The effectiveness of nurse practitioners working at a GP cooperative: a study protocol

Nancy Wijers, Lisette Schoonhoven, Paul Giesen, Hubertus Vrijhoef, Regi van der Burgt, Joke Mintjes, Michel Wensing, Miranda Laurant, Nancy Wijers, Lisette Schoonhoven, Paul Giesen, Hubertus Vrijhoef, Regi van der Burgt, Joke Mintjes, Michel Wensing, Miranda Laurant

Abstract

Background: In many countries out-of-hours care faces serious challenges, including shortage of general practitioners, a high workload, reduced motivation to work out of hours, and increased demand for out-of-hours care. One response to these challenges is the introduction of nurse practitioner as doctor substitutes, in order to maintain the (high) accessibility and safety of out of hours care. Although nurse practitioners have proven to provide equally safe and efficient care during daytime primary care, it is unclear whether substitution is effective and efficient in the more complex out of hours primary care. This study aims to assess the effects of substitution of care from general practitioners to nurse practitioners in an out of hours primary care setting.

Design: A quasi experimental study is undertaken at one "general practitioner cooperative" to offer out-of-hours care for 304.000 people in the South East of the Netherlands. In the experimental condition patient care is provided by a team of one nurse practitioner and four general practitioners; where the nurse practitioner replaces one general practitioner during one day of the weekend from 10 am to 5 pm. In the control condition patient care is provided by a team of five general practitioners during the other day of the weekend, also from 10 am to 5 pm. The study period last 15 months, from April 2011 till July 2012.

Methods: Data will be collected on number of different outcomes using a range of methods. Our primary outcome is substitution of care. This is calculated using the number and characteristics of patients that have a consultation at the GP cooperative. We compare the number of patients seen by both professionals, type of complaints, resource utilization (e.g. prescription, tests, investigations, referrals) and waiting times in the experimental condition and control condition. This data is derived from patient electronic medical records. Secondary outcomes are: patient satisfaction; general practitioners workload; quality and safety of care and barriers and facilitators.

Discussion: The study will provide evidence whether substitution of care in out-of-hours setting is safe and efficient and give insight into barriers and facilitators related to the introduction of nurse practitioners in out-of-hours setting.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01388374.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient flow for telephonic triage.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient flow for self referred patients.

References

    1. van Uden CJ, Giesen PH, Metsemakers JF, Grol RP. Development of out-of-hours primary care by general practitioners (GPs) in The Netherlands: from small-call rotations to large-scale GP cooperatives. Fam Med. 2006;38(8):565–569.
    1. Huibers L, Giesen P, Wensing M, Grol R. Out-of-hours care in western countries: assessment of different organizational models. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:105. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-105.
    1. Grol R, Giesen P, van Uden C. After-hours care in the United Kingdom, Denmark, and the Netherlands: new models. Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25(6):1733–1737. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.6.1733.
    1. Giesen P, Smits M, Huibers L, Grol R, Wensing M. Quality of after-hours primary care in the Netherlands: a narrative review. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(2):108–113.
    1. van Steenwijk P, van der Sterren E, van Vugt C. Samenwerking huisartsenposten en spoedeisende hulp (SEH): Inventarisatie van huidige situatie. Vereniging Huisartsenposten Nederland & IQ healthcare. 2010.
    1. Leibowitz R, Day S, Dunt D. A systematic review of the effect of different models of after-hours primary medical care services on clinical outcome, medical workload, and patient and GP satisfaction. Fam Pract. 2003;20(3):311–317. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmg313.
    1. Giesen P, Mokkink H, Ophey G, Drijver R, Grol R, van den Bosch W. Hoe urgent is de gepresenteerde morbiditeit op de Centrale Huisartsenpost? Huisarts Wetenschap. 2005;48(5):207–210.
    1. Giesen P, Huibers L, Krol M. Patiënten contacten op de huisartsenpost: trends 2004–2010. Huisarts Wetenschap. 2011;54(1):1–5. doi: 10.1007/s12445-011-0001-7.
    1. IGZ. Accident & emergency care: room for improvements. The Hague. 2004. pp. 1–57.
    1. van Uden CJ, Winkens RA, Wesseling GJ, Crebolder HF, van Schayck CP. Use of out of hours services: a comparison between two organisations. Emerg Med J. 2003;20(2):184–187. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.2.184.
    1. Giesen P, Franssen E, Mokkink H, van den Bosch W, van Vugt A, Grol R. Patients either contacting a general practice cooperative or accident and emergency department out of hours: a comparison. Emerg Med J. 2006;23(9):731–734. doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.032359.
    1. Moll van Charante EP, van Steenwijk-Opdam PC, Bindels PJ. Out-of-hours demand for GP care and emergency services: patients' choices and referrals by general practitioners and ambulance services. BMC Fam Pract. 2007;8:46. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-46.
    1. van Uden CJ, Winkens RA, Wesseling G, Fiolet HF, van Schayck OC, Crebolder HF. The impact of a primary care physician cooperative on the caseload of an emergency department: the Maastricht integrated out-of-hours service. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(7):612–617. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0091.x.
    1. Giesbers S, Smits M, Giesen P. Zelfverwijzers SEH jagen zorgkosten op. Medisch Contact. 2011;66(10):587–589.
    1. Dierick-van Daele AT, Metsemakers JF, Derckx EW, Spreeuwenberg C, Vrijhoef HJ. Nurse practitioners substituting for general practitioners: randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(2):391–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04888.x.
    1. Laurant M, Reeves D, Hermens R, Braspenning J, Grol R, Sibbald B. Substitution of doctors by nurses in primary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;4
    1. NHG/LHV: NHG/LHV-Standpunt. Het (ondersteunend) team in de huisartsenvoorziening. 2011.
    1. Giesen P, Braspenning J. Huisartsenpost: gewone klachten met acuut karakter. Huisarts Wetenschap. 2004;47(4):177.
    1. Giesen P, Hammink A, Mulders A, Oude Bos A. Te snel naar de huisartsenpost. Medisch Contact. 2009;64(6):239–249.
    1. van Ierland Y, van Veen M, Huibers L, Giesen P, Moll HA. Validity of telephone and physical triage in emergency care: the Netherlands Triage System. Fam Pract. 2011;28(3):334–341. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmq097.
    1. den Boer-Wolters D, Knol MJ, Smulders K, de Wit NJ. Frequent attendance of primary care out-of-hours services in the Netherlands: characteristics of patients and presented morbidity. Fam Pract. 2010;27(2):129–134. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmp103.
    1. Huibers L, Keizer E, Giesen P, Grol R, Wensing M. Nurse telephone triage: good quality associated with appropriate decisions. Family Practice. 2012;0:1–6.
    1. Toemen T. Master of ANP-Huisartsenzorg 2004–2006: overzicht inhoud en ICPC-codes modules patiëntenzorg huisartsgeneeskunde. Stichting KOH Fontys Hogescholen, Eindhoven; 2006.
    1. Ram P, Grol R, Rethans JJ, Schouten B, van der Vleuten C, Kester A. Assessment of general practitioners by video observation of communicative and medical performance in daily practice: issues of validity, reliability and feasibility. Med Educ. 1999;33(6):447–454. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00348.x.
    1. van Thiel J, Ram P, van Dalen J. Maas-Global Manual 2000. Maastricht University, In. Maastricht; 2003.
    1. Reinders ME, Blankenstein AH, van Marwijk HW, Knol DL, Ram P, van der Horst HE, de Vet HC, van der Vleuten CP. Reliability of consultation skills assessments using standardised versus real patients. Med Educ. 2011;45(6):578–584. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03917.x.
    1. Hammink A, Giesen P. CQ-index huisartsenposten. Meetinstrumentontwikkeling en onderzoek naar discriminerend vermogen. Scientific Institute of Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare) 2010. p. 79.
    1. EuroQolGroup. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Pol. 1990;16(3):199–208.
    1. Giesen P, Huibers AMJ, Wensing MJP. Kwaliteitsmeetsysteem Huisartsenposten; Rapport over ontstaan, uitkomsten en toekomst. UMC St Radboud, IQ healthcare, Nijmegen; 2008.
    1. Huisartsopleiding Nederland. .
    1. Hakkaaer-van Roijen L, Tan S, Bouwmans CAM. Handleiding voor Kostenonderzoek. Methoden en standaard kostprijzen voor economische evaluaties in de gezondheidszorg. Health care Insurance Council, Rotterdam; 2010.
    1. Dierick-van Daele AT. The Introduction of the Nurse Practitioner in General Practice. University of Maastricht, Maastricht; 2010.
    1. Boeije H. A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Qual Quant. 2002;36(4):391–409. doi: 10.1023/A:1020909529486.
    1. Hansen EH, Hunskaar S. Telephone triage by nurses in primary care out-of-hours services in Norway: an evaluation study based on written case scenarios. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(5):390–396. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.040824.
    1. Lattimer V, Sassi F, George S, Moore M, Turnbull J, Mullee M, Smith H. Cost analysis of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care: evidence from a randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2000;320(7241):1053–1057. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7241.1053.
    1. Ezra DG, Mellington F, Cugnoni H, Westcott M. Reliability of ophthalmic accident and emergency referrals: a new role for the emergency nurse practitioner? Emerg Med J. 2005;22(10):696–699. doi: 10.1136/emj.2004.018010.
    1. Henderson NC, Cookson DT, Plumley R, Cairns M, Paterson-Brown S. The influence of a nurse practitioner on out of hours work intensity for surgical house officers. Scott Med J. 1999;44(2):52–53.
    1. Mason S, O'Keeffe C, Coleman P, Edlin R, Nicholl J. Effectiveness of emergency care practitioners working within existing emergency service models of care. Emerg Med J. 2007;24(4):239–243. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.035782.
    1. O'Hara R, O'Keeffe C, Mason S, Coster JE, Hutchinson A. Quality and safety of care provided by emergency care practitioners. Emerg Med J. 2012;29(4):327–332. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.104190.
    1. Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, Allen E, Stephenson J. Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ. 2006;332(7538):413–416. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413.
    1. Dierick-van Daele AT, Metsemakers JF, Derckx EW, Spreeuwenberg C, Vrijhoef HJ. Nurse Practitioner in de huisartsenpraktijk: Onderzoeksrapport. Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht; 2008.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner