Exposure by Assessment: Effects of Daily AMQ-Based EMA of an Intrusive Trauma Memory in PTSD

Intrusive re-experiencing is a defining burden for many people with PTSD, often disrupting routines and making it hard to participate in care. Intrusion symptoms tend to be resistant to change, even when broader PTSD symptoms improve (Bar-Haim et al., 2021; Levi et al., 2022). This pattern underscores the need for brief, remote approaches tuned to everyday intrusion dynamics.

We test a home-based intervention requiring minimal clinician input that aims to reduce intrusive symptoms. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) offers such opportunity. Although typically used for data collection, Pollmann et al. (2024) reported preliminary evidence suggesting that two weeks of EMA focused on a traumatic intrusive memory (TR-IM) were followed by reductions in intrusion symptoms, while other symptom clusters remained comparatively unchanged. Their prompts were adapted from the Autobiographical Memory Questionnaire (AMQ; Rubin et al., 2003). However, in the absence of a control arm, it remains uncertain whether the observed change reflects targeted, safe-context activation of the traumatic memory, a general cognitive-distancing effect from repeated ratings regardless of target, or a different process altogether. A further methodological limitation is that EMA completion depended on participants' spontaneous recollection of the TR-IM in the preceding hours. As a result, responses were intermittent and varied across days and individuals, leading to uneven exposure and data gaps.

The present study aims to tests the mechanism in question as well as creating a different setting in which all participants answer the questionnaire every time. Adults with PTSD who report active intrusions will be randomized to one of two otherwise identical 10-days EMA protocols: (1) daily AMQ-based prompts that explicitly target a personally identified TR-IM, or (2) the same prompts targeting a neutral, non-intrusive memory. Primary outcomes will be baseline to post-treatment change and baseline to follow-up change on clinician-rated CAPS-5 total score and CAPS-5 Cluster B indices. Secondary outcomes will be self-reported PCL-5 total score and cluster B scores .