Assessing the Effects of Educational Training Aimed to Improve Pain-reporting Reliability in Children After Surgery
12 de março de 2020 atualizado por: University of Haifa
Treating pain, just as treating other medical conditions, depends on accurate assessment of patient's condition. When assessing pain, as other subjective symptoms, the challenge is twofold because the assessment is dependent on patient's understanding and use of the scale, all the more so in children
So far, attempts to improve pain assessments have been focused on the development and refining pain scales. No emphasis has been placed on improving patient's ability to report their pain. Our purpose is to evaluate a training program designed to improve the quality of children's post-surgical pain intensity reports.
After receiving Helsinki approval, eligible children and their parents will signed informed-consent. After surgery, the children, their parents, and the department nurses will assess children's pain intensity. Immediately after the nurse assessment, parents will assess their child's pain (blindly and independently) and the children will report their pain on four different pain scales.
Children aged 8-17, hospitalized in Rambam medical-center for elective surgery will be invited to participate. Children in the experimental group will be exposed to a training program, developed for this study, aimed to teach and train how to report pain. The control group will receive the standard pre-surgical instructions.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Concluído
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Tipo de estudo
Intervencional
Inscrição (Real)
98
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.
Locais de estudo
-
-
-
Haifa, Israel, 3498838
- University of Haifa, The Clinical Pain Innovation Lab
-
-
Critérios de participação
Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
8 anos a 17 anos (Filho)
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Não
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Tudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- children at age 8-17 years;
- absence of psychiatry, cognitive, and/or neurological disorders;
- understand the purpose and the instructions of the study, agree to participate and parent signed inform consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
1. children suffering from Post traumatic stress disorder.
Plano de estudo
Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Outro
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Interventional arm
The intervention, which was aimed to educate children on how to use pain scales and provide reliable pain assessments was based on a two short animation clips, lasting approximately 5 min each, and a short (5 min) guided interaction between the study nurse and the participants, in between the two clips.
|
The first animation clip focuses on the importance of pain assessment introduce three pain scales (categorical, NPS and faces) followed by explanations on their properties and on the appropriate way to use them.The second movie was aimed to provide an opportunity to implement the new knowledge in case studies
|
|
Outro: Control
Children underwent the routine pre-operative preparations, which included a section on pain assessment.
|
Routine preoperative preparations, which included a section on pain assessment instructions.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of pain intensity scores based on the concordance between pain reports on different scales.
Prazo: Pain intensity rating before analgesic consumption.
|
The average difference between scores reported on the different scales was calculated as follows: The difference between to pain scores reported on each possible pairs of two scales was calculated in absolute values.
The average difference of the 6 pairs was calculated.
The 5-point CAT was transformed into a 0-10 scale by multiplying its values by 2.5.
|
Pain intensity rating before analgesic consumption.
|
|
Quality of pain intensity scores based on the concordance between pain reports on different scales.
Prazo: Pain intensity rating one hour after analgesic consumption.
|
The average difference between scores reported on the different scales was calculated as follows: The difference between to pain scores reported on each possible pairs of two scales was calculated in absolute values.
The average difference of the 6 pairs was calculated.
The 5-point CAT was transformed into a 0-10 scale by multiplying its values by 2.5.
|
Pain intensity rating one hour after analgesic consumption.
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
The difference between children assessment vs. nurses assessment.
Prazo: NPS ratings before and one hour after analgesic consumption
|
The difference between children pain assessment vs. nurses assessment on a 0-10 numerical pain scale (NPS), in which 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 "the worst pain imaginable."
|
NPS ratings before and one hour after analgesic consumption
|
|
The average difference between children assessment vs. parents.
Prazo: NPS ratings before and one hour after analgesic consumption
|
The difference between children pain assessment vs. parents assessment on a 0-10 numerical pain scale (NPS), in which 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 "the worst pain imaginable."
|
NPS ratings before and one hour after analgesic consumption
|
|
The average decrease in pain following analgesia: NPS
Prazo: NPS ratings before and one hour after analgesic consumption
|
The average decrease in pain following analgesic consumption (Delta NPS) based on a 0-10 numerical pain scale (NPS), in which 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 "the worst pain imaginable."
|
NPS ratings before and one hour after analgesic consumption
|
|
Quality of pain intensity scores based on the concordance between pain reports on different scales.
Prazo: Pain intensity ratings before analgesic consumption.
|
The within-subjects standard deviation (SD) between the 4 pain scores (provided at the same time of assessment).
To assure that variability will be appropriately reflected by this measure, subjects who reported only "0" or only "10" in all 4 scales were excluded from this analysis due to potential bias of the within-subjects SD due to floor or ceiling effects.
|
Pain intensity ratings before analgesic consumption.
|
|
Quality of pain intensity scores based on the concordance between pain reports on different scales.
Prazo: Pain intensity ratings one hour after analgesic consumption.
|
The within-subjects standard deviation (SD) between the 4 pain scores (provided at the same time of assessment).
To assure that variability will be appropriately reflected by this measure, subjects who reported only "0" or only "10" in all 4 scales were excluded from this analysis due to potential bias of the within-subjects SD due to floor or ceiling effects.
|
Pain intensity ratings one hour after analgesic consumption.
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Publicações e links úteis
A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.
Datas de registro do estudo
Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
20 de junho de 2019
Conclusão Primária (Real)
20 de novembro de 2019
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
21 de novembro de 2019
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
8 de março de 2020
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
12 de março de 2020
Primeira postagem (Real)
13 de março de 2020
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
13 de março de 2020
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
12 de março de 2020
Última verificação
1 de março de 2020
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- 0091-19-RMB
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Não
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
produto fabricado e exportado dos EUA
Não
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .