Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Deep Rectus Sheath (DRS) Block in Abdominal Surgery (DRS block)

18 mei 2026 bijgewerkt door: Tommaso Sorrentino, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital

The Effectiveness of the Deep Rectus Sheath (Preperitoneal) Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective Observational Clinical Study

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the effectiveness of the Deep Rectus Sheath (Preperitoneal) block in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. The main question it aims to answer is:

Does the Deep Rectus Sheath block improve postoperative recovery and pain control compared to standard care or other fascial plane blocks in patients undergoing abdominal surgery?

Participants undergoing open or laparoscopic abdominal surgery as part of their routine clinical care will receive analgesic management according to standard practice, which may include systemic analgesia alone, Deep Rectus Sheath block, or other fascial plane blocks (such as TAP, ESP, or QL), depending on anesthesiologist choice. Postoperative outcomes will be collected prospectively, including quality of recovery (QoR-15 at 24 hours), pain scores at rest and during movement up to 48 hours, analgesic consumption, time to first analgesic request, mobilization time, and occurrence of complications.

Studie Overzicht

Toestand

Werving

Interventie / Behandeling

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

This prospective, observational, non-interventional clinical study aims to evaluate postoperative recovery and analgesic outcomes in adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery (open or laparoscopic) who receive different perioperative analgesic strategies as part of routine clinical care.

The study focuses on the Deep Rectus Sheath (DRS) block, also referred to as the preperitoneal block, a recently described ultrasound-guided technique involving injection of local anesthetic beneath the posterior rectus sheath into the preperitoneal space. This approach is hypothesized to provide broader analgesia compared with the conventional rectus sheath block by targeting not only somatic afferents of the anterior abdominal wall but also the richly innervated parietal peritoneum, potentially contributing to improved control of both somatic and visceral components of postoperative pain.

Patients will not be randomized. Instead, they will be managed according to standard clinical practice and subsequently categorized based on the analgesic strategy received: (A) standard systemic analgesia alone; (B) DRS block combined with standard care; or (C) alternative or additional fascial plane blocks (such as transversus abdominis plane [TAP], erector spinae plane [ESP], or quadratus lumborum [QL] blocks) combined with standard care. Detailed data will be recorded on the type of block performed, timing (pre-incision or postoperative), technique, local anesthetic dose and concentration, and use of adjuvants.

All patients will receive multimodal postoperative analgesia according to institutional protocols, typically including scheduled non-opioid analgesics with opioids reserved for rescue therapy. The study does not alter clinical management.

The primary outcome is postoperative quality of recovery, assessed using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain scores at rest and during movement at predefined time points up to 48 hours, patient satisfaction (Likert scale), total analgesic consumption, time to first rescue analgesic request (duration of analgesia), time to first mobilization, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, use of antiemetics, and occurrence of complications.

Safety assessment will include monitoring for block-related complications during and immediately after the procedure (e.g., vascular puncture, paresthesia, pain, local anesthetic systemic toxicity), early postoperative complications, and delayed adverse events, including neurological symptoms evaluated up to 7 days after surgery.

The study is exploratory in nature, with sample size based on feasibility, and is expected to be completed within 12 months. Statistical analysis will include comparisons of baseline characteristics and outcomes between groups using appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests, as well as linear mixed-effects models for repeated measures over time. A p-value <0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Studietype

Observationeel

Inschrijving (Geschat)

60

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studiecontact

Studie Locaties

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

  • Kind
  • Volwassen
  • Oudere volwassene

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Bemonsteringsmethode

Niet-waarschijnlijkheidssteekproef

Studie Bevolking

Patients undergoing abdominal surgery, either open or laparoscopic

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Patients undergoing abdominal surgery, either open or laparoscopic
  • ASA physical status I-III
  • Neuraxial or general anesthesia according to standard clinical practice
  • Provision of informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to provide informed consent
  • Contraindications to locoregional anesthesia
  • Known allergy to local anesthetic agents
  • Coagulation disorders or incompatible anticoagulant therapy
  • Infection at the injection site
  • Cognitive impairment preventing reliable assessment of outcomes

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

Cohorten en interventies

Groep / Cohort
Interventie / Behandeling
DRS block
Ultrasound-guided Deep Rectus Sheath Block (preperitoneal block)
Fascial plane blocks (TAP, QL, ESP, Rectus sheath)

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score
Tijdsspanne: 24 hours postoperatively

The Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess the quality of postoperative recovery across multiple dimensions of physical and psychological well-being.

The questionnaire consists of 15 items, each scored on an 11-point numerical scale, resulting in a total score ranging from:

Minimum score: 0 → extremely poor quality of recovery Maximum score: 150 → excellent quality of recovery

Higher QoR-15 scores indicate a better postoperative recovery experience.

The questionnaire evaluates five key domains:

Pain Physical comfort Physical independence Psychological support Emotional state

24 hours postoperatively

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Postoperative pain
Tijdsspanne: 0-2-4-6-8-12-24-48 hours postoperatively

The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is a validated and widely used tool for the assessment of pain intensity in clinical practice and perioperative research.

Patients are asked to rate their pain on a numerical scale ranging from:

0 → no pain 10 → worst pain imaginable

0-2-4-6-8-12-24-48 hours postoperatively
Duration of analgesia
Tijdsspanne: up to 48 hours
First analgesia request
up to 48 hours
Complications
Tijdsspanne: up to 48 hours
Toxicity, PONV, others
up to 48 hours

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Geschat)

1 mei 2026

Primaire voltooiing (Geschat)

1 mei 2027

Studie voltooiing (Geschat)

1 mei 2027

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

4 mei 2026

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

7 mei 2026

Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)

14 mei 2026

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

22 mei 2026

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

18 mei 2026

Laatst geverifieerd

1 mei 2026

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • DRS_Study
  • No other (Andere identificatie: Crotone Hospital)

Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)

Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?

NEE

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Nee

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren