- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00175877
A Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Lyophilized Certolizumab Pegol in the Treatment of Signs and Symptoms of Rheumatoid Arthritis and in Prevention of Joint Damage in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
A Phase III Multi-centre, Open-label, follow-on Study to CDP870-027, to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Lyophilized CDP870 an Engineered Human Anti-TNF PEG Conjugate, as Additional Medication to Methotrexate, in the Treatment of Signs and Symptoms and Preventing Structural Damage in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Expanded Access
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Buenos Aires, Argentina
- 12
-
Capital Federal, Argentina
- 14
-
Capital Federal, Argentina
- 1
-
Capital Federal, Argentina
- 9
-
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aire, Argentina
- 8
-
Cordoba, Argentina
- 11
-
Cordoba, Argentina
- 2
-
Quilmes, Argentina
- 13
-
Rosario, Argentina
- 7
-
San Miguel de Tucuman, Argentina
- 10
-
Santa Fe, Argentina
- 6
-
-
-
-
-
Malvern, Australia
- 18
-
Maroochydore, Australia
- 21
-
Perth, Australia
- 23
-
-
-
-
-
Antwerpen, Belgium
- 179
-
Liege, Belgium
- 199
-
Merksem, Belgium
- 177
-
-
-
-
-
Pleven, Bulgaria
- 29
-
Sofia, Bulgaria
- 221
-
Sofia, Bulgaria
- 28
-
Sofia, Bulgaria
- 30
-
Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
- 26
-
-
-
-
-
Hamilton, Canada
- 35
-
Kitchener, Canada
- 36
-
Pointe Claire, Canada
- 201
-
Sainte Foy, Canada
- 31
-
Winnipeg, Canada
- 203
-
-
Ontario
-
Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
- 43
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- 32
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- 39
-
-
-
-
-
Santiago de Chile, Chile
- 190
-
Santiago de Chile, Chile
- 49
-
Valdivia, Chile
- 44
-
-
-
-
-
Rijeka, Croatia
- 52
-
-
-
-
-
Brno, Czechia
- 56
-
Ostrava Trebovice, Czechia
- 57
-
Plzen, Czechia
- 187
-
Praha, Czechia
- 55
-
Praha 2, Czechia
- 61
-
Praha 5, Czechia
- 60
-
Uherske Hradiste, Czechia
- 58
-
Zlin, Czechia
- 62
-
-
-
-
-
Parnu, Estonia
- 64
-
Tallinn, Estonia
- 65
-
Tartu, Estonia
- 63
-
-
-
-
-
Hyvinkaa, Finland
- 68
-
-
-
-
-
Montpellier Cedex 5, France
- 160
-
-
-
-
-
Budapest, Hungary
- 71
-
Budapest, Hungary
- 73
-
Bupadest, Hungary
- 75
-
Debrecen, Hungary
- 191
-
Miskolc, Hungary
- 76
-
Szolnok, Hungary
- 74
-
-
-
-
-
Afula, Israel
- 79
-
Ashkelon, Israel
- 82
-
Haifa, Israel
- 81
-
Haifa, Israel
- 83
-
Ramat Gan, Israel
- 78
-
Tel Aviv, Israel
- 77
-
Zerifin, Israel
- 85
-
-
-
-
-
Riga, Latvia
- 86
-
Riga, Latvia
- 88
-
-
-
-
-
Alytus, Lithuania
- 92
-
Kaunas, Lithuania
- 89
-
Klaipeda, Lithuania
- 91
-
Panevezys, Lithuania
- 93
-
Siauliai, Lithuania
- 90
-
Vilnius, Lithuania
- 94
-
-
-
-
-
Mexicalli, Mexico
- 95
-
Monterrey, Mexico
- 96
-
-
-
-
-
Auckland, New Zealand
- 103
-
Christchurch, New Zealand
- 101
-
South Canterbury, New Zealand
- 100
-
Tauranga, New Zealand
- 192
-
-
-
-
-
Moscow, Russian Federation
- 107
-
Moscow, Russian Federation
- 113
-
Moscow, Russian Federation
- 222
-
Moscow, Russian Federation
- 223
-
Moscow, Russian Federation
- 224
-
St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
- 109
-
St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
- 111
-
St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
- 112
-
St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
- 193
-
Yaroslavl, Russian Federation
- 110
-
-
-
-
-
Belgrade, Serbia
- 117
-
Belgrade, Serbia
- 118
-
Niska Banja, Serbia
- 114
-
Novi Sad, Serbia
- 115
-
-
-
-
-
Bratislava, Slovakia
- 119
-
Kosice, Slovakia
- 121
-
Piestany, Slovakia
- 120
-
Piestany, Slovakia
- 122
-
-
-
-
-
Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine
- 210
-
Donetsk, Ukraine
- 209
-
Donetsk, Ukraine
- 216
-
Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
- 213
-
Kiev, Ukraine
- 211
-
Kiev, Ukraine
- 212
-
Kiev, Ukraine
- 215
-
Kiev, Ukraine
- 220
-
Symferopyl, Ukraine
- 208
-
Zaporozhye, Ukraine
- 214
-
-
-
-
Alabama
-
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
- 152
-
-
California
-
San Diego, California, United States
- 148
-
-
Connecticut
-
Danbury, Connecticut, United States
- 153
-
-
Florida
-
Ocala, Florida, United States
- 133
-
Orlando, Florida, United States
- 140
-
Orlando, Florida, United States
- 150
-
Sarasota, Florida, United States
- 145
-
Tampa, Florida, United States
- 136
-
-
Idaho
-
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States
- 157
-
-
Illinois
-
Springfield, Illinois, United States
- 155
-
-
Maryland
-
Wheaton, Maryland, United States
- 134
-
-
Missouri
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
- 151
-
-
Nebraska
-
Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
- 156
-
-
North Carolina
-
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
- 135
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
- 147
-
Dayton, Ohio, United States
- 158
-
-
South Carolina
-
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
- 139
-
-
Texas
-
Austin, Texas, United States
- 137
-
San Antonio, Texas, United States
- 143
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients must have either failed to achieve American College of Rheumatology 20 % Response Criteria (ACR20) at Weeks 12 and 14 in C87027 [NCT00152386], or must have completed the entire Week 52 assessment of C87027 [NCT00152386] trial.
Exclusion Criteria:
- A diagnosis of any other inflammatory Arthritis (e.g. Psoriatic Arthritis or Ankylosing Spondylitis)
- A secondary, non-inflammatory type of Arthritis (e.g. Osteoarthritis or Fibromyalgia) that in the Investigator's opinion is symptomatic enough to interfere with evaluation of the effect of CDP870 on the patient's primary diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Any concomitant biological therapy
- Any experimental therapy, within or outside a clinical trial
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Certolizumab Pegol
All patients received Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg subcutaneously (sc) every two weeks, given as two 1 ml injections of CZP for at least six months and then 200 mg of CZP sc every two weeks, given as one 1 ml injection.
|
Strength and Form: Lyophilized product reconstituted to 1 ml containing 200 mg of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) given as a subcutaneous injection. Dosage and Frequency: 400 mg every two weeks for at least 6 months, then 200 mg every two weeks. Duration: Until end of study.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Adverse Event (AE) From First Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) Dose up to Approximately 7 Years
Time Frame: From first dose of CZP to the end of the open-label study (approximately 7 years)
|
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject or trial subject that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage. First dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) was at Baseline of the preceding double-blind study [NCT00152386] for subjects randomized to CZP, or at Entry Visit (Week 0) of this study for subjects randomized to Placebo. |
From first dose of CZP to the end of the open-label study (approximately 7 years)
|
|
Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) From First Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) Dose up to Approximately 7 Years
Time Frame: From first dose of CZP to the end of the open-label study (approximately 7 years)
|
A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose:
First dose of CZP was at Baseline of the preceding double-blind study [NCT00152386] for subjects randomized to CZP, or at Entry Visit (Week 0) of this study for subjects randomized to Placebo. |
From first dose of CZP to the end of the open-label study (approximately 7 years)
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Who Withdrew Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the Study
Time Frame: From Entry Visit (Week 0) to the end of the study (approximately 6.5 years)
|
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject or trial subject that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device.
The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
The results of this Primary Outcome Measure are summarized from the Adverse Event pages of the Case Report Forms.
|
From Entry Visit (Week 0) to the end of the study (approximately 6.5 years)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20 % Response Criteria (ACR20) at Week 48
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 48 of the open-label study
|
The assessments are based on a 20 % or greater improvement from Baseline to Week 48 in the number of tender joints, a 20 % or more improvement in the number of swollen joints, and a 20 % or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Baseline is Baseline of the preceding double-blind study.
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 48 of the open-label study
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20 % Response Criteria (ACR20) at Week 96
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 96 of the open-label study
|
The assessments are based on a 20 % or greater improvement from Baseline to Week 96 in the number of tender joints, a 20 % or more improvement in the number of swollen joints, and a 20 % or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Baseline is Baseline of the preceding double-blind study.
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 96 of the open-label study
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20 % Response Criteria (ACR20) at Week 144
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 144 of the open-label study
|
The assessments are based on a 20 % or greater improvement from Baseline to Week 144 in the number of tender joints, a 20 % or more improvement in the number of swollen joints, and a 20 % or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Baseline is Baseline of the preceding double-blind study.
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 144 of the open-label study
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20 % Response Criteria (ACR20) at Week 192
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 192 of the open-label study
|
The assessments are based on a 20 % or greater improvement from Baseline to Week 192 in the number of tender joints, a 20 % or more improvement in the number of swollen joints, and a 20 % or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Baseline is Baseline of the preceding double-blind study.
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 192 of the open-label study
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20 % Response Criteria (ACR20) at Week 240
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 240 of the open-label study
|
The assessments are based on a 20 % or greater improvement from Baseline to Week 240 in the number of tender joints, a 20 % or more improvement in the number of swollen joints, and a 20 % or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Baseline is Baseline of the preceding double-blind study.
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 240 of the open-label study
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20 % Response Criteria (ACR20) at Completion/Withdrawal
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years)
|
The assessments are based on a 20 % or greater improvement from Baseline to Completion/Withdrawal in the number of tender joints, a 20 % or more improvement in the number of swollen joints, and a 20 % or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Baseline is Baseline of the preceding double-blind study.
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years)
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 50 % Response Criteria (ACR50) at Week 48
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 48 of the open-label study
|
The assessments are based on a 50 % or greater improvement from Baseline to Week 48 in the number of tender joints, a 50 % or more improvement in the number of swollen joints, and a 50 % or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Baseline is Baseline of the preceding double-blind study.
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 48 of the open-label study
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 50 % Response Criteria (ACR50) at Week 96
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 96 of the open-label study
|
The assessments are based on a 50 % or greater improvement from Baseline to Week 96 in the number of tender joints, a 50 % or more improvement in the number of swollen joints, and a 50 % or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Baseline is Baseline of the preceding double-blind study.
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 96 of the open-label study
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 50 % Response Criteria (ACR50) at Week 144
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 144 of the open-label study
|
The assessments are based on a 50 % or greater improvement from Baseline to Week 144 in the number of tender joints, a 50 % or more improvement in the number of swollen joints, and a 50 % or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Baseline is Baseline of the preceding double-blind study.
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 144 of the open-label study
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 50 % Response Criteria (ACR50) at Week 192
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 192 of the open-label study
|
The assessments are based on a 50 % or greater improvement from Baseline to Week 192 in the number of tender joints, a 50 % or more improvement in the number of swollen joints, and a 50 % or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Baseline is Baseline of the preceding double-blind study.
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 192 of the open-label study
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 50 % Response Criteria (ACR50) at Week 240
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 240 of the open-label study
|
The assessments are based on a 50 % or greater improvement from Baseline to Week 240 in the number of tender joints, a 50 % or more improvement in the number of swollen joints, and a 50 % or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Baseline is Baseline of the preceding double-blind study.
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 240 of the open-label study
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 50 % Response Criteria (ACR50) at Completion/Withdrawal
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years)
|
The assessments are based on a 50 % or greater improvement from Baseline to Completion/Withdrawal in the number of tender joints, a 50 % or more improvement in the number of swollen joints, and a 50 % or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Baseline is Baseline of the preceding double-blind study.
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years)
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 70 % Response Criteria (ACR70) at Week 48
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 48 of the open-label study
|
The assessments are based on a 70 % or greater improvement from Baseline to Week 48 in the number of tender joints, a 70 % or more improvement in the number of swollen joints, and a 70 % or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Baseline is Baseline of the preceding double-blind study.
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 48 of the open-label study
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 70 % Response Criteria (ACR70) at Week 96
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 96 of the open-label study
|
The assessments are based on a 70 % or greater improvement from Baseline to Week 96 in the number of tender joints, a 70 % or more improvement in the number of swollen joints, and a 70 % or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Baseline is Baseline of the preceding double-blind study.
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 96 of the open-label study
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 70 % Response Criteria (ACR70) at Week 144
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 144 of the open-label study
|
The assessments are based on a 70 % or greater improvement from Baseline to Week 144 in the number of tender joints, a 70 % or more improvement in the number of swollen joints, and a 70 % or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Baseline is Baseline of the preceding double-blind study.
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 144 of the open-label study
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 70 % Response Criteria (ACR70) at Week 192
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 192 of the open-label study
|
The assessments are based on a 70 % or greater improvement from Baseline to Week 192 in the number of tender joints, a 70 % or more improvement in the number of swollen joints, and a 70 % or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Baseline is Baseline of the preceding double-blind study.
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 192 of the open-label study
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 70 % Response Criteria (ACR70) at Week 240
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 240 of the open-label study
|
The assessments are based on a 70 % or greater improvement from Baseline to Week 240 in the number of tender joints, a 70 % or more improvement in the number of swollen joints, and a 70 % or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Baseline is Baseline of the preceding double-blind study.
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 240 of the open-label study
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 70 % Response Criteria (ACR70) at Completion/Withdrawal
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years)
|
The assessments are based on a 70 % or greater improvement from Baseline to Completion/Withdrawal in the number of tender joints, a 70 % or more improvement in the number of swollen joints, and a 70 % or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Baseline is Baseline of the preceding double-blind study.
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years)
|
|
Change From Baseline of the Preceding Double-Blind Study to Week 96 in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS)
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 96 of the open-label study
|
The mTSS quantifies the extent of bone erosions and joint space narrowing for 44 and 42 joints, respectively, as assessed by x-rays of the hands and feet.
The score ranges from 0 to 448 with higher scores representing greater damage.
A negative value in mTSS change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.
The higher the negative value the better the improvement.
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 96 of the open-label study
|
|
Change From Baseline of the Preceding Double-Blind Study to Completion/Withdrawal Visit in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Total Score
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years)
|
The HAQ-DI assesses the degree of difficulty experienced in eight domains (Dressing and Grooming, Arising, Eating, Walking, Hygiene, Reach, Gripping, Other Activities) of daily living activities using 20 questions.
The HAQ-DI is calculated by summing the domain scores and dividing them by the number of domains.
It ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).
Negative values indicate an improvement from Baseline to the Post-Baseline Visit with larger negative values showing a better improvement.
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years)
|
|
Change From Baseline to Completion/Withdrawal Visit in Duration of Morning Stiffness
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years)
|
Morning stiffness is defined as the time in hours elapsed between the time of usual awakening (even if not in the morning) and the time the subject is as limber as he/she will be during a day involving typical activities.
A negative value in duration of morning stiffness change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.
The higher the negative value the better the improvement.
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years)
|
|
Change From Baseline to Completion/Withdrawal Visit in Disease Activity Score 28 [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28[ESR])
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years)
|
DAS28[ESR] is calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR in mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (VAS in mm) using the following formula: 0.56 x √(TJC) + 0.28 x √(SJC) + 0.70 x lognat (ESR) + 0.014 x Global Assessment of Arthritis where 28 joints are examined and a lower score indicates less disease activity.
A negative value in DAS28[ESR] change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years)
|
|
Percentage of Subjects With Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Completion/Withdrawal Visit
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years)
|
Good EULAR response is defined as Disease Activity Score 28 [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28[ESR]) improvement from Baseline of the preceding double-blind study > 1.2 and DAS28[ESR] value < 3.2.
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years)
|
|
Change From Baseline to Completion/Withdrawal Visit in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Item Questionnaire Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years)
|
The SF-36 is a 36-item generic health status measure that measures 8 general health concepts: Physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health.
Each domain of the eight domains and the summary concept PCS score are scored to yield values between 0 (worst) and 100 (best).
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years)
|
|
Change From Baseline to Completion/Withdrawal Visit in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Item Questionnaire Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score
Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years)
|
The SF-36 is a 36-item generic health status measure that measures 8 general health concepts: Physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health.
Each domain of the eight domains and the summary concept MCS score are scored to yield values between 0 (worst) and 100 (best).
|
From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Curtis JR, Chen L, Luijtens K, Navarro-Millan I, Goel N, Gervitz L, Weinblatt M. Dose escalation of certolizumab pegol from 200 mg to 400 mg every other week provides no additional efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis: an analysis of individual patient-level data. Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Aug;63(8):2203-8. doi: 10.1002/art.30387.
- Curtis JR, Winthrop K, O'Brien C, Ndlovu MN, de Longueville M, Haraoui B. Use of a baseline risk score to identify the risk of serious infectious events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis during certolizumab pegol treatment. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017 Dec 15;19(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1466-y.
- Paul S, Marotte H, Kavanaugh A, Goupille P, Kvien TK, de Longueville M, Mulleman D, Sandborn WJ, Vande Casteele N. Exposure-Response Relationship of Certolizumab Pegol and Achievement of Low Disease Activity and Remission in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jul;13(4):743-751. doi: 10.1111/cts.12760. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
- Keystone EC, Combe B, Smolen J, Strand V, Goel N, van Vollenhoven R, Mease P, Landewe R, Fleischmann R, Luijtens K, van der Heijde D. Sustained efficacy of certolizumab pegol added to methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year results from the RAPID 1 trial. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Sep;51(9):1628-38. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes082. Epub 2012 May 16.
- van der Heijde D, Keystone EC, Curtis JR, Landewe RB, Schiff MH, Khanna D, Kvien TK, Ionescu L, Gervitz LM, Davies OR, Luijtens K, Furst DE. Timing and magnitude of initial change in disease activity score 28 predicts the likelihood of achieving low disease activity at 1 year in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with certolizumab pegol: a post-hoc analysis of the RAPID 1 trial. J Rheumatol. 2012 Jul;39(7):1326-33. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.111171. Epub 2012 May 15.
- Smolen J, Landewe RB, Mease P, Brzezicki J, Mason D, Luijtens K, van Vollenhoven RF, Kavanaugh A, Schiff M, Burmester GR, Strand V, Vencovsky J, van der Heijde D. Efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol plus methotrexate in active rheumatoid arthritis: the RAPID 2 study. A randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68(6):797-804. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.101659. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- C87028
- 2005-001350-24 (EudraCT Number)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCWithdrawnActive Rheumatoid Arthritis; Rheumatoid Arthritis
-
Centocor, Inc.CompletedRheumatoid Arthritis, Juvenile
-
Yuanyuan ZhangRecruitingRheumatoid Arthritis (RA) | Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease | Difficult-to-Treat Rheumatoid ArthritisChina
-
AmgenTerminated
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)CompletedJuvenile Rheumatoid ArthritisUnited States
-
AmgenImmunex CorporationCompletedJuvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisSociete Francaise de RhumatologieRecruiting
-
University Hospital, ToulouseCompletedRheumatoId ArthritisFrance
-
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmcEuropean CommissionCompletedRheumatoId ArthritisNetherlands, Germany, Portugal, Italy, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia
-
David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical CenterCompleted
Clinical Trials on Certolizumab Pegol
-
UCB PharmaWithdrawn
-
UCB PharmaCompleted
-
UCB PharmaCompleted
-
Atlanta Gastroenterology AssociatesUCB PharmaUnknown
-
UCB Pharma SACompletedCrohn's DiseaseUnited States, Australia, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Russian Federation, Serbia, Singapore, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Ukraine
-
UCB PharmaWithdrawn
-
UCB PharmaCompletedRheumatoid ArthritisDenmark, Netherlands, Poland, Sweden
-
UCB PharmaCompleted
-
University of WashingtonUniversity of Pennsylvania; UCB PharmaCompletedUlcerative ColitisUnited States
-
UCB PharmaCompleted