Effectiveness, Patient Acceptance, and Cost Estimation of 3D-printed Retainer Compared to Hawley Retainer in Expansion Case: a Randomized Controlled Trial
15 de junho de 2026 atualizado por: ASMA ASHARI, National University of Malaysia
Expansion of the arches is generally considered highly unstable and prone to relapse regardless of the type of expansion.
Retention appliances play a vital role in preserving these changes.
Hawley retainer users often avoid wearing them due to speech difficulties and less aesthetic appeal.
They are also more prone to breakage, costlier, and require more labour.
Despite the relatively recent introduction of 3D-printed retainers, they offer potential advantages in orthodontics, including the accuracy of digitally scanned images, reduced labour and material costs, and improved patient comfort.
While 3D-printed retainers are quite new, most studies focus on laboratory testing of their mechanical properties, there is limited evidence directly comparing their effectiveness in retaining arch width increases, patient acceptance, and cost estimation.
This knowledge gap creates uncertainty about the optimal choice of retainer for long-term stability, necessitating a comparative assessment of their performance.
This study addresses this knowledge gap by evaluating the retention of arch width increases achieved using Hawley retainers versus 3D-printed retainers
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Ainda não está recrutando
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
Maxillary dentoalveolar expansion is a procedure to correct transverse discrepancies between the maxillary and mandibular arches by applying forces to widen the maxillary arch.
This procedure is inherently unstable and is susceptible to relapse.
While Hawley retainers (HR) have served as the established standard for retention after maxillary expansion, recent studies have shown that modified thermoforming retainers can be as effective as HR.
The emergence of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) and three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has significantly streamlined fabricating appliances and prostheses.
3D printing material is more rigid, with superior compression and tensile strength.
Thus, a normal shape 3D-printed retainer may be a viable choice for the retention of maxillary expansion.
A recent systematic review highlighted a critical gap in knowledge regarding the long-term clinical efficacy and durability of 3D-printed retainers.
Thus, the present study aimed to address this research gap by investigating the long-term clinical effectiveness, patient acceptance, and cost estimation of 3D-printed retainers in expansion cases.
This study will be carried out as a multicentre prospective randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) conducted at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Universiti Malaya (UM), and Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM).
Orthodontic patients who fulfil the inclusion criteria will be randomly allocated into the HR or 3D-printed retainer groups.
Dental casts of patients will be measured at intercanine width (ICW), inter-premolar width (IPMW), inter-first molar mesiobuccal cusp width 1 (IFMW1), and inter-first molar distobuccal cusp width 2 (IFMW2) for both groups at debond(T0), 3(T1), 6(T2), and 12(T3).
The outcome assessor and data analyst will be blinded to the retention method.
The researcher will evaluate the patient's acceptance at T2 & T3 and conduct a cost analysis at T1 post-debond.
The findings of this study will contribute valuable data to the field of orthodontics, aiding clinicians in determining the most effective long-term retention strategy for patients who have undergone maxillary dentoalveolar expansion.
Tipo de estudo
Intervencional
Inscrição (Estimado)
28
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.
Contato de estudo
- Nome: Asma Ashari, BDS Adel, MClinDent Lon, MOrth
- Número de telefone: +603 8921 5555
- E-mail: asmaashari@ukm.edu.my
Estude backup de contato
- Nome: ALIZAE MARNY FADZLIN SYED MOHAMED
- Número de telefone: +6038921 5555
- E-mail: alizaemarny@ukm.edu.my
Locais de estudo
-
-
Kuala Lumpur
-
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malásia, 50300
- National University of Malaysia
-
Contato:
- Fakulti pergigian UKM
- Número de telefone: +6039289 7741
- E-mail: asmaashari@ukm.edu.my
-
Investigador principal:
- Mei Ling Cheng
-
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malásia, 50603
- University Malaya
-
Contato:
- May Nak Lau
- Número de telefone: +60379674802
- E-mail: minalau@um.edu.my
-
Subinvestigador:
- Zhang Yi Tan
-
-
Selangor
-
Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malásia, 47000
- University Teknologi Mara Selangor branch
-
Contato:
- Nik Mukhriz Nik Mustapha
- Número de telefone: +6036126 6103
- E-mail: nikmukhriz@uitm.edu.my
-
Subinvestigador:
- Siti Nor Hafizah Salehun
-
-
Critérios de participação
Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Filho
- Adulto
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Sim
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged 16 years or older at the time of debonding
- Treatment plan of extraction or non-extraction followed by straight wire appliances in the upper arch only or both arches
- Undergone expansion treatment in the upper arch causing an arch width increase of 3-10mm, either using a Quadhelix, expansion with archwires, or URA with midline screw
- Had pretreatment dental cast
- Had no chronic medical condition.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cleft lip and palate
- Chronic medical conditions
- Broken teeth or bubbles on study model at site of measurement.
Plano de estudo
Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Outro
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Solteiro
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Comparador Ativo: Hawley retainer
A screening will be done to select suitable patients for the study.
Only patients who fulfil the criteria will be invited to participate in this study.
Following informed consent, eligible subjects will be randomly allocated into one of two groups wither hawley retainer or 3D printed retainer.
Fabrication of Hawley retainers will be done using a standardized design across all centres.
|
Hawley retainers have served as the established standard for retention after maxillary expansion.
Standard design of Hawley Retainer: - Labial bow (0.8mm hard stainless steel) from canine to canine - Adam clasp on the molar (0.7mm hard stainless steel) - acrylic baseplate (2-3mm thickness) .
|
|
Experimental: 3D printed retainer
A screening will be done to select suitable patients for the study.
Only patients who fulfil the criteria will be invited to participate in this study.
Following informed consent, eligible subjects will be randomly allocated into one of two groups wither hawley retainer or 3D printed retainer.
Fabrication of 3d printed retainers will be done using a standardized design at one main centres by one technician using Nextdent Orhtoflex Resin.
|
3D-printed retainer Using Nextdent Orthoflex resin Standard design of 3D printed retainer:
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Retention of the maxillary expansion
Prazo: 12 months
|
|
12 months
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient acceptance
Prazo: 12 months
|
Subjects will be given and asked to complete a questionnaire on patient acceptance (see attachment) at 6 and 12 months post-debond. The Questionnaire has been validated and published by (Saw et al. 2025). It uses a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to ask six questions related to subject acceptance of orthodontic retainers in fitting, speech, appearance, oral hygiene, durability, and comfort. Refer to Attachment 1 (Malay version) and Attachment 2 (English Version) for the questionnaires. |
12 months
|
|
cost estimation
Prazo: 6 months
|
To estimate and compare the costs associated with the implementation and provision of 3D-printed retainers between clinics with existing in-house 3D-printing facilities and clinics planning to acquire 3D-printing services.
The analysis will include direct costs such as equipment acquisition, materials, software, maintenance, laboratory procedures, and staff chairside time.
|
6 months
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Diretor de estudo: Asma Ashari, MClinDent Lon, National University of Malaysia
Publicações e links úteis
A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.
Publicações Gerais
- Hichens L, Rowland H, Williams A, Hollinghurst S, Ewings P, Clark S, Ireland A, Sandy J. Cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction: Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers. Eur J Orthod. 2007 Aug;29(4):372-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm039.
- Naeem OA, Bencharit S, Yang IH, Stilianoudakis SC, Carrico C, Tufekci E. Comparison of 3-dimensional printing technologies on the precision, trueness, and accuracy of printed retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Apr;161(4):582-591. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.03.016.
- Firlej M, Zaborowicz K, Zaborowicz M, Firlej E, Domagala I, Pieniak D, Igielska-Kalwat J, Dmowski A, Biedziak B. Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Orthodontic Retainers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 9;19(9):5775. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095775.
- Tsoukala E, Lyros I, Tsolakis AI, Maroulakos MP, Tsolakis IA. Direct 3D-Printed Orthodontic Retainers. A Systematic Review. Children (Basel). 2023 Apr 3;10(4):676. doi: 10.3390/children10040676.
- Saw ZK, Yuen JJX, Ashari A, Ibrahim Bahemia F, Low YX, Nik Mustapha NM, Lau MN. Forward-backward translation, content validity, face validity, construct validity, criterion validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency of a questionnaire on patient acceptance of orthodontic retainer. PLoS One. 2025 Jan 3;20(1):e0314853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314853. eCollection 2025.
- Nakornnoi T, Bunjerdjin P, Santiwong P, Sipiyaruk K, Neoh SP, Chintavalakorn R. The Influence of Thickness on the Mechanical Behaviors of 3D Printing Resins for Orthodontic Retainers. Int J Biomater. 2024 Jun 25;2024:7398478. doi: 10.1155/2024/7398478. eCollection 2024.
- Ashari A, Xian L, Syed Mohamed AMF, Wahab RMA, Kit YC, Tata MD, Sinnasamy S, Kuppusamy E. One-year comparative assessment of retention of arch width increases between modified vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers. Angle Orthod. 2022 Mar 1;92(2):197-203. doi: 10.2319/050921-363.1.
- Ashari A, Nik Mustapha NM, Yuen JJX, Saw ZK, Lau MN, Xian L, Syed Mohamed AMF, Megat Abdul Wahab R, Yeoh CK, Deva Tata M, Sinnasamy S. A two-year comparative assessment of retention of arch width increases between modified vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers: a multi-center randomized clinical trial. Prog Orthod. 2022 Aug 26;23(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40510-022-00424-5.
- Stoev YY, Uzunov TT, Stoyanova NS, Grozdanova-Uzunova RG, Kosturkov DN, Taneva IK. Mechanical properties of materials for 3D printed orthodontic retainers. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2023 Dec 31;65(6):986-992. doi: 10.3897/folmed.65.e107299.
- Neoh SP, Khantachawana A, Chintavalakorn R, Santiwong P, Srikhirin T. Comparison of physical, mechanical, and optical properties between thermoplastic materials and 3-dimensional printing resins for orthodontic clear retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2025 Jan;167(1):95-109.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.06.010.
Datas de registro do estudo
Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Estimado)
1 de junho de 2026
Conclusão Primária (Estimado)
1 de dezembro de 2027
Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)
1 de dezembro de 2027
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
8 de junho de 2026
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
15 de junho de 2026
Primeira postagem (Real)
22 de junho de 2026
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
22 de junho de 2026
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
15 de junho de 2026
Última verificação
1 de junho de 2026
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- JEP 2025-630 (Outro identificador: National university of Malaysia)
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
INDECISO
Descrição do plano IPD
Only data relevant to the study analyses will be provided.
All personal identifiers and information that could reveal participant identity will be removed to protect confidentiality and comply with ethical requirements.
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .