Action Observation Therapy in Chronic Stroke Via Telerehabilitation

June 5, 2026 updated by: Mustafa Kavak, Karabuk University

Investigation of the Effect of Action Observation Therapy Via Telerehabilitation Method on Upper Extremity Functions, Daily Living Activities and Quality of Life in Chronic Stroke Patients

Stroke, a leading cause of disability worldwide, particularly affects upper extremity function, rendering individuals dependent on others for daily living activities and reducing their quality of life. To mitigate these effects, Action Observation Therapy (AOT), which has gained prominence in recent years, activates the mirror neuron system, triggering learning processes in the motor cortex and supporting functional recovery through the imitation of observed movements. Furthermore, telerehabilitation offers a significant advantage in facilitating access to rehabilitation services for these patients requiring long-term treatment, eliminating barriers such as transportation and cost. The absence of studies in the literature comparing the effectiveness of combining these two methods on hand skills and quality of life in individuals with chronic stroke with conventional physiotherapy makes investigating the clinical value of this approach academically unique and necessary.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Stroke is defined as a neurological condition caused by focal damage to the central nervous system due to vascular problems such as cerebral infarction, intracerebral or subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke is among the leading causes of death and disability worldwide.

Functional impairment in the upper extremities is frequently observed in stroke patients, significantly limiting their grasping and releasing functions, and consequently their daily living activities (ADL) such as eating, drinking, dressing, and self-care. Due to these limitations, stroke patients become dependent to varying degrees, negatively impacting their quality of life. Scientists are conducting various studies to find effective, low-cost, and easily applicable methods that can reduce the effects of stroke, which imposes a significant economic, physical, social, and psychological burden on patients and their families, and improve recovery.

Action Observation Therapy (AOT), which involves observing simple actions frequently used in ADL and then imitating those observed actions, is a rehabilitation approach applied in clinical settings in recent years to improve upper extremity function in the rehabilitation of stroke and various neurological diseases. The neural basis of AOT is the mirror neuron system, which is active not only when observing one's own movements but also when observing others' movements. Studies using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging have shown that mirror neuron activity increases when observing the movements of others. It is stated that observing an action and then trying to imitate it reduces interhemispheric inhibition, and as a result, it activates the primary motor cortex that causes the observed movement, facilitates the execution of the action, eliminates motor function disorders, and allows for the relearning of functions.

Telerehabilitation is the remote delivery of rehabilitation services through telecommunication technology. Telerehabilitation increases the accessibility of physiotherapy interventions in situations where face-to-face rehabilitation is not possible or difficult to access. In stroke patients with a lengthy rehabilitation process, telerehabilitation offers significant advantages, including reduced difficulties in transferring the patient to the healthcare center, shorter travel time, reduced transportation costs, and lower energy costs.

A literature review revealed no studies comparing the effects of AOT delivered via telerehabilitation on upper extremity function, hand skills, daily living activities, and quality of life in patients with chronic stroke compared with conventional physiotherapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

  • Turkey (Türkiye)
    • Merkez
      • Karabük, Merkez, Turkey (Türkiye), 78100
      • Karabük, Merkez, Turkey (Türkiye), 78100
        • Recruiting
        • Mustafa KAVAK
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Elif Ulukan, PT
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Cihan Caner Aksoy, Assoc. Professor
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Musa Güneş, Phd
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • İlker İlhanlı, Professor

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being over 18 years of age,
  • Diagnosis of left hemiparetic stroke,
  • Having passed between 6 months since the onset of stroke,
  • Being in stage 4 or 5 of the hand and stage 4, 5 or 6 of the upper extremity according to Brunnstrom staging,
  • Being able to sit on a chair for 30 minutes without support (patients who scored 20 or more points in total from the Trunk Impairment Scale),
  • Scoring 24 or more points from the Mini Mental Test

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwillingness to participate in the study,
  • Having spasticity that prevents grasping and releasing an object (levels 3 and 4 on the Modified Ashworth Scale),
  • Having a contracture in any of the affected upper extremity joints,
  • Having severe neglect disorder (scoring 21 or higher on the Catherine Bergego Scale),
  • Having impaired cooperation, compliance, and behavior during the administration of tests used to obtain data,
  • Having a mental impairment that prevents communication and following basic commands (scoring less than 24 on the Mini-Mental Test),
  • Having additional neurological and/or orthopedic problems that may affect motor performance and sitting balance,
  • Having severe visual and hearing problems (if any, these problems not corrected with assistive devices such as glasses, contact lenses, hearing aids, etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Action observation Therapy
Participants will receive AOT via telerehabilitation in addition to conventional physiotherapy. They will receive 3 sessions per week for 5 weeks.
Other: Conventional physiotherapy
All participants will receive conventional physiotherapy, including stretching, strengthening, core mobility, balance, electrotherapy, and endurance exercises in the clinic. These traditional sessions will be administered by physiotherapists three times a week, each lasting 45 minutes.
No Intervention: control
Participants will receive only conventional physiotherapy. They will receive 3 sessions per week for 5 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spasticity
Time Frame: Baseline
Spasticity will assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale. As the score increases, spasticity increases. The minimum score for this scale is 1 and the maximum score is 5.
Baseline
Stage of hemiplegia
Time Frame: Baseline
"Brunnstrom Hemiplegia Recovery Staging" will be used to determine the hemiplegic stage of the patients. This scale is scored between 1 and 6. As the score increases, the patient improves.
Baseline
Cognitif Function
Time Frame: Baseline
Mini Mental Test will be used to evaluate cognitive functions. In the evaluation, 24-30 points indicate that cognitive functions are normal, 18-23 points indicate mild cognitive impairment, and 17 points and below indicate that cognitive status is severely affected.
Baseline
Neglect
Time Frame: Baseline
The Catherine Bergego Scale will be used to assess the impact of unilateral neglect after stroke on activities of daily living. 1-10 indicates mild neglect, 11-20 indicates moderate neglect, and 21-30 indicates severe neglect.
Baseline
Motor function
Time Frame: Baseline, five week later (after intervention)
The "Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Assessment Scale" will be used to evaluate upper extremity motor functions. This scale ranges from 0 to 66 points. As the score increases, motor function improves.
Baseline, five week later (after intervention)
Life Quality
Time Frame: Baseline, five week later (after intervention)
The Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale will be used to assess the quality of life of individuals with stroke. The higher the total score, the better the quality of life of the individual with stroke. This scale is scored between 49-245.As the score increases, the quality of life increases.
Baseline, five week later (after intervention)
Dominant side
Time Frame: Baseline
The "Edinburgh Hand Preference Test" will be used to determine the dominant side used by the patient in daily life. It will be used to determine which hand the patient uses more in daily life (Score range: -100 to +100; high positive scores indicate right-handedness, high negative scores indicate left-handedness).
Baseline
Upper extremity function
Time Frame: Baseline, five week later (after intervention)
Evaluation of upper extremity functions (hand-arm) and motor speed will be done with the "Nine-Hole Peg Test". It is a widely used clinical test that evaluates upper extremity function (hand and arm) and motor performance. The test consists of nine wooden sticks with a diameter of 9 millimeters (mm) and a standard wooden block with nine holes of 10 mm diameter. The patient inserts the nine sticks one by one into the nine holes as quickly as possible, placing them randomly into the holes, and then removes them one by one in the same manner. The timer is started when the first stick is inserted and stopped when the last stick is removed and released from the hand. The time taken for the patient to insert and remove the sticks is recorded. A shorter time indicates better upper extremity function.
Baseline, five week later (after intervention)
Functional Independence
Time Frame: Baseline, five week later (after intervention)
Evaluation of upper extremity functions will be done with the "Functional Independence Scale (FIS)". The is used to assess the change and development in ADL (Applications for Daily Living) depending on the degree of disability experienced by individuals and rehabilitation programs. Consisting of a total of 18 items, the FIS is divided into two main subcategories: motor domain (FIS-motor; 13 items) and cognitive domain (FIS-cognitive; 5 items). All activities are rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (requires full assistance during activities) to 7 (performs the activity completely independently). The total FIS score ranges from 18 to 126 points. A decrease in the score indicates an increase in the individual's dependence during ADL.
Baseline, five week later (after intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Karabuk University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Karabuk-02

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Stroke

Clinical Trials on Conventional physiotherapy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Uzbekistan

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe