Multicentre, randomised clinical trial comparing intravitreal aflibercept monotherapy versus aflibercept combined with reduced-fluence photodynamic therapy (RF-PDT) for the treatment of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

Chinmayi Himanshuroy Vyas, Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung, Colin Tan, Caroline Chee, Kelly Wong, Janice Marie N Jordan-Yu, Tien Yin Wong, Anna Tan, Beau Fenner, Shaun Sim, Kelvin Yi Chong Teo, Chinmayi Himanshuroy Vyas, Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung, Colin Tan, Caroline Chee, Kelly Wong, Janice Marie N Jordan-Yu, Tien Yin Wong, Anna Tan, Beau Fenner, Shaun Sim, Kelvin Yi Chong Teo

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) monotherapy versus aflibercept combined with reduced-fluence photodynamic therapy (RF-PDT) (IVA+RF-PDT) for the treatment of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV).

Methods and analysis: Multicentred, double-masked, randomised controlled trial to compare the two treatment modalities. The primary outcome of the study is to compare the 52-week visual outcome of IVA versus IVA+RF PDT. One hundred and sixty treatment-naïve patients with macular PCV confirmed on indocyanine green angiography will be recruited from three centres in Singapore. Eligible patients will be randomised (1:1 ratio) into one of the following groups: IVA monotherapy group-aflibercept monotherapy with sham photodynamic therapy (n=80); combination group-aflibercept with RF-PDT (n=80). Following baseline visit, all patients will be monitored at 4 weekly intervals during which disease activity will be assessed based on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ophthalmic examination findings, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and angiography where indicated. Eyes that meet protocol-specified retreatment criteria will receive IVA and sham/RF-PDT according to their randomisation group. Primary endpoint will be assessed as change in BCVA at week 52 from baseline. Secondary endpoints will include anatomical changes based on OCT and dye angiography as well as safety assessment. Additionally, we will be collecting optical coherence tomography angiography data prospectively for exploratory analysis.

Ethics and dissemination: This study will be conducted in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki and that are consistent with the ICH E6 guidelines of Good Clinical Practice and the applicable regulatory requirements. Approval from the SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board has been sought prior to commencement of the study.

Trial registration number: NCT03941587.

Keywords: clinical trials; medical ophthalmology; medical retina.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Randomisation of the patients in the monotherapy or combination therapy groups. Once enrolled, study participants will be randomised to two treatment groups using a ratio of 1:1: (1) combination group: aflibercept combined with RF-PDT, IVA; (2) monotherapy group: aflibercept monotherapy with sham RF-PDT. ICGA, indocyanine green angiography; IVA, intravitreal aflibercept; PCV, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy; RF-PDT, reduced-fluence photodynamic therapy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Visit schedules for each randomisation group. RF-PDT/Sham PDT will be administered PRN as per protocol-specific retreatment criteria based on the presence of active polyps on ICGA. Minimum interval between two PDT treatment will be at least 12 weeks. Aflibercept administered PRN as per protocol-specific retreatment criteria. The minimum interval between two aflibercept treatments will be at least 28 days. BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; ICGA, indocyanine green angiography; OCT, optical coherence tomography; PDT, photodynamic therapy; PRN, pro re nata; RF-PDT, reduced-fluence photodynamic therapy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Retreatment criteria after baseline treatment. At each study visit, disease activity will be assessed by a masked investigator. Presence or worsening of the disease activity is considered if one or more of the following criteria are present: (1) loss of BCVA≥5 letters from best achieved BCVA since baseline, (2) presence of any amount of intraretinal fluid or any subretinal fluid, and (3) presence of new retinal haemorrhage. Depending on the duration since last the RF-PDT treatment, the patient will be treated either with monotherapy aflibercept (12 weeks since the last RF-PDT). if angiographic analysis suggests polypoidal lesion involving macula with GLD

References

    1. Yannuzzi LA, Wong DW, Sforzolini BS, et al. . Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy and neovascularized age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:1503–10. 10.1001/archopht.117.11.1503
    1. Lafaut BA, Leys AM, Snyers B, et al. . Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy in Caucasians. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000;238:752–9. 10.1007/s004170000180
    1. Wong CW, Yanagi Y, Lee W-K, et al. . Age-related macular degeneration and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy in Asians. Prog Retin Eye Res 2016;53:107–39. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2016.04.002
    1. Balaratnasingam C, Lee W-K, Koizumi H, et al. . Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: a distinct disease or manifestation of many? Retina 2016;36:1–8. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000774
    1. Cheung CMG, Lai TYY, Ruamviboonsuk P, et al. . Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: definition, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Ophthalmology 2018;125:708–24. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.11.019
    1. Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, et al. . Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1419–31. 10.1056/NEJMoa054481
    1. Brown DM, Kaiser PK, Michels M, et al. . Ranibizumab versus verteporfin for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1432–44. 10.1056/NEJMoa062655
    1. Heier JS, Brown DM, Chong V, et al. . Intravitreal aflibercept (VEGF trap-eye) in wet age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2012;119:2537–48. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.006
    1. CATT Research Group, Martin DF, Maguire MG, et al. . Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1897–908. 10.1056/NEJMoa1102673
    1. Lee WK, Kim KS, Kim W, et al. . Responses to photodynamic therapy in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy consisting of polyps resembling grape clusters. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;154:355–65. 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.02.019
    1. Yang S, Zhao J, Sun X. Resistance to anti-VEGF therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a comprehensive review. Drug Des Devel Ther 2016;10:1857–67. 10.2147/DDDT.S97653
    1. Wong CW, Wong TY, Cheung CMG. Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy in Asians. J Clin Med 2015;4:782–821. 10.3390/jcm4050782
    1. Kokame GT, deCarlo TE, Kaneko KN, et al. . Anti-Vascular endothelial growth factor resistance in exudative macular degeneration and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Ophthalmol Retina 2019;3:744–52. 10.1016/j.oret.2019.04.018
    1. Koh A, Lai TYY, Takahashi K, et al. . Efficacy and safety of ranibizumab with or without verteporfin photodynamic therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol 2017;135:1206–13. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.4030
    1. Lim TH, Lai TYY, Takahashi K, et al. . Comparison of ranibizumab with or without verteporfin photodynamic therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: the Everest II randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol 2020;138:935–42. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.2443
    1. Lee WK, Iida T, Ogura Y, et al. . Efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy in the planet study: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol 2018;136:786–93. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.1804
    1. Wong TY, Ogura Y, Lee WK, et al. . Efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: two-year results of the aflibercept in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy study. Am J Ophthalmol 2019;204:80–9. 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.02.027
    1. Cho JH, Ryoo N-K, Cho KH, et al. . Incidence rate of massive submacular hemorrhage and its risk factors in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2016;169:79–88. 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.06.014
    1. Yamashita A, Shiraga F, Shiragami C, et al. . One-year results of reduced-fluence photodynamic therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;149:465–71. 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.09.020
    1. Yamashita A, Shiraga F, Shiragami C, et al. . Two-year results of reduced-fluence photodynamic therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;155:96–102. 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.06.027
    1. Jirarattanasopa P, Ooto S, Tsujikawa A, et al. . Assessment of macular choroidal thickness by optical coherence tomography and angiographic changes in central serous chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmology 2012;119:1666–78. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.021
    1. Koizumi H, Yamagishi T, Yamazaki T, et al. . Relationship between clinical characteristics of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy and choroidal vascular hyperpermeability. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;155:305–13. 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.07.018
    1. Wei X, Ting DSW, Ng WY, et al. . Choroidal vascularity index: a novel optical coherence tomography based parameter in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2017;37:1120–5. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001312
    1. Cho JH, Park YJ, Cho SC, et al. . Posttreatment polyp regression and risk of massive submacular hemorrhage in eyes with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Retina 2020;40:468–76. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002384
    1. Nowak-Sliwinska P, van den Bergh H, Sickenberg M, et al. . Photodynamic therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Prog Retin Eye Res 2013;37:182–99. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.09.003
    1. Kang HM, Kim YM, Koh HJ. Five-year follow-up results of photodynamic therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;155:438–47. 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.09.020
    1. Schmidt-Erfurth U, Laqua H, Schlötzer-Schrehard U, et al. . Histopathological changes following photodynamic therapy in human eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:835–44.
    1. Recchia FM, Greenbaum S, Recchia CAC, et al. . Self-reported acute decrease in visual acuity after photodynamic therapy for age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2006;26:1042–8. 10.1097/01.iae.0000254894.94013.d8
    1. Wong CW, Cheung CMG, Mathur R, et al. . Three-Year results of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy treated with photodynamic therapy: retrospective study and systematic review. Retina 2015;35:1577–93. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000499
    1. Ngo WK, Chee WK, Tan CS, et al. . Comparing efficacy of reduced-fluence and standard-fluence photodynamic therapy in the treatment of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. BMC Ophthalmol 2020;20:150. 10.1186/s12886-020-01419-8
    1. Marques JP, Farinha C, Costa Miguel Ângelo, et al. . Protocol for a randomised, double-masked, sham-controlled phase 4 study on the efficacy, safety and tolerability of intravitreal aflibercept monotherapy compared with aflibercept with adjunctive photodynamic therapy in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: the Atlantic study. BMJ Open 2017;7:e015785. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015785
    1. Cho HJ, Kim HS, Jang YS, et al. . Effects of choroidal vascular hyperpermeability on anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;156:1192–200. 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.07.001
    1. Yanagi Y, Ting DSW, Ng WY, et al. . Choroidal vascular hyperpermeability as a predictor of treatment response for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Retina 2018;38:1509–17. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001758
    1. Cheung CMG, Tan CS, Patalauskaite R, et al. . Ranibizumab with or without verteporfin photodynamic therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: predictors of visual and anatomical response in the Everest II study. Retina 2021;41:387–92. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002902
    1. Cheung CMG, Lai TYY, Teo K, et al. . Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: consensus Nomenclature and Non-Indocyanine green angiograph diagnostic criteria from the Asia-Pacific ocular imaging Society PCV Workgroup. Ophthalmology 2021;128:443–52. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.08.006
    1. Teo KYC, Cheung GCM. New concepts in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy imaging: a focus on optical coherence tomography and optical coherence tomography angiography. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol 2019. 10.22608/APO.201909. [Epub ahead of print: 27 Mar 2019].
    1. Kim H, Lee SC, Kwon KY, et al. . Subfoveal choroidal thickness as a predictor of treatment response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2016;254:1497–503. 10.1007/s00417-015-3221-x
    1. Sonoda S, Sakamoto T, Otsuka H, et al. . Responsiveness of eyes with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy with choroidal hyperpermeability to intravitreal ranibizumab. BMC Ophthalmol 2013;13:43. 10.1186/1471-2415-13-43
    1. Kim S-W, Oh J, Kwon S-S, et al. . Comparison of choroidal thickness among patients with healthy eyes, early age-related maculopathy, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, central serous chorioretinopathy, and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Retina 2011;31:1904–11. 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31821801c5
    1. Koizumi H, Yamagishi T, Yamazaki T, et al. . Subfoveal choroidal thickness in typical age-related macular degeneration and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011;249:1123–8. 10.1007/s00417-011-1620-1
    1. Lee WK, Baek J, Dansingani KK, et al. . Choroidal morphology in eyes with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy and normal or subnormal subfoveal choroidal thickness. Retina 2016;36 Suppl 1:S73–82. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001346
    1. Cheung CMG, Yanagi Y, Mohla A, et al. . Characterization and differentiation of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy using swept source optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina 2017;37:1464–74. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001391
    1. Teo KYC, Yanagi Y, Lee SY, et al. . Comparison of optical coherence tomography angiographic changes after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy alone or in combination with photodynamic therapy in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Retina 2018;38:1675–87. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001776
    1. Tomiyasu T, Nozaki M, Yoshida M, et al. . Characteristics of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy evaluated by optical coherence tomography angiography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016;57:OCT324–30. 10.1167/iovs.15-18898
    1. Kim JY, Kwon OW, Oh HS, et al. . Optical coherence tomography angiography in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2016;254:1505–10. 10.1007/s00417-015-3228-3
    1. Mendonça LSM, Perrott-Reynolds R, Schwartz R, et al. . Deliberations of an international panel of experts on OCT angiography Nomenclature of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2021;128:1109–12. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.12.022

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner