Immunotherapy of HLA-A2 Positive Stage III/IV Melanoma Patients

April 19, 2013 updated by: Prof Olivier Michielin, M.D., Ph.D., Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Immunotherapy of HLA-A2 Positive Stage III/IV Melanoma Patients With CpG7909, Tumor Antigenic Peptides and Montanide

The purpose of this study is to determine whether vaccination with tumor antigenic peptides and both CpG and Montanide adjuvants can induce an immune response in melanoma patients and to assess the safety of this vaccination.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Immune therapy with tumor antigenic peptides is generally quite well tolerated. However, immune activation is often only weak or even undetectable, and clinical responses (supposedly corresponding to protective immunity) are unfortunately infrequent. Further progress is required to improve the vaccines, with the goal to increase the strength of immune activation.

The tumor antigenic peptides Melan-A/Mart-1 (EAA and ELA) and Tyrosinase (YMD) are combined with two drugs in this study, both of which are known to enhance immune responses: first, CpG 7909 oligodeoxynucleotides, and second, Montanide ISA-51.

  • Group 1: vaccination with Melan-A analog peptide + CpG and Montanide adjuvants;
  • Group 2: vaccination with Melan-A natural peptide + CpG and Montanide adjuvants;
  • Group 3 : vaccination with Melan-A natural and Tyrosinase peptides + CpG and Montanide adjuvants;
  • Group 4 : vaccination with Melan-A analog and Tyrosinase peptides + CpG and Montanide adjuvants.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Vaud
      • Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland, 1011
        • Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research + Multidisciplinary Oncology Center at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed stage III or stage IV melanoma
  • Tumor expression of Melan-A +/- Tyrosinase
  • Human leukocyte antigen-A2 (HLA-A2) positive

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically significant heart disease
  • Serious illnesses, eg, serious infections requiring antibiotics, bleeding disorders or uncontrolled peptic ulcer, or seizure or central nervous system disorders
  • History of immunodeficiency disease or autoimmune disease
  • Coagulation or bleeding disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: group 1
Melan-A analog peptide + CpG + Montanide
Melan-A analog peptide + CpG + Montanide
Experimental: group 2
Melan-A natural peptide + CpG + Montanide
Melan-A natural peptide + CpG + Montanide
Experimental: group 3
Melan-A natural peptide + Tyrosinase YMD peptide + CpG + Montanide
Melan-A natural peptide + Tyrosinase YMD peptide + CpG + Montanide
Experimental: group 4
Melan-A analog peptide + Tyrosinase YMD peptide + CpG + Montanide
Melan-A analog peptide + Tyrosinase YMD peptide + CpG + Montanide

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Melan-A and Tyrosinase specific CD8+ T-cell reactivity will be measured by Tetramers and Elispot assays
Time Frame: Change from baseline in CD8 T-cells reactivity at day 375
Change from baseline in CD8 T-cells reactivity at day 375
Safety of vaccination will be assessed according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI CTC) scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline to day 375
Change from baseline to day 375

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
In patients with measurable disease, tumor response will be assessed radiologically
Time Frame: Change from baseline in tumor response at day 375
Change from baseline in tumor response at day 375

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Olivier Michielin, MD, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

June 1, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 22, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2013

Last Verified

April 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Melanoma

Clinical Trials on group 1

Subscribe