A Naturalistic Prospective Study of Treatment Effectiveness for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

April 17, 2009 updated by: University of British Columbia

A Naturalistic Prospective Study of Treatment Effectiveness for ADHD

To determine if there is a clinically and statistically significant difference between OROS-MPH and IR MPH in ADHA and ODD symptoms by the parent completed SNAP-IV. It is hypothesized that OROS-MPH is superior in improving symptom outcomes overall, remission rate, functional improvement, quality of life and persistence with medication over time.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This one-year prospective observational study is designed to evaluate and compare outcomes effectiveness between OROS-MPH and IR MPH in ADHA and ODD symptoms at the ADHD Clinic of the British Columbia Children's and Women's Health Centre. A practical clinical trial is valuable because it has the potential to provide us the information which represents the actual outcomes in real settings.

The primary objective of this study is to analyze the treatment outcomes of ADHD patients under conditions of routine clinical practice. Patients will, therefore, be treated according to the current practice of each participating physician, with the exception of several additional rating scales which are SNAP-IV, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, WEISS Functional Impairment Rating Scale (WFIRS)-Parent, Child Health and Illness Profile (CHIP), EQ-5D, Parent/Caregiver Questionnaire, ADHD Side Effect Checklist, Adolescent Diversion Questionnaire, Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-Second Edition (ABAS-2) and Clinic Global Impressions. Patients will be assessed at baseline and 12 months regardless of whether the original treatment is continued. If a patient terminates the study early, all assessments that are normally collected at the end of the study will be collected at the time of termination. Only patients with pre and post data will be included in the analysis.

Results of this study are expected to make breakthrough on the treatment of ADHD in practice; and, particularly, information which come out from this study is not currently available from other researches.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 18 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Children between ages of 6-18; one-year prospective observational study designed to evaluate and compare outcomes effectiveness between OROS-MPH and IR MPH in ADHA and ODD symptoms at the ADHD Clinic of the British Columbia Children's and Women's Health Centre.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients between the ages of 6 and 18.
  2. Enrolled in school with at least 1 school year remaining before completion of high school.
  3. Current drug therapy with either a IR MPH or OROS MPH.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Parent/caregiver unable or unwilling to provide written informed consent.
  2. Child unable or unwilling to provide assent (for children aged 7 years).
  3. Parent/caregiver unable or unwilling to complete questionnaires.
  4. Child unable or unwilling to complete questionnaires ADHD is considered by the clinician to be secondary to another more serious disorder such as personality disorder, substance abuse, bipolar disorder, autism, or mental handicap.
  5. Participation in another treatment study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Margaret Weiss, MD, The University of British Columbia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2008

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2010

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2006

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 9, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 21, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2009

Last Verified

April 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

3
Subscribe