- ICH GCP
- Registro degli studi clinici negli Stati Uniti
- Sperimentazione clinica NCT07630688
Validation and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic (MoCA-B) in Individuals With Low Educational Level (MoCA-B Turkish)
Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of the MoCA-B Test
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Descrizione dettagliata
The prevalence of dementia is steadily increasing, and recognizing cognitive impairment at an early stage-especially during mild cognitive impairment (MCI), before full diagnostic criteria for dementia are met-is crucial. Cognitive screening tools used in individuals with low educational levels often fail to detect MCI. The illiterate version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is insufficient for identifying MCI and early dementia, resulting in delayed diagnosis. The MoCA-Basic (MoCA-B), adapted for low-educated populations and translated into Turkish, has not undergone a validation and reliability study; therefore, it is not routinely used in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish MoCA- B in detecting MCI and dementia, and to compare its diagnostic performance with the MMSE and the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR).
This study included 55 patients with MCI, 56 with dementia, and 55 healthy controls (total n=166) who presented to the Dementia and Neurology Clinics of Antalya Training and Research Hospital between January 2024 and November 2025. After a detailed mental status examination, participants underwent MoCA-B, MMSE (illiterate version), and CDR assessments. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha, and test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Group differences were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc testing. Correlations between MoCA-B, MMSE, and CDR were evaluated with Pearson correlation. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed through ROC analyses, and optimal cut- off values were determined using the Youden index.
Tipo di studio
Iscrizione (Effettivo)
Contatti e Sedi
Luoghi di studio
-
-
Muratpaşa
-
Antalya, Muratpaşa, Turchia (Türkiye), 07030
- Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Neurology Department, University of Health Sciences (SBÜ), Türkiye
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
- Adulto
- Adulto più anziano
Accetta volontari sani
Metodo di campionamento
Popolazione di studio
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 50-100 years
- Presented with memory complaints and were evaluated in the Neurology/Dementia outpatient clinics of Antalya Training and Research Hospital (Jan 2024-Nov 2025)
- Low educational attainment (illiterate to primary school level)
- Provided informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Active psychiatric disorders / active psychopathology
- Intracranial mass lesions
- Secondary causes of dementia
- Severe medical conditions affecting cognition
- History of traumatic brain injury
Piano di studio
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
Coorti e interventi
Gruppo / Coorte |
|---|
|
Controllo
Controlli sani
|
|
Dementia
Patients who had dementia
|
|
MCI
Patients who had mild cognitive impairment
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
MoCA-B cut off points
Lasso di tempo: at baseline and after 4 weeks (test-retest)
|
Calculating cutoff values for dementia and MCI in untrained individuals using the MoCA-B test.
|
at baseline and after 4 weeks (test-retest)
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Correlations of MoCA-B total score with MMSE and CDR
Lasso di tempo: data were collected between January 2024 and November 2025.
|
As a secondary endpoint, Pearson correlation (level of relationship) of the MoCA-B total score with MMSE and/or CDR total scores was evaluated to demonstrate concurrent criterion validity.
|
data were collected between January 2024 and November 2025.
|
|
Subdomain-level analyses
Lasso di tempo: Data were collected between January 2024 and November 2025
|
The subdomain-level analyses for the MoCA-B test aimed to determine which domains best facilitated diagnostic differentiation by evaluating, using ANOVA and post-hoc tests, whether subtest scores such as executive function, memory, and attention differed significantly between control, HKB, and dementia groups.
|
Data were collected between January 2024 and November 2025
|
Altre misure di risultato
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Educational/demographic factors in the use of MoCA-B testing.
Lasso di tempo: Data were collected between January 2024 and November 2025
|
The aim of this study was to examine whether the MoCA-B total score and its subgroups are affected not only by disease status but also by characteristics such as years of education, age, gender, marital status, additional illnesses, and family history.
|
Data were collected between January 2024 and November 2025
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Investigatori
- Cattedra di studio: Aylin YAMAN, Prof. MD., Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Neurology Department, University of Health Sciences (SBÜ), Türkiye
- Direttore dello studio: Ali Rıza GÜNDÜZ, MD, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Neurology Department, University of Health Sciences (SBÜ), Türkiye
Pubblicazioni e link utili
Pubblicazioni generali
- Babacan-Yildiz G, Ur-Ozcelik E, Kolukisa M, Isik AT, Gursoy E, Kocaman G, Celebi A. [Validity and Reliability Studies of Modified Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE-E) For Turkish Illiterate Patients With Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease]. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2016 Spring;27(1):41-6. Turkish.
- Siddiqui M, Nyahoda T, Traber C, Elliott S, Wang V, Toledo-Franco L, Rodin MB. Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Primary Care: Rationale and Tools. Mo Med. 2023 Nov-Dec;120(6):431-439.
- Franzen S; European Consortium on Cross-Cultural Neuropsychology (ECCroN); Watermeyer TJ, Pomati S, Papma JM, Nielsen TR, Narme P, Mukadam N, Lozano-Ruiz A, Ibanez-Casas I, Goudsmit M, Fasfous A, Daugherty JC, Canevelli M, Calia C, van den Berg E, Bekkhus-Wetterberg P. Cross-cultural neuropsychological assessment in Europe: Position statement of the European Consortium on Cross-Cultural Neuropsychology (ECCroN). Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Apr;36(3):546-557. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2021.1981456. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
- Klil-Drori S, Phillips N, Fernandez A, Solomon S, Klil-Drori AJ, Chertkow H. Evaluation of a Telephone Version for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Establishing a Cutoff for Normative Data From a Cross-Sectional Study. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2022 May;35(3):374-381. doi: 10.1177/08919887211002640. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
- Carton C, Calafiore M, Cauet C, Messaadi N, Bayen M, Wyts D, Messaadi W, Richebe T, Bayen S. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) use in general practice for the early detection of cognitive impairment: a feasibility study. BJGP Open. 2025 Apr 24;9(1):BJGPO.2024.0039. doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0039. Print 2025 Apr.
- Mulchandani R, Grover U, Ray S, Gandotra S, Dhamija RK, Lyngdoh T. Validating the Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale-Hindi as a Remote Screening Tool for Mild Cognitive Impairment. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2025 Jun 1;38(2):35-42. doi: 10.1097/WNN.0000000000000389.
- Avcil, C., H. Bulut, and G. Hızlı Sayar, Psikiyatrik Hastalıklar ve Damgalama. Üsküdar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi,
- Scheenen ME, van den Brink RHS, Konstantinidou S, Lugtenburg A, Spit J, Hendriks GJ, Naarding P, de Vent NR, Kessels RPC, Oude Voshaar RC, Jeuring HW. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Norms for Older Patients with a Depressive Disorder. Med Sci (Basel). 2025 Dec 10;13(4):312. doi: 10.3390/medsci13040312.
- Pinto JO, Dores AR, Peixoto B, Barbosa F. Ecological validity in neurocognitive assessment: Systematized review, content analysis, and proposal of an instrument. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2025 Mar-Apr;32(2):577-594. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2023.2170800. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
- Atri A, Dickerson BC, Clevenger C, Karlawish J, Knopman D, Lin PJ, Norman M, Onyike C, Sano M, Scanland S, Carrillo M. The Alzheimer's Association clinical practice guideline for the diagnostic evaluation, testing, counseling, and disclosure of suspected Alzheimer's disease and related disorders (DETeCD-ADRD): Validated clinical assessment instruments. Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Jan;21(1):e14335. doi: 10.1002/alz.14335. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
- Dickerson BC, Atri A, Clevenger C, Karlawish J, Knopman D, Lin PJ, Norman M, Onyike C, Sano M, Scanland S, Carrillo M. The Alzheimer's Association clinical practice guideline for the Diagnostic Evaluation, Testing, Counseling, and Disclosure of Suspected Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders (DETeCD-ADRD): Executive summary of recommendations for specialty care. Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Jan;21(1):e14337. doi: 10.1002/alz.14337. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
- Gugler K, Funk C, Brodelius P. Elicitor-induced tyrosine decarboxylase in berberine-synthesizing suspension cultures of Thalictrum rugosum. Eur J Biochem. 1988 Jan 4;170(3):661-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb13748.x.
- Malek-Ahmadi M, Nikkhahmanesh N. Meta-analysis of Montreal cognitive assessment diagnostic accuracy in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 13;15:1369766. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1369766. eCollection 2024.
- Luo H, Andersson B, Wong GHY, Lum TYS. Longitudinal measurement properties of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2022 Nov;44(9):627-639. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2022.2148634. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
- Luo H, Andersson B, Tang JYM, Wong GHY. Applying Item Response Theory Analysis to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in a Low-Education Older Population. Assessment. 2020 Oct;27(7):1416-1428. doi: 10.1177/1073191118821733. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
- White RS, Barber JM, Harp JP, Jicha GA. Examining the Effects of Formal Education Level on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 Dec 23;35(6):1043-1057. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220093R1.
- Livingston G, Huntley J, Liu KY, Costafreda SG, Selbaek G, Alladi S, Ames D, Banerjee S, Burns A, Brayne C, Fox NC, Ferri CP, Gitlin LN, Howard R, Kales HC, Kivimaki M, Larson EB, Nakasujja N, Rockwood K, Samus Q, Shirai K, Singh-Manoux A, Schneider LS, Walsh S, Yao Y, Sommerlad A, Mukadam N. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission. Lancet. 2024 Aug 10;404(10452):572-628. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01296-0. Epub 2024 Jul 31. No abstract available.
- Saleh AA, Alkholy RSAEHA, Khalaf OO, Sabry NA, Amer H, El-Jaafary S, Khalil MAEF. Validation of Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic in a sample of elderly Egyptians with neurocognitive disorders. Aging Ment Health. 2019 May;23(5):551-557. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2018.1428936. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
- Huang L, Chen KL, Lin BY, Tang L, Zhao QH, Lv YR, Guo QH. Chinese version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Basic for discrimination among different severities of Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018 Aug 21;14:2133-2140. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S174293. eCollection 2018.
- Amatneeks TM, Hamdan AC. Montreal Cognitive Assessment for cognitive assessment in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review. J Bras Nefrol. 2019 Jan-Mar;41(1):112-123. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2018-0086. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
- Zegarra-Valdivia JA, Chino B, Tituana K, Zapata-Restrepo L, Unaucho MM, Lopez-Norori M, Paredes-Manrique C, Custodio N. Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment Identification in Illiterate and Low-Educated People: Systematic Review About the Use of Brief Cognitive Screening Tools. Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Feb 13;15(2):207. doi: 10.3390/bs15020207.
- Mukadam N, Wolters FJ, Walsh S, Wallace L, Brayne C, Matthews FE, Sacuiu S, Skoog I, Seshadri S, Beiser A, Ghosh S, Livingston G. Changes in prevalence and incidence of dementia and risk factors for dementia: an analysis from cohort studies. Lancet Public Health. 2024 Jul;9(7):e443-e460. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00120-8.
- Lwere K, Muwonge H, Sendagire H, Gumikiriza-Onoria JL, Nakimbugwe R, Buwembo D, Nakasujja N, Kaddumukasa M. Cognitive screening and education: assessing the Montreal Cognitive Assessment's validity in older Ugandan populations. Acad Ment Health Well Being. 2025;2(3):10.20935/mhealthwellb7804. doi: 10.20935/mhealthwellb7804. Epub 2025 Jul 18.
Collegamenti utili
- Güngen, C., Ertan, T., Eker, E., Yaşar, R., & Engin, F. (2002). Standardize Mini Mental Test'in Türk Toplumunda Hafif Demans Tanısında Geçerlik ve Güvenilirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 13(4), 273-281.
- Official data from the Turkish Statistical Institute's research on the profile of the elderly in Türkiye.
Studiare le date dei record
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio (Effettivo)
Completamento primario (Effettivo)
Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
Primo Inserito (Effettivo)
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
Ultimo verificato
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi
- Malattie del cervello
- Malattie del sistema nervoso centrale
- Malattie del sistema nervoso
- Disordini mentali
- Processi patologici
- Disturbi neurocognitivi
- Disturbi cognitivi
- Tauopatie
- Malattie Neurodegenerative
- Condizioni patologiche, segni e sintomi
- Disfunzione cognitiva
- Malattia di Alzheimer
- Patologia
- Demenza
- Comportamento
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- 2024-018
Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)
Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?
Descrizione del piano IPD
Periodo di condivisione IPD
Criteri di accesso alla condivisione IPD
Tipo di informazioni di supporto alla condivisione IPD
- STUDIO_PROTOCOLLO
Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio
Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .