Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Deep Rectus Sheath (DRS) Block in Abdominal Surgery (DRS block)

18 de mayo de 2026 actualizado por: Tommaso Sorrentino, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital

The Effectiveness of the Deep Rectus Sheath (Preperitoneal) Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective Observational Clinical Study

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the effectiveness of the Deep Rectus Sheath (Preperitoneal) block in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. The main question it aims to answer is:

Does the Deep Rectus Sheath block improve postoperative recovery and pain control compared to standard care or other fascial plane blocks in patients undergoing abdominal surgery?

Participants undergoing open or laparoscopic abdominal surgery as part of their routine clinical care will receive analgesic management according to standard practice, which may include systemic analgesia alone, Deep Rectus Sheath block, or other fascial plane blocks (such as TAP, ESP, or QL), depending on anesthesiologist choice. Postoperative outcomes will be collected prospectively, including quality of recovery (QoR-15 at 24 hours), pain scores at rest and during movement up to 48 hours, analgesic consumption, time to first analgesic request, mobilization time, and occurrence of complications.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Reclutamiento

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

This prospective, observational, non-interventional clinical study aims to evaluate postoperative recovery and analgesic outcomes in adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery (open or laparoscopic) who receive different perioperative analgesic strategies as part of routine clinical care.

The study focuses on the Deep Rectus Sheath (DRS) block, also referred to as the preperitoneal block, a recently described ultrasound-guided technique involving injection of local anesthetic beneath the posterior rectus sheath into the preperitoneal space. This approach is hypothesized to provide broader analgesia compared with the conventional rectus sheath block by targeting not only somatic afferents of the anterior abdominal wall but also the richly innervated parietal peritoneum, potentially contributing to improved control of both somatic and visceral components of postoperative pain.

Patients will not be randomized. Instead, they will be managed according to standard clinical practice and subsequently categorized based on the analgesic strategy received: (A) standard systemic analgesia alone; (B) DRS block combined with standard care; or (C) alternative or additional fascial plane blocks (such as transversus abdominis plane [TAP], erector spinae plane [ESP], or quadratus lumborum [QL] blocks) combined with standard care. Detailed data will be recorded on the type of block performed, timing (pre-incision or postoperative), technique, local anesthetic dose and concentration, and use of adjuvants.

All patients will receive multimodal postoperative analgesia according to institutional protocols, typically including scheduled non-opioid analgesics with opioids reserved for rescue therapy. The study does not alter clinical management.

The primary outcome is postoperative quality of recovery, assessed using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain scores at rest and during movement at predefined time points up to 48 hours, patient satisfaction (Likert scale), total analgesic consumption, time to first rescue analgesic request (duration of analgesia), time to first mobilization, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, use of antiemetics, and occurrence of complications.

Safety assessment will include monitoring for block-related complications during and immediately after the procedure (e.g., vascular puncture, paresthesia, pain, local anesthetic systemic toxicity), early postoperative complications, and delayed adverse events, including neurological symptoms evaluated up to 7 days after surgery.

The study is exploratory in nature, with sample size based on feasibility, and is expected to be completed within 12 months. Statistical analysis will include comparisons of baseline characteristics and outcomes between groups using appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests, as well as linear mixed-effects models for repeated measures over time. A p-value <0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Estimado)

60

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Crotone, Italia
      • Crotone, Italia
        • Aún no reclutando
        • Crotone Hospital
        • Contacto:

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Niño
  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Método de muestreo

Muestra no probabilística

Población de estudio

Patients undergoing abdominal surgery, either open or laparoscopic

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Patients undergoing abdominal surgery, either open or laparoscopic
  • ASA physical status I-III
  • Neuraxial or general anesthesia according to standard clinical practice
  • Provision of informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to provide informed consent
  • Contraindications to locoregional anesthesia
  • Known allergy to local anesthetic agents
  • Coagulation disorders or incompatible anticoagulant therapy
  • Infection at the injection site
  • Cognitive impairment preventing reliable assessment of outcomes

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

Cohortes e Intervenciones

Grupo / Cohorte
Intervención / Tratamiento
DRS block
Ultrasound-guided Deep Rectus Sheath Block (preperitoneal block)
Fascial plane blocks (TAP, QL, ESP, Rectus sheath)

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours postoperatively

The Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess the quality of postoperative recovery across multiple dimensions of physical and psychological well-being.

The questionnaire consists of 15 items, each scored on an 11-point numerical scale, resulting in a total score ranging from:

Minimum score: 0 → extremely poor quality of recovery Maximum score: 150 → excellent quality of recovery

Higher QoR-15 scores indicate a better postoperative recovery experience.

The questionnaire evaluates five key domains:

Pain Physical comfort Physical independence Psychological support Emotional state

24 hours postoperatively

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Postoperative pain
Periodo de tiempo: 0-2-4-6-8-12-24-48 hours postoperatively

The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is a validated and widely used tool for the assessment of pain intensity in clinical practice and perioperative research.

Patients are asked to rate their pain on a numerical scale ranging from:

0 → no pain 10 → worst pain imaginable

0-2-4-6-8-12-24-48 hours postoperatively
Duration of analgesia
Periodo de tiempo: up to 48 hours
First analgesia request
up to 48 hours
Complications
Periodo de tiempo: up to 48 hours
Toxicity, PONV, others
up to 48 hours

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de mayo de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de mayo de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de mayo de 2027

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

4 de mayo de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

7 de mayo de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

14 de mayo de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

22 de mayo de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

18 de mayo de 2026

Última verificación

1 de mayo de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • DRS_Study
  • No other (Otro identificador: Crotone Hospital)

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir