Evaluating community-based participatory research to improve community-partnered science and community health

Abstract

Background: Since 2007, the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) Policy Research Center (PRC) has partnered with the Universities of New Mexico and Washington to study the science of community-based participatory research (CBPR). Our goal is to identify facilitators and barriers to effective community-academic partnerships in American Indian and other communities, which face health disparities.

Objectives: We have described herein the scientific design of our National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded study (2009-2013) and lessons learned by having a strong community partner leading the research efforts.

Methods: The research team is implementing a mixed-methods study involving a survey of principal investigators (PIs) and partners across the nation and in-depth case studies of CBPR projects.

Results: We present preliminary findings on methods and measures for community-engaged research and eight lessons learned thus far regarding partnership evaluation, advisory councils, historical trust, research capacity development of community partner, advocacy, honoring each other, messaging, and funding.

Conclusions: Study methodologies and lessons learned can help community-academic research partnerships translate research in communities.

Figures

Figure 1. CBPR Conceptual Logic Model

Adapted from: Wallerstein, Oetzel, Duran, Tafoya, Belone, & Rae, “What Predicts Outcomes In CBPR,” in CBPR for health from process to outcomes, Minkler & Wallerstein (eds.). San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass, 2008; and Wallerstein & Duran, CBPR contributions to intervention research: The intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am J Public Health; S1, 2010:100;S40-S46.