Comparison of Three Different Strategies to Prevent Propofol Induced Pain During Infusion

April 26, 2007 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon
Propofol is a popular intravenous drug to induce anesthesia but it causes local pain with an incidence between 40 and 90%. Three different strategies to prevent propofol induced pain will be studied compared with placebo. Pain will be scored with a four-point scale.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

200

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lyon, France, 69495
        • Grégoire CHATAIN

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Healthy adults (ASA 1-2) for scheduled surgery under general anesthesia with propofol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnant
  • sedative or analgesic drug 24h before surgery
  • allergy with drug used in the study
  • difficulty of communication
  • absence of informed written consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
After prophylactic solution, evaluation of the pain caused by injection of propofol with a four-point scale before lose of consciousness

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Explicite and implicite memory of pain immediately after surgery and on day one
Adverse effects

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vincent PIRIOU, MD, Hospices Civils de Lyon

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 7, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 27, 2007

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2007

Last Verified

April 1, 2007

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe