Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

PEARL Study: Improvement of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Care

12. november 2014 opdateret af: Radboud University Medical Center

Improvement of Hospital Care for Patients With Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

The main objective of the proposed study is to assess the effectiveness, feasibility and costs of a tailored strategy (developed in accordance with the barriers found and current practice) to improve care for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL), compared to a common strategy of 'audit & feedback'.

Studieoversigt

Status

Ukendt

Betingelser

Detaljeret beskrivelse

In a previous study among 22 Dutch hospitals many gaps in the care for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) were found, compared to best evidence as described in guidelines. In a problem analysis study, barriers and facilitators for good quality of NHL-care were assessed and a tailored implementation strategy was developed, based on these findings. The proposed study aims at the effectiveness, feasibility and costs of this tailored strategy to improve quality of care for patients with an NHL in a clustered randomized controlled trial in 19 Dutch hospitals.

Multilevel regression analyses will be performed to evaluate the effectiveness of both strategies. Exposure to and experiences with the strategy elements will be analysed descriptively.

Regarding the costs, the two strategies are compared with a health care perspective. The input of resources will be assessed by collecting volumes of consumed resources and multiplying these by the price of each resource unit; the implementation process and consequently costs will be estimated by an Activity Based Costing (ABC) approach. The output will be determined by the level of adherence to the NHL quality indicators.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Forventet)

418

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

    • Gelderland
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Holland, 6500 HB
        • Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma
  • Diagnosed in one of the participating hospitals
  • Able to read and understand Dutch

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Sundhedstjenesteforskning
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Standard implementation strategy
Standard intervention
Standard intervention consists of audit&feedback
Eksperimentel: Innovative implementation strategy
Implementation tools
  • Professionals receive audit & feedback
  • Patients (and clinicians) have access to a website with information tailored to patients with an NHL. This website gives insight into the logistic processes of each diagnostic tool and into the patients' personal care pathway.
  • Standardization of diagnostic and evaluative request forms and reports for clinicians.
  • Supporting material for standardizing the procedure for multidisciplinary meetings.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Change from baseline in adherence to quality indicators for NHL care
Tidsramme: baseline and 1 year
The effect of our interventions will be measured by means of adherence to quality indicators for optimal NHL care. The effects of the audit and feedback strategy (9 hospitals) versus the tailored strategy (9 hospitals) will be evaluated using previously developed quality indicators. These indicators for optimal NHL care were developed on the basis of evidence based guidelines, literature and opinions of clinicians about NHL care in a previous study and were validated.
baseline and 1 year

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Exposure to and experiences with the interventions
Tidsramme: after 1 year
To study the feasibility of both strategies, a process evaluation has to give insight into the mechanisms and processes responsible for the result (= extent of adherence to the indicator set for optimal NHL care). The actual 'exposure' of the patients and professionals to the implementation elements, together with their experience with these elements may have influenced the final result (success or failure of adherence). Data about 'exposure' to the different interventions will be collected using questionnaires.
after 1 year
Costs of the strategy and the changed care
Tidsramme: after 1 year
Non-adherence to the multidisciplinary NHL guideline may lead to unnecessary medical interventions and more complications, and subsequently to efficiency losses. This economic evaluation compares the two implementation strategies. The perspective of this economic evaluation will be a health care perspective. Both the costs of the implementation strategy and changes in health care consumption will be assessed. The outcome should facilitate local health care decision making on implementation.
after 1 year
Change from baseline in morbidity
Tidsramme: baseline and 1 year
Morbidity is an important outcome measure for the effect of the intervention strategy.
baseline and 1 year
Differences between both groups in Patient Related Outcome Measures (PROMs)
Tidsramme: after 1 year
Patient Related Outcome Measures as quality of life are important measures to evaluate the outcome of care from a patient perspective.
after 1 year

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Rosella Hermens, PhD, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center
  • Ledende efterforsker: Nelleke Ottevanger, MD, PhD, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart

1. oktober 2012

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

1. november 2014

Studieafslutning (Forventet)

1. december 2014

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

8. marts 2012

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

22. marts 2012

Først opslået (Skøn)

23. marts 2012

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Skøn)

13. november 2014

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

12. november 2014

Sidst verificeret

1. november 2014

Mere information

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Non-Hodgkin lymfom

Kliniske forsøg med Standard intervention

3
Abonner