Carotid Artery Stenting With Emboli Protection Surveillance-Post-Marketing Study (CASES-PMS)

July 19, 2007 updated by: Cordis Corporation
The primary objective of this study is to assess the outcomes of stenting with distal protection in the treatment of obstructive carotid artery disease during peri-approval/initial commercialization in relation to the outcomes of the Sapphire Clinical Trial. The devices to be utilized are the Cordis PRECISE Nitinol Stent Systems and the Cordis ANGIOGUARD™ XP Emboli Capture Guidewire (ECGW).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

1500

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient must be > 18 years of age.
  2. The patient has a 50% stenosis (as determined by ultrasound or angiogram) of the common or internal carotid artery and is clinically symptomatic; i.e., within the previous 180 days has experienced symptoms in the ipsilateral carotid artery distribution, defined as:

    • one or more TIAs, characterized by distinct focal neurologic dysfunction or monocular blindness with clearing of signs and symptoms within 24 hours, or
    • one or more completed strokes (as defined by this protocol) with persistence of symptoms or signs for more than 24 hours (the most recent event is used as the qualifying event), except as excluded below, with stenosis >50%, (as determined by ultrasound or angiogram) of the common or internal carotid artery, OR The patient must have a >80% diameter stenosis (as determined by ultrasound or angiogram) of the internal or common carotid artery without neurological symptoms.
  3. To be entered into the study, the patient must have one or more of the following conditions:

    · congestive heart failure (class III/IV) and/or known severe left ventricular dysfunction LVEF < 30%

    • open heart surgery within six weeks
    • recent MI (>24 hours and <4 weeks)
    • unstable angina (CCS class III/IV)
    • synchronous severe cardiac and carotid disease requiring open heart surgery and carotid revascularization
    • severe pulmonary disease to include any of the following:
  1. chronic oxygen therapy
  2. resting PO2 of 60 mmHg
  3. baseline hematocrit 50%
  4. FEV1 or DLCO 50% of normal. · contralateral carotid occlusion · contralateral laryngeal palsy · post-radiation treatment · previous CEA recurrent stenosis · high cervical ICA lesions · CCA lesions below the clavicle · severe tandem lesions

    • abnormal stress test.

4. The qualifying ultrasound or angiogram was performed less than 30 days prior to study entry.

· Stenosis >50%: PSV>130 cm/sec; EDV <135 cm/sec

· Stenosis >80%: PSV>220 cm/sec; EDV <135 cm/sec

· PSV ICA/PSV CCA ratio 4.0

5. The target vessel is in the native common or internal carotid artery. The arterial segment to be treated has a diameter between 4 mm and 9 mm as the largest diameter either proximal or distal to the lesion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient is experiencing an acute ischemic neurologic stroke or has experienced a stroke within the past 48 hours.
  2. There is any visual angiographic or ultrasound evidence of intraluminal thrombus thought to increase the risk of plaque fragmentation and distal embolization.
  3. There is total occlusion of the target carotid artery treatment site.
  4. The reference segment diameter (distal common carotid and internal carotid artery segment cephalic to the lesion) is less than 4mm or greater than 9mm. See Instructions For Use, for proper stent sizing. The exception to this would be with a lesion having >95% stenosis where the true diameter of the distal vessel cannot be determined such as the case with a string sign or distal vessel collapse. In this case the judgment of the interventionalist will prevail with the intention not to oversize the stent to the distal vessel by more than 2mm.
  5. The patient has any intracranial aneurysm (> 9 mm).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary endpoint of this study is a 30-day composite of major adverse clinical events (MAE) including any death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.
Time Frame: 30 day
30 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sidney A. Cohen, MD, PhD, Cordis Corporation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2004

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

October 4, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 20, 2007

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2007

Last Verified

July 1, 2007

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe