Adverse Events Among Hospitalized Patients in China
Adverse Events Among Hospitalized Patients: A Multicenter Evaluation of Four Detection Methods
The goal of this observational study is to learn about the incidence and characteristics of adverse events (AEs) among hospitalized patients in China and to compare 4 commonly used methods for detecting these events. The main questions it aims to answer are:
How common are AEs among hospitalized patients, and what are their characteristics (types, severity, and preventability) in China? How do 4 commonly used methods, including the Harvard Medical Practice Study (HMPS), Global Trigger Tool (GTT), Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs), and incident reporting systems (IRSs), compare in detecting AEs? Researchers review randomly selected medical records from 5 hospitals in China to identify AEs, assess their type, severity, and preventability, and evaluate the performance of the 4 detection methods.
研究概览
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
Beijing Municipality
-
Beijing、Beijing Municipality、中国、100730
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
取样方法
研究人群
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- age ≥18 years and a length of stay of at least 24 hours
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients admitted primarily for psychiatric disorders, palliative care, or rehabilitation were excluded.
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Adverse event incidence
大体时间:During the index admission, including review of relevant prior hospitalization records and all available records through 30 days after discharge.
|
The proportion of admissions with at least one adverse event.
|
During the index admission, including review of relevant prior hospitalization records and all available records through 30 days after discharge.
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Types of adverse event
大体时间:During the index admission, including review of relevant prior hospitalization records and all available records through 30 days after discharge
|
During the index admission, including review of relevant prior hospitalization records and all available records through 30 days after discharge
|
|
|
Preventability of adverse event
大体时间:During the index admission, including review of relevant prior hospitalization records and all available records through 30 days after discharge
|
Adverse event with 6-point Likert scale scores ≥4 were considered preventable.
|
During the index admission, including review of relevant prior hospitalization records and all available records through 30 days after discharge
|
|
Severity of adverse events
大体时间:During the index admission, including review of relevant prior hospitalization records and all available records through 30 days after discharge
|
Severity was graded using the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP) classification.
|
During the index admission, including review of relevant prior hospitalization records and all available records through 30 days after discharge
|
|
Sensitivity of adverse event detection methods
大体时间:After completion of AE screening, adjudication, and re-review of randomly sampled screen-negative admissions
|
Admission-level sensitivity was calculated for the Harvard Medical Practice Study (HMPS), Global Trigger Tool (GTT), Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs), and incident reporting systems (IRSs).
|
After completion of AE screening, adjudication, and re-review of randomly sampled screen-negative admissions
|
|
Specificity of adverse event detection methods
大体时间:After completion of AE screening, adjudication, and re-review of randomly sampled screen-negative admissions
|
Admission-level specificity was calculated for the Harvard Medical Practice Study (HMPS), Global Trigger Tool (GTT), Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs), and incident reporting systems (IRSs).
|
After completion of AE screening, adjudication, and re-review of randomly sampled screen-negative admissions
|
|
Positive predictive value (PPV) of adverse event detection methods
大体时间:After completion of AE screening, adjudication, and re-review of randomly sampled screen-negative admissions
|
Admission-level positive predictive value (PPV) was calculated for the Harvard Medical Practice Study (HMPS), Global Trigger Tool (GTT), Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs), and incident reporting systems (IRSs).
|
After completion of AE screening, adjudication, and re-review of randomly sampled screen-negative admissions
|
|
Negative predictive value (NPV) of adverse event detection methods
大体时间:After completion of AE screening, adjudication, and re-review of randomly sampled screen-negative admissions
|
Admission-level negative predictive value (NPV) was calculated for the Harvard Medical Practice Study (HMPS), Global Trigger Tool (GTT), Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs), and incident reporting systems (IRSs).
|
After completion of AE screening, adjudication, and re-review of randomly sampled screen-negative admissions
|
合作者和调查者
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (估计的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
关键字
其他研究编号
- I-25PJ1969
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.