Angiotensin II Antagonism of TGF-Beta 1

August 1, 2007 updated by: Providence Health & Services

Angiotensin II Antagonism of TGF-Beta 1: A Candesartan Dose - TGF-Beta 1 Response Relationship Study

Diabetic nephropathy is a frequent microvascular complication that occurs in approximately 40% of patients with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes. The most common cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the United States and in the developed world is diabetic nephropathy. Currently, more than half the United States ESRD population has diabetes. More effective therapies to prevent and treat diabetic nephropathy are urgently needed. One way to increase therapeutic effectiveness is to refine treatment targets based on improved understanding of how treatments modulate disease processes. The purpose of this study is to determine whether a treatment for diabetic nephropathy, the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan, modifies mediators of kidney injury independent of blood pressure and the relationships to drug dose.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) is a potent inducer of extracellular matrix production and of fibrogenesis and has been associated with the occurrence of diabetic micro- and macrovascular complications. Several in vitro and in vivo studies have implicated TGF-beta 1 in the pathogenesis of diabetic kidney disease. Recent animal and in vitro experiments have demonstrated that ACE inhibitors and Angiotensin II (AT-II) receptor antagonists, including candesartan, decrease the synthesis and secretion of renal TGF-beta 1 and prevent the development of glomerulosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis, and progressive renal dysfunction. These protective effects appear to be unrelated to the antihypertensive effects of the agents.

Limited data in humans have supported these findings in patients with diabetic nephropathy. A recent human study with the AT-II receptor antagonist losartan demonstrated that the ability to correct microalbuminuria was independent of blood pressure control and correlated with normalization of circulating levels of TGF-beta 1. The results were further supported by the observation that markers of collagen type 1 metabolism were normalized in hypertensives in whom TGF-beta 1 was normalized with treatment but remained unaltered in the remaining hypertensives despite blood pressure control. Such findings are consistent with the recent observation that the AT-II receptor antagonist irbesartan is renoprotective independently of its blood pressure-lowering effect in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria.

The use of ACE-inhibitors and AT-II receptor antagonists as a means to reduce progression of renal fibrosis is becoming increasingly widespread. Dosage recommendations to achieve this goal are unclear prompting some experts to ask whether TGF-beta 1 rather than blood pressure should be a therapeutic target. Although not verified under chronic conditions, previous short-term studies with the AT-II antagonist candesartan have demonstrated different dose-response relationships to exist for blood pressure, renal plasma flow, and plasma renin activity. It is likely that dose-response relationship differences also exist between the aforementioned parameters (particularly blood pressure) and TGF-beta 1. In type 1 diabetic patients treated with captopril a relationship was demonstrated between percent change in plasma TGF-beta 1 and percent decline in GFR. In another study of 21 patients with a baseline GFR of <75 ml/min there was a striking correlation between the captopril-induced reduction in serum TGF-beta 1 and 2-year change in GFR (r = -0.73, p =0.0001). This latter observation is particularly important in demonstrating that the relationship between TGF-beta 1 and rate of decline in kidney function can be modified through pharmacologic intervention.

The dosage range for candesartan according to the FDA approved package insert is 4 to 32 mg daily, adjusted based on blood pressure response. Whether the dose that effectively lowers blood pressure is sufficient to suppress urinary TGF-beta 1 concentrations is unknown. In the absence of data, many experts are already suggesting doses higher than needed to control hypertension. Including a maximum dose of candesartan 64 mg in a dose titration scheme will be important to help resolve this issue. Furthermore, it is unclear if the candesartan dose/concentration - effect relationship for TGF-beta 1 and blood pressure are dissimilar. Information regarding the relationship between candesartan dose and effect on urinary TGF-beta 1 concentrations in patients with diabetic nephropathy would be valuable in tailoring therapy and enhancing our understanding of the optimal use of agents that modulate the renin-angiotensin system.

Recent data in experimental models of diabetes indicate that the renin angiotensin system interacts with advanced glycation end products (AGEs) to produce kidney damage in diabetes. ACE inhibition in diabetic rats reduced circulating and renal accumulation of AGEs, possibly by increasing expression of the soluble receptor for AGEs. In a rat model of normoglycemia with AGE infusion, increased kidney expression of renin angiotensin system components along with structural changes similar to those in diabetic models was observed. Renin angiotensin system activation and kidney structural changes were reversed by valsartan. Therefore, modulation of AGEs may also be an important mechanism of kidney protection by renin angiotensin system inhibition in diabetes. This hypothesis is unexplored in humans. An exploratory sub-study will assess whether candesartan reduces urinary excretion of carboxymethyllysine, a prominent AGE, in patients with diabetic nephropathy.

Study Objectives and Hypotheses:

The overall objective of this study is to provide information that will improve kidney health in patients with diabetes. In a population of patients with type 2 diabetes, nephropathy, and hypertension the following hypotheses will be tested:

  1. Changes in parameters of blood pressure, urinary TGF-beta 1, serum AT-II, and urinary albumin demonstrate correlation with changes in chronic candesartan dose and serum concentrations.
  2. The candesartan dose and concentration response curves for BP and urinary TGF-beta 1 are significantly different and not predictive of one another.
  3. Candesartan treatment will reduce urinary excretion of carboxymethyllysine.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99204
        • Providence Medical Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Type 2 diabetes
  • Nephropathy (proteinuria >500 mg/day)
  • Chronic Hypertension (as determined by current antihypertensive therapy and/or an average of diastolic blood pressure greater than 90 mmHg or greater or systolic blood pressure of 140 mmHg confirmed on at least two subsequent visits over one week or more).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Conditions associated with elevated TGF-Beta (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, cancer, etc.).
  • Conditions associated with alterations in serum levels of PIP and/or CITP (liver cirrhosis, osteoporosis, hyperthyroidism, multiple myeloma, osteolytic metastases, and systemic glucocorticoid treatment
  • History of Stage III hypertension (diastolic BP > 110 mmHg or systolic BP > 180 mmHg) or a history of hypertensive urgency or emergency.
  • NYHA Class III or IV heart failure
  • Calculated creatinine clearance of less than 30 ml/min or serum creatinine > 3 mg/dL
  • HbA1c > 10%
  • Patients unable to be withdrawn for 2 weeks from AT-II antagonist or ACE- inhibitor therapy
  • Blood Pressure <140/90 is unachievable in the absence of an AT-II antagonist or ACE-inhibitor

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Blood pressure
Urinary TGF-Beta 1
Serum angiotensin II
Urinary albumin
Urinary carboxymethyllysine

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Katherine R. Tuttle, MD,FASN,FACP, Providence Medical Research Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2002

Study Completion

September 1, 2004

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

May 3, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 2, 2007

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2007

Last Verified

March 1, 2006

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Candesartan

3
Subscribe