- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00232583
Preservation of Beta-cell Function in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
November 17, 2017 updated by: Ildiko Lingvay, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
The study evaluates the rate beta-cell function decline in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients on two different treatment regimens: insulin and metformin versus glyburide, metformin and pioglitazone.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a 72 months long randomized clinical trial longitudinally evaluating beta-cell function, as well as glycemic control and inflammatory markers in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients on two different treatment regimens: insulin and metformin versus glyburide, metformin and pioglitazone.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
58
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
- University of Texas Southwestern
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
25 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosed within the prior 2 months
- HbA1c > 7% at the time of inclusion
- willing to perform intensive diabetes management
- able to comply with treatment and follow-up regimen
Exclusion Criteria:
- HbA1c > 8% at time of randomization
- creatinine > 1.5 mg/dl
- liver function tests > 3 times the upper limit of normal
- severe anemia
- severe proliferative retinopathy
- NYHA class III or IV heart failure
- active CAD or recent (within 6 months) MI
- pregnant, willing to get pregnant, or not willing to practice any contraceptive method
- non-english speaking
- active heavy alcohol or illicit drug users (within past 6 months)
- history of lactic acidosis
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Metfomin and Insulin
Metformin 1000mg/BID and Insulin Novolog 70/30 per protocol titration
|
Metformin 1000mg/BID
Insulin Novolg 70/30 per protocol titration
|
|
Active Comparator: Metformin, Pioglitazone and Glyburide
Metformin 1000mg/BID, Pioglitazone 45 mg and glyburide per protocol titration
|
Metformin 1000mg/BID
Pioglitazone 45mg
Glyburide per protocol titration
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Beta-cell Function - C-peptide AUC (Area Under the Curve)
Time Frame: 72 months
|
C-peptide AUC during a 3-hours mixed meal challenge testing
|
72 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Insulin Sensitivity as Measure be Matsuda Index
Time Frame: 72 months
|
C-peptide-based Matsuda index using following formula: Matsuda index = 500,00 / root square [(fasting c-peptide x fasting glucose x 333) x (average c-peptide 0-120 mins x average glucose 0-120 mins x 333).
Higher the Matsuda index, better the insulin sensitivity.
|
72 months
|
|
Bet-cell Function Measured by Disposition Index
Time Frame: 72 months
|
Disposition index was measured by multiplying the insulin secretion (C-peptide AUC/C-peptide AUC glucose) by the Matsuda index.
Disposition index reflects the beta-cell function adjusted for total body insulin sensitivity
|
72 months
|
|
Weight
Time Frame: 72 months
|
Body Weight
|
72 months
|
|
Inflammatory Markers - hsCRP
Time Frame: 72 months
|
Inflammatory markers - hsCRP (C reactive protein)
|
72 months
|
|
Inflammatory Markers -Fibrinogen
Time Frame: 72 months
|
Inflammatory markers - Fibrinogen
|
72 months
|
|
Inflammatory Markers - PAI-1
Time Frame: 72 months
|
Inflammatory markers - PAI-1 (Plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1)
|
72 months
|
|
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Current Health Perception
Time Frame: 72 months
|
Current health perception was measured at randomization and 72 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire.
This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL.
Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1-5, where 1 = much better than 3 months ago; 2 - Somewhat better now than 3 months ago; 3 - About the same; 4 - Somewhat worse now than 3 months ago; 5 Much worse now than 3 months ago.
|
72 months
|
|
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Treatment Satisfaction
Time Frame: 72 months
|
Treatment satisfaction was measured at randomization and 72 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire.
This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL.
Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1-5, where 1 - very satisfied; 2 - moderately satisfied; 3 - neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; 4 - moderately dissatisfied; 5 - very dissatisfied.
|
72 months
|
|
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Treatment Impact
Time Frame: 72 months
|
Treatment impact was measured at randomization and 72 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire.
This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL.
Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1-5, where 1 - very satisfied; 2 - moderately satisfied; 3 - neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; 4 - moderately dissatisfied; 5 - very dissatisfied.
|
72 months
|
|
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Social or Vocational Worry
Time Frame: 72 months
|
Social or vocational worry was measured at randomization and 72 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire.
This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL.
Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 0-5, where 0 - does not apply; 1 - never; 2 - seldom; 3 - sometimes; 4 - often; 5 - all of the time.
|
72 months
|
|
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Hypoglycemia Fear
Time Frame: 72 months
|
Hypoglycemia fear was measured at randomization and 72 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire.
This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL.
Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1-5, where 1 - never worry; 2 - rarely water; 3 - sometimes worry; 4 - often worry; 5 - very often worry
|
72 months
|
|
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Glycemia Control Perception
Time Frame: 72 months
|
Glycemia control perception was measured at randomization and 72 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire.
This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL.
Answers are in the form of a scale score of 1-7, where 1 - extremely controlled and 7 - not at all controlled.
|
72 months
|
|
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Lifestyle Flexibility
Time Frame: 72 months
|
Lifestyle flexibility was measured at randomization and 72 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire.
This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL.
Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1 to 5, where 1 - a great deal of choice; 2 - a lot of choice; 3 - some choice; 4 - a little choice; 5 - no choice.
|
72 months
|
|
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Social Stigma
Time Frame: 72 months
|
Social stigma was measured at randomization and 72 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire.
This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL.
Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1 to 5, where 1- strongly agree; 2 - somewhat agree; 3 - neither agree nor disagree; 4 - somewhat disagree; 5 - strongly disagree.
|
72 months
|
|
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Satisfaction With Insulin Treatment
Time Frame: 72 months
|
Satisfaction with insulin treatment was measured at randomization and 72 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire.
This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL.
Answers are in the form of a scale score of 1 to 7, where 1 extremely satisfied to 7 - not at all satisfied.
|
72 months
|
|
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Willingness to Continue Insulin Treatment
Time Frame: 72 months
|
Willingness to continue insulin treatment was measured at randomization and 72 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire.
This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL.
Answers are in the form of a scale score of 1 to 7, where 1 extremely willing to 7 - not at all willing.
|
72 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Philip Raskin, MD, University of Texas
- Principal Investigator: Ildiko Lingvay, MD, University of Texas
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Lingvay I, Kaloyanova PF, Adams-Huet B, Salinas K, Raskin P. Insulin as initial therapy in type 2 diabetes: effective, safe, and well accepted. J Investig Med. 2007 Mar;55(2):62-8. doi: 10.2310/6650.2007.06036.
- Harrison LB, Adams-Huet B, Raskin P, Lingvay I. beta-cell function preservation after 3.5 years of intensive diabetes therapy. Diabetes Care. 2012 Jul;35(7):1406-12. doi: 10.2337/dc11-2170.
- Lingvay I, Legendre JL, Kaloyanova PF, Zhang S, Adams-Huet B, Raskin P. Insulin-based versus triple oral therapy for newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: which is better? Diabetes Care. 2009 Oct;32(10):1789-95. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0653. Epub 2009 Jul 10.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
November 1, 2003
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2011
Study Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2011
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 30, 2005
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 30, 2005
First Posted (Estimate)
October 4, 2005
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
December 14, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 17, 2017
Last Verified
November 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1003-623
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.