White Matter Connections and Memory: the STRATEGIC Study (STRATEGIC)
7 juni 2019 uppdaterad av: Dr Mike O'Sullivan, King's College London
In patients who have had a stroke, memory problems are common.
Some patients with memory problems improve over the first year after stroke, but recovery is unpredictable.
The STRATEGIC study assesses patients with recent stroke and follows them up after one year.
The study uses cognitive testing and advanced MRI to understand the brain's mechanism for recovery from memory problems and to identify factors that may predict later recovery.
Studieöversikt
Status
Okänd
Betingelser
Detaljerad beskrivning
Memory breakdown in older age is a major challenge for medical research, with an increasing burden in personal, societal and fiscal terms. Stroke is an important cause. Memory depends on widespread networks in the brain which are bound together by white matter connections, which essentially act as the wiring of brain networks. This project uses a technique called diffusion tensor MRI to investigate these connections and their relationship to brain function and patterns of memory impairment after stroke.
Previous research showed that a tract called the fornix was most important in the healthy brain and in ageing. However, in individuals at an early stage of memory decline alternative pathways became disproportionately more important. This led to the idea that individuals with early memory decline might be especially vulnerable to injury to these alternative tracts from stroke. The purpose of this project is to test this idea.
The project focuses on patients with recent stroke. Participants undergo MRI, including diffusion tensor MRI, and in-depth testing of memory and other cognitive functions. The pattern of damage to temporal lobe connections in the brain will be assessed and related to the impact of brain infarction on memory. Analysis will determine how undamaged tracts contribute to recovery over one year. Finally, cutting edge computational image analysis techniques will be applied to try and predict memory profile in more detail and extract maximum information about prognosis from brain images.
Studietyp
Observationell
Inskrivning (Faktisk)
193
Deltagandekriterier
Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.
Urvalskriterier
Åldrar som är berättigade till studier
50 år och äldre (Vuxen, Äldre vuxen)
Tar emot friska volontärer
Nej
Kön som är behöriga för studier
Allt
Testmetod
Icke-sannolikhetsprov
Studera befolkning
Patients with recent ischaemic stroke.
Beskrivning
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged over 50 years
- Recent ischaemic stroke
- English is first language
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous large artery infarct
- Major neurological or psychiatric condition
- Moderate to severe head injury (Mayo classification)
- Dementia
- Severe cardiac failure
- Active malignancy
Studieplan
Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.
Hur är studien utformad?
Designdetaljer
Kohorter och interventioner
Grupp / Kohort |
|---|
|
Stroke patients
Patients with recent ischaemic stroke
|
Vad mäter studien?
Primära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score at 30-90 days
Tidsram: 30-90 days after stroke
|
The MoCA is a widely used test measuring across several cognitive domains. It gives a score out of 30. https://www.mocatest.org |
30-90 days after stroke
|
|
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score at one year
Tidsram: One year after stroke
|
The MoCA is a widely used test measuring across several cognitive domains. It gives a score out of 30. https://www.mocatest.org |
One year after stroke
|
|
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), change in score over one year
Tidsram: From 30-90 days after stroke to one year after stroke
|
The MoCA is a widely used test measuring across several cognitive domains. It gives a score out of 30. https://www.mocatest.org |
From 30-90 days after stroke to one year after stroke
|
|
Verbal free recall score on the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Task (FSCRT) at 30-90 days
Tidsram: 30-90 days after stroke
|
The FCSRT tests how well participants can remember 16 words.
Participants make three attempts, giving a total score out of 48.
The test has been widely used in studies of memory and is described in Grober, E., & Buschke, H. (1987).
Genuine memory deficits in dementia.
Developmental Neuropsychology, 3, 13-36.
|
30-90 days after stroke
|
|
Verbal free recall score on the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Task (FSCRT) at one year
Tidsram: One year after stroke
|
The FCSRT tests how well participants can remember 16 words.
Participants make three attempts, giving a total score out of 48.
The test has been widely used in studies of memory and is described in Grober, E., & Buschke, H. (1987).
Genuine memory deficits in dementia.
Developmental Neuropsychology, 3, 13-36.
|
One year after stroke
|
|
Verbal free recall score on the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Task (FSCRT), change in score over one year
Tidsram: From 30-90 days after stroke to one year after stroke
|
The FCSRT tests how well participants can remember 16 words.
Participants make three attempts, giving a total score out of 48.
The test has been widely used in studies of memory and is described in Grober, E., & Buschke, H. (1987).
Genuine memory deficits in dementia.
Developmental Neuropsychology, 3, 13-36.
|
From 30-90 days after stroke to one year after stroke
|
|
Backward digit span score at 30-90 days
Tidsram: 30-90 days after stroke.
|
The digit span test measures working memory and is taken from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale IV.
In the test participants must repeat a sequence of digits.
Sequences are repeated at increasing length until the participant makes two errors at the same length.
The test comprises two parts.
In the first, participants repeat sequences is the order given; in the second they repeat sequences in reverse order.
This outcome measure takes the total correct responses in reverse order.
Sequence lengths are between two and seven digits, with to sequences of each length, giving a maximum score of 12.
|
30-90 days after stroke.
|
|
Backward digit span score at one year
Tidsram: One year after stroke
|
The digit span test measures working memory and is taken from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale IV.
In the test participants must repeat a sequence of digits.
Sequences are repeated at increasing length until the participant makes two errors at the same length.
The test comprises two parts.
In the first, participants repeat sequences is the order given; in the second they repeat sequences in reverse order.
This outcome measure takes the total correct responses in reverse order.
Sequence lengths are between two and seven digits, with to sequences of each length, giving a maximum score of 12.
|
One year after stroke
|
|
Backward digit span score, change in score over one year
Tidsram: From 30-90 days after stroke to one year after stroke
|
The digit span test measures working memory and is taken from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale IV.
In the test participants must repeat a sequence of digits.
Sequences are repeated at increasing length until the participant makes two errors at the same length.
The test comprises two parts.
In the first, participants repeat sequences is the order given; in the second they repeat sequences in reverse order.
This outcome measure takes the total correct responses in reverse order.
Sequence lengths are between two and seven digits, with to sequences of each length, giving a maximum score of 12.
|
From 30-90 days after stroke to one year after stroke
|
|
Paired Associate Learning (PAL) recognition score at 30-90 days
Tidsram: 30-90 days after stroke.
|
The PAL task measures participants' ability to associate two items of information in memory.
In this study, participants must learn a set of ten objects and their associated locations.
The recognition score is the number of correct choices when given two possible locations for a given object.
Each object is tested three times, giving a maximum score of 30.
|
30-90 days after stroke.
|
|
Paired Associate Learning (PAL) recognition score at one year
Tidsram: One year after stroke.
|
The PAL task measures participants' ability to associate two items of information in memory.
In this study, participants must learn a set of ten objects and their associated locations.
The recognition score is the number of correct choices when given two possible locations for a given object.
Each object is tested three times, giving a maximum score of 30.
|
One year after stroke.
|
|
Paired Associate Learning (PAL) recognition score, change in score over one year
Tidsram: From 30-90 days after stroke to one year after stroke
|
The PAL task measures participants' ability to associate two items of information in memory.
In this study, participants must learn a set of ten objects and their associated locations.
The recognition score is the number of correct choices when given two possible locations for a given object.
Each object is tested three times, giving a maximum score of 30.
|
From 30-90 days after stroke to one year after stroke
|
|
Paired Associate Learning (PAL) recall score at 30-90 days
Tidsram: 30-90 days after stroke
|
The PAL task measures participants' ability to associate two items of information in memory.
In this study, participants must learn a set of ten objects and their associated locations.
The recall score measures participants ability to recall which object was present at each location (a maximum of 10).
|
30-90 days after stroke
|
|
Paired Associate Learning (PAL) recall score at one year
Tidsram: One year after stroke
|
The PAL task measures participants' ability to associate two items of information in memory.
In this study, participants must learn a set of ten objects and their associated locations.
The recall score measures participants ability to recall which object was present at each location (a maximum of 10).
|
One year after stroke
|
|
Paired Associate Learning (PAL) recall score, change in score over one year
Tidsram: From 30-90 days after stroke to one year after stroke
|
The PAL task measures participants' ability to associate two items of information in memory.
In this study, participants must learn a set of ten objects and their associated locations.
The recall score measures participants ability to recall which object was present at each location (a maximum of 10).
|
From 30-90 days after stroke to one year after stroke
|
|
Process Dissociation Procedure (PDP) familiarity score at 30-90 days
Tidsram: 30-90 days after stroke
|
The PDP is a word memory test.
Participants first read out loud a set of words.
They are then presented with incomplete words and must fill in the missing letters.
In one part of the test, participants must use one of the remembered words whenever possible.
In the other part of the test, they must avoid the remembered words.
The two parts are designed to dissociate two types of memory: familiarity and recollection.
Familiarity is the unconscious remembering of a word because it was previously seen, which is an advantage when including the words, but a disadvantage when avoiding them.
Recollection is the conscious remembering of a word and the context where it was encountered.
This is an advantage in both parts of the test.
The scores in each part of the test are combined to compute scores for familiarity and recollection, each in percent.
|
30-90 days after stroke
|
|
Process Dissociation Procedure (PDP) familiarity score at one year
Tidsram: One year after stroke
|
The PDP is a word memory test.
Participants first read out loud a set of words.
They are then presented with incomplete words and must fill in the missing letters.
In one part of the test, participants must use one of the remembered words whenever possible.
In the other part of the test, they must avoid the remembered words.
The two parts are designed to dissociate two types of memory: familiarity and recollection.
Familiarity is the unconscious remembering of a word because it was previously seen, which is an advantage when including the words, but a disadvantage when avoiding them.
Recollection is the conscious remembering of a word and the context where it was encountered.
This is an advantage in both parts of the test.
The scores in each part of the test are combined to compute scores for familiarity and recollection, each in percent.
|
One year after stroke
|
|
Process Dissociation Procedure (PDP) familiarity score, change in score over one year
Tidsram: From 30-90 days after stroke to one year after stroke
|
The PDP is a word memory test.
Participants first read out loud a set of words.
They are then presented with incomplete words and must fill in the missing letters.
In one part of the test, participants must use one of the remembered words whenever possible.
In the other part of the test, they must avoid the remembered words.
The two parts are designed to dissociate two types of memory: familiarity and recollection.
Familiarity is the unconscious remembering of a word because it was previously seen, which is an advantage when including the words, but a disadvantage when avoiding them.
Recollection is the conscious remembering of a word and the context where it was encountered.
This is an advantage in both parts of the test.
The scores in each part of the test are combined to compute scores for familiarity and recollection, each in percent.
|
From 30-90 days after stroke to one year after stroke
|
|
Process Dissociation Procedure (PDP) recollection score at 30-90 days
Tidsram: 30-90 days after stroke
|
The PDP is a word memory test.
Participants first read out loud a set of words.
They are then presented with incomplete words and must fill in the missing letters.
In one part of the test, participants must use one of the remembered words whenever possible.
In the other part of the test, they must avoid the remembered words.
The two parts are designed to dissociate two types of memory: familiarity and recollection.
Familiarity is the unconscious remembering of a word because it was previously seen, which is an advantage when including the words, but a disadvantage when avoiding them.
Recollection is the conscious remembering of a word and the context where it was encountered.
This is an advantage in both parts of the test.
The scores in each part of the test are combined to compute scores for familiarity and recollection, each in percent.
|
30-90 days after stroke
|
|
Process Dissociation Procedure (PDP) recollection score at one year
Tidsram: One year after stroke
|
The PDP is a word memory test.
Participants first read out loud a set of words.
They are then presented with incomplete words and must fill in the missing letters.
In one part of the test, participants must use one of the remembered words whenever possible.
In the other part of the test, they must avoid the remembered words.
The two parts are designed to dissociate two types of memory: familiarity and recollection.
Familiarity is the unconscious remembering of a word because it was previously seen, which is an advantage when including the words, but a disadvantage when avoiding them.
Recollection is the conscious remembering of a word and the context where it was encountered.
This is an advantage in both parts of the test.
The scores in each part of the test are combined to compute scores for familiarity and recollection, each in percent.
|
One year after stroke
|
|
Process Dissociation Procedure (PDP) recollection score, change in score over one year
Tidsram: From 30-90 days after stroke to one year after stroke
|
The PDP is a word memory test.
Participants first read out loud a set of words.
They are then presented with incomplete words and must fill in the missing letters.
In one part of the test, participants must use one of the remembered words whenever possible.
In the other part of the test, they must avoid the remembered words.
The two parts are designed to dissociate two types of memory: familiarity and recollection.
Familiarity is the unconscious remembering of a word because it was previously seen, which is an advantage when including the words, but a disadvantage when avoiding them.
Recollection is the conscious remembering of a word and the context where it was encountered.
This is an advantage in both parts of the test.
The scores in each part of the test are combined to compute scores for familiarity and recollection, each in percent.
|
From 30-90 days after stroke to one year after stroke
|
Samarbetspartners och utredare
Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.
Sponsor
Utredare
- Huvudutredare: Michael J O'Sullivan, MBBS,PhD, King's College London and University of Queensland
Studieavstämningsdatum
Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.
Studera stora datum
Studiestart (Faktisk)
11 april 2014
Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)
7 juni 2017
Avslutad studie (Förväntat)
30 april 2022
Studieregistreringsdatum
Först inskickad
23 november 2018
Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
7 juni 2019
Första postat (Faktisk)
11 juni 2019
Uppdateringar av studier
Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)
11 juni 2019
Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
7 juni 2019
Senast verifierad
1 juni 2019
Mer information
Termer relaterade till denna studie
Nyckelord
Ytterligare relevanta MeSH-villkor
Andra studie-ID-nummer
- KCH14-072
- 13/LO/1745 (Annan identifierare: London Bromley Research Ethics Committee)
- K022113 (Annat bidrag/finansieringsnummer: Medical Research Council, UK)
Plan för individuella deltagardata (IPD)
Planerar du att dela individuella deltagardata (IPD)?
OBESLUTSAM
IPD-planbeskrivning
If possible, we hope to share anonymised test scores and derived MRI measures, along with demographic and other background data.
Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument
Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt
Nej
Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad produktprodukt
Nej
Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .