化学療法誘発神経障害を管理するための耳介ツボ指圧
2026年7月9日 更新者：Jennifer Kawi、The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
提案された無作為化対照試験では、化学療法誘発性神経障害（CIN）に対する耳介点指圧（APA）を評価し、自己報告測定、心理物理学的測定（QST）、内因性バイオマーカー（サイトカイン）、および神経を統合することにより、点特異性とプラセボ効果を厳密に考慮します。 -APAの有効性と根底にあるメカニズムを調査するためのイメージング。
治験責任医師は、無作為化対照試験の 3 つのグループ デザインを使用します: (1) APA グループ、(2) 偽の APA コントロール、および (3) 通常のケア コントロール。 生態学的瞬間評価 (EMA) 用のスマートフォン アプリケーションを使用して、APA の順守を監視し、瞬間的な CIN の重症度と鎮痛剤の使用をキャプチャします。
調査の概要
状態
完了
条件
詳細な説明
化学療法誘発性神経障害 (CIN) - 手足に分布する痛み、しびれ、またはうずき - は、がん生存者の感覚とバランスに影響を与える持続的な症状を引き起こします。 がんサバイバーの最大 50% が、治療後 6 年も CIN に苦しんでいます。 米国臨床腫瘍学会が推奨する唯一の薬剤であるデュロキセチンは、プラセボよりも優れていることが判明しましたが、CIN は 0.73 ポイント (0-10 スケール) しか改善しませんでした。 運動以外にCINの効果的な治療法は確立されておらず、効果量は<0.508です。 オピオイドは CIN の痛みを和らげますが、オピオイドの過剰使用のため、長期使用は強くお勧めしません。
研究者らは、耳介鍼治療から開発された革新的でスケーラブルなソリューションである耳介ツボ指圧 (APA) をテストすることを提案しています。 APA は非侵襲的 (無針) で痛みのある患者に対する能動的治療ですが、鍼治療は侵襲的 (針を使用) かつ受動的治療 (認可を受けた開業医が実施) です。 APA では、熟練した医療従事者が特定の耳のポイントに小さなシードをテープで貼り、患者はシードを押して、1 日 3 回、1 回 3 分間、1 日合計 9 分間、耳のポイントを刺激します。 APA は、耳の刺激後 1 ～ 2 分以内に痛みを軽減し、4 週間の APA 介入後 1 か月間、痛みの軽減を維持します。 APAは台湾、中国、ヨーロッパで人気があります。 その使用は米国ではまばらですが、限られた数の臨床試験が疼痛管理におけるAPAを支持しています.
研究の種類
介入
入学 (実際)
238
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。
研究場所
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore、Maryland、アメリカ、21205
- Johns Hopkins University
-
-
Texas
-
Houston、Texas、アメリカ、77030
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
-
-
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
18年歳以上 (大人、高齢者)
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
はい
説明
包含基準:
- 18歳以上のがん患者
- 次のいずれかのカテゴリーの投薬を受けている：プラチナベース、ビンカアルカロイド、ボルテゾミブ、エリブリン、および/またはタキサン
- -登録の3か月以上前に化学療法のコースを完了している
- がんに対する神経毒性化学療法を受けているためにCINを持っているか、化学療法後に悪化した別の病因の既存の末梢神経障害がある
- 11 段階の数値スケールで CIN ≥ 4 により、前の週の四肢の痛み、しびれ、またはうずきの平均強度の 1 つがあります。
除外基準:
- -同時にまたは過去30日以内の疼痛管理のための治験薬の使用
- 移植可能な薬物送達システムの使用。 メドトロニック SynchroMed®
- -以前の腹腔神経叢ブロックまたは他の神経溶解性疼痛管理治療
- -化学療法の前に存在する痛みを伴う感覚異常の他の特定された原因（例：放射線または悪性神経叢症、腰椎または頸部神経根障害）
- ラテックスアレルギー（APAのテープにはラテックスが含まれています）。
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：処理
- 割り当て：ランダム化
- 介入モデル：並列代入
- マスキング：ダブル
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的：耳介点指圧 (APA)
APA部門は、毎週の対面治療と、APAを理解して投与するためのビデオを備えたセルフガイドのスマートフォンアプリケーションを受け取ります。
APA 部門は、対面でシードを 1 回配置し、参加者またはその介護者が耳のポイントにシードを配置するためのトレーニングを受けます。また、最初の訪問から 1 週間後に、参加者および/または介護者にシードについてコーチングするための 1 回のズーム ミーティングを受けます。配置。
|
対面でのシード配置と、参加者またはその介護者がイヤーポイントにシードを配置するためのトレーニング。
シード配置と APA コーチングのための Zoom セッション。最初の APA およびシード配置トレーニングの後に行われます (最初のトレーニングは対面で行われるか、スマートフォン アプリのビデオでガイドされます)。
|
|
実験的：仮想耳介点指圧 (vAPA)
VAPA 部門は、APA を理解して管理するためのセルフガイド スマートフォン アプリケーションにあるビデオ指示に従ってシードを配置することにより、APA を自己管理します。
参加者および/または介護者は、シード配置に関するビデオ指示に従い、ベースライン訪問の 1 週間後に APA コーチングのための 1 回のズーム セッションを受けます。
|
シード配置と APA コーチングのための Zoom セッション。最初の APA およびシード配置トレーニングの後に行われます (最初のトレーニングは対面で行われるか、スマートフォン アプリのビデオでガイドされます)。
APA を理解して管理するためのセルフガイド スマートフォン アプリケーションにあるビデオ指示に従ってシードを配置することにより、APA を自己管理します。
参加者および/または介護者は、種子の配置に関するビデオ指示に従います。
他の名前：
|
|
アクティブコンパレータ：いつものケアコントロール
通常のケア アームは通常のケアを継続します。
|
参加者は腫瘍専門医による通常の治療を継続します。
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Severity as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) assesses worst pain severity.
The scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain), a higher score indicates greater pain
|
Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
|
Numbness as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) assesses worst numbness.
The scale ranges from 0 (no numbness) to 10 (severe numbness), a higher score indicates greater numbness.
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
Tingling as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) assesses worst Tingling.
The scale ranges from 0 (no tingling) to 10 (severe tingling), a higher score indicates greater tingling.
|
Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
|
Stiffness as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) assesses worst stiffness.
The scale ranges from 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (severe stiffness), a higher score indicates greater stiffness.
|
Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
|
Grade of Peripheral Motor Neuropathy as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
Peripheral motor neuropathy is graded using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0.
Severity is graded on a scale that ranges from 1 to 5, with higher grade indicating greater severity of neuropathy.
|
Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
|
Grade of Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
Peripheral sensory neuropathy is graded using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0.
Severity is graded on a scale that ranges from 1 to 5, with higher grade indicating greater severity of neuropathy.
|
Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
|
Physical Function as Assessed by The Revised BPI-CIN Pain Interference Subscale
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
The BPI-CIN Interference subscale will be used to measure physical function caused by CIN.
The seven items evaluate interference with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other persons, sleep, and enjoyment of life.
Each item is rated on a 0-10 numeric scale (0 = does not interfere; 10 = completely interferes).
The overall score is calculated as the mean of the seven items with a total score ranging from 0 to 10 to determine the level of interference, with higher scores indicating greater interference.
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
Functional Ability as Assessed by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Scale
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
The ECOG Performance Status Scale describes level of functioning in terms of ability to care for oneself, daily activity, and physical. Score on the ECOG ranges from 0 (fully active and able) to 5 (dead) with higher score indicating lower function: 0 - Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
Quality of Life as Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 -Physical Function Subscale
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 - physical function subscale assesses physical function using 4 items, each scored on a 5-point likert scale (1 = Unable to do; 5 = Without any difficulty).
Raw scores ranging from 4 to 20 are converted to standardized T-scores (population mean = 50, Standard deviation = 10) using HealthMeasures tables with a range of approximately 20-80.
The higher T-scores indicate better physical function.
|
Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
|
Quality of Life as Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 -Fatigue Subscale
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 - fatigue subscale assesses fatigue using 4 items, each scored on a 5-point likert scale (1 = Unable to do; 5 = Without any difficulty).
Raw scores ranging from 4 to 20 are converted to standardized T-scores (population mean = 50, Standard deviation = 10) using HealthMeasures tables with a range of approximately 20-80.
The higher T-scores indicate greater fatigue.
|
Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
|
Quality of Life as Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 -Pain Interference Subscale
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 - pain interference subscale assesses how pain interferes with daily activities using 4 items, each scored on a 5-point likert scale (1 = Unable to do; 5 = Without any difficulty).
Raw scores ranging from 4 to 20 are converted to standardized T-scores (population mean = 50, Standard deviation = 10) using HealthMeasures tables with a range of approximately 20-80.
The higher T-scores indicate greater pain interference.
|
Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
|
Quality of Life as Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 -Depression Subscale
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 - depression subscale assesses depression using 4 items, each scored on a 5-point likert scale (1 = Unable to do; 5 = Without any difficulty).
Raw scores ranging from 4 to 20 are converted to standardized T-scores (population mean = 50, Standard deviation = 10) using HealthMeasures tables with a range of approximately 20-80.
The higher T-scores indicate greater depression severity.
|
Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
|
Quality of Life as Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 -Anxiety Subscale
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 - anxiety subscale assesses anxiety using 4 items, each scored on a 5-point likert scale (1 = Unable to do; 5 = Without any difficulty).
Raw scores ranging from 4 to 20 are converted to standardized T-scores (population mean = 50, Standard deviation = 10) using HealthMeasures tables with a range of approximately 20-80.
The higher T-scores indicate greater anxiety.
|
Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
|
Quality of Life as Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 -Sleep Disturbance Subscale
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 - sleep disturbance subscale assesses sleep disturbance using 4 items, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Unable to do; 5 = Without any difficulty).
Raw scores ranging from 4 to 20 are converted to standardized T-scores (population mean = 50, Standard deviation = 10) using HealthMeasures tables with a range of approximately 20-80.
The higher T-scores indicate greater sleep disturbance.
|
Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
|
Quality of Life as Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 -Ability to Participate in Social Activities Subscale
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 - ability to participate in social activities subscale assesses a participant's perceived ability to engage in usual social roles and activities using 4 items, each scored on a 5-point likert scale (1 = Unable to do; 5 = Without any difficulty).
Raw scores ranging from 4 to 20 are converted to standardized T-scores (population mean = 50, Standard deviation = 10) using HealthMeasures tables with a range of approximately 20-80.
The higher T-scores indicate better and higher functioning social participation.
|
Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
|
Upper Limb Function as Assessed by the Quick Dash Index
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
The QuickDASH Index assesses upper limb disability and symptoms.
It evaluates limitations in daily activities (e.g., opening jars, performing housework), as well as pain, tingling, and sleep disturbances.
The total score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability), with higher scores indicating greater disability.
|
Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
|
Symptoms Severity as Assessed by the MD Anderson Symptom Severity Inventory
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
The MD Anderson Sympton Severity Inventory assesses severity of 13 common symptoms experienced by patients with cancer.
Each item is rated on a 0-10 numeric scale (0 = not present; 10 = as bad as you can imagine).
The overall symptom severity score is calculated as the mean of the 13 items with a range of 0 to 10, higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
Pain Self Efficacy as Assessed by Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
Pain self-efficacy is assessed using the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ).
This 10-item instrument measures a participant's confidence in performing daily activities, social life and function despite pain.
Each item is rated on a 0-6 scale (0 = Not at all confident; 6 = Completely confident) and total score ranges from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy and greater confidence in coping.
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
Psychological Impact of Pain as Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Score
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) assesses components of catastrophizing: rumination, magnification, and helplessness.
The total score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater pain catastrophizing.
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
Number of Chronic Overlapping Pain Conditions as Assessed by the Chronic Overlapping Pain Conditions (COPC)
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
Chronic Overlapping Pain Conditions (COPC) are assessed using the Chronic Overlapping Pain Conditions Screener (COPCS).
This instrument identifies the presence of up to 10 common chronic pain conditions.
The COPC total score is calculated as the number of positively identified conditions (answered "Yes"), with higher scores indicating greater pain impact, central sensitization, and severity.
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
Charlson Comorbidity Index
時間枠：Baseline
|
The Charlson Comorbidity index assesses a participant's comorbidity burden and predicted risk of mortality.
The total score ranges from 0 to 37. A higher score indicates greater comorbidity burden and higher risk of mortality.
|
Baseline
|
|
Pain Impact as Assessed by Pain, Enjoyment and General Activity (PEG) Scale
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
Pain, Enjoyment and General Activity (PEG) is a three-item questionnaire that assesses pain intensity and its impact patient's daily life.
Each item is rated on a 0-10 scale.
The PEG score is calculated as the mean of three items, resulting in score range of 0 to 10, with a higher scores indicating greater pain severity and functional interference.
|
Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Opioid Use
時間枠：Baseline, Day 28
|
Baseline, Day 28
|
|
|
Opioid Use Per Day as Measured by the Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) Per Day
時間枠：Baseline, Day 28
|
Opioid use will be collected via EMA diary using a questionnaire.
Milligram Morphine Equivalent (MME) will be determined by using an equivalency factor to calculate a dose of morphine equivalent to the ordered opioid.
Daily morphine equivalent dosing is sum of the MME of all opioids a patient is likely to take within 24 hours, and will be calculated to MME for analysis.
Baseline was defined as the first day of opioid use recorded in the EMA diary.
|
Baseline, Day 28
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Experimental Pain Sensitivity as Assessed by a Multimodal Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Battery - Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT)-Trapezius
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
In order to measure experimental pain sensitivity, a multimodal Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) battery will be completed: pressure pain threshold (PPT), Mechanical Temporal Summation (MTS), and Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM).
To assess PPT, a handheld digital pressure algometer (Wagner, Greenwich, CT) was applied at a constant rate of 2.9 Newton per centimeter squared (N/cm^2) per second to the participant's trapezius and thumbs.
Participants were asked to notify the experimenter when the pressure sensation ''first becomes painful."
The pressure at which participants indicated that the pressure sensation ''first becomes painful" is reported.
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
Experimental Pain Sensitivity as Assessed by a Multimodal Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Battery - Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT)-Thumb
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
In order to measure experimental pain sensitivity, a multimodal Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) battery will be completed: pressure pain threshold (PPT), Mechanical Temporal Summation (MTS), and Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM).
To assess PPT, a handheld digital pressure algometer (Wagner, Greenwich, CT) was applied at a constant rate of 2.9 Newton per centimeter squared (N/cm^2) per second to the participant's trapezius and thumbs.
Participants were asked to notify the experimenter when the pressure sensation ''first becomes painful."
The pressure at which participants indicated that the pressure sensation ''first becomes painful" is reported.
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
Experimental Pain Sensitivity as Assessed by a Multimodal Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Battery - Mechanical Temporal Summation (MTS)
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
In order to measure experimental pain sensitivity, a multimodal Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) battery will be completed: pressure pain threshold (PPT), Mechanical Temporal Summation (MTS), and Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM).
To assess MTS, a single pinprick stimulus (e.g., via a weighted pinprick stimulator or Neuropen) is applied, followed by a series of 10 rapid, identical stimuli at the same location, usually at a rate of 1/second, to measure the change in pain sensation.
Participants rate their pain after the stimuli using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable.
A higher score means greater pain sensitivity and increased temporal summation.
MTS is calculated as the increase in pain intensity rating (Δ change score) between the first stimulus and the end of the series.
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
Experimental Pain Sensitivity as Assessed by a Multimodal Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Battery - Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
In order to measure experimental pain sensitivity, a multimodal Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) battery will be completed: pressure pain threshold (PPT), Mechanical Temporal Summation (MTS), and Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM).
CPM was assessed as the change in PPT on the trapezius immediately after the immersion of the contralateral hand up to the wrist in a cold-water bath (Neslab, Portsmouth, NH) at 4 degrees Celsius for 20 seconds.
[ [To assess PPT, a handheld digital pressure algometer (Wagner, Greenwich, CT) was applied at a constant rate of 2.9 Newton per centimeter squared (N/cm^2) per second to the participant's trapezius.
Participants were asked to notify the experimenter when the pressure sensation ''first becomes painful" to assess pressure pain threshold (PPT).]
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
Functional Connectivity Changes in Salience Network - Basal Ganglia Network (SAL-BGN) as Assessed by fMRI Neuroimaging
時間枠：Baseline
|
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) will be used to assess changes in functional connectivity between the Salience Network and Basal Ganglia Network (SAL-BGN) from baseline to post-intervention (1 month after baseline).
Functional connectivity is calculated based on the correlations in Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) signal fluctuations in different brain regions.
Connectivity strength will be quantified using Fisher z-transformed correlation coefficients, with higher values indicating stronger functional connectivity.
|
Baseline
|
|
Functional Connectivity Changes in Language Network - Basal Ganglia Network (LAN-BGN) as Assessed by fMRI Neuroimaging
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) will be used to assess changes in functional connectivity between the Salience Network and Basal Ganglia Network (SAL-BGN) from baseline to post-intervention (1 month after baseline).
Functional connectivity is calculated based on the correlations in Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) signal fluctuations in different brain regions.
Connectivity strength will be quantified using Fisher z-transformed correlation coefficients, with higher values indicating stronger functional connectivity.
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
The Grooved Pegboard Test-Dominant Hand
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
The Grooved Pegboard Test assesses fine motor skills, speed, and visual-motor coordination.
Participants are asked to place 25 pegs into slots as quickly as possible.
The total time to complete the task is recorded in seconds with dominant hand.
Higher times indicate slower performance and reduced dexterity
|
Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
|
The Grooved Pegboard Test-Non Dominant Hand
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
The Grooved Pegboard Test assesses fine motor skills, speed, and visual-motor coordination.
Participants are asked to place 25 pegs into slots as quickly as possible.
The total time to complete the task is recorded in seconds with non-dominant hand.
Higher times indicate slower performance and reduced dexterity
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
Interleukin-1 Alpha Level (From Plasma)
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers.
Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay.
Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
Interleukin-1 Beta Level (From Plasma)
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers.
Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay.
Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
Interleukin-2 Level (From Plasma)
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers.
Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay.
Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
Interleukin-4 Level (From Plasma)
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers.
Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay.
Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
Interleukin-6 Level (From Plasma)
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers.
Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay.
Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
Interleukin-8 Level (From Plasma)
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers.
Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay.
Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
Interleukin-10 Level (From Plasma)
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers.
Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay.
Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
Interleukin-12 Level (p40) (From Plasma)
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers.
Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay.
Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
Interleukin-12 Level (p70)-(From Plasma)
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers.
Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay.
Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
Interleukin-13 Level (From Plasma)
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers.
Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay.
Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
Interleukin-17 Level (From Plasma)
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers.
Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay.
Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
Interferon-gamma Level (From Plasma)
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers.
Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay.
Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.
|
Baseline, 1 month after Baseline
|
|
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Level (From Plasma)
時間枠：Baseline
|
Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers.
Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay.
Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.
|
Baseline
|
|
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Level (From Plasma)
時間枠：1 month after baseline
|
Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers.
Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay.
Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.
|
1 month after baseline
|
|
Transforming Growth Factor-beta Level 1(From Plasma)
時間枠：Baseline
|
Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers.
Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay.
Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.
|
Baseline
|
|
Transforming Growth Factor-beta Level 1 (From Plasma)
時間枠：1 month after baseline
|
Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers.
Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay.
Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.
|
1 month after baseline
|
|
Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide Level(From Plasma)
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers.
Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay.
Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.
|
Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
|
Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Level (From Plasma)
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers.
Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay.
Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.
|
Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
|
Eotaxin Level (From Plasma)
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers.
Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay.
Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.
|
Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
|
C-reactive Protein Level (From Plasma)
時間枠：Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers.
Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay.
Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.
|
Baseline, 1 month after baseline
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
捜査官
- 主任研究者：Nada Lukkahatai, PHD, MSN, RN、Johns Hopkins University
- 主任研究者：Jennifer Kawi, PhD, MSN, FNP-BC, CNE, FAAN、The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
出版物と役立つリンク
研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。
一般刊行物
- Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, Beaton D, Cleeland CS, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Kerns RD, Ader DN, Brandenburg N, Burke LB, Cella D, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dimitrova R, Dionne R, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Katz NP, Kehlet H, Kramer LD, Manning DC, McCormick C, McDermott MP, McQuay HJ, Patel S, Porter L, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Rauschkolb C, Revicki DA, Rothman M, Schmader KE, Stacey BR, Stauffer JW, von Stein T, White RE, Witter J, Zavisic S. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008 Feb;9(2):105-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.005. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
- Seretny M, Currie GL, Sena ES, Ramnarine S, Grant R, MacLeod MR, Colvin LA, Fallon M. Incidence, prevalence, and predictors of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2014 Dec;155(12):2461-2470. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.09.020. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
- Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain--United States, 2016. JAMA. 2016 Apr 19;315(15):1624-45. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.1464.
- Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole MR. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):149-158. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9.
- Vickers AJ, Vertosick EA, Lewith G, MacPherson H, Foster NE, Sherman KJ, Irnich D, Witt CM, Linde K; Acupuncture Trialists' Collaboration. Acupuncture for Chronic Pain: Update of an Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. J Pain. 2018 May;19(5):455-474. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Dec 2.
- Shrout PE, Bolger N. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychol Methods. 2002 Dec;7(4):422-45.
- Verbeke G, Molenberghs G. Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data. Springer Science & Business Media; 2009.
- Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Maschino AC, Lewith G, MacPherson H, Foster NE, Sherman KJ, Witt CM, Linde K; Acupuncture Trialists' Collaboration. Acupuncture for chronic pain: individual patient data meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Oct 22;172(19):1444-53. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3654.
- Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Maschino AC, Lewith G, Macpherson H, Victor N, Sherman KJ, Witt C, Linde K; Acupuncture Trialists' Collaboration. Individual patient data meta-analysis of acupuncture for chronic pain: protocol of the Acupuncture Trialists' Collaboration. Trials. 2010 Sep 28;11:90. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-90.
- Rao RD, Michalak JC, Sloan JA, Loprinzi CL, Soori GS, Nikcevich DA, Warner DO, Novotny P, Kutteh LA, Wong GY; North Central Cancer Treatment Group. Efficacy of gabapentin in the management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial (N00C3). Cancer. 2007 Nov 1;110(9):2110-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23008.
- Hershman DL, Lacchetti C, Dworkin RH, Lavoie Smith EM, Bleeker J, Cavaletti G, Chauhan C, Gavin P, Lavino A, Lustberg MB, Paice J, Schneider B, Smith ML, Smith T, Terstriep S, Wagner-Johnston N, Bak K, Loprinzi CL; American Society of Clinical Oncology. Prevention and management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in survivors of adult cancers: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun 20;32(18):1941-67. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.0914. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
- Winters-Stone KM, Horak F, Jacobs PG, Trubowitz P, Dieckmann NF, Stoyles S, Faithfull S. Falls, Functioning, and Disability Among Women With Persistent Symptoms of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 10;35(23):2604-2612. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.3552. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
- Franconi G, Manni L, Schroder S, Marchetti P, Robinson N. A systematic review of experimental and clinical acupuncture in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:516916. doi: 10.1155/2013/516916. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
- Flatters SJL, Bennett GJ. Studies of peripheral sensory nerves in paclitaxel-induced painful peripheral neuropathy: evidence for mitochondrial dysfunction. Pain. 2006 Jun;122(3):245-257. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.01.037. Epub 2006 Mar 13.
- Asher GN, Jonas DE, Coeytaux RR, Reilly AC, Loh YL, Motsinger-Reif AA, Winham SJ. Auriculotherapy for pain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Altern Complement Med. 2010 Oct;16(10):1097-108. doi: 10.1089/acm.2009.0451.
- Smith EM, Pang H, Cirrincione C, Fleishman S, Paskett ED, Ahles T, Bressler LR, Fadul CE, Knox C, Le-Lindqwister N, Gilman PB, Shapiro CL; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. Effect of duloxetine on pain, function, and quality of life among patients with chemotherapy-induced painful peripheral neuropathy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013 Apr 3;309(13):1359-67. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.2813.
- Miaskowski C, Mastick J, Paul SM, Abrams G, Cheung S, Sabes JH, Kober KM, Schumacher M, Conley YP, Topp K, Smoot B, Mausisa G, Mazor M, Wallhagen M, Levine JD. Impact of chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicities on adult cancer survivors' symptom burden and quality of life. J Cancer Surviv. 2018 Apr;12(2):234-245. doi: 10.1007/s11764-017-0662-8. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
- Yeh CH, Chiang YC, Hoffman SL, Liang Z, Klem ML, Tam WW, Chien LC, Suen LK. Efficacy of auricular therapy for pain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:934670. doi: 10.1155/2014/934670. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
- Chen X, Spaeth RB, Freeman SG, Scarborough DM, Hashmi JA, Wey HY, Egorova N, Vangel M, Mao J, Wasan AD, Edwards RR, Gollub RL, Kong J. The modulation effect of longitudinal acupuncture on resting state functional connectivity in knee osteoarthritis patients. Mol Pain. 2015 Oct 29;11:67. doi: 10.1186/s12990-015-0071-9.
- Costigan M, Scholz J, Woolf CJ. Neuropathic pain: a maladaptive response of the nervous system to damage. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2009;32:1-32. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135531.
- Keller M, Mazuch J, Abraham U, Eom GD, Herzog ED, Volk HD, Kramer A, Maier B. A circadian clock in macrophages controls inflammatory immune responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 15;106(50):21407-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906361106. Epub 2009 Dec 1.
- Shimozuma K, Ohashi Y, Takeuchi A, Aranishi T, Morita S, Kuroi K, Ohsumi S, Makino H, Mukai H, Katsumata N, Sunada Y, Watanabe T, Hausheer FH. Feasibility and validity of the Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire during taxane chemotherapy in a phase III randomized trial in patients with breast cancer: N-SAS BC 02. Support Care Cancer. 2009 Dec;17(12):1483-91. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0613-7. Epub 2009 Mar 28.
- Pike CT, Birnbaum HG, Muehlenbein CE, Pohl GM, Natale RB. Healthcare costs and workloss burden of patients with chemotherapy-associated peripheral neuropathy in breast, ovarian, head and neck, and nonsmall cell lung cancer. Chemother Res Pract. 2012;2012:913848. doi: 10.1155/2012/913848. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
- Lin WC, Burke L, Schlenk EA, Yeh CH. Use of an Ecological Momentary Assessment Application to Assess the Effects of Auricular Point Acupressure for Chronic Low Back Pain. Comput Inform Nurs. 2019 May;37(5):276-282. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000478.
- Staff NP, Grisold A, Grisold W, Windebank AJ. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A current review. Ann Neurol. 2017 Jun;81(6):772-781. doi: 10.1002/ana.24951. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
- Shah A, Hoffman EM, Mauermann ML, Loprinzi CL, Windebank AJ, Klein CJ, Staff NP. Incidence and disease burden of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in a population-based cohort. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;89(6):636-641. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2017-317215. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
- Park SB. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: highlighting unmet needs. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;89(6):558. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2017-317528. Epub 2018 Feb 20. No abstract available.
- Kleckner IR, Kamen C, Gewandter JS, Mohile NA, Heckler CE, Culakova E, Fung C, Janelsins MC, Asare M, Lin PJ, Reddy PS, Giguere J, Berenberg J, Kesler SR, Mustian KM. Effects of exercise during chemotherapy on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2018 Apr;26(4):1019-1028. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-4013-0. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
- Gilron I, Bailey JM, Tu D, Holden RR, Weaver DF, Houlden RL. Morphine, gabapentin, or their combination for neuropathic pain. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 31;352(13):1324-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042580.
- Gilron I, Tu D, Holden RR, Jackson AC, DuMerton-Shore D. Combination of morphine with nortriptyline for neuropathic pain. Pain. 2015 Aug;156(8):1440-1448. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000149.
- Yeh CH, Lukkahatai N, Campbell C, Sair H, Zhang F, Mensah S, Garry C, Zeng J, Chen C, Pinedo M, Khoshnoodi M, Smith TJ, Saligan LN. Preliminary Effectiveness of Auricular Point Acupressure on Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy: Part 1 Self-Reported Outcomes. Pain Manag Nurs. 2019 Dec;20(6):614-622. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 May 30.
- Yeh CH, Lin WC, Kwai-Ping Suen L, Park NJ, Wood LJ, van Londen GJ, Howard Bovbjerg D. Auricular Point Acupressure to Manage Aromatase Inhibitor-Induced Arthralgia in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Survivors: A Pilot Study. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017 Jul 1;44(4):476-487. doi: 10.1188/17.ONF.476-487.
- Yeh CH, Kwai-Ping Suen L, Chien LC, Margolis L, Liang Z, Glick RM, Morone NE. Day-to-Day Changes of Auricular Point Acupressure to Manage Chronic Low Back Pain: A 29-day Randomized Controlled Study. Pain Med. 2015 Oct;16(10):1857-69. doi: 10.1111/pme.12789. Epub 2015 May 19.
- Yeh CH, Morone NE, Chien LC, Cao Y, Lu H, Shen J, Margolis L, Bhatnagar S, Hoffman S, Liang Z, Glick RM, Suen LK. Auricular point acupressure to manage chronic low back pain in older adults: a randomized controlled pilot study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:375173. doi: 10.1155/2014/375173. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
- Yeh CH, Chien LC, Balaban D, Sponberg R, Primavera J, Morone NE, Glick R, Albers KM, Cohen SM, Ren D, Huang LC, Suen LK. A randomized clinical trial of auricular point acupressure for chronic low back pain: a feasibility study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:196978. doi: 10.1155/2013/196978. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
- Yeh CH, Chien LC, Chiang YC, Huang LC. Auricular point acupressure for chronic low back pain: a feasibility study for 1-week treatment. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:383257. doi: 10.1155/2012/383257. Epub 2012 Jul 1.
- Yeh CH, Chien LC, Chiang YC, Ren D, Suen LK. Auricular point acupressure as an adjunct analgesic treatment for cancer patients: a feasibility study. Pain Manag Nurs. 2015 Jun;16(3):285-93. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
- Yeh CH, Chien LC, Lin WC, Bovbjerg DH, van Londen GJ. Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Auricular Point Acupressure to Manage Symptom Clusters of Pain, Fatigue, and Disturbed Sleep in Breast Cancer Patients. Cancer Nurs. 2016 Sep-Oct;39(5):402-10. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000303.
- Yeh CH, Lukkahatai N, Campbell C, Sair H, Zhang F, Mensah S, Garry C, Zeng J, Chen C, Pinedo M, Khoshnoodi M, Perrin N, Smith TJ, Saligan LN. Preliminary Effectiveness of Auricular Point Acupressure on Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy: Part 2 Laboratory-Assessed and Objective Outcomes. Pain Manag Nurs. 2019 Dec;20(6):623-632. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
- Sisignano M, Baron R, Scholich K, Geisslinger G. Mechanism-based treatment for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathic pain. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Dec;10(12):694-707. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.211. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
- Smith EM, Bridges CM, Kanzawa G, Knoerl R, Kelly JP 4th, Berezovsky A, Woo C. Cancer treatment-related neuropathic pain syndromes--epidemiology and treatment: an update. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2014 Nov;18(11):459. doi: 10.1007/s11916-014-0459-7.
- Janes K, Esposito E, Doyle T, Cuzzocrea S, Tosh DK, Jacobson KA, Salvemini D. A3 adenosine receptor agonist prevents the development of paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain by modulating spinal glial-restricted redox-dependent signaling pathways. Pain. 2014 Dec;155(12):2560-2567. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.09.016. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
- Peters CM, Jimenez-Andrade JM, Kuskowski MA, Ghilardi JR, Mantyh PW. An evolving cellular pathology occurs in dorsal root ganglia, peripheral nerve and spinal cord following intravenous administration of paclitaxel in the rat. Brain Res. 2007 Sep 7;1168:46-59. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.066. Epub 2007 Jul 17.
- Ji XT, Qian NS, Zhang T, Li JM, Li XK, Wang P, Zhao DS, Huang G, Zhang L, Fei Z, Jia D, Niu L. Spinal astrocytic activation contributes to mechanical allodynia in a rat chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain model. PLoS One. 2013 Apr 9;8(4):e60733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060733. Print 2013.
- Tsavaris N, Kopterides P, Kosmas C, Efthymiou A, Skopelitis H, Dimitrakopoulos A, Pagouni E, Pikazis D, Zis PV, Koufos C. Gabapentin monotherapy for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain: a pilot study. Pain Med. 2008 Nov;9(8):1209-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00325.x.
- Magnowska M, Izycka N, Kapola-Czyz J, Romala A, Lorek J, Spaczynski M, Nowak-Markwitz E. Effectiveness of gabapentin pharmacotherapy in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Ginekol Pol. 2018;89(4):200-4. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2018.0034.
- Bellingham GA, Peng PW. Duloxetine: a review of its pharmacology and use in chronic pain management. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 May-Jun;35(3):294-303. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181df2645.
- Irwin ML, Cartmel B, Gross CP, Ercolano E, Li F, Yao X, Fiellin M, Capozza S, Rothbard M, Zhou Y, Harrigan M, Sanft T, Schmitz K, Neogi T, Hershman D, Ligibel J. Randomized exercise trial of aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia in breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr 1;33(10):1104-11. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.1547. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
- Lu W, Giobbie-Hurder A, Freedman RA, Shin IH, Lin NU, Partridge AH, Rosenthal DS, Ligibel JA. Acupuncture for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. Oncologist. 2020 Apr;25(4):310-318. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0489. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
- Li K, Giustini D, Seely D. A systematic review of acupuncture for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Curr Oncol. 2019 Apr;26(2):e147-e154. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4261. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
- Smith TJ, Razzak AR, Blackford AL, Ensminger J, Saiki C, Longo-Schoberlein D, Loprinzi CL. A Pilot Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of MC5-A Scrambler Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN). J Palliat Care. 2020 Jan;35(1):53-58. doi: 10.1177/0825859719827589. Epub 2019 Feb 3.
- Pachman DR, Weisbrod BL, Seisler DK, Barton DL, Fee-Schroeder KC, Smith TJ, Lachance DH, Liu H, Shelerud RA, Cheville AL, Loprinzi CL. Pilot evaluation of Scrambler therapy for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Support Care Cancer. 2015 Apr;23(4):943-51. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2424-8. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
- Gewandter JS, Chaudari J, Ibegbu C, Kitt R, Serventi J, Burke J, Culakova E, Kolb N, Sluka KA, Tejani MA, Mohile NA. Wireless transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation device for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: an open-label feasibility study. Support Care Cancer. 2019 May;27(5):1765-1774. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4424-6. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
- Galantino ML, Brooks J, Tiger R, Jang S, Wilson K. Effectiveness of Somatic Yoga and Meditation: A Pilot Study in a Multicultural Cancer Survivor Population with Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. Int J Yoga Therap. 2020 Jan 1;30(1):49-61. doi: 10.17761/2020-D-18-00030.
- Kono T, Mamiya N, Chisato N, Ebisawa Y, Yamazaki H, Watari J, Yamamoto Y, Suzuki S, Asama T, Kamiya K. Efficacy of goshajinkigan for peripheral neurotoxicity of oxaliplatin in patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:418481. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nep200. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
- Li Y, Cui HJ, Huang JC, Wu XQ. Clinical study of Jiawei Huangqi Guizhi Wuwu Decoction in preventing and treating peripheral neuro-sensory toxicity caused by oxaliplatin. Chin J Integr Med. 2006 Mar;12(1):19-23. doi: 10.1007/BF02857424.
- Liu Y, May BH, Zhang AL, Guo X, Lu C, Xue CC, Zhang H. Integrative Herbal Medicine for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy and Hand-Foot Syndrome in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Integr Cancer Ther. 2019 Jan-Dec;18:1534735418817833. doi: 10.1177/1534735418817833. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
- Tofthagen C, Gonzalez L, Visovsky C, Akers A. Self-management of oxaliplatin-related peripheral neuropathy in colorectal cancer survivors. Chemother Res Pract. 2013;2013:547932. doi: 10.1155/2013/547932. Epub 2013 Aug 25.
- Molsberger AF, Schneider T, Gotthardt H, Drabik A. German Randomized Acupuncture Trial for chronic shoulder pain (GRASP) - a pragmatic, controlled, patient-blinded, multi-centre trial in an outpatient care environment. Pain. 2010 Oct;151(1):146-154. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.06.036. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
- Nahin RL, Barnes PM, Stussman BJ. Insurance Coverage for Complementary Health Approaches Among Adult Users: United States, 2002 and 2012. NCHS Data Brief. 2016 Jan;(235):1-8.
- Schapira MM, Mackenzie ER, Lam R, Casarett D, Seluzicki CM, Barg FK, Mao JJ. Breast cancer survivors willingness to participate in an acupuncture clinical trial: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer. 2014 May;22(5):1207-15. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-2073-3. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
- Nogier P. Handbook to auriculotherapy. 1st ed. Moulins-les-Metz: Maisonneuve; 1981.
- Nogier R. How did Paul Nogier establish the map of the ear? Medical Acupuncture. 2014;26(2):76-83.
- Nogier P. Points Reflexes Auricularis. Maisonneuve SA: Moulin Les-Metz, France; 1987.
- Yeh CH, Huang LC. Comprehensive and systematic auricular diagnosis protocol. Medical Acupuncture 2013;25(6):423-436.
- Oleson T. Auriculotherapy Manual: Chinese and Western Systems of Ear Acupuncture. 4th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier; 2014.
- Huang LC. Auricular Medicine: A Complete Manual of Auricular Diagnosis and Treatment. 1st ed. Orlando Florida: Auricular International Research & Training; 2005.
- Alimi D, Geissmann A, Gardeur D. Auricular acupuncture stimulation measured on functional magnetic resonance imaging. Medical Acupuncture. 2002;13(2):18-21.
- Romoli M, Allais G, Airola G, Benedetto C, Mana O, Giacobbe M, Pugliese AM, Battistella G, Fornari E. Ear acupuncture and fMRI: a pilot study for assessing the specificity of auricular points. Neurol Sci. 2014 May;35 Suppl 1:189-93. doi: 10.1007/s10072-014-1768-7.
- Fonken LK, Frank MG, Kitt MM, Barrientos RM, Watkins LR, Maier SF. Microglia inflammatory responses are controlled by an intrinsic circadian clock. Brain Behav Immun. 2015 Mar;45:171-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2014.11.009. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
- Lundeberg T, Lund I. Acupuncture for preconditioning of expectancy and/or Pavlovian extinction. Acupunct Med. 2008 Dec;26(4):234-8. doi: 10.1136/aim.26.4.234.
- Lundeberg T, Lund I, Naslund J. Acupuncture--self-appraisal and the reward system. Acupunct Med. 2007 Sep;25(3):87-99. doi: 10.1136/aim.25.3.87.
- Furlan AD, Yazdi F, Tsertsvadze A, Gross A, Van Tulder M, Santaguida L, Gagnier J, Ammendolia C, Dryden T, Doucette S, Skidmore B, Daniel R, Ostermann T, Tsouros S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and safety of selected complementary and alternative medicine for neck and low-back pain. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:953139. doi: 10.1155/2012/953139. Epub 2011 Nov 24.
- Hsu C, Sherman KJ, Eaves ER, Turner JA, Cherkin DC, Cromp D, Schafer L, Ritenbaugh C. New perspectives on patient expectations of treatment outcomes: results from qualitative interviews with patients seeking complementary and alternative medicine treatments for chronic low back pain. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014 Jul 30;14:276. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-276.
- Schafer LM, Hsu C, Eaves ER, Ritenbaugh C, Turner J, Cherkin DC, Sims C, Sherman KJ. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) providers' views of chronic low back pain patients' expectations of CAM therapies: a qualitative study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012 Nov 27;12:234. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-12-234.
- Schnur JB, Hallquist MN, Bovbjerg DH, Silverstein JH, Stojceska A, Montgomery GH. Predictors of expectancies for post-surgical pain and fatigue in breast cancer surgical patients. Pers Individ Dif. 2007;42(3):419-429. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.07.009.
- Lind BK, Lafferty WE, Tyree PT, Sherman KJ, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC. The role of alternative medical providers for the outpatient treatment of insured patients with back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jun 15;30(12):1454-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000166527.18442.10.
- Shelton RC, Clarke Hillyer G, Hershman DL, Leoce N, Bovbjerg DH, Mandelblatt JS, Kushi LH, Lamerato L, Nathanson SD, Ambrosone CB, Neugut AI. Interpersonal influences and attitudes about adjuvant therapy treatment decisions among non-metastatic breast cancer patients: an examination of differences by age and race/ethnicity in the BQUAL study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Feb;137(3):817-28. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2370-4. Epub 2012 Dec 22.
- Craig BM, Reeve BB, Brown PM, Cella D, Hays RD, Lipscomb J, Simon Pickard A, Revicki DA. US valuation of health outcomes measured using the PROMIS-29. Value Health. 2014 Dec;17(8):846-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.09.005.
- PROMIS-29 Profile v2. http://www.assessmentcenter.net/documents/InstrumentLibrary.pdf. Accessed July 31, 2015.
- (CMS) CfMMS. The 2019 Rate Announcement and Call Letter:and selecting "2019 Announcement.". 2018; https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Health-Plans/MedicareAdvtgSpecRateStats/Announcements-and-Documents.html Accessed May 24, 2018.
- Campbell CM, Carroll CP, Kiley K, Han D, Haywood C Jr, Lanzkron S, Swedberg L, Edwards RR, Page GG, Haythornthwaite JA. Quantitative sensory testing and pain-evoked cytokine reactivity: comparison of patients with sickle cell disease to healthy matched controls. Pain. 2016 Apr;157(4):949-956. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000473.
- Yoo SS, Teh EK, Blinder RA, Jolesz FA. Modulation of cerebellar activities by acupuncture stimulation: evidence from fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2004 Jun;22(2):932-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.02.017.
- Yeh CH, Chien LC, Albers KM, et al. Function of auricular point acupressure in inducing changes in inflammatory cytokines during chronic low back pain: A pilot study. Medical Acupuncture. 2014;26(1):31-39.
- Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. 2nd ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 2002.
- Xiang L, Tse SK, Lee AH. Influence diagnostics for generalized linear mixed models: applications to clustered data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. 2002;40(4):759-774.
- Birhanu T, Molenberghs G, Sotto C, Kenward MG. Doubly robust and multiple-imputation-based generalized estimating equations. J Biopharm Stat. 2011 Mar;21(2):202-25. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2011.550096.
- Zeger SL, Liang KY, Albert PS. Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics. 1988 Dec;44(4):1049-60.
- Lukkahatai N, Nguyen MV, Zhang J, Cho YM, Benjasirisan C, Jia HM, Campbell CM, Kawi J, Wu H, Wang H, Bora R, Thrul J, Johnson CM, Smith TJ. A randomized controlled study of auricular point acupressure to manage chemotherapy-induced neuropathy: Study protocol. PLoS One. 2024 Sep 26;19(9):e0311135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311135. eCollection 2024.
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
2021年7月8日
一次修了 (実際)
2025年5月30日
研究の完了 (実際)
2026年3月19日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2021年6月3日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2021年6月3日
最初の投稿 (実際)
2021年6月9日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
2026年8月4日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2026年7月9日
最終確認日
2026年7月1日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
キーワード
追加の関連 MeSH 用語
その他の研究ID番号
- HSC-SN-21-1085
- 1R01CA245054-01A1 (米国 NIH グラント/契約)
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
いいえ
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
いいえ
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
いいえ
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。