USDA Western Human Nutrition Research Center (WHNRC) Cross-Sectional Nutritional Phenotyping Study

Many inflammatory responses can be modulated by specific dietary components. For example, in cardiovascular disease, macrophages and T-cells react with oxidized LDL (an endogenous modified antigen) to produce arterial plaque and subsequent blockage of coronary arteries. High intake of saturated fats (or simple sugars that drive synthesis of saturated fatty acids) may promote this inflammation by affecting macrophages and T-cells. Conversely, increased intake of omega-3 fatty acids may decrease inflammation by suppression of macrophage and T-cell pro-inflammatory activity. Long-term sub-clinical inflammation caused by intestinal bacteria has been linked to the development of Irritable Bowel Disease and related disorders. Low intake of fruits, vegetables, or whole grains or high intake of saturated fats may promote sub-clinical gut inflammation by promoting dysbiosis of the gut microbiota. Allergic asthma develops in predisposed individuals as a result of an overactive allergic-type immune response to inhaled environmental allergens. Dietary factors such as vitamin D and omega-3 fatty acids may diminish pro-inflammatory responses to environmental allergens by promoting the development of T-regulatory cells and other anti-inflammatory factors.

Individual variability in chronic disease risk is well recognized. For example, why does excess adiposity lead to disease in some individuals and not others? The nature of the fat tissue rather than the abundance, may impact cross-talk with other metabolically-relevant tissues and affect disease risk. It is important to characterize healthy vs. unhealthy phenotypes across various tissues and to understand how micro- and macro-nutrients interact with molecular and metabolic pathways to support a healthy body weight. This study brings together scientists with expertise in nutritional sciences, immunology, analytical chemistry, physiology, neuroendocrinology, and behavior to understand how diet impacts metabolism and disease risk through the interplay and coordination of signals and metabolites arising from multiple organ systems.

The overall objective is to characterize the phenotypic profile of participants according to their immunologic, physiologic, neuroendocrine, and metabolic responses to a dietary challenge and a physical fitness challenge by addressing the specific aims listed below. The cross-sectional study is organized into two study visits (Visit 1 and Visit 2) separated by approximately two weeks of at-home specimen and data collection.

Specific Aim 1: To determine if diet quality is independently associated with systemic immune activation, inflammation, or oxidative stress differentiated by:

1. pro-inflammatory T-helper cells (Th1, Th2, and Th17 cells) and related cytokines
2. anti-inflammatory T-regulatory cells and related cytokines

3. dysbiosis of the gut microbiota and markers of gut inflammation (e.g. neopterin and myeloperoxidase)

   a. and to evaluate the association between dysbiosis of the gut microbiota, gut inflammation, and systemic immune activation

4. plasma metabolomic response to a mixed macronutrient challenge meal (includes diet quality and physical activity as independent variables)
5. endothelial (dys)function and vascular reactivity

Specific Aim 2: To determine if a high fat/sugar challenge meal induces differential effects over time (0-6h postprandial) according to habitual diet characteristics, physical activity levels, stress levels, age, sex, or BMI on:

1. postprandial monocyte activation
2. plasma lipid metabolomic responses including non-esterified fatty acids, phospholipids, triacylglycerols, red blood cell fatty acids, endocannabinoids, bile acids, eicosanoids and related oxylipins, ceramides, sphingoid bases, and acylcarnitines
3. plasma amino acid metabolomics
4. glucose metabolism and metabolic flexibility (i.e. the ability to switch from glucose to lipid oxidation as energy sources)
5. changes in endocrinology and self-report of hunger and satiety
6. postprandial free cortisol

Specific Aim 3: To determine the mechanisms of:

1. postprandial monocyte activation
2. suppression of challenge-meal induced monocyte activation by docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) (in an ex vivo experiment using a subset of samples)

Specific Aim 4: To evaluate the associations between eating behavior, physical activity, and/or anthropometry and the outcomes:

1. endocrinology of hunger and satiety
2. plasma metabolomic responses
3. vulnerability and resistance to stress
4. endothelial (dys)function and vascular reactivity
5. prediction of insulin sensitivity

Specific Aim 5: To determine how genetic variants affect nutrient metabolism, cardiovascular physiology, and immune function and improve understanding of how dietary factors affect these metabolic, cardiovascular and immune phenotypes.