Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Family Empathic Behaviour Versus Nurse Empathic Behaviour

6 de março de 2014 atualizado por: Juliana de Lima Lopes

Family Empathic Behaviour Versus Nurse Empathic Behaviour: Comparison of Anxiety Symptoms in the Preoperative Cardiac Surgery Patients

The objective was to compare the frequency and intensity of symptoms of anxiety in patients of preoperative cardiac surgery who received empathic behaviour from nurse or family or those who received no specific type of empathic behaviour. This is a randomized clinical trial. The sample consisted of 66 patients in preoperative of cardiac surgery, who were divided in three groups: empathic behaviour by nurses, without specific empathic behaviour and by family. Anxiety was assessed at two time points: before and after the intervention. The instrument used was developed and validated, comprising 19 defining characteristics of the nursing diagnosis anxiety. The hypothesis is that the group who received empathic behaviour from nurse or family will reduce the anxiety.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

Primary outcome is anxiety. Anxiety was assessed by a nurse using of an instrument developed and validated previous, based on 19 defining characteristics described by NANDA-International for the nursing diagnosis anxiety: verbalization of fear (expressed concern); apprehension, nervousness, tension, restlessness, anxiety, anxious, insomnia, abnormal respiratory rate, increased pulse, dry mouth, increased perspiration, fatigue, cranky; voice / ends trembling, chest / abdominal pain, urinary urgency, nausea, and vomiting.

Patients were evaluated for the presence and absence of these anxiety symptoms through scores: 0 (no symptom) and 1 (presence of symptom). For analysis of the results was carried out the sum of the scores of each symptom, ranging from 0 to 21, with the higher the score, the greater was the anxiety symptoms presented by the patient.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

66

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • SP
      • São Paulo, SP, Brasil, 04023-061
        • Federal University of São Paulo

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

18 anos e mais velhos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients older than 18 years;
  • Literate;
  • Patient who agreed to participate in the study by signing the consent form at least 24 hours prior to surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a history of surgery;
  • Patients in preoperative cardiac transplantation;
  • Patients who did not have at least two defining characteristics of the nursing diagnosis anxiety;
  • Patients using anxiolytics;
  • Smokers and / or patients who drank any amount of alcohol daily.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Solteiro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Group 2: empathic behaviour by family.
Considered the empathic behaviour performed by family as a hospital visit with greater than 45 minutes duration, a person with whom the patient had a good relationship, he considered it to be important and welcome. It is emphasized that these families did not have any prior training and after the visit, patients were asked about how the visit had been seeking to detect the presence of any conversations that have been unpleasant for patients and, if present, the patients were excluded from the study.
Considered the empathic behaviour performed by family as a hospital visit with greater than 45 minutes duration, a person with whom the patient had a good relationship, he considered it to be important and welcome. It is emphasized that these families did not have any prior training and after the visit, patients were asked about how the visit had been seeking to detect the presence of any conversations that have been unpleasant for patients and, if present, the patients were excluded from the study.
Experimental: Group 1: empathic behaviour by nurses.
The empathic behaviour in group 1 was performed by a trained nurse.
The empathic behaviour in group 1 was performed by a trained nurse.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
The primary outcome was Anxiety.
Prazo: Participants were followed for the duration of preoperative period, an expected average of 4 days.

Anxiety was assessed by a nurse using an instrument developed and validated previous, based on 19 defining characteristics described by NANDA-International for the nursing diagnosis anxiety: verbalization of fear (expressed concern); apprehension, nervousness, tension, restlessness, anxiety, anxious, insomnia, abnormal respiratory rate, increased pulse, dry mouth, increased perspiration, fatigue, cranky; voice / ends trembling, chest / abdominal pain, urinary urgency, nausea, and vomiting.

Patients were evaluated for the presence and absence of these anxiety symptoms through scores: 0 (no symptom) and 1 (presence of symptom). For analysis of the results was carried out the sum of the scores of each symptom, ranging from 0 to 21, with the higher the score, the greater was the anxiety symptoms presented by the patient.

Participants were followed for the duration of preoperative period, an expected average of 4 days.

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Cinthia C Assis, PhD, Federal University
  • Diretor de estudo: Luiz Antônio Nogueira-Martins, PhD, Federal University of São Paulo
  • Cadeira de estudo: Alba Lucia BL Barros, PhD, Federal University of SãoPaulo
  • Cadeira de estudo: Juliana L Lopes, PhD, Federal University of São Paulo

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo

1 de maio de 2011

Conclusão Primária (Real)

1 de novembro de 2012

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

1 de dezembro de 2012

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

3 de março de 2014

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

6 de março de 2014

Primeira postagem (Estimativa)

10 de março de 2014

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Estimativa)

10 de março de 2014

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

6 de março de 2014

Última verificação

1 de março de 2014

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • UNIFESP23

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever