이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Enhanced Stress Resilience Training for Faculty (ESRT-Faculty)

2021년 10월 25일 업데이트: University of California, San Francisco

Enhanced Stress Resilience Training for Faculty Physicians

Mounting evidence shows that burnout, a critical metric for dissatisfaction and distress, is a growing problem within medicine. Burnout is a syndrome associated with worse physician performance, patient outcomes, and hospital economics. Furthermore, researchers are coming to understand that burnout, diminished performance and the development of mental and physical illness are related. It has been proposed that chronic and overwhelming stress, in the absence of adequate coping skills, promotes performance deficits from surgical errors to poor professionalism due to the effects of stress on cognition.

Notably, in small studies of physicians and other high-stress/high-performance groups mindfulness-based interventions have shown exceptional promise in improving burnout and distress symptoms, protecting cognition, and enhancing meaningfulness and satisfaction in work. Nevertheless, in spite of promising results in various populations the translation of mindfulness-based interventions to real-world settings has been slow.

There is a paucity of quality research examining individually-based interventions, formal mindfulness training in physicians, or either of these things in the high stakes world of surgeons and anesthesiologists. To address these gaps, researchers have developed Enhanced Stress-Resilience Training (ESRT) based on MBSR, but streamlined and tailored for surgeons and anesthesiologists.

Moreover, researchers have refined the scales included in our psychosocial survey of well-being in order to sharpen our approach to the complex issue of physician well-being and factors influencing physician resilience, within Surgery and Anesthesia, at UCSF.

연구 개요

상세 설명

Burnout, which comprises emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and diminished satisfaction with one's work, has been documented in medical students, trainees, and practicing physicians across specialties, including 69% of surgical residents and 40-60% of practicing physicians.

Furthermore, a strong correlation between burnout, impaired performance and the development of mental and physical illness is coming to light. It has been proposed that chronic and overwhelming stress, in the absence of adequate coping skills, promotes burnout and associated distress symptoms such as depression, suicidal ideation and anxiety. Among physicians, performance deficits from surgical errors to poor professionalism have been proposed to result from the effects of stress on cognition. Notably, in other high-stress/high-performance groups, mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have shown promise in reducing distress symptoms, protecting cognition, and enhancing performance. Among physicians, limited studies of MBIs have shown improvements in burnout and the sense of meaningfulness and satisfaction in work. Nevertheless, in spite of such evidence, MBIs have yet to be tested in surgeons and have made little progress being translated to real-world settings within healthcare.

Interestingly, our cross-sectional national survey of general surgery residents found that high dispositional mindfulness reduces the risk of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, moderate to severe depression and suicidal ideation, by 75% or more. This suggests that while mindfulness may seem out of place among surgeons and operating room culture, it is in fact already in use in this setting, albeit unconsciously. More importantly, it appears to be beneficial. These findings, in combination with promising preliminary data from our longitudinal RCT of mindfulness training in surgical interns, suggested that an appropriate MBI could enhance native skills and potentially become a powerful component of stress resilience training among surgeons and anesthesiologists. Therefore, through iterative work in surgical trainees, researchers have created a streamlined, modular MBI for surgery and anesthesia faculty physicians and aim to test it both for pragmatic feasibility and for efficacy at enhancing stress resilience and improving wellbeing.

The significance of this work lies in evaluating a process-centered skill believed to promote resilience, defined as the ability to thrive under adversity and predicated on the perception of stressors as challenges rather than overwhelming threats. The transformation of how people experience stress is a learned skill that can be applied across career stages, practice trajectories and life. The potential to protect individuals, while researchers work for mandatory institutional and systemic change, is powerful. Moreover, the resultant tendency for self-awareness and equipoise has been contagious in other settings, providing fuel for the greater culture change that is inarguably necessary and holds great promise for us and our patients.

The innovation of this work is in bringing a mind-body intervention to bear not only on well-being but also on the fundamental cognitive processes believed to sub-serve performance such as attention, working memory capacity, emotional regulation and self-awareness, which may impact behaviors such as medical decision-making, professionalism and team work. The potential to improve both the operative environment and surgical or medical errors is unprecedented. Moreover, the use of a manualized curriculum specifically crafted for physicians could pave the way for translation to larger studies, other specialties and outside institutions.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

48

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, 미국, 94143
        • University of California San Francisco

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 (성인)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Exclusion Criteria:

- Lifetime history of an organic mental illness.

Inclusion Criteria:

- Any consented surgery or anesthesia faculty who does not meet exclusion criteria.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 해당 없음
  • 중재 모델: 단일 그룹 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: ESRT

Volunteer surgery and anesthesia faculty from UCSF working at Parnassus Hospital site and interested in training.

Volunteer surgery and anesthesia faculty from UCSF working at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital site and interested in training.

Volunteer surgery and anesthesia faculty from UCSF working at Mission Bay Hospital site and interested in training.

Enhanced Stress Resilience Training (ESRT) is derived from Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction with modifications to language, activities and contextualization to tailor the training to physicians involved in the operating room environment. ESRT consists of 5 weekly 1-hour group classes and 2-4 hour retreat. Classes focus on developing sustained attention and open monitoring in addition to training focused on stress and coping. Increasing duration (3-20 minutes per day) of guided mindfulness exercises are assigned each week. A 2-4 hour intensive retreat occurs at week 4 or 5. The central exercises of the training are the body scan, sitting meditation, qi gong and yoga. The weekly teaching sessions will be offered at various days and times each week in order to accommodate complicated physicians schedules that vary at each site. Participants can attend whichever session is most convenient. Daily practice will occur independently, with the duration reported weekly through text or email.
다른 이름들:
  • ESRT

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Change in Psychological Well-being: Burnout
기간: Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
Burnout: 2-item Maslach Burnout Inventory, 7-point Likert scale, 0 to 6. High burnout present if either question scores >= 4.
Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
Change in Psychological Well-being: Perceived Stress
기간: Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale: 10-items, 5-point Likert scale, 0-4. High stress is score >17.
Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
Change in Psychological Well-being: Anxiety
기간: Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
Spielberger's State Trait Anxiety index, 4-point Likert, 1 to 4. High anxiety > 40.
Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
Change in Psychological Well-being: Depression
기간: Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
Depression and Suicidal Ideation are assessed using the 9-item form of the Patient Health Questionnaire. 4-point Likert scale, 0 to 3 and a total score from 0 to 27 is calculated. Severe depression > 20.
Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
Change in Psychological Well-being: Mindfulness
기간: Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised. 4-point Likert scale, 1 to 4. High mindfulness ≥ 31.
Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
Change in Psychological Well-being: Alcoholism
기간: Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
The AUDIT Alcohol Consumption Questions, 5-point Likert scale, 0 to 4. Misuse for females if score ≥ 3, for males if score ≥ 4.
Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
Change in Psychological Well-being: Work Climate
기간: Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
The Swedish Demand-Control-Support Questionnaire assess work climate. 4-point Likert scale, 1 to 4.
Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
Change in Psychological Well-being: Mental Health
기간: Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
The short form of the Mental Health Continuum assess various facets of well-being. 6-point Likert scale, 0 to 5.
Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
Change in Psychological Well-being: Perceived Stress Reactivity
기간: Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
The Perceived Stress Reactivity Scale is a 23-item questionnaire with 5 subscales (Prolonged Reactivity; Reactivity to Work Overload; Reactivity to Social Conflict; Reactivity to Failure; Reactivity to Social Evaluation), and 1 overall scale (Perceived Stress Reactivity total score). The first answer category of each item is coded 0, the second 1, and the third 2.
Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
Change in Psychological Well-being: Mental Disorders
기간: Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
The Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders Patient Health Questionnaire (PRIME-MD PHQ). This is a 2 item screening instrument used for the assessment of depression with an answer of "yes" to either question indicating a positive response where the respondent displayed traits of possible depression.
Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Change in Performance: Strategies
기간: Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
The Test of Performance Strategies-2 is a 68-item self-report instrument that measures a comprehensive range of psychological skills that have been shown to impact successful performance: goal-setting, imagery, self-talk, relaxation, activation, emotional control, and automaticity. 5 point Likert Scale, 1 to 5.
Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
Change in Performance: Psychological Skills
기간: Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
The Test of Performance Strategies-2 is a 68-item self-report instrument that measures a comprehensive range of psychological skills that have been shown to impact successful performance: goal-setting, imagery, self-talk, relaxation, activation, emotional control, and automaticity. 5 point Likert Scale, 1 to 5.
Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
Change in Emotional Regulation: Mind-Wandering
기간: Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
The Mind-Wandering Questionnaire, 5 item scale that is measured the frequency of mind-wandering. 6-point Likert scale, 1 to 6. The total is the sum of the five items within a 5-30 range.
Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
Change in Emotional Regulation: Emotions
기간: Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, an 18 item scale focuses on adaptive ways of responding to emotional distress. 5-point Likert scale, 1 to 5. The total score is sum the subscale scores.
Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
Change in Emotional Regulation: Decentering
기간: Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
The Experiences Questionnaire is a 12 item instrument that assesses decentering. 5-point Likert scale,1 to 5.
Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
Change in Cognitive Function
기간: Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.

Outcome contains:

1. NIH EXAMINER Battery. Measures working memory, inhibition, set shifting, fluency, planning, insight, and social cognition and behavior. The EXAMINER battery software calculates the executive composite and factor scores in the R language.

2. The Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery measures:

  1. Reaction Time - assessments of motor and mental response speeds, measures of movement time, reaction time, response accuracy and impulsivity. Outcome measures are divided into reaction time and movement time for both the simple and five-choice variants.
  2. Rapid Visual Information Processing is a measure of sustained attention. Outcome measures cover latency, probability of false alarms and sensitivity.
  3. Paired Associates Learning assesses visual memory and new learning. Outcome measures include the errors made by the participant, the number of trials required to locate the patterns correctly, memory scores and stages completed.
Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
Change in Cognitive Function: NIH EXAMINER Battery
기간: Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.
NIH EXAMINER Battery measures working memory, inhibition, set shifting, fluency, planning, insight, and social cognition and behavior. The EXAMINER battery software calculates the executive composite and factor scores in the R language.
Baseline; 6 weeks (post-intervention); 12 and 18 month follow-up.

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Carter C Lebares, MD, University of California, San Francisco

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

일반 간행물

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2018년 7월 9일

기본 완료 (실제)

2020년 12월 1일

연구 완료 (실제)

2020년 12월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2018년 4월 6일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2018년 5월 2일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2018년 5월 4일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2021년 10월 26일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2021년 10월 25일

마지막으로 확인됨

2021년 10월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

3
구독하다