Xenon Inhalation During Orthopaedic Surgery in Elderly Subjects.

September 16, 2005 updated by: Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Xenon Inhalation as Cover Sedation During Orthopaedic Surgery in Elderly Subjects Comparing the Effects of Inhaled Xenon and Intravenous Propofol

The primary objective was to explore the feasibility of inhaled xenon for sedation in terms of its effect on postoperative cognitive function in elderly, in comparison with the postoperative cognitive function found after IV propofol sedation in the same population.The secondary objectives were designed to assess the feasibility of xenon sedation in terms of its effects on different neuropsycho-logical test variables, vital signs, sedation levels and safety in elderly orthopaedic subjects.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Primary endpoint: - The primary efficacy parameter was a combined score based on the seven variables derived from four validated neuropsychological tests of cognitive function; Visual Verbal Learning test, Concept Shifting test, Stroop Color Word Interference test and Letter Digit Coding test. The parameter was used for comparing changes in test results between the screening and first postoperative follow-up testing for the treatment groups.Secondary endpoints:- Cognitive performance changes from baseline to the first post-operative follow-up judged separately for each of the seven variables from the changes in the test results.- Cognitive performance changes from baseline to the second postoperative follow-up judged separately and globally for each of the seven variables from the changes in test results.- Adequacy of ventilation (respiratory rate and pulse oximetry)- Adequacy of xenon sedation by monitoring depth of unconsciousness, signs of airway irritation, need for additional sedatives, time to recovery from anaesthesia. - Technical performance of xenon delivery device

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

44

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
        • Rigshospitalet

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female subjects ≥ 60 years of age.
  • American Soc. of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA) I-III status [27]
  • Referred for elective orthopaedic knee surgery with an anticipated duration of > 45 min
  • Expected to remain in hospital for at least 3 days
  • Expected to be able to comply with the study protocol throughout the study period
  • Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score > 23
  • Informed consent given

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Disease of the CNS (infectious, metabolic, tumours, dementia, epilepsy, major psychiatric disease, confusion/ delirium according to Diagnostic & Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) IV criteria)
  • Contradiction for spinal anaesthesia
  • Contradiction for laryngeal mask
  • Regular use of tranquillisers, or antidepressants, if prescribed by psychiatrist for psychosis or depression
  • Undergone neuropsychological testing within the last year
  • Unable to follow study procedures, illiteracy, or poor comprehension of the language used in the psychometric tests
  • Severe visual or auditory disorder
  • Alcoholism or drug abuse

CNS disease BMI > 35 Inab

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Primary endpoint: -cognitive function; Visual Verbal Learning test, Concept Shifting test, Stroop Color Word Interfer

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Side effects
Vital signs
Secondary endpoints:-

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lars S Rasmussen, MD PhD, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2004

Study Completion

December 1, 2004

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 19, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 19, 2005

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2005

Last Verified

June 1, 2005

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anaesthesia

Clinical Trials on Xenon vs propofol

3
Subscribe