Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

PEARL Study: Improvement of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Care

12. november 2014 oppdatert av: Radboud University Medical Center

Improvement of Hospital Care for Patients With Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

The main objective of the proposed study is to assess the effectiveness, feasibility and costs of a tailored strategy (developed in accordance with the barriers found and current practice) to improve care for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL), compared to a common strategy of 'audit & feedback'.

Studieoversikt

Detaljert beskrivelse

In a previous study among 22 Dutch hospitals many gaps in the care for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) were found, compared to best evidence as described in guidelines. In a problem analysis study, barriers and facilitators for good quality of NHL-care were assessed and a tailored implementation strategy was developed, based on these findings. The proposed study aims at the effectiveness, feasibility and costs of this tailored strategy to improve quality of care for patients with an NHL in a clustered randomized controlled trial in 19 Dutch hospitals.

Multilevel regression analyses will be performed to evaluate the effectiveness of both strategies. Exposure to and experiences with the strategy elements will be analysed descriptively.

Regarding the costs, the two strategies are compared with a health care perspective. The input of resources will be assessed by collecting volumes of consumed resources and multiplying these by the price of each resource unit; the implementation process and consequently costs will be estimated by an Activity Based Costing (ABC) approach. The output will be determined by the level of adherence to the NHL quality indicators.

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Forventet)

418

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

    • Gelderland
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Nederland, 6500 HB
        • Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

18 år og eldre (Voksen, Eldre voksen)

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma
  • Diagnosed in one of the participating hospitals
  • Able to read and understand Dutch

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Helsetjenesteforskning
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Ingen (Open Label)

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Standard implementation strategy
Standard intervention
Standard intervention consists of audit&feedback
Eksperimentell: Innovative implementation strategy
Implementation tools
  • Professionals receive audit & feedback
  • Patients (and clinicians) have access to a website with information tailored to patients with an NHL. This website gives insight into the logistic processes of each diagnostic tool and into the patients' personal care pathway.
  • Standardization of diagnostic and evaluative request forms and reports for clinicians.
  • Supporting material for standardizing the procedure for multidisciplinary meetings.

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Change from baseline in adherence to quality indicators for NHL care
Tidsramme: baseline and 1 year
The effect of our interventions will be measured by means of adherence to quality indicators for optimal NHL care. The effects of the audit and feedback strategy (9 hospitals) versus the tailored strategy (9 hospitals) will be evaluated using previously developed quality indicators. These indicators for optimal NHL care were developed on the basis of evidence based guidelines, literature and opinions of clinicians about NHL care in a previous study and were validated.
baseline and 1 year

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Exposure to and experiences with the interventions
Tidsramme: after 1 year
To study the feasibility of both strategies, a process evaluation has to give insight into the mechanisms and processes responsible for the result (= extent of adherence to the indicator set for optimal NHL care). The actual 'exposure' of the patients and professionals to the implementation elements, together with their experience with these elements may have influenced the final result (success or failure of adherence). Data about 'exposure' to the different interventions will be collected using questionnaires.
after 1 year
Costs of the strategy and the changed care
Tidsramme: after 1 year
Non-adherence to the multidisciplinary NHL guideline may lead to unnecessary medical interventions and more complications, and subsequently to efficiency losses. This economic evaluation compares the two implementation strategies. The perspective of this economic evaluation will be a health care perspective. Both the costs of the implementation strategy and changes in health care consumption will be assessed. The outcome should facilitate local health care decision making on implementation.
after 1 year
Change from baseline in morbidity
Tidsramme: baseline and 1 year
Morbidity is an important outcome measure for the effect of the intervention strategy.
baseline and 1 year
Differences between both groups in Patient Related Outcome Measures (PROMs)
Tidsramme: after 1 year
Patient Related Outcome Measures as quality of life are important measures to evaluate the outcome of care from a patient perspective.
after 1 year

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Etterforskere

  • Hovedetterforsker: Rosella Hermens, PhD, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center
  • Hovedetterforsker: Nelleke Ottevanger, MD, PhD, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center

Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker

Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart

1. oktober 2012

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

1. november 2014

Studiet fullført (Forventet)

1. desember 2014

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

8. mars 2012

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

22. mars 2012

Først lagt ut (Anslag)

23. mars 2012

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Anslag)

13. november 2014

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

12. november 2014

Sist bekreftet

1. november 2014

Mer informasjon

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere