Efficacy and Safety Study of a Recombinant Protein-Free Manufactured Factor VIII (rAHF-PFM) in Previously Untreated Hemophilia A Patients

April 28, 2021 updated by: Baxalta now part of Shire

Recombinant Antihemophilic Factor Manufactured and Formulated Without Added Human or Animal Proteins (rAHF-PFM): Evaluation of Immunogenicity, Efficacy, and Safety in Previously Untreated Patients With Hemophilia A

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether Antihemophilic factor, recombinant, manufactured protein-free (rAHF-PFM) is effective and safe in the treatment of hemophilia A patients who have not been treated with factor VIII (FVIII) before.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vienna, Austria
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
      • Caen, France
      • Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
      • Lyon, France
      • Marseille, France
      • Nantes, France
      • Paris, France
      • Bremen, Germany
      • Frankfurt, Germany
      • Hannover, Germany
      • Münster, Germany
      • Milano, Italy
      • San Juan, Puerto Rico
      • Barcelona, Spain
      • Stockholm, Sweden
      • London, United Kingdom
    • Wales
      • Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States
      • Peoria, Illinois, United States
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
    • New York
      • New Hyde Park, New York, United States
      • New York, New York, United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 6 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The subject has severe or moderately severe hemophilia A as defined by a baseline factor VIII level <= 2% of normal, as documented at screening
  • The subject is < 6 years of age
  • The subject's legally authorized representative has provided written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The subject has a history of exposure to factor VIII other than rAHF PFM or more than 3 infusions of commercially available rAHF PFM (i.e., ADVATE) within 28 days prior to screening, as determined by the subject's medical history. Any infusion of factor VIII replacement products prior to the 28-day period excludes the subject from participation
  • The subject has received more than 3 infusions of rAHF PFM (commercially available and/or study product) between screening and prior to the initial recovery infusion
  • The subject has a detectable inhibitor to factor VIII, as measured in the screening sample by the Nijmegen assay in the central laboratory
  • The subject has a history of inhibitor to factor VIII at any time prior to screening
  • The subject has a known hypersensitivity to rAHF PFM
  • The subject has any 1 of the following laboratory abnormalities at the time of screening:

    1. Platelet count < 100,000/mm^3
    2. Hemoglobin concentration < 10 g/dL (100 g/L)
    3. Serum creatinine > 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) for age
    4. Total bilirubin > 2 times the ULN for age
  • The subject has an inherited or acquired hemostatic defect other than hemophilia A (e.g., qualitative platelet defect or von Willebrand's disease)
  • The subject is known to be seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), or hepatitis B virus (HBV), as determined by the subject's medical history
  • At the time of enrollment, the subject has a clinically significant chronic disease other than hemophilia A
  • The subject is currently participating in another investigational drug study, or has participated in any clinical study involving an investigational drug within 120 days of the screening visit
  • The subject (or the subject's legally authorized representative) is identified by the investigator as being unable or unwilling to cooperate with study procedures
  • The subject has received any blood product, including packed red blood cells (RBC), platelets, plasma, or cryoprecipitate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Single Arm - All Participants
All subjects enrolled in the study who meet the eligibility criteria.

Treatment regimens were determined by the investigator, and may have been any combination of standard prophylaxis (25 to 50 IU/kg body weight, 3 to 4 times per week), investigator-determined prophylaxis, and/or on-demand treatment (dose selected by investigator).

The treatment of bleeding episodes and perioperative management was at the discretion of the investigator and consistent with the institution's standard of care.

For incremental recovery assessments, a single infusion at 50 +/- 5 IU/kg was to be given.

Immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy for subjects who developed factor VIII inhibitors was at the discretion of the investigator, based on the institution's guidelines or described in peer-reviewed literature, and was to be approved by the sponsor's medical director.

rAHF-PFM was to be administered intravenously via bolus infusion, except for perioperative management when it may have been given either by continuous or bolus infusion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Factor VIII Inhibitor Development
Time Frame: Assessed during study period which was to be at least 75 exposure days or 3 years (whichever came first)
Percentage of treated participants who developed factor VIII inhibitors
Assessed during study period which was to be at least 75 exposure days or 3 years (whichever came first)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bleeding Episodes Treated With 1 to ≥4 Infusions
Time Frame: Reported during study period which was to be at least 75 exposure days or 3 years (whichever came first)
The number of bleeding episodes treated with 1, 2, 3, or ≥4 infusions of rAHF-PFM to achieve adequate hemostasis
Reported during study period which was to be at least 75 exposure days or 3 years (whichever came first)
Assessment of Hemostasis for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes
Time Frame: Reported during study period which was to be at least 75 exposure days or 3 years (whichever came first)
Number of rAHF-PFM-treated bleeding episodes with treater assessment of hemostasis (4-point ordinal scale): Excellent: Full pain relief & bleeding cessation within ~8 hrs of 1 infusion. Additional infusions may have been given to maintain hemostasis; Good: Definite pain relief and/or improvement in bleeding within ~8 hrs after infusion. Possibly requires >1 infusion for complete resolution; Fair: Probable or slight relief of pain & slight improvement in bleeding within ~8 hrs after infusion. Requires >1 infusion for complete resolution; or None: No improvement or condition worsens.
Reported during study period which was to be at least 75 exposure days or 3 years (whichever came first)
Annualized Rate of Bleeding Episodes
Time Frame: Reported during study period which was to be at least 75 exposure days or 3 years (whichever came first)
Number of bleeding episodes per subject annualized over 1 year for all etiologies
Reported during study period which was to be at least 75 exposure days or 3 years (whichever came first)
Weekly rAHF-PFM Utilization
Time Frame: Reported during study period which was to be at least 75 exposure days or 3 years (whichever came first)
Weight-Adjusted Weekly Dose for Prophylaxis, On-Demand Treatment, and Perioperative Management. rAHF-PFM dose determined by the investigator (ie: standard regimen [25-50 IU/kg body weight, 3-4 times per week]; modified prophylactic regimen [dose and frequency selected by investigator] or on-demand treatment [dose selected by investigator]). Dosing to treat BEs was at investigator's discretion and in accordance with institution's standard of care. rAHF-PFM was administered I.V. via bolus infusion, except for perioperative management when it was given either by continuous or bolus infusion.
Reported during study period which was to be at least 75 exposure days or 3 years (whichever came first)
In Vivo Incremental Recovery
Time Frame: 30 minutes pre-infusion to 30 minutes post-infusion
Change in factor VIII concentration from pre- to post-infusion at initial and termination study visits.
30 minutes pre-infusion to 30 minutes post-infusion
Assessment of Intra-operative Hemostasis
Time Frame: Assessed at the time of discharge from recovery room
Number of surgical procedures managed with rAHF-PFM and with surgeon's assessment of hemostasis based on a 4-point ordinal scale: Excellent: ≤ average predicted blood loss for matched procedures in healthy individuals Good: > average predicted blood loss, but ≤ maximal predicted blood loss for matched procedures in healthy individuals Fair: > maximal predicted blood loss for matched procedures in healthy individuals, and hemostasis was achieved None: uncontrolled hemostasis with proper dosing, necessitating a change in treatment regimen
Assessed at the time of discharge from recovery room
Assessment of Postoperative Hemostasis
Time Frame: Assessed at the time of discharge from hospital or clinic
Number of surgical procedures managed with rAHF-PFM and with investigator's assessment of hemostasis based on a 4-point ordinal scale: Excellent: hemostasis was as good as or better than other licensed factor VIII products for matched procedure Good: hemostasis was probably as good as other licensed factor VIII products for matched procedure Fair: hemostasis was clearly < optimal for matched procedure, without need to change regimen None: bleeding from inadequate response with proper dosing, necessitating a change in regimen
Assessed at the time of discharge from hospital or clinic
Assessment of Blood Loss During Surgical Procedures
Time Frame: Predicted volumes preoperatively estimated and actual volumes intraoperatively recorded
Percentage of actual intraoperative blood loss compared to preoperatively predicted average and maximal blood loss in hemostatically normal matched individuals (from institutional blood bank records)
Predicted volumes preoperatively estimated and actual volumes intraoperatively recorded
Adverse Events Deemed Related to Treatment
Time Frame: Reported during the study period which was to be at least 75 exposure days or 3 years (whichever came first)
Percentage of participants who reported AEs deemed related to treatment with rAHF-PFM
Reported during the study period which was to be at least 75 exposure days or 3 years (whichever came first)
Development of Antibodies to Heterologous Proteins
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, throughout the duration of the study, which was to be at least 75 exposure days or 3 years (whichever came first), and at the termination visit.
Percentage of treated participants who developed antibodies to heterologous proteins (ie, Chinese Hamster Ovary Cell Protein, Murine IgG, or Recombinant Human VWF)
Assessed at baseline, throughout the duration of the study, which was to be at least 75 exposure days or 3 years (whichever came first), and at the termination visit.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 11, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

September 11, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 12, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described on https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/. For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe