Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Cosmetic Outcome at 4 Months in Hand and Feet Lacerations in Children: Conservative Versus Suture Repair

16 september 2020 bijgewerkt door: Trevor Tredway, MD, St. Louis University

Conservative Versus Suture Repair of Hand and Feet Lacerations in Children

Hand and feet lacerations are common in children with repair often requiring conscious sedation and needle sticks for repair. Growing evidence in adults reveal that many of these small lacerations do quite well cosmetically without intervention. This randomized controlled trial will evaluated the cosmetic outcome at 4 months in two groups of children with hand or feet lacerations <2 cm comparing suturing vs conservative wound management.

Studie Overzicht

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of 2 repair methods in simple (<2cm) hand and feet lacerations in the pediatric population (2-17 yrs). Our hypothesis is that there is no statistical difference in cosmetic outcomes between suture repair and non-repair of these injuries. This study has been performed in the adult population, but has not yet been done in children. The researchers would like to be the first to show that conservative repair can be done in our pediatric population. The suture group will have their injuries repaired with non-absorbable sutures (nylon) which remain the gold standard in cosmetic repair of hands and feet. The conservative group will have identical cleaning and preparation of the wound, but the laceration will be covered with antibiotic ointment and sterile gauze without repair. Secondary outcome measure include patient satisfaction, infection rates, pain during repair, time of initial ED visit stay, and cost of supplies used in repair. Our patients will return in 10 -14 days for follow up and in 4 months for evaluation of the wound and for digital pictures to be taken of the wound. Wounds and scars will be evaluated at both 10 -14 days and 4 months by both the researchers and the parents or care givers. A satisfaction survey will be administered to the parent or guardian. At 3-4 months, digital photographs of the healing lacerations will be graded for appearance by clinicians blinded to the repair method. The initial visit will be billed to their insurance and the follow-up visits will be free.

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Werkelijk)

26

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studie Locaties

    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, Verenigde Staten, 63104
        • cardinal glennon children's hospital / Division of Emergency Medicine

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

2 jaar tot 17 jaar (Kind)

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Allemaal

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any English-speaking child, 2 to 17 years of age that presents to the emergency department at Cardinal Glennon Children's Medical Center with a hand or foot laceration less than or equal to 2 cm is eligible for the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients will be excluded if their laceration is greater than 2 cm, have irregular borders or are, deeper than 0.5 cm.
  • Wounds that are the result of a mammalian bite,
  • Wounds more than minimally contaminated on visual inspection or are more than 8 hours old.
  • Wounds associated with an open fracture, involve a partial amputation or involve a puncture wound.
  • Wounds that involve the nailbed or a fingernail avulsion will be excluded.
  • Patients with confirmed or suspected retained foreign bodies in the wound would also be excluded.
  • Patients will also be excluded if hemostasis could not be attained after 15 minutes of pressure.
  • Patients with complex lacerations who need plastic surgery or other sub-specialty repair will be excluded.
  • Complex lacerations include: associated or suspected neurovascular, tendon, ligament, or bone injury, need for deep/multi-layer sutures will be excluded.
  • Patients with known or suspected immunodeficiency, bleeding or clotting disorders, pregnancy, diabetes, renal dysfunction, or allergic reaction to local anesthesia are also excluded.
  • Patients with a history of anticoagulant or chronic steroid use in the last year. Chronic steroid use is defined by use of steroids (PO, IV, IM, or topical) for more than 14 consecutive days, for more than 3 separate courses per year will be excluded.
  • Foster children will also be excluded, due to complications regarding custody, consent, and follow-up issues.
  • Patients with allergies to topical anesthetics solution will be excluded from the study.

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Behandeling
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Enkel

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Geen tussenkomst: conservative
patient fulfilling entry criteria will be randomized to the conservative arm - no suturing
Actieve vergelijker: suture
patient fulfilling entry criteria will be randomized to the suture arm for repair with nylon suture material
Repair of wound with suture
Repair of wound with suture

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Cosmetic Outcome of Hand and Feet Laceration in Children : Conservative vs Suture Repair
Tijdsspanne: 4 months

Randomized, parallel group study will compare cosmetic outcome by digital picture by blinded evaluators at 4 months post enrollment.

The digital pictures of the laceration repairs were scored using a previously validated Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS scale is a 100-mm continuous line that is marked at the right end with "best appearance/scar"(score 100), and on the left end with "worst appearance/scar" (score 0).

4 months

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Wound Healing in Hand and Feet Lacerations in Children: Conservative vs Suture Repair
Tijdsspanne: 10-14 days

Wound healing by visual inspection at the first follow up visit. The wounds will be evaluated for complications that were defined a priori as follows: "wound infection" was one that required systemic antibiotics as determined by the treating attending physician; and "wound dehiscence" as a wound that required the placement of additional sutures or tissue adhesives.

The outcome measure data is reported as the number of participants without the presence of "wound infection" or "wound dehiscence".

10-14 days
Cosmetic Outcome of Hand and Feet Laceration in Children : Conservative vs Suture Repair
Tijdsspanne: 10-14 days
Infection rate by visual inspection. The wounds will be evaluated for complications that were defined a priori as follows: "wound infection" was one that required systemic antibiotics as determined by the treating attending physician; and "wound dehiscence" as a wound that required the placement of additional sutures or tissue adhesives.
10-14 days
Cosmetic Outcome of Hand and Feet Laceration in Children : Conservative vs Suture Repair
Tijdsspanne: 10-14 days
Rate of wound dehiscence by visual inspection. The wounds will be evaluated for complications that were defined a priori as follows: "wound infection" was one that required systemic antibiotics as determined by the treating attending physician; and "wound dehiscence" as a wound that required the placement of additional sutures or tissue adhesives.
10-14 days

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Werkelijk)

13 april 2014

Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 mei 2019

Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 mei 2019

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

22 september 2017

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

25 oktober 2017

Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)

26 oktober 2017

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

9 oktober 2020

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

16 september 2020

Laatst geverifieerd

1 september 2020

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • IRB 26912

Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)

Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?

JA

Beschrijving IPD-plan

if other facilities are performing similar studies would be happy to participate

IPD-tijdsbestek voor delen

7/19

IPD-toegangscriteria voor delen

By Appointment

IPD delen Ondersteunend informatietype

  • LEERPROTOCOOL
  • ICF

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Ja

product vervaardigd in en geëxporteerd uit de V.S.

Nee

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren