Comparing Intravitreal Aflibercept Monotherapy vs Aflibercept Combined With Reduced Fluence PDT in PCV Treatment

April 16, 2024 updated by: Gemmy Cheung Chui Ming, Singapore National Eye Centre

A Multi-center Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Intravitreal Aflibercept Monotherapy vs Aflibercept Combined With Reduced Fluence PDT for the Treatment of Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

In this study, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an individualized dosing schedule comprising Aflibercept and RF-PDT in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). The primary objective is to compare the polyp closure rate at week 12 between the 2 treatment groups. The secondary aims include comparing visual, anatomical, treatment burden and clinical biomarkers between each treatment group.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Age related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide. In its exudative or wet form, choroidal neovascularization (CNV) causes an exudative maculopathy resulting in sudden loss of vision with severe effects on patients' quality of life. Intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents (anti-VEGF) have become the mainstay of treatment for AMD CNV and has been shown to have favorable outcomes in most AMD CNV subtypes. In the Asian population, however, a particular subtype called polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), which affects about 50% of exudative maculopathy, has been shown to have less favorable response to anti-VEGF therapy.

The best treatment option for PCV has remained unclear. Current best evidence is from 2 recent randomized controlled trials, the EVEREST II trial which compares the efficacy of ranibizumab with or without photodynamic therapy (PDT) for treatment of PCV and the PLANET trial which compares Aflibercept monotherapy against a rescue PDT when Aflibercept is deemed ineffective. Both trials have reported significant improvement in visual outcomes, however there remain significant unanswered questions and unmet needs regarding the use of Aflibercept and PDT as the best treatment for PCV.

In this study, we aim to compare the efficacy of combination Aflibercept with RF-PDT (at baseline) and Aflibercept monotherapy. This particular strategy has not been studies before and represents the amalgamation of unanswered questions from the best evidence to date for the treatment of PCV.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Kelvin Teo Yi Chong

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore
        • National University Hospital
      • Singapore, Singapore, 168751
        • Singapore National Eye Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

48 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged over 50 years old at the time of informed consent.
  • Provide written informed consent.
  • Willingness and ability to comply with all scheduled visits and study procedures.
  • Confirmed diagnosis of symptomatic macular PCV based ICGA.
  • Activity of PCV confirmed by exudative activity involving the macula on OCT or Fluorescein Angiography (FA) or both.

    • Presence of intra retinal or subretinal fluid/blood as seen on OCT
    • Treatment naïve

      • NO previous treatment with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents, regardless of the indication
      • NO previous thermal laser in the macular region, or verteporfin photodynamic therapy (vPDT), regardless of indication
      • NO other previous treatment for neovascular AMD (nAMD), except oral supplements and traditional Chinese medicine
  • An ETDRS BCVA of at least 4 letters (Snellen equivalent approximately 20/800 or better) in the study eye.
  • Greatest Linear Dimension (GLD) of the total lesion area (BVN + polyps) <5400µm (~9 mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) Disc Areas) as delineated by ICGA.

Exclusion Criteria: - Participant

  • Medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g. unstable medical status including blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and glycemic control).
  • Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days of enrollment which involves treatment with unapproved investigational drug.
  • Known allergy to any component of the study drug.
  • Blood pressure> 180/110 (systolic above 180 OR diastolic above 110 on repeated measurements). If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, individual can become eligible.
  • Myocardial infarction, other acute cardiac event requiring hospitalization, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or treatment for acute congestive heart failure within 4 months prior to randomization.
  • Systemic anti-VEGF or pro-VEGF treatment within four months prior to randomization or anticipated use during the study.
  • Amblyopia or blind in one eye Study Eye
  • Eye with intra retinal or sub-retinal fluid due to other causes than PCV
  • An ocular condition is present (other than PCV) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect intra or sub retinal fluid or alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., Diabetic Macular Edema (DME), vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, etc.)
  • Substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by more than three lines (i.e., cataract would be reducing acuity to worse than 20/40 if eye was otherwise normal).
  • Any intraocular surgery within 1 month of enrollment
  • Treatment with intra vitreal corticosteroids
  • History of retinal detachment or surgery for retinal detachment
  • History of vitrectomy
  • History of macular hole
  • Evidence of vitreomacular traction that may preclude resolution of macular edema > 4 disc areas of intra/sub retinal hemorrhage
  • Aphakia
  • Exam evidence of external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or significant blepharitis

Other Eye

  • Active intraocular inflammation
  • History of uveitis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Aflibercept + RF-PDT

Patients with symptomatic macular PCV (n=80) as confirmed by Indocyanine green Angiography(ICGA) will be treated with Aflibercept (dosage=2mg/0.05ml) through an intravitreal injection + RF-PDT ( 6mg/m2 intravenous infusion of Verteporfin followed by laser light at a dose rate of 25 Joules/cm2) at baseline.

Aflibercept- 1st treatment (baseline) followed by minimum retreatment interval of 4 weeks (from Baseline to week 8) and then retreatment at intervals of 4 weeks pro re nata (PRN) retreatment( week 12-48). Primary endpoint at week 52.

RF-PDT treatment at baseline followed by pro re nata (PRN) at 12 week intervals.

At each visit, subjects will be assessed based on BCVA, ophthalmic examination and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

Aflibercept dosage of 2mg in 0.05ml along with intravenous infusion of Verteporfin (6mg/m2)followed by laser light at a dosage of 25Joule/cm2
Other Names:
  • Eylea
  • Visudyne
Active Comparator: Aflibercept + sham RF-PDT

Patients with symptomatic macular PCV (n=80) as confirmed by Indocyanine green Angiography(ICGA) will be treated with Aflibercept (dosage=2mg/0.05ml) through an intravitreal injection, at baseline. A minimum of 1 injection(baseline) followed by minimum pro re nata (PRN) retreatment interval of 4 weeks ( from baseline to week 8) and then a minimum of 4 weeks retreatment thereafter (week 12-48). Primary endpoint at week 52.

Sham RF-PDT treatment at baseline followed by pro re nata (PRN) at 12 week intervals.

At each visit, subjects will be assessed based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), ophthalmic examination and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

Aflibercept dosage of 2mg in 0.05ml along with sham photodynamic therapy
Other Names:
  • Eylea

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Polyp Closure rate
Time Frame: 12 weeks
polyp closure rate at week 12 between the 2 treatment groups.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Optical Coherence Tomography
Time Frame: 12 months
For evidence of intraretinal or subretinal fluid, ill-defined hyper-reflective material and/or new hemorrhage
12 months
Optical Coherence Tomography-Angiograph
Time Frame: 12 months
For evidence of intraretinal or subretinal fluid, ill-defined hyper-reflective material and/or new hemorrhage
12 months
Color Fundus photography
Time Frame: baseline, month 3, month12
inspect anomalies associated to diseases that affect the eye, and to monitor their progression
baseline, month 3, month12
Autofluorescence Photography
Time Frame: baseline, month 3, month12
Retinal imaging
baseline, month 3, month12
Fundus Fluorescein Angiography
Time Frame: Baseline, month 3, month 12
Retinal circulation
Baseline, month 3, month 12
Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months
Fluid Pressure in eye
Baseline, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gemmy Cheung Chui Ming, Singapore National Eye Centre

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

Clinical Trials on Aflibercept + reduced fluence photodynamic therapy (RF-PDT)

3
Subscribe