Does a Customized Intubation Facility Reduce Incidence of Difficulty (Person-OTI)
Does a Customized Intubation Facility Reduce Incidence of Difficulty: Randomized Multicenter Trial?
The idea of this study is to demonstrate that the position of the head at a comfort height spontaneously expressed by the patient, between Jackson's amended position or Ramp position, significantly improves the quality of the intubation gesture. This patient position can be easily achieved by placing a compressed air mattress under the patient's trunk - AirPal RAMP ™ mattress.
Thus the investigators can assume that the appropriate positioning and use of a video laryngoscope (McGrathR Mac) places the patient in the best anatomical configuration to breathe and, indirectly to facilitate control of the airways, especially for those with a risk of difficult airway management.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
Position for orotracheal intubation The period preceding the administration of anesthetic agents is essential to ensure a satisfactory oxygen supply (pre-oxygenation). Then, once loss of consciousness is achieved, an interface (oral intubation probe) is put in place to allow mechanical ventilation during the procedure. This phase can be marked by a more or less expected difficulty depending on the risk factors presented by the patient. Thus an Arne score> 11 is predictive of a potential difficulty which may lead to an alternative technique being proposed. Simple techniques also exist in the patient setup to reduce the incidence of difficulties. Among them, the placement of a cushion under the head with a slight extension of the head of 20 ° (Jackson's amended position) is recommended because it allows to obtain the alignment of the posterior pharyngeal and glottic spaces. This patient position can be easily achieved by placing a compressed air mattress under the patient's trunk - AirPal RAMP ™ mattress.
This optimization of the position according to the patient, between Jackson's amended position or Ramp position, opens up the prospect of defining an optimal position personalized to each patient. Thus, it can be assumed that the appropriate positioning places the patient in the best anatomical configuration for breathing and, indirectly, to facilitate control of the airways.
- Video laryngoscope The use of a video laryngoscope (McGrathR Mac) is becoming widespread in anesthesia, especially for the management of patients at risk of difficult airway management. This device by the video support at the end of the blade provides a better visualization of the glottic orifice.
- The hypothesis of this research The idea of this study is to demonstrate that the position of the head at a height of comfort spontaneously expressed by the patient significantly improves the quality of the intubation procedure.
Tipo de estudio
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
-
Suresnes, Francia, 92150
- Morgan LE GUEN, PhD
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Adulto
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Men or women over 18 and under 80;
- Must undergo general anesthesia with oral intubation using a standard intubation probe;
- Can be contacted directly by telephone if they are patients treated in outpatient surgery;
- Having signed a consent form;
- Being affiliated to a Health Insurance scheme.
Exclusion Criteria:
- pregnant or breastfeeding patients;
- patients with a predicted difficulty in mask ventilation or intubation according to the assessment of the doctor who performs the clinical examination prior to inclusion (Arne score ≥ 11) or the one who takes care of the patient in the block operative;
- patients for whom the surgery requires the placement of a double-lumen tube;
- patients requiring rapid sequence induction;
- patients for whom induction cannot be carried out by the sufentanil, propofol, atracurium or rocuronium sequence.
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Otro
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Custom
patient with installation on an infused airbag until a comfortable position is reached
|
patient with personalized installation until a comfortable position is reached
|
|
Sin intervención: Control
Jackson's amended position with placement of a 6 cm high cushion under the patient's head
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
the impact of a custom installation versus a conventional Jackson amended installation with a 6-centimeter cushion under the patient's head to facilitate orotracheal intubation
Periodo de tiempo: 1 day
|
the proportion of orotracheal intubations for which third party assistance is required
|
1 day
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of the effect of patient positioning on the quality of exposure during intubation
Periodo de tiempo: 1 day
|
|
1 day
|
|
Determination of the most frequent complementary resettlement actions
Periodo de tiempo: 1 day
|
|
1 day
|
|
Assessment of the quality of manual ventilation before intubation (peroxygenation)
Periodo de tiempo: 1 day
|
|
1 day
|
|
Assessment of the frequency and severity of complications of intubation
Periodo de tiempo: 2 days
|
The complications of intubation was defined by the pharyngeal pain the day after surgery, dysphonia, an irritative cough reported by the patient and atelectasis.
|
2 days
|
|
Assessment of patient comfort and the doctor's opinion on the technique
Periodo de tiempo: 1 day
|
The doctor's opinion on the technique was defined by the regard to pre-oxygenation, peroxygenation, and intubation.
|
1 day
|
|
Safety assessment of the technique
Periodo de tiempo: 1 day
|
Safety was evaluated by the occurrence of a fall of the head, occurrence of a fall of the patient, accidental extubation, the incidence of arterial oxygen desaturation, the lowest arterial oxygen saturation and the perception of difficulty in intubation.
|
1 day
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Finalización primaria (Actual)
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 2020_0030
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .