- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00145327
Double-blind Extension of HORIZON Pivotal Fracture Trial (Zoledronic Acid in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis)
June 24, 2011 updated by: Novartis
A 3-year, Double-blind Extension to CZOL446H2301 to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Zoledronic Acid in the Treatment of Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women Taking Calcium and Vitamin D
This extension study is designed to assess the long term safety and efficacy of zoledronic acid in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who have participated in the CZOL446H2301 (NCT00049829): HORIZON Pivotal Fracture Trial.
This extension study began after the 3-year core study ended.
Baseline is the same as Year 3.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
2456
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Nuernberg, Germany
- Novartis
-
-
-
-
Arizona
-
Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85723
- Southern Arizona VA
-
-
Arkansas
-
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205
- University of Arkansas for Medical Science
-
-
California
-
Beverly Hills, California, United States, 90211
- Osteoporosis Medical Center
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92103
- Osteoporosis Prevention Center
-
Walnut Creek, California, United States, 94598
- Diablo Clinical Research, Inc
-
-
Colorado
-
Lakewood, Colorado, United States, 80227
- Colorado Center for Bone Research
-
-
Florida
-
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, United States, 33334
- CRIA Research
-
Stuart, Florida, United States, 34996
- Radiant Research
-
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33409
- Comprehensive Clinical Trials, LLC
-
-
Georgia
-
Gainesville, Georgia, United States, 30501
- United Osteoporosis Centers (UOC)
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- Northwestern University Center for Clinical Research
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
- School Of Medicine
-
Munster, Indiana, United States, 46321
- Medical Specialist Clinical Research Center
-
-
Kansas
-
Wichita, Kansas, United States, 67207
- Heartland Research Associates, LLC
-
-
Maine
-
Bangor, Maine, United States, 04401
- Maine Center for Osteoporosis Research and Education
-
-
Maryland
-
Hagerstown, Maryland, United States, 21740
- Osteoporosis Clinical Trial Center
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01610
- Clinical Pharmacology Study Groups
-
-
Missouri
-
St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 62110
- Washington University Center for Clinical Studies
-
-
New Mexico
-
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87106
- New Mexico Clinical Research and Osteoporosis Center Inc
-
-
New York
-
Mineola, New York, United States, 11501
- Winthrop U Hospital
-
-
North Dakota
-
Fargo, North Dakota, United States, 58104
- Odyssey Research Services/CCRC Internal Medical
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45219
- University of Cincinnati Bone Health and Osteoporosis Center
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19131
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15261
- University of Pittsburgh
-
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States, 19610
- Radiant Research
-
-
Rhode Island
-
Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02903
- Rhode Island Hospital, Endocrinology Clinical Research Unit
-
-
Tennessee
-
Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38105
- University of Tennessee Health Science
-
-
Virginia
-
Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23249
- McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center
-
Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298
- VA Commonwealth University
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98144
- Puget Sound Osteoporosis Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
68 years to 90 years (Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who have received 3 infusions in the HORIZON-Pivotal Fracture (PFT) Study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Poor kidney, eye, or liver health
- Use of certain therapies for osteoporosis in the HORIZON-PFT study (other than the study medication)
- Abnormal calcium levels in the blood
Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Zoledronic Acid 6
Patients who received Zoledronic acid for 3 years in the core study (CZOL446H2301; NCT00049829) received a single intravenous infusion of 5 mg Zoledronic acid once a year for 3 years (at Months 36, 48 and 60) in this extension study for a total of 6 years of treatment.
|
Zoledronic Acid 5 mg in 100 mL physiologic 0.9% normal saline for intravenous infusion.
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Zoledronic Acid 3 Placebo 3
Patients who were treated with Zoledronic acid for 3 years in the core study received a single intravenous matching Placebo infusion once a year for 3 years in this extension study.
|
100 mL physiologic 0.9% normal saline for intravenous infusion.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Placebo 3 Zoledronic Acid 3
Patients who were treated with placebo for 3 years in the core study received 5 mg Zoledronic acid in a single intravenous infusion once a year for 3 years (at Months 36, 48 and 60) in this extension study.
|
Zoledronic Acid 5 mg in 100 mL physiologic 0.9% normal saline for intravenous infusion.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Femoral Neck at Year 6 Relative to Year 3
Time Frame: Year 3 (Extension Baseline; Month 36 prior to the first treatment of the extension study) and Year 6 (Month 72; end of extension study)
|
The primary efficacy variable was the percentage change in BMD of the femoral neck as measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at Year 6 relative to Year 3. It was derived as 100 *(femoral neck BMD at Year 6 - femoral neck BMD at Year 3) / (femoral neck BMD at Year 3).
|
Year 3 (Extension Baseline; Month 36 prior to the first treatment of the extension study) and Year 6 (Month 72; end of extension study)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Bone Resorption and Formation Biochemical Markers at Year 4.5: P1NP
Time Frame: Year 4.5
|
The amount of serum n-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (P1NP) as determined by the central laboratory.
|
Year 4.5
|
|
Bone Resorption and Formation Biochemical Markers at Year 6: P1NP
Time Frame: Year 6
|
The amount of serum P1NP as determined by the central laboratory
|
Year 6
|
|
Percentage Change in BMD of Lumbar Spine at Year 4.5 Relative to Year 3
Time Frame: Year 3 (Extension Baseline; Month 36 prior to the first treatment of the extension study) and Year 4.5 (Month 54)
|
The percentage change in BMD as measured by DXA at Year 4.5 relative to Year 3. It was derived as 100 * (BMD at Year 4.5 - BMD at Year 3)/(BMD at Year 3).
|
Year 3 (Extension Baseline; Month 36 prior to the first treatment of the extension study) and Year 4.5 (Month 54)
|
|
Percentage Change in BMD of Lumbar Spine at Year 6 Relative to Year 3
Time Frame: Year 3 (Extension Baseline; Month 36 prior to the first treatment of the extension study) and Year 6
|
The percentage change in BMD as measured by DXA at Year 6 relative to Year 3. It was derived as 100 * (BMD at Year 6 - BMD at Year 3)/(BMD at Year 3).
|
Year 3 (Extension Baseline; Month 36 prior to the first treatment of the extension study) and Year 6
|
|
Percentage Change in BMD of Distal Radius at Year 4.5 Relative to Year 3
Time Frame: Year 3 (Extension Baseline; Month 36 prior to the first treatment of the extension study) and Year 4.5 (Month 54)
|
The percentage change in BMD as measured by DXA at Year 4.5 relative to Year 3. It was derived as 100 * (BMD at Year 4.5 - BMD at Year 3)/(BMD at Year 3).
|
Year 3 (Extension Baseline; Month 36 prior to the first treatment of the extension study) and Year 4.5 (Month 54)
|
|
Percentage Change in BMD of Distal Radius at Year 6 Relative to Year 3
Time Frame: Year 3 (Extension Baseline; Month 36 prior to the first treatment of the extension study) and Year 6 (Month 72)
|
The percentage change in BMD as measured by DXA at Year 6 relative to Year 3. It was derived as 100 * (BMD at Year 6 - BMD at Year 3)/(BMD at Year 3).
|
Year 3 (Extension Baseline; Month 36 prior to the first treatment of the extension study) and Year 6 (Month 72)
|
|
Percentage Change in BMD of Femoral Neck, Total Hip and Trochanter at Year 4.5 Relative to Year 3
Time Frame: Year 3 (Extension Baseline; Month 36 prior to the first treatment of the extension study) and Year 4.5 (Month 54)
|
The percentage change in BMD as measured by DXA at 4.5 relative to Year 3. It was derived as 100 * (BMD at Year 4.5 - BMD at Year 3)/(BMD at Year 3).
|
Year 3 (Extension Baseline; Month 36 prior to the first treatment of the extension study) and Year 4.5 (Month 54)
|
|
Percentage Change in BMD of Femoral Neck, Total Hip and Trochanter at Year 6 Relative to Year 3
Time Frame: Year 3 (Extension Baseline; Month 36 prior to the first treatment of the extension study) and Year 6 (Month 72)
|
The percentage change in BMD as measured by DXA at Year 6 relative to Year 3. It was derived as 100 * (BMD at Year 6 - BMD at Year 3)/(BMD at Year 3).
|
Year 3 (Extension Baseline; Month 36 prior to the first treatment of the extension study) and Year 6 (Month 72)
|
|
Percentage of Patients With New and New/Worsening Morphometric Vertebral Fractures
Time Frame: Year 3 (Extension Baseline; Month 36 prior to the first treatment of the extension study) and Year 6
|
Lateral vertebral x-rays were performed at the final core study visit and at Year 6 and read by a central expert reader at a central imaging laboratory to assess for new or new/worsening morphometric vertebral fracture.
The percentage of patients with new morphometric vertebral fractures (observed for the first time) and patients with either new or worsening morphometric vertebral fractures was calculated.
|
Year 3 (Extension Baseline; Month 36 prior to the first treatment of the extension study) and Year 6
|
|
Number of Participants With Incidence of Clinical Fracture
Time Frame: Extension Baseline (Year 3; Month 36) to Year 6
|
Clinical fracture excludes finger, toe, and facial bone fractures.
Clinical vertebral fracture includes thoracic spine fracture and lumbar spine fracture.
Non-vertebral fracture excludes clinical vertebral, finger, toe, and facial bone fractures.
|
Extension Baseline (Year 3; Month 36) to Year 6
|
|
Qualitative Bone Biopsy Parameters
Time Frame: End of Study Visit at Year 6
|
Unpaired transiliac crest bone biopsy was performed for histomorphometry, which was obtained after double tetracycline labeling.
No data were collected for Patients who received Placebo for the first 3 years of the study (Placebo 3 Zoledronic Acid 3).
|
End of Study Visit at Year 6
|
|
Change in Serum Creatinine From Baseline to 9-11 Days Post Year 3 Infusion
Time Frame: Extension Baseline (Year 3; Month 36 prior to the first treatment of the extension study) to 9-11 days after the Year 3 infusion
|
Serum creatinine measurements performed by a central laboratory was used to evaluate acute changes in renal function 9-11 days after study drug infusion in Z6 patients compared to Z3P3 patients and in P3Z3 patients.
|
Extension Baseline (Year 3; Month 36 prior to the first treatment of the extension study) to 9-11 days after the Year 3 infusion
|
|
Change in Serum Creatinine From Baseline to 9-11 Days Post Year 4 Infusion
Time Frame: Extension Baseline (Year 3; Month 36 prior to the first treatment of the extension study) to 9-11 days after the Year 4 infusion
|
Serum creatinine measurements performed by a central laboratory was used to evaluate acute changes in renal function 9-11 days after Year 4 study drug infusion.
|
Extension Baseline (Year 3; Month 36 prior to the first treatment of the extension study) to 9-11 days after the Year 4 infusion
|
|
Change in Serum Creatinine From Baseline to 9-11 Days Post Year 5 Infusion
Time Frame: Extension Baseline (Year 3; Month 36 prior to the first treatment of the extension study) to 9-11 days after the Year 5 infusion
|
Serum creatinine measurements performed by a central laboratory was used to evaluate acute changes in renal function 9-11 days after Year 5 study drug infusion.
|
Extension Baseline (Year 3; Month 36 prior to the first treatment of the extension study) to 9-11 days after the Year 5 infusion
|
|
The Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameters
Time Frame: Extension Baseline (Year 3; Month 36 prior to the first treatment of the extension study) to Year 6
|
Evaluate the laboratory key profile such as Calcium, Creatinine and Urea.
The number of patients with clinically significant calcium, creatinine and urea were reported.
|
Extension Baseline (Year 3; Month 36 prior to the first treatment of the extension study) to Year 6
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Eastell R, Boonen S, Cosman F, Reid IR, Palermo L, Cummings SR, Black DM. Relationship between pretreatment rate of bone loss and bone density response to once-yearly ZOL: HORIZON-PFT extension study. J Bone Miner Res. 2015 Mar;30(3):570-4. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2361.
- Black DM, Reid IR, Boonen S, Bucci-Rechtweg C, Cauley JA, Cosman F, Cummings SR, Hue TF, Lippuner K, Lakatos P, Leung PC, Man Z, Martinez RL, Tan M, Ruzycky ME, Su G, Eastell R. The effect of 3 versus 6 years of zoledronic acid treatment of osteoporosis: a randomized extension to the HORIZON-Pivotal Fracture Trial (PFT). J Bone Miner Res. 2012 Feb;27(2):243-54. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1494. Erratum In: J Bone Miner Res. 2012 Dec;27(12):2612.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
May 1, 2005
Primary Completion (Actual)
November 1, 2009
Study Completion (Actual)
November 1, 2009
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 1, 2005
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 1, 2005
First Posted (Estimate)
September 5, 2005
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
June 28, 2011
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 24, 2011
Last Verified
June 1, 2011
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CZOL446H2301E1
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.