A Study on the Use of Tanakan® for Recovery of Neurological Impairment Following Ischaemic Stroke

January 4, 2019 updated by: Ipsen

A Phase III, Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blinded, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled Clinical Study for Evaluating the Efficacy of EGb 761® (Tanakan®) (240mg) in the Recovery of Neurological Impairment Following Ischemic Stroke

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Tanakan® 240mg in association with Acetylsalicylic acid (325mg/day) in the recovery of neurological impairment following ischemic stroke.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

204

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hradec Kralove, Czechia, 500 02
        • Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove
      • Prague 2, Czechia, 120 00
        • General Faculty Hospital
      • Katowice, Poland, 40 752
        • Department and Clinic of Neurology of the Old Age
      • Krakov, Poland, 31503
        • CMUJ Krakov
      • Warsaw, Poland, 00 416
        • Postgraduate Medical Teaching Center
      • Bucharest, Romania, 75622
        • Institul de Boli Cerebro Vascular
      • Bucharest, Romania, Sector 5
        • Spitalul Universitar de Urgenţă
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 117415
        • Russian State Medical University - Neurology and Neurosurgery Clinic
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 129327
        • Russian State Medical University - Dept Fundamental Neurology & Neurosurgery
      • Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620102
        • Ural State Medical Academy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient having had a single infarct in the carotid artery territory 3 to 8 days before inclusion
  • Patient with a moderately severe or severe disability (Modified Rankin Score 4 or 5)
  • Patient having a Quick's Test (for INR) and APPT (activated partial prothrombin time) test in the normal values of the laboratory

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients having had an ischemic stroke (CT confirmed) less than 3 days and more than 8 days prior
  • Patient with known pre-existent cerebral infarction
  • Infarct damaged area bigger than 1/3 hemisphere
  • Patient having a score below the cut-off point at Frenchay Aphasia Short Test

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: EGb761®

EGb761® 240 milligrams (mg)/day for 6 months administered orally, in association with acetylsalicylic acid (325 mg/day).

The test treatment consists of 6 tablets/day. 2 tablets (each containing 40 mg EGb761®) taken orally with half a glass of water during 3 main meals. 1 tablet/day of acetylsalicylic acid during lunch.

EGb761 (Tanakan) 40 mg tablets (2 tablets t.i.d. (3 times a day)) 240 mg/day for 6 months.
Other Names:
  • Tanakan
Acetylsalicylic acid 325 mg/day (1 tablet once daily), for 6 months.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo

6 months, administered orally, in association with acetylsalicylic acid (325 mg/day).

The placebo consists of 6 tablets/day. 2 tablets taken orally with half a glass of water during 3 main meals. 1 tablet/day of acetylsalicylic acid during lunch.

Acetylsalicylic acid 325 mg/day (1 tablet once daily), for 6 months.
Placebo 40 mg tablets (2 tablets t.i.d.) 240 mg/day for 6 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Subjects With Modified Rankin Score of Less Than 3 at the End of Study Period.
Time Frame: Day 168
The degree of disability and dependence in daily activities was assessed using the modified Rankin scale. The modified Rankin scale is a 6-point numerical scale (0=no symptoms at all, 1=no significant disability, 2=slight disability, 3=moderate disability, 4=moderately severe disability, 5=severe disability) which measures the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke. Assessments were made at baseline (Day 0) and at each follow-up visit on Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168. The percentage of subjects having a modified Rankin Score<3 at the end of the study (Day 168) are reported.
Day 168

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Subjects With Modified Rankin Score of Less Than 3 at Day 28 and Day 84.
Time Frame: Up to Day 84
The degree of disability and dependence in daily activities was assessed using the modified Rankin scale. The modified Rankin scale is a 6-point numerical scale (0=no symptoms at all, 1=no significant disability, 2=slight disability, 3=moderate disability, 4=moderately severe disability, 5=severe disability) which measures the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke. Assessments were made at baseline (Day 0) and at each follow-up visit on Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168. The percentage of subjects having a modified Rankin Score<3 at each follow-up visit (not including end of study) are reported.
Up to Day 84
Percentage of Subjects at Each Point on the Modified Rankin Scale at Baseline, Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168.
Time Frame: Up to Day 168
The degree of disability and dependence in daily activities was assessed using the modified Rankin scale.The modified Rankin scale is a 6-point numerical scale (0=no symptoms at all, 1=no significant disability, 2=slight disability,3=moderate disability, 4=moderately severe disability, 5=severe disability) which measures the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke. Assessments were made at baseline (Day 0) and at each follow-up visit on Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168. The distribution of subjects according to disability severity scores was assessed and the percentage of subjects at each point on the modified Rankin scale are reported for each time point.
Up to Day 168
Mean Change From Baseline in Sandoz Clinical Assessment-Geriatric (SCAG) Scores at Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168.
Time Frame: Up to Day 168
The SCAG scale was to be used to evaluate the psychopathological state of the subject. It is composed of 18 symptom areas and an overall global assessment, all rated on a 7-point format from 1=not present to 7=severe. The total score range is from 19 to 133 (best to worst), with a negative mean change from baseline indicating an improvement in symptoms. Assessments were made at baseline (Day 0) and at each follow-up visit on Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168 and the mean change from baseline at each time point is reported.
Up to Day 168
Mean Change From Baseline in Barthel Index Scores at Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168.
Time Frame: Up to Day 168

The performance in activities of daily living was assessed by using the Barthel scale. The Barthel scale is an ordinal scale which measures 10 performance items describing activities of daily living. Each item is rated with a given number of points from 0 indicating total dependence up to a maximum of 10 or 15 (depending on performance item) indicating complete independence. The total score range is from 0 to 100 (worst to best), with a positive mean change indicating an improvement in independence.

Assessments were made at baseline (Day 0) and at each follow-up visit on Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168 and the mean change from baseline at each time point is reported.

Up to Day 168
Mean Change From Baseline in the Mini Mental State (MMS) Test Scores at Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168.
Time Frame: Up to Day 168
The MMS test was used to evaluate the cognitive function of the subject. It includes tests of orientation, attention, memory, language and visual spatial skills, which are rated with a given number of points assigned to each level or ranking. The lower the score, the more important the mental deficit. The total score range is from 0 to 30 (worst to best), with a positive mean change indicating an improvement (i.e. less mental deficit). Assessments were made at baseline (Day 0) and at each follow-up visit on Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168 and the mean change from baseline at each time point is reported.
Up to Day 168
Mean Change From Baseline in the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) Subscore for Questions 1a,1b and 1c at Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168.
Time Frame: Up to Day 168

The NIHSS was to be used to objectively quantify the impairment caused by the stroke.The NIHSS is composed of 11 items, each of which score a specific ability between 0 (normal function) and 4 (high level of impairment).The minimum total score is 0 and maximum is 42. Only 8 of the NIHSS subscores were calculated for this study.

Assessments were made at baseline (Day 0) and at each follow-up visit on Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168. Mean NIHSS subscores for questions 1a (level of consciousness),1b (asking patient the month and their age), and 1c (asking to open and close eyes) were analysed using descriptive quantitative statistics at each visit and the mean change from baseline at each time point is reported. The range for the subscore for items 1a is 0 - 3, for 1b is 0 - 2 and for 1c is 0 - 2 (best to worst), with a negative mean change from baseline indicating an improvement.

Up to Day 168

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

January 13, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe