Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Does a Customized Intubation Facility Reduce Incidence of Difficulty (Person-OTI)

9. juni 2026 oppdatert av: Hopital Foch

Does a Customized Intubation Facility Reduce Incidence of Difficulty: Randomized Multicenter Trial?

The idea of this study is to demonstrate that the position of the head at a comfort height spontaneously expressed by the patient, between Jackson's amended position or Ramp position, significantly improves the quality of the intubation gesture. This patient position can be easily achieved by placing a compressed air mattress under the patient's trunk - AirPal RAMP ™ mattress.

Thus the investigators can assume that the appropriate positioning and use of a video laryngoscope (McGrathR Mac) places the patient in the best anatomical configuration to breathe and, indirectly to facilitate control of the airways, especially for those with a risk of difficult airway management.

Studieoversikt

Detaljert beskrivelse

  1. Position for orotracheal intubation The period preceding the administration of anesthetic agents is essential to ensure a satisfactory oxygen supply (pre-oxygenation). Then, once loss of consciousness is achieved, an interface (oral intubation probe) is put in place to allow mechanical ventilation during the procedure. This phase can be marked by a more or less expected difficulty depending on the risk factors presented by the patient. Thus an Arne score> 11 is predictive of a potential difficulty which may lead to an alternative technique being proposed. Simple techniques also exist in the patient setup to reduce the incidence of difficulties. Among them, the placement of a cushion under the head with a slight extension of the head of 20 ° (Jackson's amended position) is recommended because it allows to obtain the alignment of the posterior pharyngeal and glottic spaces. This patient position can be easily achieved by placing a compressed air mattress under the patient's trunk - AirPal RAMP ™ mattress.

    This optimization of the position according to the patient, between Jackson's amended position or Ramp position, opens up the prospect of defining an optimal position personalized to each patient. Thus, it can be assumed that the appropriate positioning places the patient in the best anatomical configuration for breathing and, indirectly, to facilitate control of the airways.

  2. Video laryngoscope The use of a video laryngoscope (McGrathR Mac) is becoming widespread in anesthesia, especially for the management of patients at risk of difficult airway management. This device by the video support at the end of the blade provides a better visualization of the glottic orifice.
  3. The hypothesis of this research The idea of this study is to demonstrate that the position of the head at a height of comfort spontaneously expressed by the patient significantly improves the quality of the intubation procedure.

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

      • Suresnes, Frankrike, 92150
        • Morgan LE GUEN, PhD

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

  • Voksen
  • Eldre voksen

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men or women over 18 and under 80;
  • Must undergo general anesthesia with oral intubation using a standard intubation probe;
  • Can be contacted directly by telephone if they are patients treated in outpatient surgery;
  • Having signed a consent form;
  • Being affiliated to a Health Insurance scheme.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnant or breastfeeding patients;
  • patients with a predicted difficulty in mask ventilation or intubation according to the assessment of the doctor who performs the clinical examination prior to inclusion (Arne score ≥ 11) or the one who takes care of the patient in the block operative;
  • patients for whom the surgery requires the placement of a double-lumen tube;
  • patients requiring rapid sequence induction;
  • patients for whom induction cannot be carried out by the sufentanil, propofol, atracurium or rocuronium sequence.

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Annen
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Ingen (Open Label)

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Eksperimentell: Custom
patient with installation on an infused airbag until a comfortable position is reached
patient with personalized installation until a comfortable position is reached
Ingen inngripen: Control
Jackson's amended position with placement of a 6 cm high cushion under the patient's head

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
the impact of a custom installation versus a conventional Jackson amended installation with a 6-centimeter cushion under the patient's head to facilitate orotracheal intubation
Tidsramme: 1 day
the proportion of orotracheal intubations for which third party assistance is required
1 day

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Assessment of the effect of patient positioning on the quality of exposure during intubation
Tidsramme: 1 day
  • the duration of the intubation;
  • the quality of visualization of the glottis;
  • failure of intubation defined by reexposure, by esophageal intubation;
  • the calculation of the Intubation Difficulty Scale (or IDS)
1 day
Determination of the most frequent complementary resettlement actions
Tidsramme: 1 day
  • the ideal position chosen by the patient (and measured) before the start of the procedure;
  • the patient's position (measured) when the intubation is successful. The intubation time will be correlated with these measurements and the angles that will be deduced from them;
  • additional techniques used at the time of intubation.
1 day
Assessment of the quality of manual ventilation before intubation (peroxygenation)
Tidsramme: 1 day
  • the use of a Guédel cannula;
  • the number of hands required for ventilation;
  • the percentage of leakage;
  • minimal SpO2;
  • maximum ETCO2.
1 day
Assessment of the frequency and severity of complications of intubation
Tidsramme: 2 days
The complications of intubation was defined by the pharyngeal pain the day after surgery, dysphonia, an irritative cough reported by the patient and atelectasis.
2 days
Assessment of patient comfort and the doctor's opinion on the technique
Tidsramme: 1 day
The doctor's opinion on the technique was defined by the regard to pre-oxygenation, peroxygenation, and intubation.
1 day
Safety assessment of the technique
Tidsramme: 1 day
Safety was evaluated by the occurrence of a fall of the head, occurrence of a fall of the patient, accidental extubation, the incidence of arterial oxygen desaturation, the lowest arterial oxygen saturation and the perception of difficulty in intubation.
1 day

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Sponsor

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

5. januar 2022

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

5. januar 2024

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

12. januar 2024

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

6. august 2021

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

9. juni 2026

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

15. juni 2026

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

15. juni 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

9. juni 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. juni 2026

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Andre studie-ID-numre

  • 2020_0030

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

NEI

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere