Walk on: A Community-based Approach to Increase Physical Activity Among Men Treated for Colorectal Cancer
2018年9月13日 更新者：Jennifer Brunet、University of Ottawa
Walk on: A Community-based Approach to Promote Participation in Physical Activity Among Men Treated for Colorectal Cancer
In Canada, over 102,900 men are diagnosed with cancer each year. Of these, 81,000 are diagnosed with colorectal cancer and an estimated 65% are expected to survive the disease for at least 5 years. Men who have completed treatment for colorectal cancer face many adverse physical, cognitive, psychological, and social effects. The Wellness Beyond Cancer Program at The Ottawa Hospital is a cancer survivorship program that helps people who have completed treatment for cancer, including men diagnosed with colorectal cancer, manage these effects. The Wellness Beyond Cancer Program does this through education and referral to supportive care services and programs offered throughout the city of Ottawa.
Group-based physical activity programs are one of the varied services and programs available to adults diagnosed with cancer in Ottawa. Such programs are offered through the Ottawa Regional Cancer Foundation (http://www.ottawacancer.ca) and Breast Cancer Action Ottawa (http://bcaott.ca). Research on these programs show that group-based physical activity can improve disease and treatment-related effects while promoting overall quality of life amongst women with cancer. However, few of these programs have targeted men, even though their needs and preferences have been shown to be very different from women. While men diagnosed with colorectal cancer might also benefit from group-based physical activity programs offered in the community, it is not known if such programs would effectively reach them and what the impact would be on their quality of life after cancer treatment.
It is believed that a men's group-based walking program could be an effective way to reach men and promote quality of life after cancer treatment. Therefore, a sustainable 8-week group-based walking program was developed. This project will seek to explore the feasibility and potential benefits of the program among men who have completed treatment for colorectal cancer and who are referred to the program from staff at the Wellness Beyond Cancer Program in a prospective single-arm trial.
研究概览
研究类型
介入性
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
Ontario
-
Ottawa、Ontario、加拿大、K1N 6N5
- University of Ottawa
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)
接受健康志愿者
不
有资格学习的性别
男性
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Men 18 years of age or older;
- Have completed treatment for colorectal cancer <1 year;
- Willing to provide informed consent to participate in this study and willing to follow the study protocol;
- Have the ability to walk without the use of an assistive device (including a cane) or the help of another person;
- Able to read and understand English;
- Medically cleared to participate in the walking program as determined by their referring Wellness Beyond Cancer Program healthcare provider.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Congestive heart failure, clinically significant aortic stenosis, history of cardiac arrest, use of a cardiac defibrillator, uncontrolled angina, uncontrolled arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, major heart surgery, stroke, or pulmonary embolus;
- Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure>200 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure >110 mm Hg);
- The use of supplemental oxygen;
- Severe arthritis (i.e., osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis);
- History of chest pain or severe shortness of breath either at rest or when engaging in physical activity;
- Hip fracture, hip or knee replacement in the past 6 months;
- Currently enrolled in another study involving a physical activity intervention.
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：支持治疗
- 分配：不适用
- 介入模型：单组作业
- 屏蔽：无（打开标签）
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：Group-based walking
Participants will engage in one supervised outdoor group-based walking session per week for the 8 week program.
|
The walking prescription will be progressive in nature.
The program will begin with participants walking for approximately 20 minutes in weeks 1-3.
This will gradually increase to approximately 30 minutes in weeks 4-6.
Finally, this will increase to 45-60 minutes in weeks 7-8.
The program will promote walking at a moderate intensity as assessed by Borg's Rating of Perceived Exertion scale.
Each session will be preceded by a brief warm-up and followed by a brief cool-down period.
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Recruitment rates
大体时间：Through study completion, an average of 8 weeks
|
The number of men who enrol in the study out of the number who are referred.
|
Through study completion, an average of 8 weeks
|
|
Retention rates
大体时间：Through study completion, an average of 8 weeks
|
The number of men who complete the intervention and all scheduled assessments.
|
Through study completion, an average of 8 weeks
|
|
Adherence rates
大体时间：Through study completion, an average of 8 weeks
|
The number of walking sessions men engage in out of the total recommended as part of the intervention.
|
Through study completion, an average of 8 weeks
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Physical Activity Behaviour: Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (Godin & Shephard, 1985)
大体时间：Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 8)
|
Change in participants' self-reported physical activity (over the past 7 days) from baseline to post-intervention.
|
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 8)
|
|
Change in Quality of Life: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Colorectal (Ward et al., 1999; Yost et al. 2005)
大体时间：Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 8)
|
Change in participants' self-reported quality of life from baseline to post-intervention.
|
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 8)
|
|
Change in Cognitive Functioning: FACT-Cognitive Function (Wagner et al., 2004)
大体时间：Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 8)
|
Change in participants' self-reported cognitive functioning from baseline to post-intervention.
|
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 8)
|
|
Change in Affect: Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (Watson et al., 1988)
大体时间：Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 8)
|
Change in participants' self-reported affect from baseline to post-intervention.
|
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 8)
|
|
Change in Depression: Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale 10-item Revised (Eaton et al., 2004; Radloff, 1977)
大体时间：Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 8)
|
Change in participants' self-reported depressive symptoms from baseline to post-intervention.
|
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 8)
|
|
Change in Social Support: Relatedness to Others in Physical Activity Scale (Wilson & Bengoechea, 2010)
大体时间：Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 8)
|
Change in participants' self-reported perceptions of social support from baseline to post-intervention.
|
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 8)
|
|
Change in Physical Self-Perceptions: Physical Self Description Questionnaire Short-Form (Marsh et al., 2010)
大体时间：Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 8)
|
Change in participants' self-reported physical competence, confidence, and self-esteem from baseline to post-intervention.
|
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 8)
|
|
Change in Stress: Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen et al., 1982)
大体时间：Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 8)
|
Change in participants' self-reported perceptions of stress from baseline to post-intervention.
|
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 8)
|
|
Change in Fatigue: Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (Yellen et al., 1997)
大体时间：Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 8)
|
Change in participants' self-reported perceptions of fatigue from baseline to post-intervention.
|
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 8)
|
|
Participants' Overall Experiences: Qualitative Interviews
大体时间：Post-intervention (week 8)
|
Participants' perspectives on how the intervention contributed to their behavioural, physical, psychological and social functioning, as well as their overall quality of life.
|
Post-intervention (week 8)
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
调查人员
- 首席研究员：Jennifer Brunet, PhD、University of Ottawa
出版物和有用的链接
负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。
一般刊物
- Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available.
- Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.
- Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985 Sep;10(3):141-6.
- Yellen SB, Cella DF, Webster K, Blendowski C, Kaplan E. Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) measurement system. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997 Feb;13(2):63-74. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(96)00274-6.
- Marsh HW, Martin AJ, Jackson S. Introducing a short version of the physical self description questionnaire: new strategies, short-form evaluative criteria, and applications of factor analyses. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2010 Aug;32(4):438-82. doi: 10.1123/jsep.32.4.438. Erratum In: J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2010 Dec;32(6):909-11.
- Ward WL, Hahn EA, Mo F, Hernandez L, Tulsky DS, Cella D. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) quality of life instrument. Qual Life Res. 1999 May;8(3):181-95. doi: 10.1023/a:1008821826499.
- Yost KJ, Cella D, Chawla A, Holmgren E, Eton DT, Ayanian JZ, West DW. Minimally important differences were estimated for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) instrument using a combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Dec;58(12):1241-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.008. Epub 2005 Oct 13.
- Eaton WW, Muntaner C, Smith C, Tien A, Ybarra M. Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: Review and revision (CESD and CESD-R), in The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcomes Assessment, M.E. Maruish, Editor. 2004, Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ. p. 363-377.
- Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1977. 1: p. 385-401.
- Wagner L, Lai J-S, Cella D, Sweet J, Forrestal S. Chemotherapy-related cognitive deficits: development of the FACT-Cog instrument. Ann Behav Med, 2004. 27: p. S10.
- Wilson PM, Bengoechea EG. The relatedness to others in physical activity scale: evidence for structural and criterion validity. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 2010. 15(2): p. 61-87.
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
2017年10月5日
初级完成 (预期的)
2018年9月30日
研究完成 (预期的)
2018年9月30日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2017年7月23日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2017年7月25日
首次发布 (实际的)
2017年7月28日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2018年9月17日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2018年9月13日
最后验证
2018年9月1日
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.
Group-based walking的临床试验
-
Centro Hospitalar do PortoUniversity of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro; Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal; Institute...招聘中
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkNovo Nordisk A/S; Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev; Danish Cancer Society; TrygFonden, Denmark完全的