甲状腺がんの術前評価における AI 支援超音波技術の臨床応用
2026年8月5日 更新者:Bo Wang,MD、Fujian Medical University
この研究は、甲状腺がんの術前評価における AI 支援超音波技術の応用を探ることを目的としています。
甲状腺がん患者からの従来の超音波検査データが収集され、AI システムが甲状腺結節やリンパ節の検出と診断に活用されます。
2 次元超音波検査と AI システムの結果の間に不一致がある場合は、生検によってさらなる確認が求められます。
その後、病理学的結果は、AI システムと従来の超音波検査結果を比較するための「ゴールド スタンダード」として機能し、その精度と信頼性を評価します。
この研究活動を通じて、より正確で信頼性の高い甲状腺がんの術前評価方法を提供し、それによって臨床上の意思決定を支援し、医用画像診断分野におけるAIの新たな応用への道を開くことが期待されています。
調査の概要
詳細な説明
この研究は、甲状腺がんの術前評価における AI 支援超音波技術の応用を調査することを目的としています。
甲状腺がん患者からの従来の超音波検査データには、2 次元超音波画像、カラー ドップラー フロー画像、甲状腺結節やリンパ節の数、サイズ、形態、エコー源性、辺縁、石灰化、アスペクト比などの詳細な特徴が含まれます。集められる。
手術前にはAI超音波技術を用いた再評価が行われ、AIシステムによる甲状腺結節やリンパ節の検出・診断結果が記録されます。
2次元超音波検査の結果とAIシステムの結果に相違がある場合には、その性質をさらに確認するために、穿刺吸引生検または術中生検が実行されます。
手術後の各結節の病理学的結果は、AI システムと従来の 2 次元超音波検査との比較分析の「ゴールド スタンダード」として機能します。
結節の検出と位置特定における AI システムの精度が分析され、その感度、特異度、精度が計算されて、甲状腺がんの術前評価における診断の有効性と信頼性が評価されます。
この研究を通じて、臨床上の意思決定を支援する、甲状腺がんの術前評価のためのより正確で信頼性の高い補助診断法の提供を目指します。
さらに、医療画像診断分野における AI 応用の新たな道と方向性が模索されます。
研究の種類
介入
入学 (実際)
515
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。
研究場所
-
-
Fujian
-
Fuzhou、Fujian、中国、350001
- Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
-
-
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 子
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
いいえ
説明
包含基準:
- 術前に甲状腺悪性腫瘍が病理学的に確認され、外科的治療を受けている患者。
- 圧迫症状を引き起こす甲状腺腺腫などの良性甲状腺腫瘍を患い、外科的治療を受けている患者。
- 患者は完全かつ高品質の従来の 2 次元カラー超音波画像を取得できます。
- 術後の病理レポートを完了します。
- この臨床試験に参加する意欲とインフォームドコンセントへの署名。
除外基準:
- 首の手術または放射線治療の既往のある患者。
- 体の他の部分に悪性腫瘍の病歴がある患者。
- 甲状腺機能障害のある患者。
- 不完全または低品質の従来の 2 次元カラー超音波画像。
- 術後の病理報告が不完全。
- この臨床試験への参加を拒否する。
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:診断
- 割り当て:なし
- 介入モデル:単一グループの割り当て
- マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的:AI-Assisted Preoperative Review
Participants undergo standard preoperative thyroid ultrasonography followed by a standardized AI-assisted repeat examination and surgeon-led review incorporating the locked AI system's thyroid-nodule output.
The AI system does not assess cervical lymph nodes.
All supplementary examinations and final diagnostic and surgical decisions are made by clinicians.
|
After standard preoperative ultrasonography, the same participant underwent a standardized AI-assisted repeat examination.
The locked system identified and classified thyroid nodules and provided malignancy-score information for surgeon-led review.
It did not assess cervical lymph nodes and was not retrained or recalibrated during the study.
Additional fine-needle aspiration, intraoperative pathologic examination, and surgical management were determined by clinicians using the complete clinical assessment.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Participants Undergoing Supplementary Cytologic or Pathologic Examination
時間枠:From completion of the AI-assisted repeat examination through completion of surgery
|
Number and proportion of enrolled participants who underwent at least one additional cytologic or pathologic examination, such as fine-needle aspiration or intraoperative frozen-section examination, after completion of conventional ultrasonography and AI-assisted review and before completion of surgery.
Each participant is counted once regardless of the number of examinations.
The decision remained clinician led; cervical lymph-node examinations were outside the AI system's task.
|
From completion of the AI-assisted repeat examination through completion of surgery
|
|
Proportion of Participants With a Change in Planned Surgical Management
時間枠:From completion of the AI-assisted review through surgery
|
Number and proportion of enrolled participants with at least one documented change in the surgeon-led planned surgical approach or extent after conventional ultrasonography, AI-assisted review, and any supplementary pathological examination, when performed.
Changes may involve thyroid resection or cervical lymph-node management.
Each participant is counted once regardless of the number of changes.
The AI system provided thyroid-nodule information only and did not assess cervical lymph nodes.
|
From completion of the AI-assisted review through surgery
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Distribution of C-TIRADS Categories Among Evaluated Thyroid Nodules
時間枠:During standard preoperative ultrasonography, before the AI-assisted repeat examination
|
Number and percentage of evaluated thyroid nodules in each clinician-assigned C-TIRADS category during conventional ultrasonography.
Nodule size, composition, echogenicity, margins, calcifications, and clinician-assessed cervical lymph-node findings were recorded as descriptive covariates and were not treated as separate outcome measures.
|
During standard preoperative ultrasonography, before the AI-assisted repeat examination
|
|
Proportion of Evaluated Thyroid Nodules Classified as AI-Positive
時間枠:During the preoperative AI-assisted repeat examination, before surgery
|
Number and percentage of evaluated thyroid nodules with a locked AI malignancy score >0.5.
The AI system evaluated thyroid nodules only and did not assess cervical lymph nodes.
|
During the preoperative AI-assisted repeat examination, before surgery
|
|
Results of Supplementary Cytologic or Pathologic Examinations
時間枠:From supplementary sampling to availability of the corresponding result, before or during surgery
|
Among participants who underwent at least one additional cytologic or pathologic examination, record the cytologic or histopathologic result for each sampled thyroid nodule or cervical lymph node.
Results are summarized at the examination level as nonmalignant, indeterminate, malignant, or metastatic, as applicable.
|
From supplementary sampling to availability of the corresponding result, before or during surgery
|
|
Final Histopathological Diagnosis of Resected Thyroid Nodules
時間枠:From surgery until the final postoperative histopathology report became available; assessed through October 15, 2025, over the approximately 14-month study period.
|
For each resected thyroid nodule linked unambiguously to the evaluated lesion, record the final diagnosis as benign, malignant, follicular tumor of uncertain malignant potential (FT-UMP), well-differentiated tumor of uncertain malignant potential (WDT-UMP), non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP), or another borderline diagnosis.
|
From surgery until the final postoperative histopathology report became available; assessed through October 15, 2025, over the approximately 14-month study period.
|
|
Nodule-Level Sensitivity of AI and C-TIRADS
時間枠:From the preoperative examinations until the final postoperative histopathology report became available; assessed through October 15, 2025, over the approximately 14-month study period.
|
Using definitive postoperative histopathology as the reference standard, sensitivity is TP/(TP + FN), expressed as a percentage, for the locked AI classification (positive if score >0.5) and conventional C-TIRADS (positive if category 4a or higher).
Include only pathology-matched nodules with an unambiguous lesion-level link and a definitive benign or malignant diagnosis.
Exclude FT-UMP, WDT-UMP, NIFTP, other borderline diagnoses, and nodules without unambiguous lesion-level linkage.
These lesion-level exclusions do not alter the 515-participant workflow cohort.
|
From the preoperative examinations until the final postoperative histopathology report became available; assessed through October 15, 2025, over the approximately 14-month study period.
|
|
Nodule-Level False-Negative Rate of AI and C-TIRADS
時間枠:From the preoperative examinations until the final postoperative histopathology report became available; assessed through October 15, 2025, over the approximately 14-month study period.
|
For each method, the false-negative rate is FN/(TP + FN), expressed as a percentage, among definitively malignant thyroid nodules.
AI positivity is defined as score >0.5; conventional ultrasound positivity is C-TIRADS category 4a or higher.
Include only pathology-matched nodules with an unambiguous lesion-level link and a definitive benign or malignant diagnosis.
Exclude FT-UMP, WDT-UMP, NIFTP, other borderline diagnoses, and nodules without unambiguous lesion-level linkage.
|
From the preoperative examinations until the final postoperative histopathology report became available; assessed through October 15, 2025, over the approximately 14-month study period.
|
|
Nodule-Level Positive Predictive Value of AI and C-TIRADS
時間枠:From the preoperative examinations until the final postoperative histopathology report became available; assessed through October 15, 2025, over the approximately 14-month study period.
|
For each method, positive predictive value is TP/(TP + FP), expressed as a percentage, among thyroid nodules classified as positive.
AI positivity is defined as score >0.5; conventional ultrasound positivity is C-TIRADS category 4a or higher.
Include only pathology-matched nodules with an unambiguous lesion-level link and a definitive benign or malignant diagnosis.
Exclude FT-UMP, WDT-UMP, NIFTP, other borderline diagnoses, and nodules without unambiguous lesion-level linkage.
|
From the preoperative examinations until the final postoperative histopathology report became available; assessed through October 15, 2025, over the approximately 14-month study period.
|
|
Nodule-Level Youden Index of AI and C-TIRADS
時間枠:From the preoperative examinations until the final postoperative histopathology report became available; assessed through October 15, 2025, over the approximately 14-month study period.
|
For each method, the Youden index is sensitivity + specificity - 1 using fixed binary thresholds.
AI positivity is defined as score >0.5; conventional ultrasound positivity is C-TIRADS category 4a or higher.
Include only pathology-matched nodules with an unambiguous lesion-level link and a definitive benign or malignant diagnosis.
Exclude FT-UMP, WDT-UMP, NIFTP, other borderline diagnoses, and nodules without unambiguous lesion-level linkage.
|
From the preoperative examinations until the final postoperative histopathology report became available; assessed through October 15, 2025, over the approximately 14-month study period.
|
|
Distribution of Cervical Lymph-Node Metastasis Status Among Pathologically Examined Nodes
時間枠:From surgery or supplementary sampling until the corresponding pathology result became available; assessed through October 15, 2025, over the approximately 14-month study period.
|
Among cervical lymph nodes actually removed or sampled and pathologically examined, record the number and percentage with and without metastasis.
No pathologic reference diagnosis is assigned to unsampled lymph nodes.
|
From surgery or supplementary sampling until the corresponding pathology result became available; assessed through October 15, 2025, over the approximately 14-month study period.
|
|
Nodule-Level Specificity of AI and C-TIRADS
時間枠:From the preoperative examinations until the final postoperative histopathology report became available; assessed through October 15, 2025, over the approximately 14-month study period.
|
Using definitive postoperative histopathology as the reference standard, specificity is TN/(TN + FP), expressed as a percentage, for the locked AI classification (positive if score >0.5) and conventional C-TIRADS (positive if category 4a or higher).
Include only pathology-matched nodules with an unambiguous lesion-level link and a definitive benign or malignant diagnosis.
Exclude FT-UMP, WDT-UMP, NIFTP, other borderline diagnoses, and nodules without unambiguous lesion-level linkage.
|
From the preoperative examinations until the final postoperative histopathology report became available; assessed through October 15, 2025, over the approximately 14-month study period.
|
|
Nodule-Level Negative Predictive Value of AI and C-TIRADS
時間枠:From the preoperative examinations until the final postoperative histopathology report became available; assessed through October 15, 2025, over the approximately 14-month study period.
|
Using definitive postoperative histopathology as the reference standard, negative predictive value is TN/(TN + FN), expressed as a percentage, for the locked AI classification (positive if score >0.5) and conventional C-TIRADS (positive if category 4a or higher).
Include only pathology-matched nodules with an unambiguous lesion-level link and a definitive benign or malignant diagnosis.
Exclude FT-UMP, WDT-UMP, NIFTP, other borderline diagnoses, and nodules without unambiguous lesion-level linkage.
|
From the preoperative examinations until the final postoperative histopathology report became available; assessed through October 15, 2025, over the approximately 14-month study period.
|
|
Nodule-Level Accuracy of AI and C-TIRADS
時間枠:From the preoperative examinations until the final postoperative histopathology report became available; assessed through October 15, 2025, over the approximately 14-month study period.
|
Using definitive postoperative histopathology as the reference standard, accuracy is (TP + TN)/(TP + TN + FP + FN), expressed as a percentage, for the locked AI classification (positive if score >0.5) and conventional C-TIRADS (positive if category 4a or higher).
Include only pathology-matched nodules with an unambiguous lesion-level link and a definitive benign or malignant diagnosis.
Exclude FT-UMP, WDT-UMP, NIFTP, other borderline diagnoses, and nodules without unambiguous lesion-level linkage.
|
From the preoperative examinations until the final postoperative histopathology report became available; assessed through October 15, 2025, over the approximately 14-month study period.
|
|
Area Under the ROC Curve for the Continuous AI Malignancy Score
時間枠:From the preoperative examinations until the final postoperative histopathology report became available; assessed through October 15, 2025, over the approximately 14-month study period.
|
Using definitive postoperative histopathology as the reference standard, calculate the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the continuous locked AI malignancy score.
Include only pathology-matched nodules with an unambiguous lesion-level link and a definitive benign or malignant diagnosis.
Exclude FT-UMP, WDT-UMP, NIFTP, other borderline diagnoses, and nodules without unambiguous lesion-level linkage.
No AUC is calculated for the single-threshold C-TIRADS classification.
|
From the preoperative examinations until the final postoperative histopathology report became available; assessed through October 15, 2025, over the approximately 14-month study period.
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
2024年9月1日
一次修了 (実際)
2025年9月28日
研究の完了 (実際)
2025年10月15日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2024年6月9日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2024年7月11日
最初の投稿 (実際)
2024年7月12日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
2026年8月7日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2026年8月5日
最終確認日
2026年8月1日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- AI-base PCD
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
いいえ
IPD プランの説明
Individual participant data are not planned for external sharing because the dataset contains detailed clinical records and ultrasound images that may remain re-identifiable, and the available study records do not document participant consent specifically permitting external IPD sharing or institutional authorization for such sharing.
Aggregate, non-identifiable results will be reported in publications.
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
いいえ
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
いいえ
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。