Improving Geriatric Drug Safety in Underserved Practices

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a CRM (adapted Crew Resource Management approach proven successful in aviation as well as some inpatient medical settings) intervention is effective for reducing medication errors among older adults in primary care settings.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Adverse drug events (ADEs) are among the most common and serious medication use concerns among older patients in primary care practices, yet they are often preventable. This translational research into practice (TRIP) pilot study uses a randomized trial to evaluate the effect of a site-level intervention in a sample of practices in medically underserved communities within the Upstate New York Practice Based Research Network (UNYNET). These sites are located in rural and urban areas and include an over-sample of minority patients. The specific aims of this study are to:

  1. Examine the feasibility of objectively assessing the impact of a CRM (adapted Crew Resource Management approach proven successful in aviation as well as some inpatient medical settings) intervention on reducing medication errors among geriatric patients in primary care settings; and
  2. Assess office staff internalization and application of CRM principles for reducing geriatric medication errors in primary care settings by examining changes in safety attitude constructs achieved

    1. with a practice enhancement assistant (PEA) and
    2. without a PEA.

Outcomes measured for Aim #1 will be change in number, severity, consequence, and stage of process of preventable ADEs. Outcomes for Aim # 2 will be change in safety climate, teamwork climate, stress recognition, and working conditions.

Fifteen sites will be randomized into one of three intervention arms: usual care, CRM only, or CRM plus a PEA. A random sample of charts of older adults (aged >64) with cardiovascular disease will be reviewed for adverse drug events over prior-year periods at baseline and post-intervention endpoints. Participatory research methods will be used to assess provider- and staff-identified barriers to implementation. This study will test the feasibility of incorporating PEA's into the practice setting to improve geriatric medication safety. The information gathered will serve as a basis for an ongoing translational research program that will lead to an RO1 application.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

4800

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14215
        • Recruiting
        • Family Medicine Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Practice Inclusion Criteria:

  • Practice must located in Health Professional Shortage Area or Physician Scarcity Area.
  • Practice must be a member of the Western New York Practice-Based Research Network

Practice Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Patient Inclusion Criteria (for chart review):

  • Aged >64
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Seen at the practice within the past year

Patient Exclusion Criteria (for chart review):

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Educational/Counseling/Training
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Change in number of total and preventable ADEs.
Change in culture of safety

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gurdev Singh, MScEng. PhD., State University of New York at Buffalo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

January 16, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 16, 2006

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2006

Last Verified

January 1, 2006

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R21HS014867 (U.S. AHRQ Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe