The CAP-1 Trial: Stepwise Excavation Versus One Completed Excavation in Deep Caries

October 14, 2016 updated by: Lars Bjørndal, University of Copenhagen

The CAP-1 Trial: Effect of Stepwise Versus One Completed Excavation in Deep Caries in Permanent Teeth: A Randomised, Patient - and Observer-blinded Multicenter Trial

Brief summary

Background:

A large proportion of dental practice involves the treatment of caries in the permanent dentition. In USA alone tooth related pain is annually responsible for 15 billions days lost through sickness. We do not know whether a stepwise excavation is better or worse compared with one final completed excavation in adults with deep caries with or without pain. A deep carious lesion is in the risk zone of being pulpal exposed during excavation.

Aim:

The aim of the CAP-1-trial is to investigate the beneficial effects of stepwise excavation during two visits versus óne completed excavation of deep caries in permanent teeth with or without pain.

Patients:

Consecutive patients contacting the units involved in the CAP trial for the treatment of deep caries. The trial will comprise 300 patients.

Design:

CAP-1-trial is a randomised patient- and observer-blinded multicenter trial, with two parallel intervention groups. Patients that fulfill the inclusions criteria and none of the exclusions criteria, will be centrally bloc-randomised in Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen DK, and stratified by age and pain. Allocation ratio is 1:1.

Interventions and products:

Patients are allocated for stepwise excavation in two visits or final excavation in one visit. The patients will not be informed about the result of the randomisation, i.e. the type of intervention. Therefore, all patients will be contacted for two visits. The second visit in the stepwise excavation group wil be used for the second and final excavation, and for the performance of a permanent restoration. The second visit in the one step excavation group will solely be used for the performance of a permanent restoration. The interventions in both groups are completed following 8-10 weeks after the randomisation.

A temporary calcium hydroxide based material is used in both groups (Dycal®). The temporary restoration material, glas-ionomer cement is used (Ketac Molar®) in between visits, and a resin material is used for the final restoration(Herculite®).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

References

BJERKÉN E, WENNBERG A, TRONSTAD L. Endodontisk akutbehandling. Tandläkartidningen. 1980;72:314-9.

BJØRNDAL L, REIT C. The annual frequency of root-fillings, tooth extractions and pulp related procedures in Danish adults 1977-2003. Int Endod J 2004:37:782-788.

BJØRNDAL L. The deep caries lesion dilemma. In Nordic Dentistry 2004 yearbook (Schou L, ed). Copenhagen, Denmark: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc., 2004; 107-20.

BJØRNDAL L & THYLSTRUP A. A practice -based study on stepwise excavation of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a 1-year follow-up study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998;26:122-8.

BJØRNDAL L. Treatment of deep carious lesions with stepwise excavation. A practice-based study. Tandlaegebladet 1999;103:498-506.

BJØRNDAL L, LARSEN T, THYLSTRUP A. A clinical and microbiological study of deep carious lesions during stepwise excavation using long treatment intervals. Caries Res 1997;31:411-.

BJØRNDAL L, LARSEN T. Changes in the cultivable flora in deep carious lesions following a stepwise excavation procedure. Caries Res 2000;34:502-8.

BERGENHOLTZ G, SPÅNGBERG L. Controversies in endodontics. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2004;15:99-114.

FOUAD AF. Molecular mediators of pulpal inflammation. In Seltzer and Bender's Dental pulp ( Hargreaves KM, Goodis HE, eds). Chicago, USA: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc., 2002; 247-79.

KARLSSON P-O, REIT C. Reasons for endodontic treatment among Swedish general practitioners (abstract). Int Endod J 1994;27:100.

KIRKEVANG L-L Periapical and endodontic status in Danish populations (Ph.D: thesis). Århus: University of Aarhus; 2001.

LEKSELL E, RIDELL K, CVEK M, MEJÁRE I. Pulp exposure after stepwise versus direct complete excavation of deep carious lesions in young posterior permanent teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1996;12:192-96.

MAGNUSSON B, SUNDELL SO. Stepwise excavation of deep carious lesions in primary molars. J Int Ass Child 1977;8:36-40.

NADIN G, GOEL BR, YEUNG Ca, GLENNY AM. Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2004. Chichester,Uk: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

NÄRHI M. Dentinal and pulpal pain. In Textbook of Endodontology (Bergenholtz G, Hørsted-Bindslev P, Reit C, eds). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Munksgaard, 2003; 43-56.

REIT C, HEDEN G, MILTHON R. Endodontiskt behandlingspanorama inom allmäntandvården. Tandläkartidningen 1993;85:543-6.

RICKETTS DNJ, KIDD EAM, INNES N. Complete or ultraconservative removal of decayed tissue in unfilled teeth (Protocol for a Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Libray, Issue 1, 2004. Chichester , UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

SJÖSTRÖM O, SUNDBERG H. Arbetstidens fördelning på olika verksamheter i svensk tandvård 1988. Tandläkartidningen 1989;81:856-67.

SUDA H, IKEDA H. The circulation of the pulp. In Seltzer and Bender's Dental pulp (Hargreaves KM, Goodis HE, eds). Chicago, USA: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc., 2002; 123-50.

TAYLOR H, CURRAN NM. The Nuprin Pain Report. New York, Lou Harris, 1985.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

314

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Copenhagen N
      • Copenhagen, Copenhagen N, Denmark, 2200
        • School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Person ≥ 18 yrs having deep caries with or without pain:
  • x-ray show primary caries in the inner 1/4 of the dentin, with the presence of a radiopaque zone at the pulpal wall NB: Need to mark a 'yes' for both criteria!

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Deep carious tooth with (irreversible pulpitis)unbearable pain and/or disturbed night's sleep)
  • Deep carious tooth negatively responding on thermal and electrometric tests.
  • Deep carious tooth has 'attachment loss' > 5 mm
  • X-ray shows apical radiolucency of the actual tooth
  • Deep carious tooth has restoration in direct contact with the pulp
  • The person has problems with communication
  • No informed and written consent is present
  • Due to health conditions or pregnancy the person can not participate in the trial

NB: Need to mark 'No' for all criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SW intervention
Stepwise Excavation
Stepwise removal of carious tissue in 2 stages
Other Names:
  • Stepwise carious removal wos
Other: DCE intervention
Control intervention Direct complete excavation. The updated terminology for completed excavation is non-selective excavation to hard dentin
one complete excavation
Other Names:
  • Non-selective carious removal to hard dentin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary outcome is whether the treatment can be made with a maintained sensible pulp and without root infection following a 1-year control.
Time Frame: 1year control data for all treatments primo 2008
In this update we have also completed 5 yr control
1year control data for all treatments primo 2008

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Secondary outcome constitutes pain intensity using a visual analogue scale measured before the first visit and 1 and 7 days after.
Time Frame: ultimo 2007
ultimo 2007

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 16, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 18, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 10001 (Disarm Therapeutics)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

1½ yr results published in European Journal of Oral Sciences 2010; 118: 290-297.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe