An Analysis of the Efficacy of Different Teaching Modalities
An Analysis of the Efficacy of Different Teaching Modalities in Imparting Adult CPR Skills in First Year Medical Students
研究概览
地位
条件
详细说明
Introduction
Our current medical curriculum devotes a large percentage of its time to knowledge acquisition by means of didactic lectures. Psychomotor skill acquisition takes a back seat. Certain lifesaving skills like basic life support skill training have not even made an appearance in the current curriculum. Equal time distribution to cognitive and psychomotor skills should be allotted for a subject as practical as MBBS .Simulation can prove to be a valuable tool in imparting skill training. The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy of different teaching modalities in imparting lifesaving skills in first year MBBS students.
Methods
This Cross sectional study is conducted among 33 first year students who consented to participate. Institutional ethics clearance was also obtained. The students were divided into three groups, each undergoing didactic lecture, animation based videos and simulation studies. Pretest, posttest and skills test was administered to them. One way anova, Paired t test were some of the statistical test employed using SPSS version 21.
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
Kerala
-
Thrissur、Kerala、印度、680005
- Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
取样方法
研究人群
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- All First year MBBS Students who are willing to participate
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior training in adult CPR skills
- Physical disabilities that does not permit performing high quality CPR
学习计划
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
队列和干预
团体/队列 |
|---|
|
First year medical students
First year medical students of jubilee mission medical college and research institute
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
comparing the mean post test score of groups of students that underwent training using different teaching modalities assessed using a ten part multiple choice questionnaire.
大体时间：4 hours
|
Amongst visual, didactic and simulation models of teaching, to identify the more effective strategy to impart Basic Life Support (BLS) knowledge to first year medical students through a four hour training programme, by comparing the mean post test scores of each group
|
4 hours
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
comparing the change in the baseline test score amongst first year medical students taught by visual, didactic and simulation models.
大体时间：4 hours
|
students through a four hour training programme, by comparing the mean pre test and post test scores of each group
|
4 hours
|
|
comparing the mean score of groups of students that underwent training using different teaching modalities, assessed by an examiner testing their skills using a pre set basic life support checklist proforma.
大体时间：4 hours
|
comparing the effectiveness of each teaching modality amongst first year medical students to impart Adult Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) skills assessed by an examiner observing and testing their skills using a pre set checklist proforma.
|
4 hours
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 学习椅：Pallavi Panchu, MD、Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他研究编号
- 18/19/IEC/JMMC&RI
- U1111-1229-7995 (其他标识符：World Health Organisation)
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.