging from:

0 → no pain 10 → worst pain imaginable

0-2-4-6-8-12-24-48 hours postoperatively
Duration of analgesia
Délai: up to 48 hours
First analgesia request
up to 48 hours
Complications
Délai: up to 48 hours
Toxicity, PONV, others
up to 48 hours

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 mai 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 mai 2027

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 mai 2027

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

4 mai 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

7 mai 2026

Première publication (Réel)

14 mai 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

22 mai 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

18 mai 2026

Dernière vérification

1 mai 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • DRS_Study
  • No other (Autre identifiant: Crotone Hospital)

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner