- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT07586462
Deep Rectus Sheath (DRS) Block in Abdominal Surgery (DRS block)
The Effectiveness of the Deep Rectus Sheath (Preperitoneal) Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective Observational Clinical Study
The goal of this observational study is to learn about the effectiveness of the Deep Rectus Sheath (Preperitoneal) block in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. The main question it aims to answer is:
Does the Deep Rectus Sheath block improve postoperative recovery and pain control compared to standard care or other fascial plane blocks in patients undergoing abdominal surgery?
Participants undergoing open or laparoscopic abdominal surgery as part of their routine clinical care will receive analgesic management according to standard practice, which may include systemic analgesia alone, Deep Rectus Sheath block, or other fascial plane blocks (such as TAP, ESP, or QL), depending on anesthesiologist choice. Postoperative outcomes will be collected prospectively, including quality of recovery (QoR-15 at 24 hours), pain scores at rest and during movement up to 48 hours, analgesic consumption, time to first analgesic request, mobilization time, and occurrence of complications.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
This prospective, observational, non-interventional clinical study aims to evaluate postoperative recovery and analgesic outcomes in adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery (open or laparoscopic) who receive different perioperative analgesic strategies as part of routine clinical care.
The study focuses on the Deep Rectus Sheath (DRS) block, also referred to as the preperitoneal block, a recently described ultrasound-guided technique involving injection of local anesthetic beneath the posterior rectus sheath into the preperitoneal space. This approach is hypothesized to provide broader analgesia compared with the conventional rectus sheath block by targeting not only somatic afferents of the anterior abdominal wall but also the richly innervated parietal peritoneum, potentially contributing to improved control of both somatic and visceral components of postoperative pain.
Patients will not be randomized. Instead, they will be managed according to standard clinical practice and subsequently categorized based on the analgesic strategy received: (A) standard systemic analgesia alone; (B) DRS block combined with standard care; or (C) alternative or additional fascial plane blocks (such as transversus abdominis plane [TAP], erector spinae plane [ESP], or quadratus lumborum [QL] blocks) combined with standard care. Detailed data will be recorded on the type of block performed, timing (pre-incision or postoperative), technique, local anesthetic dose and concentration, and use of adjuvants.
All patients will receive multimodal postoperative analgesia according to institutional protocols, typically including scheduled non-opioid analgesics with opioids reserved for rescue therapy. The study does not alter clinical management.
The primary outcome is postoperative quality of recovery, assessed using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain scores at rest and during movement at predefined time points up to 48 hours, patient satisfaction (Likert scale), total analgesic consumption, time to first rescue analgesic request (duration of analgesia), time to first mobilization, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, use of antiemetics, and occurrence of complications.
Safety assessment will include monitoring for block-related complications during and immediately after the procedure (e.g., vascular puncture, paresthesia, pain, local anesthetic systemic toxicity), early postoperative complications, and delayed adverse events, including neurological symptoms evaluated up to 7 days after surgery.
The study is exploratory in nature, with sample size based on feasibility, and is expected to be completed within 12 months. Statistical analysis will include comparisons of baseline characteristics and outcomes between groups using appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests, as well as linear mixed-effects models for repeated measures over time. A p-value <0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Contacts et emplacements
Coordonnées de l'étude
- Nom: Tommaso Sorrentino, MD
- Numéro de téléphone: +393277038017
- E-mail: dr.sorrentinotommaso@gmail.com
Lieux d'étude
-
-
-
Crotone, Italie
- Recrutement
- Crotone Hospital
-
Contact:
- Tommaso Sorrentino
- Numéro de téléphone: +393277038017
- E-mail: dr.sorrentinotommaso@gmail.com
-
Crotone, Italie
- Pas encore de recrutement
- Crotone Hospital
-
Contact:
- Tommaso Sorrentino, MD
- Numéro de téléphone: +393277038017
- E-mail: dr.sorrentinotommaso@gmail.com
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Enfant
- Adulte
- Adulte plus âgé
Accepte les volontaires sains
Méthode d'échantillonnage
Population étudiée
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Patients undergoing abdominal surgery, either open or laparoscopic
- ASA physical status I-III
- Neuraxial or general anesthesia according to standard clinical practice
- Provision of informed consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal to provide informed consent
- Contraindications to locoregional anesthesia
- Known allergy to local anesthetic agents
- Coagulation disorders or incompatible anticoagulant therapy
- Infection at the injection site
- Cognitive impairment preventing reliable assessment of outcomes
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
Cohortes et interventions
Groupe / Cohorte |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
DRS block
Ultrasound-guided Deep Rectus Sheath Block (preperitoneal block)
|
Fascial plane blocks (TAP, QL, ESP, Rectus sheath)
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score
Délai: 24 hours postoperatively
|
The Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess the quality of postoperative recovery across multiple dimensions of physical and psychological well-being. The questionnaire consists of 15 items, each scored on an 11-point numerical scale, resulting in a total score ranging from: Minimum score: 0 → extremely poor quality of recovery Maximum score: 150 → excellent quality of recovery Higher QoR-15 scores indicate a better postoperative recovery experience. The questionnaire evaluates five key domains: Pain Physical comfort Physical independence Psychological support Emotional state |
24 hours postoperatively
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative pain
Délai: 0-2-4-6-8-12-24-48 hours postoperatively
|
The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is a validated and widely used tool for the assessment of pain intensity in clinical practice and perioperative research. Patients are asked to rate their pain on a numerical scale ranging from: 0 → no pain 10 → worst pain imaginable |
0-2-4-6-8-12-24-48 hours postoperatively
|
|
Duration of analgesia
Délai: up to 48 hours
|
First analgesia request
|
up to 48 hours
|
|
Complications
Délai: up to 48 hours
|
Toxicity, PONV, others
|
up to 48 hours
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Estimé)
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- DRS_Study
- No other (Autre identifiant: Crotone Hospital)
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .