Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Action Observation Therapy in Chronic Stroke Via Telerehabilitation

5 juin 2026 mis à jour par: Mustafa Kavak, Karabuk University

Investigation of the Effect of Action Observation Therapy Via Telerehabilitation Method on Upper Extremity Functions, Daily Living Activities and Quality of Life in Chronic Stroke Patients

Stroke, a leading cause of disability worldwide, particularly affects upper extremity function, rendering individuals dependent on others for daily living activities and reducing their quality of life. To mitigate these effects, Action Observation Therapy (AOT), which has gained prominence in recent years, activates the mirror neuron system, triggering learning processes in the motor cortex and supporting functional recovery through the imitation of observed movements. Furthermore, telerehabilitation offers a significant advantage in facilitating access to rehabilitation services for these patients requiring long-term treatment, eliminating barriers such as transportation and cost. The absence of studies in the literature comparing the effectiveness of combining these two methods on hand skills and quality of life in individuals with chronic stroke with conventional physiotherapy makes investigating the clinical value of this approach academically unique and necessary.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Recrutement

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

Stroke is defined as a neurological condition caused by focal damage to the central nervous system due to vascular problems such as cerebral infarction, intracerebral or subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke is among the leading causes of death and disability worldwide.

Functional impairment in the upper extremities is frequently observed in stroke patients, significantly limiting their grasping and releasing functions, and consequently their daily living activities (ADL) such as eating, drinking, dressing, and self-care. Due to these limitations, stroke patients become dependent to varying degrees, negatively impacting their quality of life. Scientists are conducting various studies to find effective, low-cost, and easily applicable methods that can reduce the effects of stroke, which imposes a significant economic, physical, social, and psychological burden on patients and their families, and improve recovery.

Action Observation Therapy (AOT), which involves observing simple actions frequently used in ADL and then imitating those observed actions, is a rehabilitation approach applied in clinical settings in recent years to improve upper extremity function in the rehabilitation of stroke and various neurological diseases. The neural basis of AOT is the mirror neuron system, which is active not only when observing one's own movements but also when observing others' movements. Studies using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging have shown that mirror neuron activity increases when observing the movements of others. It is stated that observing an action and then trying to imitate it reduces interhemispheric inhibition, and as a result, it activates the primary motor cortex that causes the observed movement, facilitates the execution of the action, eliminates motor function disorders, and allows for the relearning of functions.

Telerehabilitation is the remote delivery of rehabilitation services through telecommunication technology. Telerehabilitation increases the accessibility of physiotherapy interventions in situations where face-to-face rehabilitation is not possible or difficult to access. In stroke patients with a lengthy rehabilitation process, telerehabilitation offers significant advantages, including reduced difficulties in transferring the patient to the healthcare center, shorter travel time, reduced transportation costs, and lower energy costs.

A literature review revealed no studies comparing the effects of AOT delivered via telerehabilitation on upper extremity function, hand skills, daily living activities, and quality of life in patients with chronic stroke compared with conventional physiotherapy.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

30

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

  • Turquie (Türkiye)
    • Merkez
      • Karabük, Merkez, Turquie (Türkiye), 78100
      • Karabük, Merkez, Turquie (Türkiye), 78100
        • Recrutement
        • Mustafa KAVAK
        • Sous-enquêteur:
          • Elif Ulukan, PT
        • Contact:
        • Sous-enquêteur:
          • Cihan Caner Aksoy, Assoc. Professor
        • Sous-enquêteur:
          • Musa Güneş, Phd
        • Sous-enquêteur:
          • İlker İlhanlı, Professor

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being over 18 years of age,
  • Diagnosis of left hemiparetic stroke,
  • Having passed between 6 months since the onset of stroke,
  • Being in stage 4 or 5 of the hand and stage 4, 5 or 6 of the upper extremity according to Brunnstrom staging,
  • Being able to sit on a chair for 30 minutes without support (patients who scored 20 or more points in total from the Trunk Impairment Scale),
  • Scoring 24 or more points from the Mini Mental Test

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwillingness to participate in the study,
  • Having spasticity that prevents grasping and releasing an object (levels 3 and 4 on the Modified Ashworth Scale),
  • Having a contracture in any of the affected upper extremity joints,
  • Having severe neglect disorder (scoring 21 or higher on the Catherine Bergego Scale),
  • Having impaired cooperation, compliance, and behavior during the administration of tests used to obtain data,
  • Having a mental impairment that prevents communication and following basic commands (scoring less than 24 on the Mini-Mental Test),
  • Having additional neurological and/or orthopedic problems that may affect motor performance and sitting balance,
  • Having severe visual and hearing problems (if any, these problems not corrected with assistive devices such as glasses, contact lenses, hearing aids, etc.)

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Double

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Action observation Therapy
Participants will receive AOT via telerehabilitation in addition to conventional physiotherapy. They will receive 3 sessions per week for 5 weeks.
Autre: Conventional physiotherapy
All participants will receive conventional physiotherapy, including stretching, strengthening, core mobility, balance, electrotherapy, and endurance exercises in the clinic. These traditional sessions will be administered by physiotherapists three times a week, each lasting 45 minutes.
Aucune intervention: control
Participants will receive only conventional physiotherapy. They will receive 3 sessions per week for 5 weeks.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Spasticité
Délai: Base de base
La spasticité sera évaluée à l'aide de l'échelle Ashworth modifiée. À mesure que le score augmente, la spasticité augmente. Le score minimum pour cette échelle est de 1 et le score maximum est de 5.
Base de base
Stade de l'hémiplégie
Délai: Base de base
"Brunnstrom Hemiplegia Recovery Staging" sera utilisé pour déterminer le stade hémiplégique des patients. Cette échelle est notée entre 1 et 6. À mesure que le score augmente, le patient s'améliore.
Base de base
Fonction cognitif
Délai: Base de base
Un mini test mental sera utilisé pour évaluer les fonctions cognitives. Dans l'évaluation, 24 à 30 points indiquent que les fonctions cognitives sont normales, 18-23 points indiquent une légère déficience cognitive et 17 points et moins indiquent que l'état cognitif est gravement affecté.
Base de base
Négligence
Délai: Base de base
L'échelle de Catherine Bergego sera utilisée pour évaluer l'impact de la négligence unilatérale après un AVC sur les activités de la vie quotidienne. 1-10 indique une légère négligence, 11-20 indique une négligence modérée et 21-30 indique une grave négligence.
Base de base
Motor function
Délai: Baseline, five week later (after intervention)
The "Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Assessment Scale" will be used to evaluate upper extremity motor functions. This scale ranges from 0 to 66 points. As the score increases, motor function improves.
Baseline, five week later (after intervention)
Life Quality
Délai: Baseline, five week later (after intervention)
The Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale will be used to assess the quality of life of individuals with stroke. The higher the total score, the better the quality of life of the individual with stroke. This scale is scored between 49-245.As the score increases, the quality of life increases.
Baseline, five week later (after intervention)
Dominant side
Délai: Baseline
The "Edinburgh Hand Preference Test" will be used to determine the dominant side used by the patient in daily life. It will be used to determine which hand the patient uses more in daily life (Score range: -100 to +100; high positive scores indicate right-handedness, high negative scores indicate left-handedness).
Baseline
Upper extremity function
Délai: Baseline, five week later (after intervention)
Evaluation of upper extremity functions (hand-arm) and motor speed will be done with the "Nine-Hole Peg Test". It is a widely used clinical test that evaluates upper extremity function (hand and arm) and motor performance. The test consists of nine wooden sticks with a diameter of 9 millimeters (mm) and a standard wooden block with nine holes of 10 mm diameter. The patient inserts the nine sticks one by one into the nine holes as quickly as possible, placing them randomly into the holes, and then removes them one by one in the same manner. The timer is started when the first stick is inserted and stopped when the last stick is removed and released from the hand. The time taken for the patient to insert and remove the sticks is recorded. A shorter time indicates better upper extremity function.
Baseline, five week later (after intervention)
Functional Independence
Délai: Baseline, five week later (after intervention)
Evaluation of upper extremity functions will be done with the "Functional Independence Scale (FIS)". The is used to assess the change and development in ADL (Applications for Daily Living) depending on the degree of disability experienced by individuals and rehabilitation programs. Consisting of a total of 18 items, the FIS is divided into two main subcategories: motor domain (FIS-motor; 13 items) and cognitive domain (FIS-cognitive; 5 items). All activities are rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (requires full assistance during activities) to 7 (performs the activity completely independently). The total FIS score ranges from 18 to 126 points. A decrease in the score indicates an increase in the individual's dependence during ADL.
Baseline, five week later (after intervention)

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Karabuk University

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

Liens utiles

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

15 juin 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 juillet 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 octobre 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

1 juin 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

1 juin 2026

Première publication (Réel)

5 juin 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

9 juin 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

5 juin 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juin 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • Karabuk-02

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner