The Selah study protocol of three interventions to manage stress among clergy: a preference-based randomized waitlist control trial

Logan C Tice, David E Eagle, Joshua A Rash, Jessie S Larkins, Sofia M Labrecque, Alyssa Platt, Jia Yao, Rae Jean Proeschold-Bell, Logan C Tice, David E Eagle, Joshua A Rash, Jessie S Larkins, Sofia M Labrecque, Alyssa Platt, Jia Yao, Rae Jean Proeschold-Bell

Abstract

Introduction: Like many helping professionals in emotional labor occupations, clergy experience high rates of mental and physical comorbidities. Regular stress management practices may reduce stress-related symptoms and morbidity, but more research is needed into what practices can be reliably included in busy lifestyles and practiced at a high enough level to meaningfully reduce stress symptoms.

Methods and analysis: The overall design is a preference-based randomized waitlist control trial. United Methodist clergy in North Carolina will be eligible to participate. The intervention and waitlist control groups will be recruited by email. The interventions offered are specifically targeted to clergy preference and include mindfulness-based stress reduction, Daily Examen, and stress inoculation training. Surveys will be conducted at 0, 12, and 24 weeks with heart rate data collected at 0 and 12 weeks. The primary outcomes for this study are self-reported symptoms of stress and heart rate at week 12 for each intervention compared to waitlist control; the secondary outcome is symptoms of anxiety comparing each intervention vs waitlist control.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from the Duke University Campus IRB (2019-0238). The results will be made available to researchers, funders, and members of the clergy community.

Strengths and limitations of this study: While evidence-based stress reduction practices such as mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) exist, a wider variety of practices should be tested to appeal to different individuals. Clergy in particular may prefer, and consequently enact, spiritual practices like the Daily Examen, and individuals such as clergy who spend most of their time thinking and feeling may prefer experiential-based practices like stress inoculation training. If efficacious, the Daily Examen and stress inoculation training practices have high feasibility in that they require few minutes per day. This study is limited by the inclusion of Christian clergy of only one denomination.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04625777 . November 12, 2020.

Keywords: Controlled trial; Intervention; Mindfulness; Patient preference; Stress.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Pandemic-adapted Selah study design: a partially randomized waitlist-controlled preference
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Timeline of measures: surveys, ECG, and daily practice times (reported via text messaging)

References

    1. Proeschold-Bell RJ, LeGrand SH. High rates of obesity and chronic disease among United Methodist clergy. Obesity. 2010;18(9):1867–1870. doi: 10.1038/oby.2010.102.
    1. Proeschold-Bell RJ, Miles A, Toth M, Adams C, Smith BW, Toole D. Using effort-reward imbalance theory to understand high rates of depression and anxiety among clergy. J Prim Prev. 2013;34(6):439–453. doi: 10.1007/s10935-013-0321-4.
    1. Johnson JV, Hall EM. Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. Am J Public Health. 1988;78(10):1336–1342. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.10.1336.
    1. Häusser JA, Mojzisch A, Niesel M, Schulz-Hardt S. Ten years on: a review of recent research on the Job Demand–Control (-Support) model and psychological well-being. Work Stress. 2010;24(1):1–35. doi: 10.1080/02678371003683747.
    1. Carroll, J. W. (2006). God’s potters: pastoral leadership and the shaping of congregations (Pulpit & Pew). William B. Eerdmans Pub.
    1. DeShon, R. (2012). Clergy effectiveness: national survey results summary. General Board of Higher Education and Ministry. Accessed 3 April 2021.
    1. Eagle DE, Hybels CF, Proeschold-Bell RJ. Perceived social support, received social support, and depression among clergy. J Soc Personal Relation. 2018;36(7):2055–2073. doi: 10.1177/0265407518776134.
    1. Holman D, Johnson S, O’Connor E. Stress management interventions: improving subjective psychological well-being in the workplace. In: Diener E, Oishi S, Tay L, editors. Handbook of well-being. Salt Lake City: DEF Publishers; 2018.
    1. Richardson KM, Rothstein HR. Effects of occupational stress management intervention programs: a meta-analysis. J Occup Health Psychol. 2008;13(1):69–93. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.13.1.69.
    1. Pascoe MC, Thompson DR, Jenkins ZM, Ski CF. Mindfulness mediates the physiological markers of stress: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res. 2017;95:156–178. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.08.004.
    1. Khoury B, Sharma M, Rush SE, Fournier C. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for healthy individuals: a meta-analysis. J Psychosomat Res. 2015;78(6):519–528. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.03.009.
    1. Walter S, Turner R, Macaskill P, McCaffery K, Irwig L. Beyond the treatment effect: evaluating the effects of patient preferences in randomised trials. Stat Methods Med Res [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 May 17];26(1):489–507. Available from: 10.1177/0962280214550516
    1. Kowalski CJ, Mrdjenovich AJ. Patient preference clinical trials: why and when they will sometimes be preferred. Perspect Biol Med. 2013;56(1):18–35. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2013.0004.
    1. Sidani S, Epstein DR, Bootzin RR, Moritz P, Miranda J. Assessment of preferences for treatment: validation of a measure. Res Nurs Health. 2009;32(4):419–431. doi: 10.1002/nur.20329.
    1. Meyer RD, Ratitch B, Wolbers M, Marchenko O, Quan H, Li D, et al. Statistical issues and recommendations for clinical trials conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Stat Biopharm Res [Internet]. [cited 2021 May 18];12(4):399–411. Available from:
    1. Clergy Health Initiative. (2020). 2019 Clergy Health Initiative Survey Report.
    1. Kabat-Zinn, J. (2018). Meditation is not what you think: mindfulness and why it is so important (1st ed.). Hachette Books.
    1. Thibodeaux SJ ME. Reimagining the Ignatian Examen: fresh ways to pray from your day. Loyola Press; 2015.
    1. Meichenbaum D. Stress inoculation training: a preventative and treatment approach. 2007; In Lehrer P, Wookfolk R, Sime W. Principles and practice of stress management [Internet]. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press; [cited 2021 May 18]. 497–518 p. Available from:
    1. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company; 1984. 460 p.
    1. Meichenbaum D, Cameron R. Stress inoculation training. In: Meichenbaum D, Jaremko ME, editors. Stress reduction and prevention [Internet]. Boston, MA: Springer US; 1989 [cited 2021 May 18]. p. 115–54. Available from: 10.1007/978-1-4899-0408-9_5, 1989
    1. Mohr DC, Spring B, Freedland KE, Beckner V, Arean P, Hollon SD, Ockene J, Kaplan R. The selection and design of control conditions for randomized controlled trials of psychological interventions. Psychother Psychosom. 2009;78(5):275–284. doi: 10.1159/000228248.
    1. Carlson LE, Thomas BC. Development of the Calgary Symptoms of Stress Inventory (C-SOSI) Int J Behav Med. 2007;14(4):249–256. doi: 10.1007/BF03003000.
    1. Tarvainen MP, Niskanen J-P, Lipponen JA, Ranta-Aho PO, Karjalainen PA. Kubios HRV--heart rate variability analysis software. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014;113(1):210–220. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.07.024.
    1. Tarvainen M, Lipponen J, Niskanen J, Ranta-aho P. Kubios HRV software users guide [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 May 18]. Available from:
    1. Penttilä J, Helminen A, Jartti T, Kuusela T, Huikuri HV, Tulppo MP, Coffeng R, Scheinin H. Time domain, geometrical and frequency domain analysis of cardiac vagal outflow: effects of various respiratory patterns. Clin Physiol. 2001;21(3):365–376. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2281.2001.00337.x.
    1. Refinetti R, Lissen GC, Halberg F. Procedures for numerical analysis of circadian rhythms. Biol Rhythm Res [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2021 May 18];38(4):275–325. Available from:
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer R, Williams J, Löwe B. The patient health questionnaire somatic, anxiety, and depressive symptom scales: a systematic review. 2010 [cited 2021 May 18];32(4):345–59. Available from:
    1. Spitzer R, Kroenke K, Williams J, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7 - PubMed. Archives of Internal Medicine [Internet]. [cited 2021 May 18];166(10):1092–7. Available from:
    1. Godin G. The Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire. Health Fit J Can [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2021 May 18];4(1):18–22. Available from:
    1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 1998.
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9. J Gen Intern Med [Internet]. 2001 Sep [cited 2021 May 18];16(9):606–13. Available from:
    1. Wu Y, Levis B, Riehm KE, Saadat N, Levis AW, Azar M, Rice DB, Boruff J, Cuijpers P, Gilbody S, Ioannidis JPA, Kloda LA, McMillan D, Patten SB, Shrier I, Ziegelstein RC, Akena DH, Arroll B, Ayalon L, Baradaran HR, Baron M, Bombardier CH, Butterworth P, Carter G, Chagas MH, Chan JCN, Cholera R, Conwell Y, de Man-van Ginkel JM, Fann JR, Fischer FH, Fung D, Gelaye B, Goodyear-Smith F, Greeno CG, Hall BJ, Harrison PA, Härter M, Hegerl U, Hides L, Hobfoll SE, Hudson M, Hyphantis T, Inagaki M, Jetté N, Khamseh ME, Kiely KM, Kwan Y, Lamers F, Liu SI, Lotrakul M, Loureiro SR, Löwe B, McGuire A, Mohd-Sidik S, Munhoz TN, Muramatsu K, Osório FL, Patel V, Pence BW, Persoons P, Picardi A, Reuter K, Rooney AG, Santos IS, Shaaban J, Sidebottom A, Simning A, Stafford L, Sung S, Tan PLL, Turner A, van Weert HC, White J, Whooley MA, Winkley K, Yamada M, Benedetti A, Thombs BD. Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2020;50(8):1368–1380. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719001314.
    1. Deterding N, Waters M. Flexible coding of in-depth interviews: a twenty-first-century approach. Sociological Methods & Research [Internet]. [cited 2021 May 18];50(2):708–39. Available from: 10.1177/0049124118799377
    1. Quintana DS, Alvares GA, Heathers JAJ. Guidelines for Reporting Articles on Psychiatry and Heart rate variability (GRAPH): recommendations to advance research communication. Transl Psychiatry. 2016;6:e803. doi: 10.1038/tp.2016.73.
    1. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc. 1995 [cited 2021 May 18];57(1):289–300. Available from: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x, 57, 1, 289, 300

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner