The (Cost-)Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners Working at the Primary Out of Hours Emergency Service

April 21, 2015 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

A Study on the (Cost-)Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners Working at the Primary Out of Hours Emergency Service and the Feasibility of Implementing These Nurses

The aim of this study is to explore whether the implementation of Nurse Practitioners can lead to a more accessible and efficient patient care at the primary out of hours service.

The primary objectives of the proposed study are:

  1. What are the effects of the implementation of NPs on the primary out of hours service in comparison with the current out of hours service? Effects in terms of accessibility, objective and subjective workload of general practitioners, quality of care and patient satisfaction.
  2. How efficient is the implementation of NPs in the primary out of hours services?
  3. What is the feasibility of the implementation of NPs in the out of hours services? And under which conditions?
  4. What are the barriers and facilitating factors considering the implementation of NPs?

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The emergency care and primary out of hours care in the Netherlands is under pressure. There is a rising demand from patients for acute care at the primary out of hours service (run by General Practitioners) as well as for the emergency departments (EDs) at the hospitals. The workload for healthcare professionals in these acute care setting is high. Without changes in the organization of primary out of hours care and emergency care, the quality, accessibility and efficiency of the acute care can't be guaranteed in the future.

The substitution of care from General Practitioners (GPs) to Nurse Practitioners (NPs) is seen as one possible solution to decrease the GPs' workload and improve accessibility and efficiency of care without reducing the quality of care.

It turned out that about 80% of the acute complaints is U3 and U4 (low complex and not urgent) and does not necessarily to be seen by a physician.

Based on previous research we expect that the NPs are competent to diagnose and treat almost all low complex and not urgent complaints. During surgery hours (day time) the NPs act in about 90% of the consultations independently.

Hypothetical substitution of care should contribute to enhancing quality, improving accessibility and reducing the workload of doctors. It can also benefit the efficiency of the acute (primary out of hours) care.

However, specific scientific evidence for this is lacking.

In this study we examine whether substitution of care from GPs to NPs in a primary out of hours care setting can contribute to a more accessible and efficient patient care. Also the feasibility of implementing NPs in a primary our of hours setting is examined.

Comparison: Care provided by the Nurse Practitioner will be compared to care provided by a General Practitioner.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12092

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Noord-Brabant
      • Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands, 5623 EJ
        • Centrale Huisartsen Post (CHP)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients (with urgency U2, U3, or U4) requesting an appointment at the primary out of hours emergency service during the weekend between 10.00 and 17.00 hours.

Exclusion Criteria (patients seen by a NP):

  • Patients under the age of 1 year
  • Patients with psychiatric complaints
  • Patients with abdominal pain, abdominal infections, chest pain or neck complaints (angina pectoris), headache and dizziness.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
NO_INTERVENTION: General Practitioners Care
Usual medical care provided by a general practitioner at the Primary Out of Hours Emergency Service.
EXPERIMENTAL: Nurse Practitioners Care
Medical care provided by the Nurse Practitioner at the Primary Out of Hours Emergency Service.
Patients will receive care at the Primary Out of Hours Emergency Service by a Nurse Practitioner instead of a General Practitioner (substitution of care from physicians to nurses).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accessibility of care
Time Frame: 15 months
Number of patients that have a consult at the Primary Out of Hours Emergency Service; Waiting time; Productivity by NPs in comparison with productivity by GPs.
15 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality and safety of care
Time Frame: 15 months

Quality and safety of care will be measured by video/audio recording. In total, 60 consultations/visits will be recorded. 30 of the General Practitioner and 30 of the Nurse Practitioner. The care between these two disciplines will be compared according to the practice guidelines for General Practitioners (list of indicators).

Furthermore, we report the amount of adverse events and complications. Also complaints by the patients will be recorded.

15 months
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 15 months
Patient satisfaction will be measured by a questionnaire (CQ-index). At baseline and three times during the intervention period questionnaires will be sent to patients who had a consult at the Primary Out of Hours Emergency Service.
15 months
Feasibility
Time Frame: 15 months
Barriers and facilitators will be explored. We collect this information through semi-structured interviews with GPs, practice assistants, NPs and physicians working at the Primary Out of Hours Emergency Service.
15 months
Efficiency of care
Time Frame: 15 months

To measure the efficiency of healthcare, we will measure type of consultation; duration of the consult; type of care provider; number of patients; number of prescriptions; number of test & investigations ordered, referral to other healthcare providers and the emergency department.

These data will be derived from the electronic medical records and patient questionnaires.

15 months
Workload
Time Frame: 15 months

Objective workload will be measured by the numbers of consults, taking into account the urgency levels of the complaints. This data will be derived from the electronic medical records

Subjective workload will be measured by a questionnaire. General practitioners as well as the practice assistants at the Primary Out of Hours Emergency Service receive a questionnaire before and after the intervention period to measure satisfaction with care and workload issues

15 months
Knowledge/competence of the NPs
Time Frame: 15 months
After 9 months, we will measure the knowledge of NPs with regard to a number of frequently presented complaints. We will use a 'knowledge test' used to examine the knowledge of GP trainees. Besides NPs also a random selection of GPs (with similar experience of practice) will be invited to fill in the knowledge test.
15 months
Cost-analysis
Time Frame: 15 months

All costs related to care provided by NPs and GPs will be calculated, including number of consultations, resource use, referrals, etc. We will also include the costs for training of GPs and NPs.

The EQ-D5 will be used as standardized measure for health status of the patient.

15 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: M.G.H. Laurant, Dr., IQ healthcare, UMC St Radboud

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 6, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 22, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2015

Last Verified

April 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary Health Care

Clinical Trials on Other, care provided by Nurse Practitioners

Subscribe